Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    27,647
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    287

Everything posted by CdnFox

  1. Well we both know I didn't but it's on par with your childishness that you would try and quote me out of context and pretend i did LOL how sad is that?
  2. That was the position you were supporting. So like it or not you're still wrong You're wrong about just about everything. The initial claim was that everything that happens now will be musk and trump's fault. My point was is that they just got in so anything that would have happened this year would have been Biden's fault not trump or musks. So yeah. You're still wrong. What you did is try and change the tune later on after jumping in part way through and I'm sorry but that's just not how it works If a plane goes down today and it's a government's fault it would be by default not trump
  3. You and your friends literally support sentencing lightly You supported a program which bought drugs to give to illegal drug peddlers and gangs to be sold back to our high school children under the guise of safe supply so that you and your friends could virtue signal even though it meant more death and more destruction. In other words you were perfectly fine with no penalties and more death as long as it matched your echo chamber talking points I'll take PoilievreS approach any day. Whatever is flaws may be they're nowhere near as bad as you're morally bankrupt death planning
  4. There's no back pedal here. You claim trump will be responsible for all these deaths and he wasn't even around when these people were hired It's just so on brand for you to be utterly wrong and blame someone else for your own personal stupidity
  5. It was that so high for a reason and it failed and the second one also failed and no it was not designed to fail And then all the other provinces that have brought referendums it has failed. Those who support the lunacy always come up with reasons why it's failed and how it's not the fault of PR that it's failed. PR is a horrible system. It takes an already weak system, democracy, and weakens it further. PR is Governance by committee. It prioritizes showboating and special interest groups and it fractures nations more than anything. There needs to be a government with a clear mandate. That's when countries work best. Sure, in our current situation we frequently see minority governments but we also can give majorities to those parties we feel deserve it. The more you get into proportional representation the farther away you get from the idea of one person representing one area and being held to account. The party becomes more and more in charge and the politician becomes less and less accountable It's just not a good system. If you want more representation by the 'non winning' parties there are much better ways to do it.
  6. Well of course we don't know yet, we haven't heard his demands. But interestingly I think it will be made of the greater of one of two factors. There is what he wants to get, and then possibly what he thinks he can get in excess of what he wants to get if he pushes hard enough. He will go for whichever of those two numbers is the higher No, I think he wants control and I think he wants a larger market. I think he also wants to drive manufacturing jobs specifically back to the united states. I think part of this whole process is sending a clear message to American businesses as well as foreign businesses that if you're not making your product in America you never know when a trade more may wipe out your business. But we'll see what the end looks like. My guess is the sticking points will be more access to Canadian markets for telecommunications, banking, dairy and poultry, and some of the other restricted areas
  7. most of the deis Absolutely 0% of them under trump So either way you're wrong
  8. The NDP and the liberals are the dictators and supporters
  9. I quoted it and addressed specific points in it. Firstly I pointed out that you can't even define some of the terms, and then you proved me right by not being able to define the terms or your supposed point . Kid everybody can see you. Everybody can see that you are unable to make the most simple Arguments or provide the most simple definitions. You are looking like a m0ron to literally everybody. Either address the points or admit that you can't and move on. I'm actually becoming embarrassed on your behalf just watching you flounder through this like Urkel fighting Hulk Hogan
  10. Oh look. Rather than make a point Michael simply jumps in to tell someone else to ignore facts and truth if they find them disturbing. Quelle suprise
  11. That's true, provided what I think is going on is actually the truth. Sorry kid but everybody can see the truth here. I don't have to go back and change what I said or explain what I said or pretend I never said it in order to try and eak out a point now. As I have said on this board about a trillion times, if you have to lie to make your point you probably didn't have a very good point. And you didn't have a very good point
  12. Proportional models do not add transparency or accountability of government in fact they obscure it. Every province that is taken a good solid look at changing to a proportional or similar model has voted against it. The only people that truly believe in it are losers on the fringe who feel their fringe party would have more power if we ruled the government by committee instead of majority. First pass the post is by no means perfect but it is the best model available to us at this time by a fair amount. It's like the old saying goes, democracy is a terrible way to govern a people, it's so redeeming value being that it's better than all the other ways we've ever tried
  13. Sure does. No it doesn't TARD! LOL! We can always tell you know you're wrong when you have to go all caps like that Nope. Watch. I bet he doesn't even get charged If trump does anything you say he's broken the law. If trump does nothing you say he's broken the law So honestly i just don't think about it any more. According to you his very existence seems to break the law. Remember when you said he lead an insurrection and wasn't allowed to be on ballots? And you were wrong? And I was right? According to the supreme court? That's one example of many.
