Jump to content

First a trickle....Now a flood

Recommended Posts

Remember when they told you the spike protein stays in your arm and just dissipates?

Yeah.  It doesn't.

Here's another study to shows that was all a lie.

Circulating Spike Protein Detected in Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis | Circulation (ahajournals.org)





Immunoprofiling of vaccinated adolescents and young adults revealed that the mRNA vaccine–induced immune responses did not differ between individuals who developed myocarditis and individuals who did not. However, free spike antigen was detected in the blood of adolescents and young adults who developed post-mRNA vaccine myocarditis, advancing insight into its potential underlying cause.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to present 3 pieces of data which continue to build the case that this FDA, under Peter Marks, is acting recklessly with its push to boost, in perpetuity, 18 year old men who had COVID19.

  1. This week, internal emails show Marion Gruber, former head of FDA vaccine science frustrated with Marks. She specifically highlighted the myocarditis issue. Myocarditis appears to occur at least 1/10k with boosters, and subclinical troponin elevation is likely 100 times as high (based on 2 studies). This concern was ignored.

  2. FDA under Marks has changed the date Pfizer is required to turn in postmarket safety data. From Dec to June. This is the study to look for troponin in young men. These data were needed in 2021— their continued delay is catastrophic.


    If the rate of myocarditis is 1/10k hospitalized (consistent with Sharff’s estimate for the last booster), how can the benefit outweigh this in a 16 year old man who had COVID? He does not have even an absolute risk of 1 in 10k hospitalization from reinfection. This is now a harmful intervention until proven otherwise.

Links in article:

Peter Marks' FDA is Playing Games with Young Men's Health & Maximizing Pfizer's Profits (substack.com)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


FYI - T-cells protect your body from cancers.

CD4 t-cells help coordinate immune response and CD8 t-cells fight infection.

"There's a lot that's unknown".......so let's make bivalent boosters for children, too.  We could be fuquing up their immune systems for life, but we'll never know if we don't give them the jabs. 🙄 

These people are fuquing insane.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Goddess said:

U.K. Becomes Latest Country to Ban Covid Boosters for Under-50s – The Daily Sceptic

Weird how governments have to ban these things, you'd think it would be the CDC or the FDA.....

It's almost like they get 65% of their budget from Big Pharma or something.




It's too bad that this isn't actually true, like so many of your other sources.  

The UK is no longer offering boosters to healthy people under 50 because, as they say, the health risks aren't especially high, the community at this point has some herd immunity and because the elderly are fully vaccinated and as protected as they can be.  

Don't listen to common sense or anyone else though.  Just go with your garbage-web conspiracy-confirming headlines.  


Edited by Moonbox
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Nice to see you can read.  I was wondering.

Reading is one thing, comprehension another. It should be noted that the UK is the world leader in teaching medicine, and has the top doctors in the world who advise their government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OftenWrong said:

Reading is one thing, comprehension another.

Yes, I assumed people would read the article if they wanted, and I didn't have to put every detail of it in my comment.

Of course, Moonpie and his merry band of cheerleaders would miss the obvious point - boosters for under 50 will not be offered in the UK any more.  For a reason.

Those two just like to follow me around the board, find some point to nitpick and seem incapable of comprehending the actual point of anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call to her tribunal every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear."

Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Pfizer exec got caught on video discussing how they are planning on "directing evolution" by mutating the virus on their own to predict what the next strain will be.  It's not gain-of-function, but it's pretty damn close.  When he realized he was being filmed, he went ape-shit and threw a fit in the restaurant, broke an iPad and called the police reporting that white people were threatening him.

His Pfizer credentials were wiped from the internet the second the video hit the sites.

Rubio Sends Letter to Pfizer CEO on Alleged Gain-of-Function Research - Press Releases - U.S. Senator for Florida, Marco Rubio (senate.gov)

An investigative report suggests that Pfizer may be conducting gain-of-function research, which it dubs “directed evolution” research to mutate the SARS-CoV-2 virus to create additional, more potent variants and vaccines to combat future variants. This type of research, similar to gain-of-function research, has long been controversial, and is suspected to be the cause of the COVID-19 pandemic.
U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) sent a letter to Albert Bourla, the President and CEO of Pfizer, following the release of a video showing Pfizer’s director of research and development casually discussing the company’s manipulation of the SARS-Cov-2 virus for company profit.


