Jump to content

First a trickle....Now a flood


Recommended Posts

Former CDC Chief and Covid Task Force member Robert Redfield testified before a House committee yesterday and ripped Fauci a new one. After being shunted aside and kept in the dark during the pandemic, Redfield is finally getting his chance to say his piece. 

Among other things, Redfield said that the work in Wuhan was definitely GoF, it was funded by the NIH, State Department, DoD, and NIAID, and overseen by Fauci, in order to skirt U.S. rules prohibiting gain-of-function work (because of safety issues), and that the evidence points to a lab leak:

“In September 2019, three things happened in that lab. One is they deleted the sequences. Highly irregular, researchers don’t like to do that. The second thing is they changed the command and control from civilian to military. Highly unusual. The third, which is very telling, is they let a contractor redo the ventilation system in that laboratory. Clearly, there was strong evidence that a significant event happened in that laboratory in September.”

 

 

Redfield also described the scientific reasons why the virus appears to have been engineered, such as the out-of-place furin cleavage site:

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, myata said:

Surely that has to have been discussed in the research community, possibly I'm missing something and I'm curious to know the arguments.

It's been discussed a lot, then suppressed and censored.

You're doing well, good research  ?

No argument from me.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to play devil's advocate and hear from those who insist on the "most probable origin". What is their answer to a simple, glaring question: why is this thing nothing or very near, like a regular agent that moved species? There has something special about it, other than percentiles of genetic matches? Did they even notice that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few days ago the Federal government quietly announced that they were changing the "COVID-19 vaccine: Canadian Immunization Guide". They are not recommending boosters for most people under the age of 80.

NACI Guidance on an additional COVID-19 booster dose in the spring of 2023 for individuals at high risk of severe illness due to COVID-19 (canada.ca)

(Page 9)

newrecs.thumb.jpg.161e8bfa0495f23c54103632f9e9d964.jpg

This confirms what many of us have said all through the past 2 years. If you're under 80, and in relatively good health, the virus is 99% survivable, and taking repeated doses of an experimental drug is statistically (not to mention "commonsensically") not warranted.

I wish they'd just come out and say the vaccine doesn't work. They can't say that because that would be admitting negligence. At least they'll stop hurting Canadians going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, myata said:

Oops...

 

 

trend2.jpg

Hi Myata, could you provide some more info on this?  There's no reference on the graph for where it comes from or a study or data set that explains the graph.  What is "attributed mortality"?  Does that mean this is a modelling estimate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Hi Myata, could you provide some more info on this?

The data is Statista reports in the age group in Canada, apparently based on the PH data, actual, not estimate between Nov. 21 (when first reported for this age group) to now. Saw it in a preprint, a disturbing trend in very young age group in Canada I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Workers who were dismissed from their jobs for not taking the COVID shots and who were denied employment insurance upon getting fired are suing the city.

City of Cambridge among defendants in $126M class action vaccine mandate lawsuit - CityNews Kitchener

Quote

 

Alleging the City of Cambridge's COVID vaccine mandate for employees violated their constitutional rights, an employee on the Cambridge Fire Department is asking the court to award them $550,000 in compensation.

They're part of a class action involving more than 200 plaintiffs throughout the province, largely first responders and essential workers, seeking a collective $125.95 million from a variety of defendant municipalities and taxpayer-funded service providers.

“All the plaintiffs were sent home on ‘leave without pay’ and/or subsequently fired for refusing to take the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ (inoculations) whether or not they were working from home, and/or further refused to multi-weekly PCR testing in order to continue working,” notes the statement of claim filed earlier this month in Toronto.

“All the plaintiffs possess a conscientious and/or physical /medical reason for refusing to take  the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ (inoculation).” 

 

Since the CMO of Ontario, Kieran Moore, has said that the province did not mandate this and  only asked employers to have  a "policy framework" with alternatives, he basically threw employers who fired workers under the bus.

Lawsuits.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no doubt that COVID is biologically different from past seasonal flus, since it was created in a lab. But I also have no doubt that if it weren’t for the lockdowns, mass testing and propaganda, we simply would have considered it another bad seasonal flu and no one would’ve known the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Australia didn’t have a lot of COVID deaths until after they rolled out the COVID vaccines. Now excess deaths are out of control.

The author, Wilson Sy of Investment Analytics, has 62 published papers in the last 48 years and uses the gold standard Bradford-Hill Causation criteria to analyze the Australian data:

(PDF) Australian COVID-19 pandemic: A Bradford Hill analysis of iatrogenic excess mortality (researchgate.net)

 

aus1.thumb.JPG.c4c6d7b2b201ae24dd5341c598b6e8e5.JPG

aus2.thumb.JPG.fd76d4ebd1996ee4dce8ee40b1f68cc5.JPG

aus3.thumb.JPG.6d7c8abc8f63394c4e0c220c7e3f6c56.JPG

aus4.thumb.JPG.e8e57d74c20ca7451bdac32a2be76330.JPG

 

Same thing is happening in New Zealand.  And every other highly vaccinated country.  ACM for working age people has risen dramatically since mandated covid vaccines.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I have no doubt that COVID is biologically different from past seasonal flus, since it was created in a lab. But I also have no doubt that if it weren’t for the lockdowns, mass testing and propaganda, we simply would have considered it another bad seasonal flu and no one would’ve known the difference.

