Biden's Hateful Screed

[TreeBeard]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I would be your senior in the corporate pecking order. Imagine you...having to cow to the likes of me.

Do you think this is how a corporation should work with workers cowing in terror of their superiors?

[Rebound]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

See? They have no sound reasoning for they're TDS. It's all based on their precious "feelings". Today Greg Gutfeld is destroying the libbie late night sissies. 

@Rebound...lol...oh emasculated one...one of my sons is gay and is twice the man you sound like.

As for your education...I worked my way from the bottom of the IT world, to the top of it. Today...I would be your senior in the corporate pecking order. Imagine you...having to cow to the likes of me.

LOL...what a dope.

Stop yapping and fix my laptop, nerd. 

[blackbird]

5 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

Didn’t you post an article about America becoming the new Sodom and how evil that was?  That gays like to stuff gerbils up their bums?  That God is going to punish these wicked sodomites?  
 

So this leaves me a bit confused…. Do you want God to strike them down?  Or would you prefer everyone be treated respectfully and equally?  

"All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God." - Bible.  Yes, America and the west is becoming more evil.  But it is not up to me to punish anyone or do anything bad to people.   I just pointed out the article on how America is evil (and Canada).  We are all called to treat others with respect and fairness regardless.  That does not mean one must approve of other people's lifestyle or behavior.   We all know leftists and people like yourself are trying to force everyone to buy into and agree with what is going on.   But that will never happen.  Do you understand the difference?  One can disagree without being disagreeable.  Do you understand or are you still confused?

[Aristides]

On 9/1/2022 at 10:37 PM, Yzermandius19 said:

more so

Clinton called half the country a basket of deplorables

Biden calls them extremists instead

and people try and front like Trump is the divisive one

https://news.yahoo.com/video-resurfaces-trump-calling-democrats-141539538.html

[eyeball]

I figured it would have long since been by now but I still maintain Trump's assassination will be an inside job.

Biden Laid the Trap. Trump Walked Into It.

At his Pennsylvania rally, the former president gave exactly the narcissistic display his Democratic nemesis tried to provoke.

By David Frum

 

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/09/trump-pennsylvania-rally-republicans/671344/

[Yzermandius19]

41 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I figured it would have long since been by now but I still maintain Trump's assassination will be an inside job.

Biden Laid the Trap. Trump Walked Into It.

At his Pennsylvania rally, the former president gave exactly the narcissistic display his Democratic nemesis tried to provoke.

By David Frum

 

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/09/trump-pennsylvania-rally-republicans/671344/

notorious Trump hater David Frum engages in a copious amount of wishful thinking

quelle surprise

Biden's speech turns off way more voters

and Trump's endorsements are doing quite well

2022 will not be a referendum on Trump

it will be a referendum on the sitting President

as it always is

Edited September 6, 2022 by Yzermandius19

[Nationalist]

13 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

Do you think this is how a corporation should work with workers cowing in terror of their superiors?

Did I say "terror"? Quit being such a little girl.

[Nationalist]

13 hours ago, Rebound said:

Stop yapping and fix my laptop, nerd. 

And that's why you Libbies fail. No substance. 

[Rebound]

6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

And that's why you Libbies fail. No substance. 

So, how does your gay son feel about your support of a political party that wants to take away his right to marry? 

[Nationalist]

28 minutes ago, Rebound said:

So, how does your gay son feel about your support of a political party that wants to take away his right to marry? 

He could care less.

[Yzermandius19]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

So, how does your gay son feel about your support of a political party that wants to take away his right to marry? 

fake news

even if Obergefell is overturned

thar merely returns the issue to the states

just like overturning Roe

there is no right to abortion or gay marriage in the constitution

Edited September 6, 2022 by Yzermandius19

[WestCanMan]

On 9/5/2022 at 10:34 AM, Rebound said:

Stop yapping and fix my laptop, nerd. 

Keys are sticky, hey?

Maybe stop watching Trudeau videos. 

[WestCanMan]

16 hours ago, Yzermandius19 said:

Biden's speech turns off way more voters

By a huge margin.

Biden's looked and sounded like a brain-addled Adolf Hitler up there in front of his blood-red background and his Marine guard.

He had all the venom, hatred and deception, he just lacked the oomph and the passion of a younger man. 

