impartialobserver

Does it really matter if she loses by 100 Electoral votes vs. 96 Electoral Votes. Either way, she loses and in such a way to quell most reasonable debate.

did you mean to say, "he certainly did NOT have"

Walz seems like a safe choice. I still think that Harris loses but maybe by slightly less than before.

from my experience... most are too braindead to be corrupt. they have a hard time figuring out the day of the week so masterminding some corruption.. its asking a bit much.

Its a conspiracy.. Simply stated. Since that is what the OP wants to hear.. may as well tell him what he wants to hear/

I have watched some of the Olympics. The last supper item, even if I was religious, would not have changed my viewing pattern. Now the real news is that NCAA football is coming in 3 weeks, NFL in 5 weeks, and the NBA in 3 months.

Is it possible that this is subjective? It is art after all...

Hmmm... and Khelif lost to Kellie Harrington (ireland).. so any supposed advantage seems to have not worked on that day.

There should be a meme for all the crybabies crying about the last supper incident at the Paris Olympics. If I own stock in Kleenex.. I would be very happy today.

And as I read about this.. there is a spectrum involved. So what would be the threshold or cutoff? My guess is that this threshold would be arrived at from an emotional viewpoint. To do this from a scientific/quantitative viewpoint would not work for society's political leanings.

One guy gets fired and another will take his place.. riveting stuff.

Well if the boxer was born female and does not identify as intersex or trans.. how does the IOC legally bar them from competing?

Do you have some factual data.. actual medical tests? If not, your speculation is of no value. Lots of women have higher than average testosterone... does not make them male.

algerian... not albaiban

All politicians lie... Therefore both parties lie.

The boxer was born female and alert, alert... she comes from Algeria where being trans is illegal. This is what happens when you wait, do some research, take time to think, etc instead of reflexively reacting and doing so emotionally.

Those who boycott a sporting event due to some perceived insult in all actuality were not sports fan to begin with. If all it takes is some perceived insult to get you to lose interest.. you never had much interest to begin with. I am a hardcore NFL fan and could not care less about the pregame. My interest is in the game and narratives such as the Detroit Lions finally winning a Super Bowl and so on. The kneeling did not deter me.. it is a separate item altogether.

I get that Facebook and Google are ubiquitous. What they do has a huge impact. However, it is not a first amendment issue because they are not governmental institutions. And as you know... there are other options. Maybe not the most convenient options but options nonetheless.

Exactly. Life can go on without Google and Facebook. DuckDuckGo is a great alternative if you do not want your data mined and sold. I do not care for cable news in any form so guess what? I do not watch it. Easy enough.

And another tidbit.. the shooter acted alone as far as can be discerned. No grand conspiracy.. nothing all that interesting.

Yes, I will agree the topic of Trump is boring. Same old stuff, same old impassioned but overly simplistic responses. Same people saying the same things every day. Yawnnn....

Google and Facebook are private entities and so are free to do what they wish with their privately owned platforms. If you do not like it... do not use it. Yes, they are ubiquitous but you still have options. The quality of options is not the point.. but I know that certain someones will go down that route. My point is that the options exist.

hence why you should wait to derive strong opinions about a topic. More information is better.

Agreed.