Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    41,247
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    351

Everything posted by CdnFox

  1. Well there you go Like most conversations this one appears to have been over your head. It's understandable, no pictures after all
  2. And yet I've been schooling you all along. It can be a natural process but the simple fact of the matter is many times it is not a natural process. It is an active effort to create propaganda. That is the case here. There's no natural evolution of that word. You're making excuses for Bad actors. "Oh but both sides do it" , especially after claiming you weren't going to address the motives of the actors here, is a debating tactic designed to deflect rather than to address the issue, unless you're going to claim that it's normal and nothing is wrong with it. It doesn't matter who's doing it, it's still bad. But in this particular case we're talking about a specific circumstance and a specific group of people. And the word has been hijacked to try and make an emotional appeal for propaganda purposes. It is beyond dishonest, there was never any attempt to wipe out first nations culture by sending the kids to school.
  3. LOL well the fact is that for now the libs will give him a pass and blame trump. Despite the fact most of our problems predate trump and he was hired specifically to deal with trump. He's currently like the teflon don, nothing sticks no matter how bad his crimes are. It was like that for trudeau in his first couple of years as well. I think this will be a little deeper and drag on a little longer than the liberals are hoping, just as we saw with inflation. Sooner or later people will realize this guy not only hasn't got the skill to solve the problem he hasn't got the inclination to. He's too busy spending three or $4,000 a meal for airline food At that point they'll turn and look to other things but the reality is the damage will be done
  4. It will while you're napping. I won't have to put up with your childish nonsense for that entire time 😂😂😂😂 I'll try shipping you off to your grandparents for a few weeks after that if I need more of a break
  5. Most of that is only half true at best. He's developing two facilities one in Canada and one in america. The American one was not as big as you say it is and both of them will have their own independent power generation if they proceed. In other words they won't use a single scrap of the existing grids power supply. This is a perfect example of the conspiracy theory type misinformation the causes people to freak out about these kinds of things and it's just simply not justified. Not that I like Kevin O'Leary, I think he's a bit of a twat. But the data centers are not going to significantly negatively impact the communities that they're put in. And we don't see the people in Alberta freaking out about it. It's not that there are no valid concerns, it's just that the concerns that are there are so grossly overblown that it's ridiculous.
  6. awww muffin go have your cookie and your nap, you'll feel better .
  7. Again you misunderstand. The vast majority of this issue these days is not the issue itself but the money and power that comes with keeping the issue alive and emotionally charged. It was never any genocide, there was never even an attempt. Again the records are pretty crystal clear that the first nations opportunities for their children. The challenge was in the execution and there is much to complain about but it's: Into a near religion. Which is why even this very weak arguments were being made in the senate that anyone who dares question this should be labeled a residential school denier and subject to jail time. I kid you not. They want it to be hate speech
  8. Cultural genocide is a propagandist term invented by those who wished to make a situation sound more dire and horrible than it actually was. The term has no basis in reality, it is yet another example of the left Co-opting language to make an emotional appeal. It is childish.
  9. Ur behaving like a child ................again. You really just don't get it do you. Sadly for you I'm making perfect sense to every other adults on the forum. It's very common for children such as yourself to mistakenly believe that adults "Just don't understand them!! Snif!!" But kid we've seen it all before.
  10. Oh it's beyond juvenile, it's outright childish. I don't know why you do it. It appears to be some species of emotional response, kind of like a defense mechanism on your part. But yeah it is definitely not a good look. Ahhh projection The final refuge of all lefties and the emotionally stunted No, but somehow i suspect you'd still manage to be wrong, You write like a child, you talk like a child, he behave like a child, you think like a child. So.... yeah If u tink u r getting any respect by..........behaving.....................like dat ur cray cray LOLOL ( you so leet!)
  11. The scoops happened because the people of the day felt the first nations couldn't care for their children in those cases. And they were right. The first nations have not done a very good job of managing their own communities. I'm the first to admit that removing the children and putting them in better homes was not the correct answer Even if it seemed expedient. But it certainly wasn't an attempt at genocide. And the schools in the 60's and late 70's weren't bad places In fact trudeau ( the first one) was still building more of them. And by that time in history, the church was no longer in charge. That happened in 1969 officially, and even before then, the churches had been largely pushed aside, and the government had full scrutiny and control over the facilities. And while there were individual abuses the same as there is in the school system today the vast majority of the problems and abuse have been brought to a halt No that is an extremely common popular refrain that the left uses today. But slavery was one of the irritants, the real issue was self-determination. Who gets to make the laws and who has to respect the laws. I will remind you that even after the war a number of slave owning states that did not participate in the conflict kept their slaves for the better part of a decade afterwards. The southern states believed that the states should have equal power under confederation and this was in fact a major issue when confederation took place and these states had received assurances that they wouldn't suddenly become the holden to a central authority. Now that Central Authority wanted control. One of the largest areas where that manifested itself was in regards to slaves but the war was not about slavery. The war was about control Biden was a racist. Obama was a horrible racist. None of that's relevant The problem is not that history shouldn't be taught, the problem is people like you seem to enjoy rewriting history to fit a current narrative. " America was built on slavery!" No, it wasn't, less than 5 percent of people owned slaves and they only had a major impact in the south's agricultural success. That's not nothing, but they sure as hell didn't build america. Etc etc. VOTER ID IS JIM CROW!!!!! MIT ROMNEY WILL PUT YOU ALL BACK IN CHAINS!!! IF I HAD A SON HE"D LOOK LIKE TRAVON MARTIN!" But you were fine with that? Can only think of republican examples? LOL it's not that i disagree with your statement it's just that you're so stunningly one sided and bias that it's hard to take you seriously. The challenge is that there will always be people who grab these issues and turn them into a career opportunity. And there will always be those who enjoy being professionally offended on behalf of someone else. I mean this kind of crap goes back to the crusades Just don't buy into it. The first nations were definitely mishandled and there were elements about the residential school system that Were bad. But it was not genocide, nor was it the horror show that many first nations now like to try and present. It wasn't the mass slaughter of innocent children. Wasn't inflicted upon the first nations, it literally was out there request. So if you want to look at the bad things and have an honest discussion about them, sure. Honestly the medical experiments are still in my mind the most absolutely insane and shocking thing about the whole program and yet it's the thing that never gets talked about, but whatever. We can discuss what happened But that's not what that side wants to do. They want to attribute malice where malice is non-existent. They want to be victims we're victimhood isn't appropriate. And they want that victimization to last for at least another 100 years or more.
