CdnFox

Discounts are one thing but your claim is that they're actually losing money which they have to make up by charging regular people more. That sounds like a lie. So i asked you to provide an example of where this happened. You couldn't. THat has never happened. And again, provide an example if it has. Companies do not do deals that LOSE them money. Think about what you're claiming. It makes ZERO sense. If they can get away with charging more money for their services to customers they are going to do that ANYWAY, why in gods name would they only do it because they did a deal with someone else? "Oh we could easily charge 10 percent more to our customer base but we're not going to because .... why?" meanwhile if they get a deal with someone else for bulk purchases they make MORE money, not less. There's nothing to 'make up' by charging more to customers Again this has NEVER HAPPENED, and it wouldn't . You've been misinformed.

I assume that was this morning when she made your cereal Sorry, i meant I......... assume........ U maby Projecting ur trauma on udders i tink. You're right, the majority of mediocre trolls such as yourself DO try to critique my responses. They always wind up looking stupid. Even more so when they use internet "Baby talk" like U du LOL Sure, lots o people laugh at you ROFLMAO yeah i'm 'in the closet', nobody knows if i'm liberal or conservative around here 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Kid, do you think this is going well for you? You speak like a child, you resort to childish names and changing other people's names, and you sound like a twat, all the while insulting yourself because you don't have basic English writing skills. but as you say, we all appreciate the laugh

But they're behind the republicans in popularity right now

You change your tune about that pretty regular. and you do feel people need to be punished for 'badspeak' when it comes to trans people. Heck i just asked you if you agreed that people should have the right not to use a person's pronoun of choice if they don't want to and you couldn't. You believe people DON"T have that right. So, if not jail, you certainly believe they should be punished for not complying with others' demands.

Five years after Kamloops, the church burnings haven't stopped | National Post

Only one political party in Canada believes that. The liberals believe that taking rights away from gun owners, voters, taking away privacy rights etc increases the rights of other people somehow. The NDP believes the same. The green party believes the only way to give other people's rights is to take away people's rights and the block believes the only rights that matter are correct rights and provinces other than connection lose their rights so that could that could keep its Only conservatives actually believe that taking away someone else's right is not the way to increase their own rights. But then again you've always had challenges with counting

Nobody does that Mike. They repeat opinions you expressed in the past and give you an opportunity to clarify your position It can't be helped that you refuse to do so when offered. And certainly it is a reasonable position to assume that if someone asks you specifically to clarify your position and you don't clarify it then what they had explained their understanding of your position to be previously must be when you agree with As I said, your hypocrisy is amazing and it's of your own making.

The problem is those would actually need to be fast tracked. This one was already approved and done, so it's much easier to swoop in and grab credit

Skipped over mine again i see Pretending we didn't see it are we?

That makes zero sense whatsoever. Give me an example of that happening. Where did they see this occur? You're not talking about a discount, you're talking about a subsidy where the state pays the data center essentially. The state isn't going to sell power at a LOSS that would have to be 'made up' by the people in most cases. And the commitment and contract from the data center should be able to be leveraged to build more power supply. And as i understand it data centers mostly use closed loop water systems now, and it wouldn't impact anyone. Kind of feels like the concerns are being grossly over exaggerated

And the church burnings are still going on

And while carney stuffs his face: Food insecurity a crisis as millions of Canadians are going hungry | Toronto Sun Food insecurity in Canada has hit 'crisis' level, millions of Canadians going hungry 24% of Canadians were living in a food-insecure household last year: StatsCan

Yes..........because..............you.................behave............like.............a .................. child. What's with that crap? Are you using voice dictation with a studder or something? So your mommy just calls you 'brat', I take it? LOL sure kid Nobody says that. But you are making a good case for the concept. Uhhh sure kid, i'm forever (glows majestically) Wow, so what are you actually, about 15 or so? Or a young 20 who does a lot of drugs and has no social skills? You have a couple of other similarly aged friends here to play with What an embarrassment you must be to your folks.

LOL ahhh well that makes more sense

Harper did many things to reduce CO2 emissions and lo and behold they went down. You guys did 10 years of carbon taxing and emissions have done nothing but go up Sorry kid but the fact that you suck and that harper was great is not harper's fault entirely. It's your fault for sucking Meanwhile... Records show Carney spent more than Trudeau on luxury in-flight meals Carney spent more money on airplane food during three trips than the average family will spend on groceries in a decade,” said Franco Terrazzano, federal director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.

