CdnFox

LOL no, but i'm sure any that were around attempted to exploit it for political points, same as today

But isn't this how it always is with the left? They never want to deal with points, they just change language to suit their needs Bribery that they like is funding. Social policy they don't like is genocide. People they don't like are racist and Hitler. And so on and so on If they want something to look good they just change the language. It wasn't rape, it was Procreative activity with suboptimal consent. No different here. They don't have to debate the point if they change the language so it sounds like nothing bad happened

Notice how you still can't come up with a rebuttal or intelligent counterpoint?

I see you're dreaming about PP's penis again... you get SO weird when you lose an argument

Nobody. They had boats before. Did you think they swam across the ocean? Actually The newcomers figured that out pretty quickly. But they allowed the first nations to come trade with them so the first nations did most of the gathering. But the first nations had never gathered such pelts prior to this in any kind of number. It was literally europeans the top the first nations to go hunting for beaver pelts and bison The first nations were largely saved by efforts of the leader of the Hudson's Bay Company who spent a personal fortune trying desperately to keep his many of them alive as possible. And it wasn't the Europeans that brought that illness to North America as it turns out. And sure, the first nations help fight off the Americans. Good job too considering the Americans treat their first nations a hell of a lot worse than we do But the vast majority of the land was still empty. Sorry to burst your bubble but there was almost nobody here . About 200,000 people for a land mass that's still the second largest nation on earth. That's basically statistically empty

Ummm... your own link says that the zero population growth actually has growth And carney has said high immigration is coming back. " Liberal leader Mark Carney has proposed a series of reforms aimed at controlling population growth by placing new limits on immigration levels. These suggestions include capping temporary residents to 5% of the population by 2027 and setting permanent resident (PR) admissions to 1% of the population annually—approximately 400,000 newcomers per year.:" So 400,000 new permanents a year, allow the temporary to grow to 2 million which is double what we had under trudeau and no restrictions on refugees. That is STILL very close to what it was under trudeau, higher than most years except the last one or two and definitelly MUCH higher than our increase in homes or medical services. Sooooo yeah. You were wrong on that one.

Yeah, i'll give you that one. That was funny

On a per capita basis they're still behind Look at any of the countries I mentioned and look at their investment in clean energy over the last 10 years and look at china's. Even if you look over the last five years per capita everyone else is pulling ahead. In fact in 2024 china still put more money into global carbon energy than it did renewables and that even includes electric cars and batteries and such which have nothing to do with energy production. Sadly you can't think it all it would seem. You got it wrong the first time, then you doubled down and got it wrong the second time. Wrong twice think never?

There would be if the liberals took away their anti-pipeline law. Which they have not. Ambridge came out and said so. And if they said so you can bet others would be looking at it as well. So your whole point is the liberals blocked any Pipelines and your proof that this is okay is that now that the pipelines are blocked nobody is proposing any Pipelines It's a shame when parents drop their children so often, i hope you sued them for it.

LOL you mean the part where it said they would put forward proposals if there were legislative changes for it? Which is precisely what I said previously? I pointed out why the latest bill doesn't actually change anything in Alberta? roflmao!!!!!!!!!!!! You got proven wrong again and now you're having another hissy fit HAAHAAHAHA!!! God you're just precious aren't you enbridge is being quite clear and it's volumes that they would say even this much considering normally these guys keep their mouths shut for fear of upsetting the government If the legislation changed, they would put forward a proposal You were wrong, I was right. I'm sure everyone is shocked

They're pretty clear about what it means. They said there would have to be substantial legislative changes federally and provincially. Which means for the feds no more tanker band and no more anti pipeline bill. BC would have to make a change or two as well but we're talking about the feds right at the moment. Based on your level of freak out you know that what I'm saying is true and it upsets you. I can't really help that, the truth is what it is What are you even talking about? I realize it's Friday so technically you're not violating our deal by drinking this early but still. What they're saying is they would love to relook at that project. And they love to put a proposal forward but it cost a lot of money to redo a proposal from scratch. And they're not interested in spending that money while there are rules in place that would make it impossible And that's what every other company is thinking as well. There's no point in Showing any interest while the rules are in place that would prevent it from happening Pretty cut and dry. Get rid of the rules that prevent it from happening and they will put projects forward. If you don't they can't Oh you are in full meltdown mode aren't you Haven't seen this for a few weeks, always entertaining You're such a fragile little creature, it's so easy to push you buttons

Ahem. Enbridge says it would pitch new Alberta-B. C. pipeline only under right conditions - Business in Vancouver ROFLMAO!!!! You never ever miss a chance to look like an uninformed twat do you LOL Why don't you actually read something before you say stuff like that? Sure, the conservatives voted to make it easier but the liberals have not removed the underlying laws which make it hard. The only way it gets easier is if the liberals declare an area to be a special economic zone. Well they haven't done that for Alberta, the old rules are still in place so development can't happen. But I appreciate you taking the time to demonstrate how uneducated you are on the subject yet again

