CdnFox

You're right, it was very easy for me to quote your foolish prediction, although honestly it's far too late for that to be the reason you appear to be a fool Sorry i scare you so bad

Interesting times

But it does absolutely say that gender affirming care denial is child abuse and the state will take corrective measures. The end result is the same. If the parents don't provide chemical castration in the form of gender affirming chemicals then the state can consider that abuse, remove the children and take actions to provide it. So the substance is still there West claimed the state can use the Coerced control provision to take the kid and apply the treatment and he's correct. Even surgeries could be covered by that. The others, mainly user, are making the claim that the state can utilize the law i posted to bypass the parent's wishes and provide the drugs or surgery to the kid because denying gender affirming care is coerced control. And although he's using some inflammatory and colourful language to describe that it is in fact substantially true. Now. i think we both would agree that we're ok with the state removing a child from a harmful environment and providing the necessaries of life, as would be required by Canadian law. Kids should be fed, and be and feel safe. And you might go so far as to say that if the kid wants to identify as a different sex then it's best to allow them to do that. But.... I don't believe that should be license to conduct unnecessary elective medical treatments with permanent life altering effects against the parents wishes. I believe that is a gross abuse of power and serious gov't overreach. Don't you agree? or do you feel that's appropriate?

So? Show me the law that says that's the only plan he can fly in. If he wants to fly in something less sophisticated and call it air force one what's to stop it? It takes him setting foot on the plane. Literally. Any aircraft the president is on automatically becomes air force one. "Air Force One, any aircraft of the U.S. Air Force that is carrying the president of the United States." Air Force One | Plane, History, List of Aircraft, & Facts | Britannica And no, there is no specification. If trump says this plane will be used as air force one then that's that. There's no legal list they have to follow. And? Do with out, or get them done quickly. There is no law that says he has to have them. Sweep it for bugs, install a few radios and be done with it. You can always keep the other ones handy for back up in case you have to bug the president out for a nuclear threat or the like. (there's 2 you know, you act like there can only be one air force one) Sure he can if he repaints it. Bullshit. The current 'air force one' thats under construction will be well into the double digits as far as billions of dollars goes when it's ready and that won't be till after trump is gone. Hundreds of millions to get one up and running soon is pocket change.

LOL it's not like i can jump out of his screen or anything THIS IS HOW ROBOSCARED SEES ME:

Of course not You rarely have anything to say to the truth

I noticed you are ignoring the actual links that I posted which prove your entire argument is wrong Kind of being a little bit of a chickenshit aren't you?

Yep, the guy lies his ass off and caves when the public gets mad. They sepcifically refused a budget in the fall to 'take the time to get things right' and it was just not possible and nobody can budget in this environment etc etc.... then when people start pointing out what a lying sack of crap he is suddenly it's entirely possible and of course they were always going to do that (which they said they weren't). If the "fall' means september that might get him off the hook but i suspect he'll delay as long as he can.

They're right there above. they're even on the same page as your request there. This literally is the link and everyone can read the thread. your words " there exists no meaningful mechanism by which this can be done." as i said, literally your words I get why you're ashamed of what you've said. That happens to you a lot. You say things and then have to spend pages trying desperately to rewrite them. Or pretend you were talking about something else when it's obvious you weren't. Or pretend you never said it in the first place. Your dishonesty Always catches up with you. Hey. Here's the facts. Producing a budget is a huge part of being accountable. This is a minority gov't, the voters can easily hold the gov't to account with an election if the public turns against the liberals. And you're arguing that budgets dont' matter and elections don't matter so we should just let the liberals off the hook. If you cared about accountability you'd be furious with the liberals for what they're doing. It's pretty obvious you don't. And trying desperately to rewrite what you've said is just childish.

Any top politician is going to be ambitious, but some of them will do anything to stay at the top and others realize that it's only worth it under certain circumstances. There been a number of honest politicians that did their job. Carney is not one of them

Oh look who's embarrassed by what he said yet again and is desperately trying to deny it They were your precise words LOLOL so you really didn't know and had to look it up and now you've realized i was right and you want it to be my fault I've never said it was all we need. In fact i'm arguing on this very thread that we need things like budgets. but it is the one most certain way the voters can punish those who are corrupt and drive corruption outside of the political Arena. I'm using weight you say that elections are meaningless and at the same time you're arguing that budgets aren't necessary as part of holding governments to account. Basically absolutely everything that can be used against the liberals you shoot down No you didn't. You argued that there's no such thing as a real budget. Everybody in the universe argues that a budget is a way to hold the government accountable and you just basically said no it doesn't really mean anything but we both know it does. So you're not arguing that there isn't a way, you're arguing that we shouldn't. Budgets are a way and you argue the liberals should be allowed not to produce one without comment If you believed in holding governments to account you would be demanding that they put out a budget but you're not Do you mean your standards? Were you voted for these people and continue to excuse their behavior? I agree that your standards allow for the liberals to not be held to account. You said it a million times. You probably been saying it for decades now You lying. As always. You claim you didn't say what you said, you pretend that you care about accountability when you argue night and day against it for the liberals at least. Honestly it's gotten to the point where newfoundlanders make jokes about how stupid you are You don't give a crap about accountability. You never have. You care about arguing to protect your beloved liberals and that's all you do

Laughed at for amusement I thought you were still petrified of me and hiding?

Or the castration part. In most cases they are infertile for life. Many trans have commented that they wish they had not done that later on when they realize they would have liked to have the option for children

Seems pretty unbias....

Dairy quote it won't come up until the free trade talks next year. I suspect we're going to lose ground there too

covid is over.

