betsy Posted March 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 (edited) Who would've thought that America under Trump would be beset by temper-tantrum-throwing Dems - see the long faces at the Congress speech? Some didn't even stand up for the widow of the slain soldier. Who would've thought that America under Trump - at least for the first month of it - would be constantly attacked by undermining Dems? Just shows you that the Dems have only one tunnel-vision interest. SELF. Who cares about America, right? Who would've thought that America under Trump would have the Dems to be like these? VIDEO DELETED It's a constant witch-hunt! Trying to see what will finally stick. The latest pathetic witch-hunt is about Pence! Brazenly comparing him with Hillary! They don't bother with the truth. Edited March 3, 2017 by Charles Anthony VIDEO DELETED https://www.youtube.com/embed/TB11JlyjmkE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted March 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 (edited) Just for clarification about the difference between Pence and Hillary's private email: Quote Indiana law does not prohibit public officials from using personal email accounts, although the law is generally interpreted to mean that official business conducted on private email must be retained for public record purposes. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/03/02/mike-pence-private-email/98637782/ Quote Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton violated federal records rules through her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state, a State Department audit has concluded. http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/clinton-broke-federal-rules-email-server-audit-finds-n580131 Edited March 3, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 1 minute ago, betsy said: Just for clarification about the difference between Pence and Hillary's private email Yes, the difference is clear. There is no evidence that Clinton's email was ever hacked, but according to Tony Cook at the Indy Star who broke the Pence story they have seen the email exchange between Pence and his top homeland security advisor discussing matters of global terrorist attacks. Pence was hacked. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted March 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, ?Impact said: Yes, the difference is clear. There is no evidence that Clinton's email was ever hacked, but according to Tony Cook at the Indy Star who broke the Pence story they have seen the email exchange between Pence and his top homeland security advisor discussing matters of global terrorist attacks. Pence was hacked. The difference is not about the hacking. The difference is posted right before your post. Edited March 3, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 35 minutes ago, betsy said: The difference is not about the hacking. The difference is posted right before your post. Hillary using a private email server wasn't illegal either, and the guidelines were changing while she was in office. But at least she wasn't gullible enough to fall for a phishing scheme and get hacked. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted March 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 (edited) 9 minutes ago, BubberMiley said: Hillary using a private email server wasn't illegal either, and the guidelines were changing while she was in office. But at least she wasn't gullible enough to fall for a phishing scheme and get hacked. I didn't say it was illegal! Whether the guidelines were changing, is irrelevant. She violated federal record rules! Pence didn't break the law, or any rules. Edited March 3, 2017 by betsy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 (edited) 3 minutes ago, betsy said: I didn't say it was illegal! She violated federal record rules! Pence didn't break the law, or any rules. The rules were in flux at the time. Big deal. Pence, meanwhile, was also careless and, worse, fell for a phishing scheme, exposing sensitive information because of his carelessness. Edited March 3, 2017 by BubberMiley 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted March 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 (edited) 13 minutes ago, BubberMiley said: The rules were in flux at the time. Big deal. Pence, meanwhile, was also careless and, worse, fell for a phishing scheme, exposing sensitive information because of his carelessness. Quote Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton violated federal records rules through her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state, a State Department audit has concluded. Clinton violated federal record rules. Edited March 3, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, betsy said: Clinton violated federal record rules. By doing the same thing Pence did. But Pence's actions had bad consequences. There were no bad consequences from when Hillary did the same thing. So big deal. Since Hillary is gone, I think it's time you start worrying about federal conflict of interest and nepotism rules and the judgment of the people in power. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted March 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 (edited) 41 minutes ago, BubberMiley said: By doing the same thing Pence did. The same thing......BUT too bad, she broke federal records rules......and Pence did not break any law, or any rules. That's, the difference. Edited March 3, 2017 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topaz Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 Question...is it normal for a foreigners, like ambassadors to be present when the President of the US is making a speech like Trump did this past week? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 First speech to Congress Nielsen ratings: Bush - 39.79 million Obama - 52.37 million Trump - 47.74 million I sure we will be getting some 'alternative facts' from Sean Spicer in the near future 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dialamah Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 40 minutes ago, ?Impact said: First speech to Congress Nielsen ratings: Bush - 39.79 million Obama - 52.37 million Trump - 47.74 million I sure we will be getting some 'alternative facts' from Sean Spicer in the near future That 47.74 million doesn't include all the space-aliens who tuned in. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 55 minutes ago, betsy said: The same thing......BUT too bad, she broke federal records rules......and Pence did not break any law, or any rules. That's, the difference. Pence was using his private email for sensitive public business after he criticized Hillary for doing the same. So I guess he didn't think it was really a serious matter, after all, despite encouraging mobs to chant "lock her up!" (which is not a witch hunt at all). But once again, since Hillary is gone, do you have any concern for the conflict of interest rules Trump is currently breaking? Would it be a witch hunt to mention it? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 5 minutes ago, BubberMiley said: despite encouraging mobs to chant "lock her up!" (which is not a witch hunt at all). Excellent point, we need some rallies with a poster of Pence in striped prison attire and crowds shouting lock him up. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted March 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 Speaking of ratings: Quote WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s first address to congress brought in solid ratings. Trump’s speech brought in an overnight rating of 28.2, according to early data. That was lower than the 33.2 rating for Barack Obama’s first joint address in 2009, but was higher than Obama’s last State of the Union that drew a 22.6 rating last year. http://kdvr.com/2017/03/01/trumps-first-address-to-congress-scores-solid-ratings/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 On 11/14/2016 at 6:27 AM, betsy said: At this point in his life and at his age, he's most likely to have become spiritual. Typical for an ignorant person like Trump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubberMiley Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 1 hour ago, betsy said: Speaking of ratings: I take that as a "no, I do not care if Trump breaks similar rules. I only care that Hillary broke rules." 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxme Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 23 hours ago, BubberMiley said: Is he denying speaking to the Russian ambassador? If he isn't, he must have done it. if he did it, he lied about not doing it. If he lied about not doing it, he had a very good reason to do so. So tell me what the hell are Canadians all upset about what Sessions did or may not have done? What is it to you and other Canadians anyway? Is it hurting you as a Canadian? This should be an American problem not a Canadian one. Canadians appear to love to butt their noses in American politics when it is really none of their business. We have issues that need to be brought up and debated on in Canada that needs fixing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-TSS- Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 At the risk of repeating myself I'll say this again: The US political system is not very good. Too much centered around the person of the President. When the President is in trouble the system is paralysed, which happened in the 90's with Clinton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, -TSS- said: At the risk of repeating myself I'll say this again: The US political system is not very good. Too much centered around the person of the President. When the President is in trouble the system is paralysed, which happened in the 90's with Clinton. This is by design. It is a feature of the system...not a flaw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxme Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 2 hours ago, ?Impact said: Excellent point, we need some rallies with a poster of Pence in striped prison attire and crowds shouting lock him up. Ok, so what is your problem with Trump or Pence. Have they hurt you in anyway? What have they done to you that you feel that you must attack them all the time? Is there anything that they can say or do without you constantly whining about them? You are really starting to sound like the rest of those democrat and liberals in America. Crybaby losers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxme Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 4 minutes ago, -TSS- said: At the risk of repeating myself I'll say this again: The US political system is not very good. Too much centered around the person of the President. When the President is in trouble the system is paralysed, which happened in the 90's with Clinton. The Canadian political system is not that much great either. The democrat liberals lost the election, and they cannot accept that loss. They are determined to screw the system up and slow it down because they are just a sore bunch of losers and crybabies. They are the problem, not Trump. At least Trump says that he wants to clean up the swamp where the democrats wanted to make the swamp a lot bigger, and paralyze America even more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 1 minute ago, taxme said: just a sore bunch of losers and crybabies Where is Trump's birth certificate... long form 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxme Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 7 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said: This is by design. It is a feature of the system...not a flaw. Designed by the dumbocrats to try and throw America into chaos. The swamp does need a cleaning out. Trump will do that despite how much the dumbocrats try to make it difficult for him. It is amazing how a political party like the democrats show so much childish immaturity. There is no doubt about it that Americans need more of Trump, and not less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.