[Rebound]

On 9/6/2022 at 3:07 AM, Nationalist said:

And that's why you Libbies fail. No substance. 

And lame IT guys like you are why I wind up fixing my laptop problems myself. 

[robosmith]

On 9/6/2022 at 12:01 AM, Nationalist said:

Did I say "terror"? Quit being such a little girl.

 

On 9/6/2022 at 12:07 AM, Nationalist said:

And that's why you Libbies fail. No substance. 

And you believe calling posters names is substance? LMAO

Huge right wing fail.

[Nationalist]

18 hours ago, Rebound said:

And lame IT guys like you are why I wind up fixing my laptop problems myself. 

Lol...

[Nationalist]

17 hours ago, robosmith said:

 

And you believe calling posters names is substance? LMAO

Huge right wing fail.

Ate any of my political positions blatantly destructive? No.

[Rebound]

On 9/5/2022 at 6:52 PM, blackbird said:

"All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God." - Bible.  Yes, America and the west is becoming more evil.  But it is not up to me to punish anyone or do anything bad to people.   I just pointed out the article on how America is evil (and Canada).  We are all called to treat others with respect and fairness regardless.  That does not mean one must approve of other people's lifestyle or behavior.   We all know leftists and people like yourself are trying to force everyone to buy into and agree with what is going on.   But that will never happen.  Do you understand the difference?  One can disagree without being disagreeable.  Do you understand or are you still confused?

Acknowledging that homosexuals have the right to marry is not “forcing” anyone to agree with anything. There aren’t social issues which the liberals use to “force” anybody to do anything.  But banning abortion certainly does force someone to do something. Yes, if you work as a county clerk you have to do your job. If you’re a doctor you have to do your job. You don’t get to discriminate as part of your job. Wah wah. 

Edited September 17, 2022 by Rebound

[blackbird]

46 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Acknowledging that homosexuals have the right to marry is not “forcing” anyone to agree with anything. There aren’t social issues which the liberals use to “force” anybody to do anything.  But banning abortion certainly does force someone to do something. Yes, if you work as a county clerk you have to do your job. If you’re a doctor you have to do your job. You don’t get to discriminate as part of your job. Wah wah. 

People who disagree with immoral behavior must be free to decline to have any part in it, such as bakers, videographers, photographers when same-sex couples want a wedding service.  It simply goes against the conscience of many people and they have human rights.  Doctors, nurses and others who disagree with killing unborn babies certainly should not be forced to have any part in it for the same reason.  Discrimination has different meanings.  Discrimination can be perfectly right and moral.  People are discriminated against all the time for all kinds of reasons.  There is no blanket definition of the word and no such thing as everyone must be treated equal.  Criminals in prison cannot be treated equal to everyone else in society because of the circumstances.  People who have religious beliefs or morally oppose something cannot be forced to support it or participate in what they see as immoral or wrong.  It cannot be held against them for declining to be part of something immoral.  A society that tries to force people to be part of something immoral is a totally corrupt and evil society.

[Rebound]

3 hours ago, blackbird said:

People who disagree with immoral behavior must be free to decline to have any part in it, such as bakers, videographers, photographers when same-sex couples want a wedding service.  It simply goes against the conscience of many people and they have human rights.  Doctors, nurses and others who disagree with killing unborn babies certainly should not be forced to have any part in it for the same reason.  Discrimination has different meanings.  Discrimination can be perfectly right and moral.  People are discriminated against all the time for all kinds of reasons.  There is no blanket definition of the word and no such thing as everyone must be treated equal.  Criminals in prison cannot be treated equal to everyone else in society because of the circumstances.  People who have religious beliefs or morally oppose something cannot be forced to support it or participate in what they see as immoral or wrong.  It cannot be held against them for declining to be part of something immoral.  A society that tries to force people to be part of something immoral is a totally corrupt and evil society.

It’s baking a cake. 
 

Here’s the thing: There are Ten Commandments, and believers of all Judeo-Christian faiths - Jew, Christian and Muslim - agree that those Ten Commandments are supreme AND they were written by the Lord.  Much of the new and old testaments are not written by the Lord, but we all agree the Ten Commandments were.  
 

