-TSS- Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 On 20.2.2017 at 3:21 PM, Topaz said: As I reported here, there are people trying to discredit Trump and make the people distrust him and now its out in the open. This is more than the Dems vs Reps., this is the elite within the US government. http://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/politics/spies-are-plotting-to-take-down-donald-trump-says-former-cia-operative/ar-AAn7UwY?li=AAggFp5 Both main parties could actually implode within next few years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 The fascism is being ratcheted by President Trump. Now he is denying CNN, the New York Times and others from the Whitehouse briefings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 57 minutes ago, ?Impact said: The fascism is being ratcheted by President Trump. Now he is denying CNN, the New York Times and others from the Whitehouse briefings. Is it just me or is there never a bunch of 2nd Amendment folks around when you really need them? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 1 hour ago, ?Impact said: The fascism is being ratcheted by President Trump. Now he is denying CNN, the New York Times and others from the Whitehouse briefings. Good....hope President Trump also kicked out the fake news CBC...Canada's state broadcaster. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek 2.0 Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 1 hour ago, ?Impact said: The fascism is being ratcheted by President Trump. Now he is denying CNN, the New York Times and others from the Whitehouse briefings. Right, like how Obama's White House booted FOX several times...... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek 2.0 Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 47 minutes ago, eyeball said: Is it just me or is there never a bunch of 2nd Amendment folks around when you really need them? Typical "leftist"......looking for someone else to do their "dirty work" 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek 2.0 Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 45 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said: Good....hope President Trump also kicked out the fake news CBC...Canada's state broadcaster. He booted BBC, Daily Mail and Al Jazeera......not sure about any Canadian orgs 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 33 minutes ago, Derek 2.0 said: Right, like how Obama's White House booted FOX several times...... These poor dears have had their way...all the way...for MORE than 8 years. This is like a cold bath... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 50 minutes ago, Derek 2.0 said: Typical "leftist"......looking for someone else to do their "dirty work" I'll be there with my shovel when the call to arms comes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 Trump just can't function unless he is surrounded by cheerleaders. This way Il Duce won't have to stage rallies to get his ego pumped up. But he probably will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 2 hours ago, Derek 2.0 said: Right, like how Obama's White House booted FOX several times...... Would you like to cite that so it can be discredited or admit you're mistaken? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek 2.0 Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 10 minutes ago, BubberMiley said: Would you like to cite that so it can be discredited or admit you're mistaken? It was the second story on Cavuto this afternoon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted February 25, 2017 Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 We aren't talking about just CNN but six news agencies including two of the countries largest newspapers and two of the worlds most respected news sources. Is Trump going to ban everyone who asks a question he doesn't like? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek 2.0 Posted February 25, 2017 Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 4 minutes ago, Wilber said: We aren't talking about just CNN but six news agencies including two of the countries largest newspapers and two of the worlds most respected news sources. Is Trump going to ban everyone who asks a question he doesn't like? He didn't "ban" anyone.......all pool reporters were present, which share the information among all media outlets. You cite two of the World's most respected news sources.....who cares? The Trump administration doesn't "owe" international media squat........if this was politically motivated, why didn't he "ban" MSNBC? CBS? ABC? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted February 25, 2017 Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Derek 2.0 said: He didn't "ban" anyone.......all pool reporters were present, which share the information among all media outlets. You cite two of the World's most respected news sources.....who cares? The Trump administration doesn't "owe" international media squat........if this was politically motivated, why didn't he "ban" MSNBC? CBS? ABC? He banned those he accuses of publishing "fake news" Of course it is politically motivated because regardless of who he banned, excluding those six is a clear threat to all news agencies of what can happen if they aggravate him. This was done as warning to all media, not just punish those who were excluded. Edited February 25, 2017 by Wilber Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek 2.0 Posted February 25, 2017 Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 1 minute ago, Wilber said: He banned those he accuses of publishing "fake news" Of course it is politically motivated because regardless of who he banned, excluding those six is a clear threat to all news agencies of what can happen if they aggravate him. This was done as warning to all media, not just punish those who were excluded. A warning.........by letting in the pool reporters? It is motivated by "fake news" and bias, not politics, no different then any other administration before it......no different than any other Western Government. In this case, CNN and NYT etc have been going after unsubstantiated reports of ties between people in the Administration and Russia........last week, the New York Times ran a story, with no evidence, claiming the Trump campaign held daily conversations with the Russians.......the FBI itself said such stories are B.S CNN, New York Times etc, if they're going to report stuff worthy of the National Enquirer, why should they be given special access? