CdnFox

Says the guy who is desperately trying to argue for the suppression of media freedom. So anyone who questions the CBC is basically a 359-year-old roman catholic. That makes a lot of sense The only people to blame here are the media freaks and the established media who lost their crap because rebel media did something perfectly legal that any of them could have done but didn't. That is the only blame to be had here. "Hey guys, everyone has to follow these rules." "We followed the rules" "WHAT!!! HOW DAAAAARRE YOU FOLLOW THE RULES!?!?!?!!? " Pathetic

It does. And the section I specifically mentioned to you from the case I quoted it specifically addressed advertising as well as advocacy work said it clear as a bell. Mind you that was more than 45 seconds ago so you've probably forgotten

Why are you wrecking the planet like that? Here’s how many times you need to reuse your reusable grocery bags | CNN

Not really very funny i guess. Kinda sad.

Preferably one where their daughter will make a mint if she's found guilty

So not none. So you admit that you Were wrong and that they do do journalism even if they do do other things as well. The judge literally agreed they're journalists producing their own content, but not enough. Frankly the number really isn't that much of a concern. They don't consider it journalism or original content if your commenting on somebody else's content even if you do add your own content and facts and figures and frankly that is a large part of what they do and I don't know that I wouldn't call it journalism per se. I suppose if someone was trying to split a hair that would be commentary but that still seems like journalism to me, whatever. But at the end of the day they still produce original content, and they are still journalists. So now that we've demonstrated by your own admission you were wrong, their presence at the event was obviously as journalists. I mean they can't be there to comment on articles, those havent' been written yet. They were there to conduct interviews and ask questions and do their job as journalists. And that was a whole lot of twisting and turning to yet again get us back to the beginning. Whether you like it or not they are journalists, their outlet does produce original content, they were there as journalists and the courts have twice ordered that they must be allowed to attend. So despite how you may feel about it they did nothing wrong and they should have been accommodated. But that's the point! I didn't need to tell you. It's obvious that you felt I was winning when you started running all over the forum crying like a baby The whole point is I obviously don't need to tell you But I love that you took the time to be wrong again after having been wrong the first time because apparently being stupid once isn't enough for you, and also that you have just demonstrated to the entire forum that you are so obsessed with me that you keep a folder of quotes going back god knows how far just so you can try and pull them out when you're losing an argument I mean I think the whole chasing me around the forum thing was enough but that certainly does punctuate the point LOLOL ! I don't know why you're like this But I do enjoy it. You keep going little guy!

No felons are people who have committed felonies. We don't have felonies in Canada. Felonious crimes are in the states which is where some people get the term from mistakenly. Like I said, inconsequential but I do like to improve your education here and there where I can, obviously I can't fix all of it but if you clean up a mess where you see it then that's at least one small part of the earth that's not messy Probably not, I would imagine they would be able to get a discharge within about 2 years. Traditionally that has been more than enough to be able to get into the states and is definitely good enough for everywhere else. Of course with the way things are going god knows of any of us will be able to get into the states in 2 years. I mean seriously, this is Canada. If you were hoping to see long-term severe penalties for criminal behavior I'm afraid you are living in the wrong country Meanwhile he will be hailed as a hero by the various groups that believe in that sort of thing and that will enable him to raise large amounts of money or his own living standard, it wouldn't surprise me to see a book, and speaking engagements should be in high demand. That'll probably fetch him 15 grand per event. You won't be suffering as a result of his punishment. That's one of the problems with virtually all of the protesters out there, it's actually money for them to get arrested

Nope The judge said they did some. They said that they didn't do enough as a organization to qualify for the grant but they did say they did so. Go take a look at the reading We both know you're wrong. The moment you chase me around like a puppy trying to attack me on every other thread because your buthurt that you're losing again you're basically skywriting that you're wrong and your fewwings are huwt The journalist, judges have ruled that they are journalists specifically for this event. It's really end of story. And if I was wrong you wouldn't be crying all over the forum like you just soiled your diapers

Given the source I would say "go for lobotomy". He did and he's never looked back. Or up.

Literally the only kind of person qualified to in your case.

LOLOLOL oh my god, you're losing on our other forum so you're stalking me around and trying to blame my post count for your stupidity AGAIN!!! LOL And yes that was the first time someone said something like that But i'm so happy to see you've got a new friend for your "cdnfox made me cry" Support group LOL

^loser lost

So they're journalists. Working for a news organization that produces original news content related in this case to politics. Sigh, Yeah. I know. I've said that. 🙄🙄 That's not what the judge ruled. The judge ruled they don't produce enough original news to be qualified for the tax credit. Sorry kiddo. The people who went there were journalists and twice the judges ruled they had to be included. You can twist and turn and have your hissy fits but at the end of the day

From a link previously given. I'm sorry, I forgot about you 30 second attention span. You probably forgot by the time you got to the end of the post.