AND, the Bible calls for death for violating most, or perhaps all of the Ten Commandments.  BUT, the religious right doesn’t give a damn about any of them, they only care about the Bible when it gives them the opportunity to hate someone.  
 

Do Christians work at Wal-Mart? Do they shop there? ABSOLUTELY. Is Wal-Mart open on Sundays? You bet! The Bible says the punishment is death.  How comes THAT doesn’t matter at all, but two gay people matter? 
 

Has Donald Trump cheated on his wives over and over and over? You bet he has! All of them!! Many times. The Bible says the punishment is death. How comes THAT doesn’t matter at all, but dispensing the Pill to a 20 year-old woman does?  
 

Jesus in his own words preached against the evils of wealth.  The Bible commands that we donate 15% of our fields to the poor. The Bible commands that we forgive all debts every seven years.  And so the evangelicals oppose forgiving even a penny of college debt, they stand in favor of cutting taxes to the rich, and they worship preachers who fly in private jets. 

Oh, but two gay people are getting married!  Let’s go wrap ourselves around the Bible all of a sudden.  Yes, that is a false, un-Godly, non-Christian religion. It is outright satanic. 

Edited September 17, 2022 by Rebound

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, blackbird said:

People who disagree with immoral behavior must be free to decline to have any part in it, such as bakers, videographers, photographers when same-sex couples want a wedding service.  It simply goes against the conscience of many people and they have human rights.  Doctors, nurses and others who disagree with killing unborn babies certainly should not be forced to have any part in it for the same reason.  Discrimination has different meanings.  Discrimination can be perfectly right and moral.  People are discriminated against all the time for all kinds of reasons.  There is no blanket definition of the word and no such thing as everyone must be treated equal.  Criminals in prison cannot be treated equal to everyone else in society because of the circumstances.  People who have religious beliefs or morally oppose something cannot be forced to support it or participate in what they see as immoral or wrong.  It cannot be held against them for declining to be part of something immoral.  A society that tries to force people to be part of something immoral is a totally corrupt and evil society.

OPINIONS about "immoral behavior" have no basis for discrimination under THE LAW.

Citizens have EQUAL RIGHTS under THE LAW.

 

[blackbird]

51 minutes ago, robosmith said:

OPINIONS about "immoral behavior" have no basis for discrimination under THE LAW.

Citizens have EQUAL RIGHTS under THE LAW.

 

Really?   So people that commit murder, steal, and break various other laws etc. which is immoral behavior should not be discriminated against by having it outlawed in "THE LAW"??? and be punished by the "THE LAW"???  I'm afraid you have it wrong.  There is no such thing as "equal rights' in many subjects and areas of life, in the laws, and in how society operates.  One could argue that everyone has "equal rights" to hold whatever religious beliefs they choose.  The fact is fundamental rights include freedom of religion in the Charter of Rights which take precedence over the law.  Where the law conflicts with freedom of religion, the Charter of Rights is supreme.  But more important than that, the Charter of Rights and laws of the land are human made documents.  Where they conflict with God's law in the Holy Bible,  then God's law takes precedence.   I give one example.  The government of Germany under Adolph Hitler and the Nazis ruled that the Jews should be eliminated and killed six million of them in the gas chambers.  They were acting contrary to the Bible or law of God which takes precedence and is supreme.  Nobody would disagree with that.  People are free under their religion or religious beliefs to have an opinion contrary to what they consider is an immoral law and cannot be forced to do things that would in effect condone or support such behavior such as support the practice of abortion and some other things. 

[blackbird]

5 hours ago, Rebound said:

It’s baking a cake. 
 

Here’s the thing: There are Ten Commandments, and believers of all Judeo-Christian faiths - Jew, Christian and Muslim - agree that those Ten Commandments are supreme AND they were written by the Lord.  Much of the new and old testaments are not written by the Lord, but we all agree the Ten Commandments were.  
 

AND, the Bible calls for death for violating most, or perhaps all of the Ten Commandments.  BUT, the religious right doesn’t give a damn about any of them, they only care about the Bible when it gives them the opportunity to hate someone.  
 

Do Christians work at Wal-Mart? Do they shop there? ABSOLUTELY. Is Wal-Mart open on Sundays? You bet! The Bible says the punishment is death.  How comes THAT doesn’t matter at all, but two gay people matter? 
 