  • “Whether it’s gain of function research, or selected structure mutations through directed evolution, as Mr. Walker claimed would occur, any effort to make a virus more transmittable and deadlier is careless and dangerous. Further, Mr. Walker stated that Pfizer is willing to engage in this dangerous research because COVID and its variants are ‘a cash cow’ for the company and regulators will go easy on their efforts because a significant percentage of government officials aim to work for Pfizer and other biopharmaceutical companies and do not want to compromise their future job prospects.”
  • In a video released by Project Veritas on January 25, 2023, Mr. Walker laid out Pfizer’s plans to develop new vaccines for future variants of COVID by mutating the virus through directed evolution, a process that uses protein engineering to impose natural selection on a living organism or other biological materials, including viruses. Though he claimed the research is currently “exploratory,” he detailed how the research would proceed, such as how scientists would inject the mutated viruses into monkeys and collect serial samples from other monkeys who are infected. 


Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the number needed to vaccinate and why does it matter?

To understand the benefit of a drug, the simplest way to present the data is to figure out how many people need to be treated for one (1) person to have the desired outcome.  This is known as "Number Needed to Vaccinate" (NNV).

The UK government has finally done the only calculation that matters to patients regarding vaccination (on Nov. 8, 2022) and the answer is not pretty.



Appendix 1: estimation of number needed to vaccinate to prevent a COVID-19 hospitalisation for primary vaccination, booster vaccination (3rd dose), autumn 2022 and spring 2023 booster for those newly in a risk group (publishing.service.gov.uk)

For the covid vaccines, for healthy people aged 40-49 - 932,500 people would need an autumn booster in order to prevent a single ICU admission.  That means:  Chances of preventing an ICU admission is almost 1 in a million.


For over 70 y.o., 2,500 need to be vaccinated to prevent a single ICU admission.

For some reason, data for older age groups is sparse in this table.


When discussing adverse events connected with a drug, these are the terms used in medical to describe how frequently they occur:


Using these terms, the chance of a benefit (avoiding ICU) from taking the drug in terms of an over 70 y.o. is *rare*.

The chance for anyone under 60 was *very rare*. 
Critically, the number needed to harm from injection is considerably higher than the number needed to benefit, about 1 in 800 currently require hospitalization.
The UK gov't has now said that for 12-15 y.o., 162,600 would need to be injected to avoid a single ICU admission.

In the meantime, the risk for young boys is at least 1 in 10,000 for myocarditis - and that is just one type of adverse event.
Notably, both Dr. Aseem Malhotra (this was part of the research he conducted which made him reverse his views on the vaccines) and the UK's The Hart Group published these figures in Sept. 2022:
1) Why was that Cost/Benefit ratio not monitored?

2) Why was it 'first discovered' by independent analysis?

3) Why did they then censor it, when alerted?

4) Why no immediate stop?

And yes, these are rhetorical questions.

If you take away nothing else, I hope you understand now that when the CDC describes myocarditis or menstrual issues or any other adverse event as "rare", the ratio could be as high as 1 out of 1000.  This is medical jargon "rare", not average person "rare".  Every time I see people dismiss data by arguing "Oh, the CDC says it's RARE!!", I think the average person is thinking like 1 in a million, not 1 in a 1000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

Guess who's children are NOT "dying suddenly"? We can all learn something from these people.


The Hutterites around where I am also refuse vaccines.  There was some outbreaks of covid in a couple colonies early on, but they also seem to have come out of the pandemic relatively unscathed.  I wonder if the Amish, Hutterites and other groups would be wiling to contribute data as a control group?  Seeing as we don't really have a control group anymore due to forced vaccination.


  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

The Hutterites around where I am also refuse vaccines.  There was some outbreaks of covid in a couple colonies early on, but they also seem to have come out of the pandemic relatively unscathed.  I wonder if the Amish, Hutterites and other groups would be wiling to contribute data as a control group?  Seeing as we don't really have a control group anymore due to forced vaccination.


I will add that the Hutterites also refused masking, which INFURIATED the mask-Nazis around here, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doctors trying to determine why many young people are suddenly dying | Daily Mail Online

People aged under 40 are being urged to have their hearts checked because they may potentially be at risk of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome. 

The syndrome, known as SADS, has been fatal for all kinds of people regardless of whether they maintain a fit and healthy lifestyle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
    • Most Online

    Newest Member
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...