LOL no kid, i usually have a point in each of my posts, whereas you can't make one to save your life Imagine being so stupid you criticize someone for making insult only posts in an insult only post LOL!! Well... the rest of us have to imagine anyway, you don't Are you having another little hissy shit meltdown? Kind of looks that way

They're not even close. Google ai: In Canada, approximately 66% of the electricity generated comes from renewable sources. n 2024, Germany achieved a significant milestone by generating 62.7% of its electricity from renewable sources. In 2024, renewable sources generated 50.8% of the UK's electricity, marking a new record and the first time renewables have surpassed 50% of the total. In 2024, renewable energy sources accounted for approximately 32.33% of China's total electricity generation China Isn't leading the way at all. In fact they're behind a lot of countries. They're ahead of the US on paper but remember that the US buys a lot of its power from canada so while their own generation is actually not all that renewable their actual power consumption comes from even higher percentage of Renewables than china You should really take a few minutes to look this stuff up before you actually post. China is actually way behind the pack when it comes to renewable energy. Worse, a higher percentage of its non-renewable energy is from very carbon heavy sources like coal-fired plants, whereas canada for example uses considerably more natural gas and nuclear power, which reduce emissions tremendously, especially nuclear which produces no emissions. I know you guys on the left love to worship china but they're really not doing that great. And there is nothing emerging about their market or economy, they didn't modern economy since the seventies

The answer is obvious, and the list is long. Housing prices, food prices, the economy, our international standing, our trade with the US and allies, our GDP per capita, our health system, Our competitiveness, the labor market, etc etc It's quite easy to see what's broken. And it's quite easy to see who broke it, justin Trudeau and his liberals absolutely trashed this country. Unfortunately mark carney managed to lie his way into having people believe that he would fix it, but as we are already seeing it's just the same old liberals with no actual solutions. He knows what needs to happen because he stole it from poilievre who correctly identified the problems, but he doesn't actually know how to implement the solutions effectively so things aren't getting better. And in fact they'll probably be worse by the end of the year. And worse again by the end of the next year. Of course, depending how badly things go from with trump from here on out he may not survive past spring. He's promised a budget this fall which is bound to be absolutely horrible, and he'll have to do a new budget in the spring which is bound to be absolutely horrible and by then the other parties will be in a position to seriously consider bringing him down. At that point he's just going to be living on borrowed time

Sigh. Are you having weird fantasies about smaking other men again? LOL Kid, your only purpose here is for us to point and laugh at you, your opinion doesn't actually mean anything When you can afford to move out on your own and leave your basement then we can talk

Ohh... i see what you did there! You took something i said about you and pretended it referred to ME! HAHAHAHA! Gosh that's just so witty and intelligent For a grade 5 pupil anyway that's all you've got left kid? LOL well In fairness I think it's about what we've all come to expect from you You have the wit have a grade schooler, and unfortunately you're intelligence doesn't Even reach that point But we appreciate you being here to laugh at As previously noted in detail the last election wasn't exactly fair. "stolen" Is the term you and your friends make up because you think it makes us sound more like trump supporters or something childish, but it is demonstrably not fair. Sorry if that leaves you feeling a little buthurt

Look who's playing stupid. OH! You're not playing..... sorry about that Only your side has used the term "stolen election" And yes, i realize you wouldn't recognize actual debate if you saw it, which says a lot about you. So i have to ask, was "dumb and angry" the look you were going for? Asking for a friend.

What's worse is we didn't actually get a trade deal done. Appease the bully and get a deal only makes sense if you get a deal. Our tariffs are still in force and doing severe damage to our economy. You have to be 15 different kinds of stupid to think this was any kind of a good business deal even before you take into account the fact that as you say it could change tomorrow. No matter what happens right now we still have NAFTA to renegotiate next year, they've said they won't bump that forward. Anything agreed on today could be gone when that happens

And your point was a dishonest when that's already been answered, and he's mocking you as a result. Seriously, what kind of losers have you been hanging out with that you think that this level of debate that you're showing is somehow anything more than juvenile?

Actually that's not quite true. Enbridge has come forward and said they would love to present a plan, but the current laws and regulations make it impossible. They even advise what would need to change. So in fact there is a willing private partner in this that would love to move forward but they can't because the current regulation makes it cost prohibitive or impossible. At the moment the left argument is that we have passed enough laws and regulations to make it impossible to present a plan, and therefore the fact that there is no plan is proof that nobody wants to. You don't need me to explain why that logic is faulty I'm sure.

uhhh yeahhhhh..... sure kiddo..... that's what it is..... Your mother really needs to hide the nyquil better ,

ummm..... nobody said it did say that in the bill. He's talking ABOUT the bill and paraphrasing the liberals response to energy development in Canada...... holy brain damage batman! Did you actually think he was quoting the bill? You need to up your meds kiddo.

Ahhh yes, Duffygate. That scandal where the conservatives got caught forcing someone to give back taxpayers their money because they felt that it had been taken unfairly. We need a hell of a lot more scandals like that

No Dumbass it was bill c69. Like.... i know that it's hard to find time to read the papers when there's just so many good comic books out there that you're following but surely to god you know at least THAT much?