You realize those felons will probably make a considerably better living than you do from the fame and prestige of that conviction right? LOL Oh and Canada doesn't have felons. Insignificant point but i do like to bump up your education when i can.

You think that's funny but that's actually the case in A couple states in the US. If someone breaks into your home and claims they're a renter you cannot kick them out without due process and having a judge from you remove them. Even though they fully admit that they entered your house illegally and we're not renting, the cops cannot remove them from your home without due process. This is literally how some people think the world is supposed to work

Then they will go out of business. What's your problem You mean a journalist 🙄 How much is 100 - 50?

Well, i mean if they COMPLETELY lost faith it would be an epic disaster the likes of which we've never seen for sure. But like i say the fundimentals are still there. They may get badly beaten up and i think a recession is pretty much unavoidable at this point or at least severe stagflation but i don't think there's much chance of an actual collapse.

So now he's not a journalist because..... you don't like how he looks? You don't like the idea of making Alberta debt free again? What exactly about this picture proves that he is not a journalist? Anybody else want to take a guess of this? Mike hardener says this person isn't a legitimate journalist because of this picture, anyone care to comment on why this person can't possibly be a journalist? No actually you can't. A person can be both. And organization can be both. And this is what was tested in court People have made your argument twice regarding this specific thing in court and both times the judge said no. It's amazing how you left these throw the courts right out the window the moment they say something you don't like

They did. That is why they overruled the decision to bar them. From the exact venue specifically that we're talking about now. Twice This isn't going to be one of those cases where you have a meltdown and try and reinvent a word so that it's meaning is twisted enough that you can shoot horn it in is it? The courts have ruled twice and they did so on these specifically specific circumstances from this specific commission Rebel news journalists must be allowed even if rebel news itself engages in political activism or advertising as was specifically mentioned in the previous cases. There is no room for discussion here, this has been decided two times by different judges in different court cases. They absolutely are the same thing and both were dressed in the previous quotes from the court cases so you now owe me $20

CBC corrects mistake on indigenous residential school graves Now you go try and find a smarter AI. I suppose that's easier than becoming intelligent yourself

We've seen hundreds of very similar things from many of the other left-leading media sources including CBC. Just the other day I heard a CBC reporter ask "you're doing terribly in the polls and people don't seem to trust you, why is that?' That's exactly the same sort of thing. But you, who will go on ad nauseam about how other people won't acknowledge basic points will not acknowledge that basic point

Sure, but that distrust is based largely on not knowing what trump is going to do next. The fundamentals are still there, America isn't going broke even if it suffers an economic downturn. And considering our currency is so dependent on America's any lack of faith in America's currency is going to reflect on ours before long. It's not like we can separate our economy from the united states. So if faith goes down for the American economy it is going to happen for us as well. That's just how the world works. And if the Americans are having to sell bonds at 4%, we're not going to get away with being much lower than that. And as I said that will be triply true if carney gets in and there is a sense that the oil production won't be going up

That won't last long though. Investors are not going to put their money in Canadian dollars for the long run if the US will pay twice as much. You're talking about a very short-term fluctuation But the fundamentals are still solid and investors are going to realize that over time. Long term you are not going to get people investing heavily in Canadian dollars if the Americans are paying twice the rate. That's just absolute Bare Bones Common Sense. That is a billion times true if we get a Kearney government that is obviously anti oil because oil is the only thing that really keeps us afloat as far as a currency goes. Other than in the moment, if the Americans have to jack their rates we are going to wind up having to come close to them at the very least which will work to put the brakes on our economy and considering the borrowing we're looking at doing it will probably severely hurt future economies as well

No, that's how it works if you're private. That is not how it works if you're public. If you are a public news organization you really do have to make sure that your coverage is even in balanced and that is not the case with the CBC In your opinion but other people absolutely think those questions need to be asked. For example the question of why the government did nothing when 200 churches, 200 mind you, we're burnt to the ground with virtually no investigation or any action on the federal part. That's entirely valid even if perhaps you aren't interested just because you don't believe in having an imaginary friend that doles out colored eggs at this time of year for reasons that have never been entirely clear to me. I also think that the question about whether or not there are two genders after carney is a silly one but nobody said so when other news outlets asked that of Poilievre just last month. Journalism isn't just about the masses. Journalism is not supposed to be only questions that the group at large have approved. Journalists are supposed to ask all the questions, and that's why you have more than one journalistic organ ization.