  14. If there is that would actually be Biden's fault. All of the air traffic people would have been hired under his term. You would literally be proving trump and musk right. You'll have to wait a couple years for it to be trump's fault
  15. No, carney is your personal Only Hope for keeping your beloved liberal party in power after they've destroyed Canada for 10 years running. He is no hope whatsoever with regards to trump. He has no experience in politics, he has no experience with government negotiations with other governments, he doesn't even truly understand how our government system works. He's never been a part of it. He's not even a businessman. He's a banker. If dealing with trump involved getting a really good deal on a mortgage then he would be perfect. He would be an unmitigated disaster for Canada brought to you by the people that brought us our last unmitigated disaster for Canada Justin Trudeau. Fortunately it doesn't look like it's going to be an issue. I doubt anyone's even going to know who he is, vast majority of Canadians don't know and he's not really doing any interviews in Canada or meeting with reporters. And when he does he looks kind of weak. He will have done an exceptional job if he gets the liberals above 50 seats. I doubt that he'll even hit that. He certainly isn't going to win anything and he certainly would be a disaster with trump
  16. Says the guy who fully supported biden's attempts to pay off student debt by the hundreds of billions And no, it's a pension benefit essentially. It's quite common. Anyway if they're not needed why keep them?
  17. No, he tried to minimize it and then said let's move on and not talk about it further. I've pointed this out many times, whenever he comes across something he doesn't like that he can't refute he comes up with some version of "Why are we even talking about this", And it's a common tactic we see on the left. If it was one time obviously I wouldn't have much of a leg to stand on. If he did it a couple of times a year I really probably wouldn't be able to make much of a statement. But he's fairly chronic and I have pointed it out many times. For a guy who never starts a thread He spends an awful lot of time complaining about what other people are talking about.
  18. Yes, yours. You say something stupid, we comment on it, you pretend you never said it and then try and change the subject. Very consistent with you. You know, if you actually say things that make sense or that you can get behind or explain to begin with you won't have to spend so much time pretending you never said it at all
  19. Oh you mean the thing that I specifically referred to and quoted but that you then pretended you never said and then changed your story to I didn't understand it and still can't explain it. So in other words I understood it just fine, I quoted it, I called you out on your inconsistencies and you are unable to address that so you have attempted to lie and change the subject Gosh nobody would ever guess you're a left Winger
  20. LOL you guys are such a class act
  21. Sorry to hear that, hope you feel better Uhhh... sure? Recognized banned slavery? How do you recognize banned slavery? It's true that women's rights made strides in the US before canada, i mean the first woman to run for president did so in 1870 and we wouldn't have allowed that at that time. Women first voted in the states in 1890, that woudln't happen in Canada till 1916 i believe (manitoba of all places, federally granted 2 years later). Lots of other examples sooooo. Did you have a point or were you just drinking a little early tonight?
  22. Oh look who's pretending he doesn't know what he said before again. How shocking. 🙄
  23. No, both statements are true. The bank is independent and the governor does not have to follow the instructions given to him by the Prime Minister. But as I also said they work hand in glove and meet on a weekly basis more or less especially during times of crisis. The Prime Minister says this is what I need you to do and the bank follows it unless they have a very good reason not to. But they don't take off on their own economic policy or come up with economic policy on their own. They may exercise some control over the precise execution but generally speaking especially in times of financial difficulty they follow the lead of the government. And that's true even today. Sorry, I forgot that you need things spelled out with crayon in order to understand it
  24. Not to be a downer but just so you're aware, the constitution says that we don't have to have an election until fall of 2026. Not 2025. We have election laws in place that are passed by parliament that say it will be in 2025 but those laws can easily be undone for dozens of reasons. If Trudeau, or Carney after he takes over, were to declare that dealing with The threat of the US tariffs was a crisis and it wasn't the right time for an election they could easily carry on to fall 2026 with the support of the NDP. Just food for thought
  25. I heard the thunderous sound of footstomping as if a bunch of radicals was rushing to denounce evidence that had come forward showing that the left is corrupt and I didn't know what was causing it. Then I saw this post
×
×
  • Create New...