Jump to content

Impeachment


Impeach Donald Trump  

24 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, Omni said:

At least I think Clinton's extra marital affairs were consensual. 

Juanita Broaddrick claims rape, and Paula Jones claims indecent exposure. There is not much to support either claim, but they are claims of non-consensual actions. Of course there are several other claims of "adultery" but yes consensual. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/6/2017 at 6:15 PM, kactus said:

Probably not but it doesn't negate the fact that Trump is emotioanlly unbalanced to be in charge of running a country. No one knows what he stands for and he is clearly not fit in decision making judging by his records for the last three weeks and goes into tantrums on twitter with everyone who disagrees with him...

He stands for incompetence and white privilege.  Didn't have to be qualified, didn't have to be intelligent, didn't have to do anything except be white,pale male and politically incorrect.  That is it.  The fact that his detractor cannot see that boggles my mind.

 

On 2/6/2017 at 10:42 PM, OftenWrong said:

Sounds like a positive, in general. But yes, seems like being the POTUS takes its toll. As President Donald Trump famously said, "This office is so powerful, you need God even more."

No, his parents living long is a negative for those who don't want him in office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, hernanday said:

He stands for incompetence and white privilege.  Didn't have to be qualified, didn't have to be intelligent, didn't have to do anything except be white,pale male and politically incorrect.  That is it.  The fact that his detractor cannot see that boggles my mind.

 

Based on all previous 44 presidents, President Trump fits right in.   All he needs is a bigger overcoat, top hat, and cigars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Boges said:

Sweet more Godwin 

 

Cheapens the actual Holocaust.

Folks can't imagine how evil a place like Treblinka REALLY was, it seems.

So they make-up stuff. Trump must be like Treblinka.

Meanwhile, they'd s--- their pants if their train pulled-up to the pleasant looking Treblinka station*. No waiting...just through the ol' gates....while the string quartet played.

* Made to look like a transfer train station.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hernanday said:

He stands for incompetence and white privilege.  Didn't have to be qualified, didn't have to be intelligent, didn't have to do anything except be white,pale male and politically incorrect.  That is it.  The fact that his detractor cannot see that boggles my mind.

So what did Obama do to qualify for president? Community organizer? Oh right. He's was a black man with good public speaking skills. BTW there is no "white privilege" - only "wealth privilege" . Obama and Trump are both "privileged".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Omni said:

He actually was elected by a majority of the voters for starters.

So? That is irrelevant. The system in the US balances individual and state representation. States all have an equal number of senators and two extra electoral college votes. This means that if someone wants to be elected president they have to appeal that extends beyond the heavily populated urban states.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TimG said:

So? That is irrelevant. The system in the US balances individual and state representation. States all have an equal number of senators and two extra electoral college votes. This means that if someone wants to be elected president they have to appeal that extends beyond the heavily populated urban states.

That's correct, and it (the EC) is highly gerrymandered. They ought to dump it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

Cheapens the actual Holocaust.

Folks can't imagine how evil a place like Treblinka REALLY was, it seems.

So they make-up stuff. Trump must be like Treblinka.

Meanwhile, they'd s--- their pants if their train pulled-up to the pleasant looking Treblinka station*. No waiting...just through the ol' gates....while the string quartet played.

* Made to look like a transfer train station.

Schadenfreude...

The guilt in bosnia is killing ya....

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Omni said:

That's correct, and it (the EC) is highly gerrymandered. They ought to dump it.

That word does not think what you think it means. The EC is set up the way the founders thought it should be because the founders believed that state representation matters. That has nothing to with "gerrymandering". To all of the people whinging about the EC: why aren't you complaining about the senate too? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TimG said:

That word does not think what you think it means. The EC is set up the way the founders thought it should be because the founders believed that state representation matters. That has nothing to with "gerrymandering". To all of the people whinging about the EC: why aren't you complaining about the senate too? 

