impartialobserver
Member-
Posts
4,098 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by impartialobserver
-
The reason that they go to LV is that it is close to home (SoCal) and then they get to avoid state income tax. They still get to be close to friends/family. 3 hour drive through the Mojave being all that separates them from LA and its suburbs. As of yet, it is getting bluer as it also has one thing but most places in that area do not have... supply of housing and a relatively low price.
-
Except that it does. The reason for these changes in pro sports was that folks wanted more offense.. higher scores. Inevitable evolution. Labor saving technology, the internet, and greater economic fortunes are going to give rise to certain realities.. inevitable evolution. I have a son and I teach him to adapt and make the most of what he has right now.. Wanting a utopian fantasy that does not exist is for 20-pt. IQ types.
-
well as of yet, the data says that they are. No, not all CA expats vote Democrat but most that move to LV are. The more Conservative ones go to West TX, Reno, or Boise ID. My office does a ton of research on this topic.. not so much the politics but where they go, what businesses they open, what income streams they have, etc.
-
I would say not. No real difference between expectations now versus in 2019.
-
Hmmm... lets look at the definition of NOW. Do you have any issues with this definition? Lets start with that... https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/now a : at the present time or moment Now is the time for action. b : in the time immediately before the present thought of them just now c : in the time immediately to follow : FORTHWITH
-
My point in the beginning (easily verified) was that my complaining about gas prices is not change it NOW... Lets read that last word again... And here you come to refute it (easily verified).. So that tells me that you disagree with my claim that my complaining can't change the price NOW... I included that three letter word for a reason and yet you conveniently overlook it.. the reason is simple.
-
Yes, City of reno voted to do something about them but only those that were not up to snuff basically. So if they were operating and within certain areas.. they were allowed to continue. Look, we are in agreement about it mostly being a matter of choice. However, that is not the point. The point is that politics is not to blame for our relatively high homeless population. Ask anyone that goes downtown regularly and ask them what their primary issues are and they will say.. 1. too many homeless and 2. not enough parking. The second one is common to all major cities. As for the homeless, I have laid out why we have relatively more per capita than other cities. There are only so many police and they can't be everywhere at every time. It is not about having a bleeding heart for them. It is about understanding why there are so many and what to do about them given current laws and amount of resources. If you must know.. I was homeless once. It was Salt Lake City from august 1999 to late november 1999. I will not give the whole story now. Just now that I have zero patience for panhandlers. If I detect (which I have quite the nose for) that someone is young, able-bodied, etc.... my blood pressure goes way up and I want to knock them out.
-
In the western US, the primary driver of high housing prices is that demand exceeds supply in the short term. In CA, this is compounded by a very wide disparity in income. The top of the food chain can easily afford $4500 per month for a mortgage while the bottom 20% can't even come close. This reality predates the current interest rate hike.
-
Your responses are equally ridiculous. I post something that is somewhat immutable such as the sky is blue, 2+2= 4, Regina is the capital of Saskatchewan, etc. One comment, post, vote, complaint does not change the outcome all by itself. You know this to be true. Can you say that? No.. the reason as to why is quite simple.
-
Reno and NV as a whole's increased access to alcohol goes back to 1945. That is when the statute was put in place that made it to where there was no time limit on alcohol purchases. Second, most states have limits on the number of liquor licenses. In Idaho, it is based on the zip code. Only so many can be given out in a zip code. In MT. it is tied to population. Only so many per 5,000 or so in population. In NV.. all you have to do is to have a business license ($65 fee) and then be able to purchase the liquor license. This is between $2500 and $5000. After that is settled, It is fairly simple to start selling it. Lastly, the sales tax in NV is 4.6% and not nearly as onerous on the paperwork as that of CA, OR, or especially UT. Next, casinos.... this makes for a steady, dependable supply chain of liquor. So if said distributor adds another account.. fairly simple task. So, there you have it. We have 24 - hour access to it, ease of supply, relatively low cost, and a steady demand. As for marijuana, yes it is legal (relatively) here. However, the homeless problem predates this by 20 years. Last item... what do people do in Casinos? Hmmm... Most rational people know that the odds are fixed and that it is a colossal waste of money. However, your average low income or homeless person thinks that they can get lucky. And what happens when they are not lucky? Their meager resources go up in smoke. About the weekly motels, they represent the only way besides a homeless shelter for the low income and homeless to get housing. No credit check, no rental history needed, no deposits, and somewhat close to where they want to be. Even if someone is mentally ill, they are still capable of holding a job and affording these at the 2010 prices. Keep in mind that the jobs that they will take are in restaurant and retail which are historically low wage industries especially in NV. Average weekly wage in Naics 72 in 2022q3 in Washoe county pre tax was $636. https://gizmodo.com/how-much-a-bottle-of-whiskey-costs-in-every-state-1650381482
-
Ok, I am wrong then. My very Conservative grandfather who served in WWII had no respect or patience for those who wanted to keep talking about war. His thinking was that by viewing it as "the glory days", we were being hypocrites. If it was so terrible, which he thought it was, then we should stop talking about it with such reverence. Behind closed doors, he would tell me about how reliving it was just their way of wanting a fight.. a fight that these visitors were too old/frail to fight.
