TreeBeard Posted February 14, 2022 Report Share Posted February 14, 2022 14 minutes ago, Moonbox said: communist What’s your definition of a communist? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonbox Posted February 14, 2022 Report Share Posted February 14, 2022 6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: QFT. That was quite a mature, accurate and decent post by your standards. It was a good characterization of your reasoning. There's really no worthwhile response to an imbecilic comment like, "You're just like Nancy Pelosi." The best part is that the mental energy I expended on posting that meme was at least equal to (likely higher) than the buffoonish post it was responding to. Cheers man. Thanks for the laughs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonbox Posted February 14, 2022 Report Share Posted February 14, 2022 8 minutes ago, TreeBeard said: What’s your definition of a communist? I don't know anymore. Ask them. One moment I'm a communist, the next I'm a fascist. I can't really keep it straight anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Anthony Posted February 14, 2022 Report Share Posted February 14, 2022 Folks, Please avoid trolling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted February 14, 2022 Report Share Posted February 14, 2022 29 minutes ago, Moonbox said: I don't know anymore. Ask them. One moment I'm a communist, the next I'm a fascist. I can't really keep it straight anymore. Sucks not having an identity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack9000 Posted February 14, 2022 Report Share Posted February 14, 2022 Ctv and global are not filth and Cbc shouldn't be defunded those 3 news channels are alot better then the propaganda ones like rebel news and truenorth spread. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted February 15, 2022 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 1 hour ago, Moonbox said: It was a good characterization of your reasoning. There's really no worthwhile response to an imbecilic comment like, "You're just like Nancy Pelosi." The best part is that the mental energy I expended on posting that meme was at least equal to (likely higher) than the buffoonish post it was responding to. Cheers man. Thanks for the laughs. It's actually just imbecilic that you don't understand what I said about Nancy, and the difference in the way she reacts to something that happens to her and something that happens to someone else. She didn't do jack about the vast majority of the violent rioting. It was all great. She didn't speak out against people letting rioters out of jail or bailing rioters out of jail. People overran police stations, overran parts of Seattle and declared sovereignty, attacked federal buildings for 100 days straight, they attacked the WH and injured over 60 secret service members - it's all good baby. Let 'er rip! ESPN dude - the riots are awesome. BURN IT ALL DOWN BABY! Those are all examples of being pro-riot, and CNN was right there. You were too, because you dodged using the word riot as well. Your idiocy is on the previous page: Quote "the protests were mostly peaceful until later on in the evening, when things got worse." ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonbox Posted February 15, 2022 Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 I don't understand much of anything you say, to be honest. Your posts are like mental spaghetti and so incoherent it's hard to even begin typing a thoughtful response. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted February 15, 2022 Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 (edited) 5 hours ago, WestCanMan said: eyeball, you're still a liar and a slanderer until you find some proof that there were racist flags at the freedom convoy. I'm quite certain I'll be a liar and a slanderer no matter what you're presented with but it'll be interesting to see what proof you come up with to substantiate why. Quote Michael Cooper is seen in Ottawa, while speaking with CBC News. Just out of the frame, an upside down Canada flag with a swastika on it can be seen. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/edmonton-area-mp-under-fire-for-photo-of-him-near-flag-bearing-nazi-symbol-1.6333266 Quote Just because CTV, CBC and Global have 4 useful idiots here doesn't mean that they're off the hook. Will you be putting Michael Cooper on the hook for substantiating the proof you asked for? So now what? I suppose it could be sophistically pointed out that 'racist flag' is different than 'flag with an evil symbol' - but that means pulling another Whoopie to argue the Holocaust had nothing to do with race - and that means Jews and Nazi's would now be on your hook for saying it was entirely about race. Pretty soon "everybody knows" becomes "everybody is against me". How do you tell a rat-hole from a regular hole? By the rat that's digging it. Edited February 15, 2022 by eyeball 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted February 15, 2022 Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 3 hours ago, Moonbox said: I don't know anymore. Ask them. One moment I'm a communist, the next I'm a fascist. I can't really keep it straight anymore. DogOnPorch should be able to explain how that works. He showed me a diagram once to illustrate a communist reaching around behind them to shake hands with a Nazi - meaning they're one and the same thing. As if you needed any other evidence NAZI even has the word socialist in it. Welcome to the club btw. Personally I swing more towards Pol Pot - a real lefties lefty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted February 15, 2022 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 18 minutes ago, eyeball said: I'm quite certain I'll be a liar and a slanderer no matter what you're presented with but it'll be interesting to see what proof you come up with to substantiate why. I'm not sure what proof you want me to have. That one symbol just mystically appeared when a CBC camera was right there and it was already down by the time Cooper was done speaking. I coulda got a better picture of that on my iPhone from that far away. Looks highly suspicious, right? Is that really enough for CTV and CBC to characterize the whole movement? Hundreds of thousands of people in several cities across the country? Obviously not. You need way more than that. There are several videos of BLM supporters in different cities doing chants calling for people to kill police officers. CNN says that "Those mostly peaceful protesters don't represent BLM." Really? Literally everyone in that march feels that way or they'd quickly gtfo. Not even 1% of the people at the march are represented by a flag that only lasted ten seconds. Here are a bunch of white supremacists standing in front of Youngkin's bus in Virginia. Did they represent him? No, they were planted by the Lincoln Project. Just like the confederate flag at the rally was seen beside Trudeau's personal photographer. Quote How do you tell a rat-hole from a regular hole? By the rat that's digging it. If a leftist is digging it, it's a rathole by definition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted February 15, 2022 Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 (edited) 3 hours ago, WestCanMan said: I'm not sure what proof you want me to have. The proof that puts the lie to your assertion there was zero evidence of any racist symbols/flags at the convoy. Quote Is that really enough for CTV and CBC to characterize the whole movement? I wouldn't think so but wtf has that got to do with the immunity from the burden of evidence you claim to possess? Nothing, it's just you digging a hole. Edited February 15, 2022 by eyeball 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeBeard Posted February 15, 2022 Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 5 hours ago, TreeBeard said: What’s your definition of a communist? Apologies…. Quoted the wrong person. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted February 15, 2022 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 14 hours ago, eyeball said: The proof that puts the lie to your assertion there was zero evidence of any racist symbols/flags at the convoy. I said that you needed some evidence. Look above. I also mentioned that you need very real evidence to substantiate such a serious claim about so many people. I probably said that you provided zero evidence, which was the absolute truth. Here's a comparable eyeball, and you can't pretend to not understand this: When a single fully vaxed person died of covid, that wasn't proof that the vax was junk. Do you understand so far? One covid death among millions of vaxed doesn't mean that "THEY'RE ALL GONNA DIE!" By the same token, when a tiny swastika on the corner of a large flag just magically shows up behind a CTV camera, and only lasts ten seconds before it's taken down, that's not proof that "THE CONVOY IS EVIL!" CTV and CBC made an extremely substantial accusation which is being backed by their useful idiots all across the country. If what you provided me was proof that the convoy is evil then by the same token you also have to admit that the vax is complete garbage and we shouldn't have passports or force-vaxing anyways. Quote I wouldn't think so but wtf has that got to do with the immunity from the burden of evidence you claim to possess? Nothing, it's just you digging a hole. I'm not digging a hole, I'm just running circles around and you're confused, as usual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonbox Posted February 15, 2022 Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 You're arguing about a swastika that may or may not have been at the rally. Most of us don't actually care and understand that the trucker's aren't Nazis or Nazi sympathizers, regardless of the fact that there are probably are a handful of extreme idiots. You're focusing on battling a strawman that nobody actually cares about anymore and can't let it go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted February 15, 2022 Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: I said that you needed some evidence. You're a worthless loser...go fuck yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted February 15, 2022 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, eyeball said: You're a worthless loser...go fuck yourself. ? Classic eyeball. Hey good news! The war measures act has been enacted! Grab some popcorn, crank up the propaganda on CBC, CTV or Goebbels, and just imagine that the people getting slammed to the ground by the jack-booted vax-Nazis are me ? YAYYYYY! Peaceful protesters getting f-ed up! How perfect! Maybe their lives will be ruined for standing up for their bodily autonomy and for protecting their children ? Edited February 15, 2022 by WestCanMan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeBeard Posted February 15, 2022 Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 13 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: The war measures act has been enacted! Really? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack9000 Posted February 15, 2022 Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 30 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: ? Classic eyeball. Hey good news! The war measures act has been enacted! Grab some popcorn, crank up the propaganda on CBC, CTV or Goebbels, and just imagine that the people getting slammed to the ground by the jack-booted vax-Nazis are me ? YAYYYYY! Peaceful protesters getting f-ed up! How perfect! Maybe their lives will be ruined for standing up for their bodily autonomy and for protecting their children ? stop spreading this properganda its not the war measures act its the emergency act which replaced it and has no where near the powers the war measure act did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Anthony Posted February 15, 2022 Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 Folks, Please tone down the inflammatory rhetoric. Keep the discussion civil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonbox Posted February 15, 2022 Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 2 minutes ago, Charles Anthony said: Folks, Please tone down the inflammatory rhetoric. Keep the discussion civil. I think the tone for this thread was set with the thread title and the OP. ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted February 15, 2022 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 57 minutes ago, TreeBeard said: Really? Yep. It's called the emergency act now, and he did enact it. https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/the-emergencies-act-has-been-enacted-here-s-what-that-means-1.5781457 From CTV: Quote WHAT IS THE EMERGENCIES ACT? Formerly known as the War Measures Act.... The last time these federal emergency powers were invoked was during the 1970 FLQ October Crisis, when Trudeau's father was the prime minister. Prior to that it was used in both the First World War and Second World War. So it has been used once during each world war, and then in the FLQ crisis when people were being murdered and a politician was kidnapped and murdered. Do you see the similarities between then and now? No? Just pretend that some of the things that Trudeau was saying about the convoy were true, and then it would kind of make sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted February 15, 2022 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 45 minutes ago, Jack9000 said: stop spreading this properganda ? What I'm saying actually is proper, so you got off to a good start. Your post went downhill fast though. Quote its not the war measures act its the emergency act which replaced it and has no where near the powers the war measure act did. It's the war measures act, v2.0, and if the village idiot can call people who didn't get the pseudo-vax 'anti-vaxxers', which is a term that's already in use with a completely different meaning, and say that they're 'very often racists and misogynists' then I'll say whatever I want. Suck it up, buttercup. It's the WAR MEASURES ACT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeBeard Posted February 15, 2022 Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Yep. It's called the emergency act now, and he did enact it. So, he didn’t enact the War Measures Act, the government enacted the Emergencies Act. A fib, or just ignorance on your part? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack9000 Posted February 15, 2022 Report Share Posted February 15, 2022 (edited) 1 minute ago, WestCanMan said: ? What I'm saying actually is proper, so you got off to a good start. Your post went downhill fast though. It's the war measures act, v2.0, and if the village idiot can call people who didn't get the pseudo-vax 'anti-vaxxers', which is a term that's already in use with a completely different meaning, and say that they're 'very often racists and misogynists' then I'll say whatever I want. Suck it up, buttercup. It's the WAR MEASURES ACT. it is not a war measures act just because you say it is.. its a watereddown far less powers given emergency act jesus.. you got a little ego on you don't you lmao. Edited February 15, 2022 by Jack9000 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.