Has Donald Trump cheated on his wives over and over and over? You bet he has! All of them!! Many times. The Bible says the punishment is death. How comes THAT doesn’t matter at all, but dispensing the Pill to a 20 year-old woman does?  
 

Jesus in his own words preached against the evils of wealth.  The Bible commands that we donate 15% of our fields to the poor. The Bible commands that we forgive all debts every seven years.  And so the evangelicals oppose forgiving even a penny of college debt, they stand in favor of cutting taxes to the rich, and they worship preachers who fly in private jets. 

Oh, but two gay people are getting married!  Let’s go wrap ourselves around the Bible all of a sudden.  Yes, that is a false, un-Godly, non-Christian religion. It is outright satanic. 

     The ten commandments are part of the Old Testament law which was directed only at Israel during the Old Testament times.  The commandment about the seventh day as a day of rest does not apply to the church which began 2,000 years ago.  It was only directed to Israel long ago.  The other commandments are still in effect because they are stated in other words in the New Testament.  However, a day of rest in the church age has been established as Sunday, but not by commandment, but as a voluntary thing.  Nobody is under the Sunday day of rest as a commandment.  There are some churches who misinterpret that and have turned it into a command, but that is not biblical.  As in many areas, different denominations interpret some things in different ways.  That is one reason we have thousands of different denominations.  But many Christian churches do still agree on the main teachings of the Bible.

quote

The Purpose of the Law

In Galatians 3:23-29, Paul explained that the law of Moses was a “paidagogos,” which is translated schoolmaster, tutor, or guardian. In the Greco-Roman world, the son of a wealthy man would be cared for by a paidagogos, a slave who was given the responsibility of watching over his master’s son. This guardian would watch over the boy constantly; taking him to school, keeping him out of trouble, guiding him, guarding him, and teaching him. In the life of a young boy, a paidagogos was a good thing. However, when the boy became a man, he no longer needed a paidagogos. He was set free from this tutelage.

Paul said the law was just like that in the life of Israel. It’s end-goal was to bring the nation of Israel to a state of maturity and faith, where they would accept Jesus as their Messiah. And once they came to faith in Jesus, like a boy who became a man, they would no longer need the law in the same way.

“Now before faith came, we were held captive under the law, imprisoned until the coming faith would be revealed. So then, the law was our guardian until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian, for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith” (Galatians 3:23-26).

A young boy does what is right because his guardian tells him to, but a man does what is right because he is an heir of his father’s household. When a young boy is under a guardian, he is just like a slave (Galatians 4:1-2). And Paul makes the point that the Jews were slaves under the law. But when Christ came, the law was lifted – at least for those who accepted Jesus as their Messiah – because that was the whole purpose of the law.

The son of a king doesn’t need a law to tell him to do the king’s will. The son of a king – in many ways – is exempt from the law, but he does the king’s will because he loves the king and because the king is his father. He does the king’s will because the king’s will has become his will. This is what being a Christian is all about.

“But when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son, born of woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, so that we might receive adoption as sons. And because you are sons, God has sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, crying, “Abba! Father!” So you are no longer a slave, but a son, and if a son, then an heir through God” (Galatians 4:4-7).    unquote

Why Christians "Are Not Under Law But Under Grace" - Radically Christian

So you see Christians are free to work on Sunday if their job requires it.  While it would preferable for Christians to have Sunday off, many jobs, which are not Christian organizations, require their employees to work on Sundays at times.  This is not against Christianity or Christian teachings, except in some churches which as I said misinterpret this subject.

Donald Trump is NOT the model that Christians follow.  He is a politician.  Politics or politicians are not the church and is not a guide for Christian beliefs or behavior.  As far as voting is concerned, as I have said on another post, Christians should vote for the least evil leaders and parties.  In the U.S. there are only two main political parties to choose from, Democrats and Republicans.  We know Democrats strongly support things that are evil such as abortion and progressive ideology.  Therefore if a Christian is going to vote, he/she should choose the lesser evil.  That's what it boils down.  Sixty million babies have been aborted since Roe versus Wade was passed fifty years ago.  