  12. Ahhh... so you're saying your bipolar then So two weeks before she admitted she'd lied under oath. So you admit she committed a crime. Confessing to the crime doesn't mean you didn't commit a crime. They just randomly funded her out of the blue without even knowing where to send the money She already admitted to lying. So really it's just a matter of determining how much. Good luck with that. Bet trump gets to pick the venue the way they did with his trial. Not only is lt likely to go somewhere, even if it doesn't he'll break her with legal fees. punishment by process You think he wasn't paying attention when the dems did all this to him?
  13. I get that you feel the need to lie and distract, given the fact you basically just made yourself look like the worlds biggest dung ball. But nothing changes the fact that even if canada stopped ALL it's extracting and burning together it would make no difference. The world would be less than a hundredth of a degree cooler even by the end of the century. Whereas if we adapt it will cost less than the carbon tax and be hugely successful and even beneficial to us. the "Climate Crisis' is a hoax. You and your losers are exposed.
  14. Interesting to watch but I think it's likely grandstanding
  15. We saw the same thing with brexit. When discussion gets out there these things have a horrible habit of taking on a life of their own. It has to be taken seriously. That is 100 percent even more true if this referendum proceeds to the next referendum. But honestly i think one of the things that may wind up driving this is people's reaction. When it was quebec everyone back east was "oh we love quebec we don't want to see them leave they have legit concerns that need to be addressed", but with alberta its "you whiny brats should be thankful we don't milk you dry, you have NO valid complaints." That kind of gets under their skin.
  16. I have never heard anybody anywhere tout the rules as a simple majority. Well many numbers have been bandied about it seems to be universally accepted that it's got to be clear. In fact the legislation that would govern it is literally The Clarity Act
  17. My assertion has remained the same since the very beginning and remains the same now. There hasn't been even the tiniest tiniest bit of change or variation. The government did not substantially warn people about the risks in any meaningful way. They went on to fail to stand behind people who were hurt taking the vaccine they demanded people take Completely simple. Easily verified. That's it. Now let's recap your argument:
  18. well. the other day Robosmith said it was Thursday according to his calendar. I looked it up.... it was indeed Thursday! So far that's one
  19. That's not a bottom line, that's an irrelevant fact that doesn't make a single bit of difference to what I just posted If every single scrap of emissions in Canada today stopped tomorrow it would make no difference. That's the science and we're spending close to 15 billion dollars a year directly I'm probably another 30 to 50 billion a year indirectly through associated lost revenues to try and achieve that Or we could spend $5 billion a year and with a little bit of proactive work reduce that substantially and actually resolve the issue Now I know mathing is hard for you. But it turns out that 5 billion is way less than 15 to 65 billion. and it actually achieves something And once again you literally begged for me to make you look like a complete twat. Maybe next time do your homework first
  20. @BeaverFever knows he's full of shit. Our economy is not struggling to grow, it has failed. And when you look at the GDP per capita our economy is shrinking in relation to our population. We're doing terribly and you cannot blame it on trump because this problem started at least a full two years ago and carney was a trusted advisor to the liberals at that time This reeks of the Trudeau liberal era all over again. Oh it's not a REAAAAAAALL recession.. it's a VIBEcession!!!! Yeah!" remember that? Remember when inflation was 'transient"? Now it's all "we're the most affordable we've been in decades" and "it's not a REAAAAAALL recession again".
  21. Nope. OECD predicts Canadian economy will avoid recession, but will see flat growth in 2025 Carney gets a little help from his international banking friends | National Post Carney rallied everybody and did all kinds of speeches saying we're doing great, no recession, we're the strongest positioned to do well if we do the right things So the liar here would be you But most agree it's a recession. And if you read that another articles what you'll find is they agree it's a recession but they're not so sure it's a really bad recession. They say there's a chance we could bounce back a little bit next quarter. If we don't then they'll admit it's a really bad recession But the reality is many economists have been saying we are in a recession for the last year and a half due to the reduced GDP per capita ratio And when that was widely commented on the liberal said "But we're not in a technical recession technically" Well now we are in a technical recession technically and our GDP per capita is still in the tank. Your liberals are doing horribly. Canada is suffering badly at a time when other countries are doing quite well. Moreover this mess started before trump showed up. You're choosing your ideology over your fellow Canadians because you don't care if people suffer as long as you're beloved liberals don't look bad
  22. So they all agree the economy stalled And you found some propaganda That tries to argue that somehow this is a good thing . Well there you go. Our economy is the shit*, our government is the shit*
  23. Oh? It isn't? we DID get large amounts of new gear? What gear did we actually get that wasn't already scheduled for delivery? what new gear was delivered? new tanks? new planes? new boats? New rucksacks so that we don't have to borrow from some soldiers to cover other soldiers? New firearms perhaps? New AA systems? You're a lying sack of shit
×
×
  • Create New...