 

Agreed...."gerrymandering" has nothing to do with the EC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TimG said:

That word does not think what you think it means. The EC is set up the way the founders thought it should be because the founders believed that state representation matters. That has nothing to with "gerrymandering". To all of the people whinging about the EC: why aren't you complaining about the senate too? 

The founding fathers are long gone by now. State legislatures have redrawn many district boundaries and they are a partisan bunch and effect the numbers of EC reps. per state. Kind of like instead of the voters picking their reps., the reps. pick their voters. That's gerrymandering, plain and simple.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TimG said:

So what did Obama do to qualify for president? Community organizer? Oh right. He's was a black man with good public speaking skills. BTW there is no "white privilege" - only "wealth privilege" . Obama and Trump are both "privileged".

Constitutional Law professor for 12 years at one of the top law schools in the world and most prestigious US law school, national senator, state senator, ran for congress, author of 2 top selling books, 2 decades in public service, Harvard Law grad with an expertise in Constitutional law, president of the harvard law review (probably the most prestigious role a Harvard student can get),  ivy league undergrad degree in politics, worked in several highly regarded law firms, community organizer and yes great public speaker.

 

Trump is the exemplar of white privilege.  His only qualifications was his skin color.  If he was red, yellow, brown, any other skin color, he couldn't be elected.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump supporters are such bad losers...Nevermind being a publc speaker Trump cannot even control himself....As a businessman he should have remained a businessman. Being a president requires a different calibre of a person and it doesn't come in colour....

Edited by kactus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, hernanday said:

Constitutional Law professor for 12 years at one of the top law schools in the world and most prestigious US law school, national senator, state senator, ran for congress, author of 2 top selling books, 2 decades in public service, Harvard Law grad with an expertise in Constitutional law, president of the harvard law review (probably the most prestigious role a Harvard student can get),  ivy league undergrad degree in politics, worked in several highly regarded law firms, community organizer and yes great public speaker.

 

Trump is the exemplar of white privilege.  His only qualifications was his skin color.  If he was red, yellow, brown, any other skin color, he couldn't be elected.

Trump = billionaire and management of a large company making payroll and being able to articulate his way into the White House.

theres no such thing as white privelege only good decision privelege.  

But please continue being racist to white people.  As you were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Achtung! Achtung!

Herr Oberführer Donald Duck in action:

Quote

 

From New York to Los Angeles, a series of immigration arrests this week have unleashed waves of fear and uncertainty across immigrant communities.
"There are people that I work with who essentially want to go dark," said Cesar Vargas, one of the first immigrants without legal status in New York state to be sworn in as a lawyer. 
"They don't want to be public in any way whatsoever. They spend less time on the street. They go to work and go straight back home. They don't go on Facebook. They put curfews on themselves."
 

 

 

 

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/02/11/politics/immigration-roundups-community-fear/

 

Make America unsafe again, make America hateful again. Well done Trump carry on Ducking....

Edited by kactus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, hernanday said:

Constitutional Law professor for 12 years at one of the top law schools in the world and most prestigious US law school, national senator, state senator, ran for congress, author of 2 top selling books,

And this makes him qualified for managing an organization with a trillion dollar budget?  Sorry. It does not. Running a billion dollar company is certainly a better qualification. Obama was white he would be indistinguishable from Clinton and would never have gotten the nomination. So you can say he got his position because of his skin colour. Trump, OTOH, could have been elected with his anti-immigration platform no matter what his race. 

BTW: a degree from Harvard is perhaps the best example of "wealth privilege" that you could find. The only reason so much status is conferred on Americans who graduate from ivy league schools is that status is what the wealthy need to protect their privilege for the children. If Americans wanted to do something about social mobility and "wealth privilege" (the real issue) they could start by changing their attitude toward graduates of schools whose main claim to fame is it costs huge sums of money to attend.

Edited by TimG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,727
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    lahr
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • impartialobserver went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • gatomontes99 went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • JA in NL earned a badge
      First Post
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...