qmuddy2 Posted March 12, 2017 Report Share Posted March 12, 2017 i would love to see hillary run, one more time, in 2020 !! who agrees with me ? she would be a shoe-in win !!! thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimmy Posted March 12, 2017 Report Share Posted March 12, 2017 No. She should move on. The fact that she couldn't even defeat the orange clown should make it unmistakably clear: Americans just don't want her to be President. Someone else will carry the torch. -k 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted March 12, 2017 Report Share Posted March 12, 2017 (edited) I think she would have done a good job but kimmy is probably right. Failed US presidential candidates don't get second chances. Edited March 12, 2017 by Wilber Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted March 12, 2017 Report Share Posted March 12, 2017 14 minutes ago, Wilber said: I think she would have done a good job but kimmy is probably right. Failed US presidential candidates don't get second chances. lol nah...none of that crown the queen stuff. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonlight Graham Posted March 12, 2017 Report Share Posted March 12, 2017 2 shots, 2 failures. Next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 12, 2017 Report Share Posted March 12, 2017 2 hours ago, Wilber said: ....Failed US presidential candidates don't get second chances. Really ? See Adlai Stevenson II ('52, '56) and Richard Nixon ('60, '68). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillyBeaver Posted March 12, 2017 Report Share Posted March 12, 2017 i hope she is hung or rotting in jail by then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted March 14, 2017 Report Share Posted March 14, 2017 Hillary Clinton failed twice to get to the White House. Next candidate please! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queenmandy85 Posted March 16, 2017 Report Share Posted March 16, 2017 (edited) I suspect that the interference of the FBI director in the last week of the campaign cost her the election. That being said, I think her Presidency would be paralyzed by massive opposition from Congress and the Senate. By 2020, she will be considered too old. Edited March 16, 2017 by Queenmandy85 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonam Posted March 17, 2017 Report Share Posted March 17, 2017 10 hours ago, Queenmandy85 said: That being said, I think her Presidency would be paralyzed by massive opposition from Congress and the Senate. By 2020, she will be considered too old. I think it would have been no more paralyzed than Obama's had been. I think after the frothing idiocy of election-season rhetoric had died down, Republicans would have probably been able to work with Clinton a bit moreso than they did with Obama (she is far less liberal/progressive than Obama is). That said, yeah, she managed to lose to Trump of all people, so definitely time for a new candidate. Hopefully somebody younger instead of all these gerontocrats, too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-TSS- Posted March 19, 2017 Report Share Posted March 19, 2017 No thanks. Bye bye Hillary! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topaz Posted March 19, 2017 Report Share Posted March 19, 2017 How can anyone support the Clinton's when they gave info. or equipment to North Korea and China and now the world is facing a possible nuke war with the crazy guy from N.K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 19, 2017 Report Share Posted March 19, 2017 Hillary Clinton's fall from grace began long before Trump....it was Barack Obama that killed the beast. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cum Laude Posted March 19, 2017 Report Share Posted March 19, 2017 On 3/12/2017 at 1:55 PM, kimmy said: No. She should move on. The fact that she couldn't even defeat the orange clown should make it unmistakably clear: Americans just don't want her to be President. Someone else will carry the torch. -k We are ingrained with the belief that the president should act “presidential”. That some career politician, or attorney, or partisan mafioso should be held, and maintain, deep respect. De facto legitimacy. The great thing about Trump, is that he destroyed that. We no longer MUST hold these criminals and clowns in high respect. When the president Tweets that the cow Meryl Streep is an overrated actress, we are met with pangs of embarrassment, followed by waves of joy… finally someone reverential… speaking the truth. Hilarious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted March 19, 2017 Report Share Posted March 19, 2017 1 hour ago, Cum Laude said: We are ingrained with the belief that the president should act “presidential”. That some career politician, or attorney, or partisan mafioso should be held, and maintain, deep respect. De facto legitimacy. There's some truth to this, but being more "real" has been done before, and has been also done with honesty and hard work. As you point out, "presidential" behaviour is superficial and that cuts two ways. Trump's numbers are down today - maybe because the better healthcare plan he promised hits his core supporters. He's down to 37% approval, with a tough week coming up... http://www.gallup.com/poll/201617/gallup-daily-trump-job-approval.aspx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.