On the question of wealth.  The Bible does not teach that it is a sin to be wealthy.  It is how wealth is acquired and what one does with it that is important.  Many wealthy people do charitable or good works with part of their wealth and they earn it honestly.

quote

We know that wealth itself is not sinful. Wealth is not offensive to God because He often blessed His servants with wealth when they pleased Him (Deuteronomy 28:1–8). Abraham (Genesis 13:2), Jacob (Genesis 30:43), and King Solomon (1 Kings 10:23) are examples of wealthy men in the Bible who were used by God in mighty ways. In the Old Testament, wealth was sometimes an indicator of the Lord’s pleasure and blessing. However, wealth has never been an accurate barometer of a person’s standing with God. Some righteous people are poor while some wicked people are rich (Psalm 73; Jeremiah 12:1).

In the New Testament, too, several wealthy people were instrumental in advancing God’s kingdom. Matthew (Luke 5:27–29), Joanna (Luke 8:3), Joseph of Arimathea (Matthew 27:57), Zacchaeus (Luke 19:8), and Lydia (Acts 16:14–15) were all individuals of great means who were called by God for a special work and who used their wealth for a righteous cause. Wealth itself is morally neutral. What we do with wealth can either enhance good or create more evil. Wealth can be used for God’s purposes or for selfish goals.

unquote

What does the Bible say about wealth? | GotQuestions.org

Again the commandment about giving a certain percentage in the Old Testament was directed only to Israel at that time and does not apply to the church in the New Testament age.

The Bible teaching on marriage and homosexuality has always been the same in both the Old and New Testaments.  God created man and woman and meant for them to procreate.  Therefore marriage by definition is only between one man and one woman.  That is the clear teaching in the Bible.  Anything outside that is wrong.

What Is the Definition of Marriage in the Bible? (learnreligions.com)

The article on this link answers many claims about same-sex unions:

The Bible and Same-Sex Marriage: 6 Common but Mistaken Claims | Bible.org

 

 

Edited September 17, 2022 by blackbird

[Rebound]

1 hour ago, blackbird said:

     The ten commandments are part of the Old Testament law which was directed only at Israel during the Old Testament times.  The commandment about the seventh day as a day of rest does not apply to the church which began 2,000 years ago.  It was only directed to Israel long ago.  The other commandments are still in effect because they are stated in other words in the New Testament.  However, a day of rest in the church age has been established as Sunday, but not by commandment, but as a voluntary thing.  Nobody is under the Sunday day of rest as a commandment.  There are some churches who misinterpret that and have turned it into a command, but that is not biblical.  As in many areas, different denominations interpret some things in different ways.  That is one reason we have thousands of different denominations.  But many Christian churches do still agree on the main teachings of the Bible.

quote

The Purpose of the Law

In Galatians 3:23-29, Paul explained that the law of Moses was a “paidagogos,” which is translated schoolmaster, tutor, or guardian. In the Greco-Roman world, the son of a wealthy man would be cared for by a paidagogos, a slave who was given the responsibility of watching over his master’s son. This guardian would watch over the boy constantly; taking him to school, keeping him out of trouble, guiding him, guarding him, and teaching him. In the life of a young boy, a paidagogos was a good thing. However, when the boy became a man, he no longer needed a paidagogos. He was set free from this tutelage.

Paul said the law was just like that in the life of Israel. It’s end-goal was to bring the nation of Israel to a state of maturity and faith, where they would accept Jesus as their Messiah. And once they came to faith in Jesus, like a boy who became a man, they would no longer need the law in the same way.

“Now before faith came, we were held captive under the law, imprisoned until the coming faith would be revealed. So then, the law was our guardian until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian, for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith” (Galatians 3:23-26).

A young boy does what is right because his guardian tells him to, but a man does what is right because he is an heir of his father’s household. When a young boy is under a guardian, he is just like a slave (Galatians 4:1-2). And Paul makes the point that the Jews were slaves under the law. But when Christ came, the law was lifted – at least for those who accepted Jesus as their Messiah – because that was the whole purpose of the law.

The son of a king doesn’t need a law to tell him to do the king’s will. The son of a king – in many ways – is exempt from the law, but he does the king’s will because he loves the king and because the king is his father. He does the king’s will because the king’s will has become his will. This is what being a Christian is all about.