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted February 25, 2017 Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 That was reported by multiple agencies, not just the NYT. Priebus has said the FBI has told him that and is under fire for trying to get the FBI to make a public statement on the issue. Quote The FBI would not say whether it had contacted the White House about the veracity of the Times report. That was from Fox News. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted February 25, 2017 Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 6 minutes ago, Derek 2.0 said: with no evidence With no disclosed evidence - big, big difference. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek 2.0 Posted February 25, 2017 Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 8 minutes ago, Wilber said: That was reported by multiple agencies, not just the NYT. Agencies since "banned" from a meeting in Spicer's office? 14 minutes ago, Wilber said: Quote The FBI would not say whether it had contacted the White House about the veracity of the Times report. That was from Fox News. Is there another Fox News? I'm currently watching Chris Wallace anchoring the Factor, and their take differs.......and is reported as much: Quote Fox News has learned that McCabe indeed had initiated the conversation, asking to speak with Priebus for a few minutes at the end of an intelligence meeting last week. During that conversation, McCabe informed the chief of staff that the Times story was wrong. Priebus wanted to know what he could do, but apparently was told later by McCabe that the FBI couldn’t be calling balls and strikes on every news story. FBI Director James Comey later told Priebus he could go out and refute the story, which he did. If CNN and NYT etc are reporting "fake news" about the Trump administration.....why would they expect to get special access? 15 minutes ago, ?Impact said: With no disclosed evidence - big, big difference. Likewise "no evidence" or "incorrect evidence". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted February 25, 2017 Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Derek 2.0 said: Agencies since "banned" from a meeting in Spicer's office? Is there another Fox News? I'm currently watching Chris Wallace anchoring the Factor, and their take differs.......and is reported as much: If CNN and NYT etc are reporting "fake news" about the Trump administration.....why would they expect to get special access? Likewise "no evidence" or "incorrect evidence". Priebus says the FBI called him, CNN and the NYT says it was the other way around. We don't know who called who or if anyone called anyone because the FBI won't comment on any of it. Edited February 25, 2017 by Wilber Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted February 25, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 (edited) On 5/5/2016 at 8:36 AM, betsy said: His first 100 days will be a flurry of activities to implement most of the policies he'd promised. Here's an excerpt from a lengthy article how he says it would look: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/05/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html?_r=0 Looking back at that OP, and relating his interview with what he's done so far.......he's indeed different. Like he's said at the Conservative Conference: "The era of empty talk is over." This article was written in May, 2016. Quote Despite his radical vision of how to remake America, and all his outrageous talk on juvenile subjects like his anatomy — to say nothing of the polls showing him behind Hillary Clinton — Jan. 20 may find the most underestimated politician in America assuming the presidency. While professing some surprise at his success, Mr. Trump increasingly sounds like a man who thinks he knows where he will be eight months from now, and the unrivaled power he will hold. He talked of turning the Oval Office into a high-powered board room, empowering military leaders over foreign affairs specialists in national security debates, and continuing to speak harshly about adversaries. He may post on Twitter less, but everyone will still know what he thinks. “As president, I’ll be working from the first day with my vice president and staff to make clear that America will be changing in major ways for the better,” Mr. Trump said in a telephone interview on Saturday. “We can’t afford to waste time. I want a vice president who will help me have a major impact quickly on Capitol Hill, and the message will be clear to the nation and to people abroad that the American government will be using its power differently.” https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/05/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html His confidence - his vision - is amazing! Like, he knew for sure he'll be the one sitting as President. This guy tackles everything like pieces on a chess board. His first 100 days are on track with what he said he'd do! They're indeed a flurry of activities - fulfilling promises he's made as fast as he can. Edited February 25, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted February 25, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 (edited) He's had meetings with the auto industry - and it was productive! He had a meeting with Manufacturing CEOs a few days ago. BRINGING BACK JOBS! JOBS. JOBS. JOBS. He's physically participated in negotiations! That's what he's promised, didn't he? That he'd be negotiating! What politician has done what he's been doing - within the first 100 days? Edited February 25, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted February 25, 2017 Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 This is going to be interesting. How did sanity sneak into the Trump administration? McMaster differs from Trump position on Muslims and Russia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted February 25, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, Wilber said: This is going to be interesting. How did sanity sneak into the Trump administration? McMaster differs from Trump position on Muslims and Russia. If he isn't on board, and he PUBLICLY opposes the President - who's only doing what got him elected - I suppose, we'd be saying adios amigo to this guy pretty soon. Meh. If this is true.....now I understand why looney John McCain was so enthusiastically in favor of this guy. McCain's reaction should've been a red flag. Edited February 25, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted February 25, 2017 Report Share Posted February 25, 2017 Yup, I doubt Trump's team has much time or patience for any snowflakes. Was this McMaster a draft dodger or something? He should probably be sent to a re-education camp or pushed out of an airplane or something. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.