I don't see you saying that anywhere after I asked a questionin fact I don't see you replying to me since then so it seems that your memory may be off. I noticed that seems to happen a lot with you. Further it wouldn't be relevant, that wasn't the question i asked Let me guess, you had me on ignore for JUST that part of the reply, right? LOLOLOL Again, you can clear it up right now by simply agreeing that people should and do have the right to ignore people's requests to use specific pronouns.

Kamloops residential school 'graves' may actually be septic pipes | National Post Well. How about that. The more time passes, the more this story unravels. They now definitively ruled out a number of the grades as being from past archaeological digs, and now it turns out that these supposed graves line up with a septic system that was put in at a roundabout the same time as these children were supposedly buried. And still not a body has been found. Experts in the industry say that it is quite possible given the information that the disturbances were related to the septic system. There is still the possibility that some or all of the remaining ones in both child graves but it's looking less and less likely and there are more and more other explanations. I am certain without a doubt that whether these particular graves are actual graves or not, a lot of native children were buried at residential schools. They were also churches after all, and most of the children, the vast majority, died from tuberculosis and bodies cannot be moved safely (they remain contagious long after death). But this particular nonsense has been absolutely breathtaking. They demanded there were hundreds of bodies. THat is quickly turning out to be false, at this point it's questionable if there's ANY bodies. They demanded that all of those children were either murdered or neglected to death, there is no indication of children dying suspiciously there at all so even if there were graves they might well be natural deaths during the time of tuberculosis, which claimed tens of thousands of children across canada. They made a motion in pariament that anyone who dared disagree with the idea there were bodies there should be guilty of a crime. THe gov't and the media spent months going on about how we're all a bunch of genocidal maniacs. And now .... it all may have been over some SEWER PIPES?!?!?!

BWAAAHAHHA kid you haven't managed to be wise on this PAGE yet

And yet I'm not. He's still pulling better than the democrats as I pointed out. So one guy being unhappy doesn't really suggest that anything is over for him Yeah sorry but the aggregate is that he's pulling better than them. I suppose you thought that posting endless links would somehow cover that but it doesn't. Personally he's pulling slightly higher than the democrats On a voter intention level it's within 6% of the aggregate and considering the margins of error that's probably pretty close to being within the margins as well. Sorry to burst your bubble kid

Uhh, that's the lawful access act, it wouldn't apply to restricting travel from other countries.

Nobody ignored you and I repeated myself because you weren't listening. A fact proven by the fact that you asked me to repeat myself yet again Your own quote demonstrates that they presented the idea to the public that these were safe as any vaccine and that it was known that the risk was tiny. Both of those statements are false and they knew that at the time because they knew the testing wasn't as rigorous as a normal vaccine and they knew there was a great deal of possibility for side effects that had not been identified as product have never been used wide scale. Those are simple facts I have literally defined what I'm talking about and what I'm expecting in precise language. Stop being so dishonest. We can have a difference in opinion without you trying to break out bullcrap and lies to support your position. I am well aware you're smarter than that As I have said many times above my expectation would have been that they would be honest with people. What I am talking about is the fact that they weren't honest with people and that they frequently radically downplayed the risks while knowing that the evidence did not support that conclusion, therefore when they tell the public that it's as safe as any other vaccine they are knowingly stating something that is untrue. Therefore they are not substantially warning the public about the risks involved. Let me try this another way. If i told you That it was okay to drink and drive because while there was a slim chance it might increase your risk of an accident that increase is absolutely tiny and negligible and not significantly higher than you drinking normally, that would be dishonest woudn't it. You would not say that i gave you a substantially correct evaluation of the risks. If you then drank and drove and got into an accident, a court would likely find that i bore responsibility for not warning you about the risks This is the same. As your link pointed out, they downplayed the risk to a level that was unreasonable given their knowledge. That means the public was not adequately warned about the risk. I have been 100% clear about that So when you say I haven't provided that information previously that is absolutely dishonest of you. Knock it off. You want me to show you the quote that you provided? Are you kidding me? Are you saying you did NOT post this? Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer, issued the following statement today: "Like any medication, vaccines can cause side effects and reactions. After being vaccinated, it's common to have mild side effects, such as redness and swelling at the injection site — this is the body's natural response, as it's working to build immunity against a disease. In most instances, these effects resolve quickly and completely. However, it is also possible for someone to have a serious adverse reaction to a vaccine. " You're a fcuking liar kid. I don't mind honest debate and disagreement but now you're just lying your ass off because you're butthurt you're losing. Shame on you A coward plays the "sea lion" game, a coward claims he wasn't provided with details that were clearly provided, you are fast becoming a lying sack of shit coward. I HAVE made my position clear, I HAVE provided my own quotes to prove the point and i've pointed out the quotes which YOU NOW DENY YOU POSTED EVEN THO EVERYONE CAN SEE IT. At this point we're done with the debate, I'm just going to sit here and make fun of you and your replies for the amusement of myself and others. That was absolutely pathetic of you. The government Failed to warn the public of the risks and any significant or meaningful way and they failed to stand behind the people who got sick from their mistakes, and this is exactly what people were afraid of. Cope with it