It does seem pretty clear that The law does not expressly demand castration, but that if a court finds that denying chemical castration in the form of gender affirming drugs is Part of denying gender affirming care then they will be found guilty of coercive control and therefore child abuse, and the state can take action to require the treatment. And he's right, you're quoting the wrong law. Here's a deeper dice. Bill_Analysis_-_Analysis_of_House_Bill_25-1312-_Legal_“Protections”_For_Transgender_People.pdf The information provided by Robo wrong is misleading. It's true that the law does not specifically state that it require parents to provide surgery or chemical castration. But what it does say is that if they don't they could be guilty of child abuse and the state will take the appropriate steps which would include such gender treatments against the will of the parents. Sorry, but the lp is actually closer to the truth

Dude he did it the day after he talked to trump. This wasn't our idea. And trump wanted it stopped BECAUSE it was hurting him. And if carney didn't intend to do it, why did he cancel them DURING THE ELECTION but continue to run on the idea for the rest of the election? There's no way to spin this into a good thing. If he thought that it was wise he should have said so and run on that. He ran on 'elbows up', which he claimed included equal reciprocal tarrifs. Now we're still being hurt by trump and he has NO reason to ever take them off of us, and has said he won't and that they're permanent. Is that your plan? We just watch our automotive industry and our ohter industries wither and die with no fight?

Those were literally your words. It's not a strong man argument when I'm referencing what you specifically said. I don't think you understand what straw man actually means No you thought that we should do away with elections because they're pointless and don't hold anyone to account No, that's not what you said. And I know because I read much more than you just quoted You said they have that responsibility but it doesn't matter. You also suggested there's no way to actually have a budget. You suggested that there's no mechanism for that these days. So basically you said they have a responsibility but there's no way or reason that they should possibly be expected to fulfill it. That is what you said. Lie much? No point in answering everyone can see already.

Sure he can. I have little doubt trump can ignore or change whatever law is necessary to make it happen. In fact the president frequently flies on planes that aren't the official air force one, which is why any plane the president is on is considered air force one. If they can get it running up for a billion dollars it is the cheapest option they have. The current project to replace air force one is already billions of dollars in the whole and still requires billions more. If they replace air force one with this for a lousy billion they have a screaming deal As to what he does with it or doesn't do with it or if he accepts it or not that's still not him personally benefiting financially from a plane. Which was your original contention and it's full of shit. Why should anybody care about how much trump games the system when nobody cares when the democrats game the system? If you guys are going to cheat 24/7 you can hardly complain when other people get sick of worrying about it. If you care about this kind of crap you should have been all over the bidens. Why is this so hard for democrats to understand, if you commit crimes and condone crimes and excuse crimes, eventually the other people will decide that this is the new bar and they will stop trying to get you to change your ways and will instead just simply cheat themselves If you want people to care you have to care when it's your side. If you don't people give up worrying about it which is basically what's happened in the united states. It's probably going to come fairly soon in Canada too

I don't think you even pay attention to what you say. I doubt your basement HAS curtains. But sure, post the data you've got on how housing shortages are substantial in the rural areas. I've come to expect that level of conversation from you. Simple-minded.... That was you kiddo Yes, and that's all quite true but has nothing to do with what we're discussing. Does it. Kid i wrote variations of what i wrote there dozens of times in teh last 2 years. I"ve been 100 percent consistant. Which means if you're claiming that the person who posted that later is a copy cat, that would be you Even before PP first proposed his plan of keeping immigration tied to capacity (which was over a year ago) we were discussing immigration here. And as everyone here knows i've always said immigration is necessary - but we do NOT require immigration to be in excess of what we can support with increases in infrastructure. So what was that you were saying again Mr parrot? LOLOLOL

LOL looks like we've emotionally destabilized exflyer again, he's back to sticking us with downarrows while he cries in mommie's basement LOL He doesn't react to truth terribly well. This is your fault, you should have put a trigger warning at the beginning along with locations of a safe space and puppies for him.

Which as we all know is a blatant lie. All the provinces turned out budgets, federal governments have turned out budgets since the beginning of confederation, there's absolutely a complete meaningful mechanism by which they can be produced. Pretending that there's no way to produce a budget is not even going to trick your fellow grade two students Kid as I have told you a trillion times your stupidity is not my fault. When you say something that is childish pureile and retarded I point it out. The fact that that's most of what you say is not my fault And if someone else says something that is equally childish puerile and retarded I generally call them out But you are literally arguing that there's no meaningful mechanism to turn out a budget. Budgets are one of the primary ways that we hold governments to account and you're arguing your ass off that it's not possible for him to have one where there's no meaningful mechanism or that there's no point in having one etc This has nothing to do with me. This is you demanding that we don't hold the liberals to account If you gave one tiny itty bitty little bit of A crap about accountability you would be all over the liberals for not turning out a budget. And you can't blame that on me

Dude he's not allowed to keep it. Get your head around this simple concept. I have no idea what he's going to use it for, I have no idea how long it will take to get ready. I would guess that if he said that's what I want to fly on have it running tomorrow that they would find a way to make it airworthy tomorrow. If they can't it could just sit there until it's ready to go to his museum. But he can't keep it. So let's stop pretending otherwise And start behaving like an adult If it can fly it can be used as air force one. In fact by definition any plane that the American president is aboard is air force one. And yes of course they're doing it to stroke his ego. That is the purpose of almost every presidential or prime ministerial gift from a foreign nation to a leader that has ever been We've been through this a million times. And again you didn't care then and you expect people to care now and that's just not how it works.

No they don't. Unless you were talking about your barbie dream home What everyone figured out was that you were lying your ass off, and it took about 6 seconds I don't recall moaning about how much it cost to fix my roof? 30 grand tho, must be one hell of a big roof. I can get an entire pod of 4 townhomes reroofed by a good company for that. If it's just a regular house i'd be pissed at that price too.