This is US data, but you can see my point:

flu.thumb.JPG.d05c9b0e9507c4cffcd523205f424e52.JPG

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Covid is a strange infection. Its essential characteristics are very different from the earlier known cases of corona-type virus zoonotic transmissions. It merited, and merits a thorough in-depth, objective and impartial investigation, not a hoopla bandwagon. Some countries managed to stay sane. Not here no how can we.

Edited by myata
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, myata said:

Some countries managed to stay sane.

Indeed.  And those are the countries who are faring better than the ones who went insane with fear and panic.

In the end, Sweden protected more lives and saved more jobs.  Sweden remained true to its political traditions and democratic values.  And they did it in the face of international scorn.

By Sweden's independent actions, based on scientific evidence instead of abstract "models" driven by fear, Sweden strengthened the crucial bond of trust between government and citizens.  This part of the Swedish example may turn out to be the most important achievement a government could accomplish during the covid event.

The government trusted the Swedish people instead of trying to bully them.  The people trusted their government to protect them without trying to run their lives and trampling their freedoms, without intimidating police actions  and without imposing outrageous fines on people already hurting.

Sweden did not deprive citizens of freedom of expression or the freedom to earn a living.  They allowed people to care for their loved ones and associate freely.  They didn't decide it was an "opportunity" to ruin regions or industries they didn't agree with politically.  Without abusive power-grabbing or giving unchecked power to any one government official, let alone the entire government.

They showed the world that a democracy can deal with threats in moderate ways and that they don't need to resort to undermining those democratic foundations of society in response to such a low-level threat.

Maintaining that trust - between government and citizens - is critical to healthy liberal democracies.

It's a lesson lost on Canadian politicians and sadly, on most Canadians, as well.

Edited by Goddess
Thinking faster than my typing ability, typos.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Goddess said:

They showed the world that a democracy can deal with threats in moderate ways and that they don't need to resort to undermining those democratic foundations of society in response to such a low-level threat.

It always comes down to the essence of democracy: is it by informed, active and involved citizens for the common sense, and good? Or, is it for the population and from above by wise priests and gurus who always know best. These are two different patterns with different and diverging outcomes. We just had another opportunity to observe this difference, and divide.

Edited by myata
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Denis Rancourt's pre-print paper, an estimated 13 million people have died from the Covid vaccines, and we can deduce that millions more have been disabled.

So this is not some simple crime that will go away.

On top of that, approximately 7 million have died from Fauci's Gain of Function Covid Virus.

2023-02-09 Age-stratified COVID-19 vaccine-dose fatality rate for Israel and Australia - Denis Rancourt

 

The above study also uses Canadian data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Goddess said:

According to Denis Rancourt's pre-print paper, an estimated 13 million people have died from the Covid vaccines, and we can deduce that millions more have been disabled.

So this is not some simple crime that will go away.

On top of that, approximately 7 million have died from Fauci's Gain of Function Covid Virus.

2023-02-09 Age-stratified COVID-19 vaccine-dose fatality rate for Israel and Australia - Denis Rancourt

 

The above study also uses Canadian data.

Bad enough that this is true, and the long-term outcomes are also not understood yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OftenWrong said:

Bad enough that this is true, and the long-term outcomes are also not understood yet.

I feel that we haven't even scratched the surface on the fertility issues to come.

The fact that the toxic spike is settling in the ovaries and testes and the millions of women experiencing menstrual issues which were denied for far too long, are not good signs.

I'm currently going over the data and studies from many countries regarding upticks in miscarriages and stillbirths.  The jabs were never recommended during pregnancy by the manufacturers and there is a sacred scientific trust that was broken about never experimenting on pregnant women or children.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the numbers in the graph above taken from a recent  preprint (and those as I understand, directly from PH Canada records) there were 11 fatal outcomes attributed to Covid in the age group 0-11 in close to two years, from January, 2020 to November 2021 before q-vaccines in the age group were in use. Followed by 36 more in just over a year after vaccines in the age group were approved and recommended.

11 deaths in two years per 5 million of population is very close to nothing ,compared to other causes. There's the centuries old clear medical ethics code: a doctor should not prescribe any treatment that i1) does not have a clear benefit for the patient and 2) may not be safe to the patient, relative to the risk of the condition.

Clearly, the recommendation, and even more, active promotion of these treatments went against the code of ethics and the facts.  Other, more objective jurisdictions never recommended them for this age group. This is a very clear factual and chilling demonstration that we, as citizens cannot rely on anything or anyone to support and enable the medical code of ethics. And that's just too bad. Scary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,742
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    CrazyCanuck89
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • DACHSHUND went up a rank
      Rookie
    • CrazyCanuck89 earned a badge
      First Post
    • aru earned a badge
      First Post
    • CrazyCanuck89 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • User earned a badge
      Posting Machine
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...