“But when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son, born of woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, so that we might receive adoption as sons. And because you are sons, God has sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, crying, “Abba! Father!” So you are no longer a slave, but a son, and if a son, then an heir through God” (Galatians 4:4-7).    unquote

Why Christians "Are Not Under Law But Under Grace" - Radically Christian

So you see Christians are free to work on Sunday if their job requires it.  While it would preferable for Christians to have Sunday off, many jobs, which are not Christian organizations, require their employees to work on Sundays at times.  This is not against Christianity or Christian teachings, except in some churches which as I said misinterpret this subject.

Donald Trump is the model that Christians follow.  He is a politician.  Politics or politicians are not the church and is not a guide for Christian beliefs or behavior.  As far as voting is concerned, as I have said on another post, Christians should vote for the least evil leaders and parties.  In the U.S. there are only two main political parties to choose from, Democrats and Republicans.  We know Democrats strongly support things that are evil such as abortion and progressive ideology.  Therefore if a Christian is going to vote, he/she should choose the lesser evil.  That's what it boils down.  Sixty million babies have been aborted since Roe versus Wade was passed fifty years ago.  

On the question of wealth.  The Bible does not teach that it is a sin to be wealthy.  It is how wealth is acquired and what one does with it that is important.  Many wealthy people do charitable or good works with part of their wealth and they earn it honestly.

quote

We know that wealth itself is not sinful. Wealth is not offensive to God because He often blessed His servants with wealth when they pleased Him (Deuteronomy 28:1–8). Abraham (Genesis 13:2), Jacob (Genesis 30:43), and King Solomon (1 Kings 10:23) are examples of wealthy men in the Bible who were used by God in mighty ways. In the Old Testament, wealth was sometimes an indicator of the Lord’s pleasure and blessing. However, wealth has never been an accurate barometer of a person’s standing with God. Some righteous people are poor while some wicked people are rich (Psalm 73; Jeremiah 12:1).

In the New Testament, too, several wealthy people were instrumental in advancing God’s kingdom. Matthew (Luke 5:27–29), Joanna (Luke 8:3), Joseph of Arimathea (Matthew 27:57), Zacchaeus (Luke 19:8), and Lydia (Acts 16:14–15) were all individuals of great means who were called by God for a special work and who used their wealth for a righteous cause. Wealth itself is morally neutral. What we do with wealth can either enhance good or create more evil. Wealth can be used for God’s purposes or for selfish goals.

unquote

What does the Bible say about wealth? | GotQuestions.org

Again the commandment about giving a certain percentage in the Old Testament was directed only to Israel at that time and does not apply to the church in the New Testament age.

The Bible teaching on marriage and homosexuality has always been the same in both the Old and New Testaments.  God created man and woman and meant for them to procreate.  Therefore marriage by definition is only between one man and one woman.  That is the clear teaching in the Bible.  Anything outside that is wrong.

What Is the Definition of Marriage in the Bible? (learnreligions.com)

The article on this link answers many claims about same-sex unions:

The Bible and Same-Sex Marriage: 6 Common but Mistaken Claims | Bible.org

 

 

So Christians can kill people, because the Ten Commandments don’t apply to Christians. And Christians can cheat on their wives and have homosexual relationships, because that’s all Old Testament. And Christians can be rich as they want, because Paul’s words matter more than Jesus’.

Truly, I understand Evangelical Christianity: It is a religion for straight white sinful males. It preaches that it’s OK for them to sin, but it’s also ok for them to discriminate and hate people who are different because it’s convenient to do so.  It is a Bullshit religion.  If the Bible says you cannot do it, that’s ok, you can do it. But if it’s something you don’t do, then those “other people” are horrible sinners.  That is a Bullshit religion. It is pick-and-choose and judge all you want on everybody else, because we decided that’s what the rules are.  God’s words are completely meaningless whenever they are inconvenient.  That is American Evangelical Christianity. White supremacy and discrimination in the name of a God who’s rules they defy far more than they obey. 

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, blackbird said:

Really?   So people that commit murder, steal, and break various other laws etc. which is immoral behavior should not be discriminated against by having it outlawed in "THE LAW"??? and be punished by the "THE LAW"???  I'm afraid you have it wrong.  

I KNOW you are CONFUSED. When it is the LAW it is NOT just your OPINION whether it is IMMORAL.