There are similarities for sure, but i think they "won" that one primarily because while most people kind of saw it as childish they didn't see it as a lie and in fact it kind of solved a problem (you didn't have to guess if a woman you were writing to was married or not). It still was a term for a woman who was married (but now also one who wasn't just like Mr). So it got normalized for practical reasons if nothing else. Tho i recall a few women testily demanding "it's MISSUS" as well as a few equally mad ones saying "It's MIZ!!", and it's like "Ok, have a meeting and work this out between you please" But you'll notice that the 'hyphenated name" had far far less success. A lot of women and women's rights people really wanted married people to use hyphenated names for the very same reason as 'ms'. And that got a LITTLE traction and you still see it ONCE in a while but a lot of men and a fair number of women thought that was downplaying marriage. I think you'll find the pronoun thing is going to go the same way. It doesn't solve any problems, it makes things messy, it's a lie to begin with and the proponents seem to want to use it as a springboard to demand other rights that people aren't ok with. So they'll probably get Mr's being called Ms's, that's not too onerous. But they're not getting traction with they them and ze zir and honestly if they keep demanding rights to go into the opposite sex's communal change showers then i think there will be backlash on the whole thing. I notice you didn't clarify your position previously as i mentioned, thanks for confirming that i was correct Oh? Can you hear them from where you are?

I have absolutely no doubt that's what the left thinks like And the rules are ones you just made up this second to support your argument

Dude i did that already multiple times above!!! What the hell, all of a sudden you're arguing like a liberal?!?! In the link you provided they proposed that the risk of the new covid vaccine was the same as any regular vaccine. They knew at the time that was not accurate, the mNRA vaccines were a new technology with many untested elements and they were NOT known to be as safe as existing vaccines. At the time they knew there could be many unknown risks or effects And later we would see that such concerns were correct. while you can argue they were necessary if you like you cannot argue they're as safe as regular vaccines And i have pointed all this out previously FURTHER in public the same politicians and medical officer downplayed the risks even more as i noted in my link You cannot reasonably argue that the gov't substantially disclosed the risk of the vaccine AT ALL. they claimed with surety that it was as safe as any vaccine while knowing that the data to date did not allow for that conclusion.

He did. In other words they realized they were wrong to destroy the economy based on the lie of the 'climate crisis' and realized that if they didn't throw their previous 'morals' in the garbage can their cash cow might die. "late to the game" indeed. There's nothing but evidence to support it. Be specific, what specific thing did carney do that made the project move forward that wasn't already happening or wouldn't have happened? What specific road block did he remove? Funding? regulation? Nope. nothing. Higher than harper for the youth for sure, and it doesn't account for the bankruptcies, the flight of investment money that's still going on, the worsening trade deficit minus gold, or anything else. He has done absolutely nothing to fast track it in the slightest. It was already green lit and moving forward entirely on it's own and absolutely nothing is happening any faster. All he did was take credit. All carney is is a snake oil peddler who preys on the weak minded such as yourself, crabbing credit he doesn't deserve for things he didn't do from financial crisis to fake military spending to 'greenlighting' projects that were already green lit. Meanwhile the real world results are horrible and no better than when trudeau was around. And everything carney announces will arrive in just a few short decades, long after he's gone. honest! we promise! What a joke,