ironstone

I know some of you are going to roll your eyes at this link because it's Lauren Southern, but she states that the suspect is second generation, parents from Rwanda. She got kicked out of the UK for criticizing radical Islam, just words. If you watch it, can you honestly point to anything she says that is wrong?

So is Bernie Sanders but he isn't exactly a supporter of Israel. You guys are ignoring the fact that there is a significant element within the Democrat party that do not like Israel I should have stated it in a better way, it's more about Israel itself. She is unlikely to pick anyone 'too pro-Israel'.

Her team will weigh pros and cons of picking a VP who is Jewish. Especially one who is supportive of Israel. Of course not all Jews share that sentiment when it comes to Israel. Bernie Sanders is Jewish and he is not a supporter of that state. The only thing Kamala's team cares about is whether or not the running mate they choose will help her win or not. There are a lot of Jews in the US but most of them already vote Democrat. They will soon be surpassed by the rapidly growing number of Muslims in the country. It's not unreasonable to point out that most Muslims do not like the state of Israel. In the streets of Michigan recently, people were chanting 'death to America'. Democrats want their support which is why I think it's unlikely they'll choose Shapiro.

These are names that are bandied about by the media. I'm merely pointing out that if Shapiro was actually chosen, that will anger the radicals within the Democrat party. AKA the Squad. Shapiro has been outspoken about Israel's right to defend itself. That doesn't sit well with the Squad. https://www.jpost.com/american-politics/article-811492 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/2024/07/24/josh-shapiro-kamala-harris-leading-vp-candidate-pro-israel/ Josh Shapiro, the Pennsylvania governor, is too “pro-Israel” to be selected as Kamala Harris’ running mate, a New York Times columnist has claimed. Michelle Goldberg, an opinion columnist for the Left-wing newspaper, has warned Mr Shapiro’s support for Israel could lead to issues within the Democratic party.

One of the names mentioned as a possible pick was Josh Shapiro. Now that seems very strange given the fact that he is Jewish and we know how radical Democrats like Kamala feel about Jews.

How many 'prosecutors' go the extra mile to bail out rioters? On the subject of raising taxes for Americans, here is a bit of Kamala in her own words: This is not an attack on her. It's what she actually will do if she wins.

This story won't be long in the news cycle. It's mentioned on the CBC website but they too do not mention the name of the suspect. They do say that the police do not consider the attack an act of terrorism. It's as though they have already concluded their investigation and that's the end of it.

The result of the Biden/Harris Afghanistan debacle. "The boys are back in town!"

So this guy was walking around freely until this attack? And just a day or so ago, authorities arrested Tommy Robinson on some absurd terrorism charges. Al Jazeera didn't see fit to publish any details about the suspect they arrested other than his age.

I made no such assertion that she was corrupt. I merely pointed out the hypocrisy that she was never called out for it while she was alive. Not called out for it by the same people that call out Clarence Thomas.

You didn't read the link I posted earlier. The Democrats claim they need to strengthen the recusal provisions for justices, but they never had any problem with Justice Ginsburg’s husband’s firm appearing repeatedly before the Supreme Court. Justice Ginsburg never recused, and in fact, she voted in favor of her husband’s firm’s client in the 2007 KSR International case. Nor did she recuse when Marty Ginsburg’s former client, Ross Perot, who had gifted him an endowed chair at Georgetown Law Center, appeared before the court in 1997. No Democrat or the media ever raised concerns about this. The Democrats and media have claimed the court has become too partisan, with no basis for this claim. But Democrats had no problem when Justice Ginsburg accepted the Eleanor Roosevelt Award (and statue) from the National Women’s Democrat Club, a partisan organization dedicated to electing Democrats. NPR Supreme Court reporter Nina Totenberg even emceed this partisan event! But neither Democrats nor the media had any criticism when Ginsburg traveled with billionaire Morris Kahn and toured three countries in the Middle East in 2018 right after the court ruled in his company’s favor. Kahn paid for transportation, food, and lodging. No Democrat or reporter criticized this. In fact, while Kahn’s company’s case was still pending before the court in 2017, the Genesis Prize Foundation, a group to which Kahn was involved and provided significant financial support at the time, announced it was awarding Ginsburg a lifetime achievement award. (And the foundation appears initially to have wanted to award her its $1 million dollar Genesis Prize). Less than two weeks later, the Supreme Court ruled in Kahn’s favor.

The usual leftist logic, she is deceased so it's like it never happened. Clarence Thomas has wealthy friends. Where is the evidence that these gifts influenced any cases that were before the court?

https://thefederalist.com/2023/07/20/democrats-concerned-with-scotus-ethics-rules-should-look-into-leftist-justices-first/

Can you please post the links to the 'overwhelming evidence' that you speak of?

I found the meme, I didn't created it. And I think this meme is funny. It's like you don't recognize anyone pictured on it, don't know the back story, or are clueless about irony.

But won't a bunch of drag queens offend France's massive muslim population?😉

Soon you'll be claiming that the information in the Steele dossier wasn't false. And that Hillary didn't pay for it either.

Below is Kamala's San Francisco.

It seems that as far as presidential assassinations and attempts go, they come mainly from one side. https://anncoulter.com/2024/07/18/hey-are-those-bullets-in-your-npr-tote/ MSNBC’s Joy Reid called Trump “the greatest purveyor and promoter of political violence, really, since anyone can remember.” Pro tip for Biden defenders: Maybe don’t bring up people’s ability to remember things. I’m not sure how to measure who the biggest “purveyor and promoter of political violence” is, but I can do a body count. And when it comes to political violence, the left beats the living daylights out of the right, so to speak, Granted, we’re only 248 years into this experiment, but so far, every single shooting of a national politician in the U.S. has been committed by a person on the left — or someone even more deranged than a liberal.