Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    15,606
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    154

Everything posted by CdnFox

  1. Nonsense phrases from the left that mean nothing but expose their hypocrisy. Having sex can lead to pregnancy so we should ban abortion right? I mean - some choices have consequences Pointing a gun at someone and demanding their money shoudln't be considered robbery right? I mean, they DID have a choice, they COULD have chosen to get shot... The poor should be left to starve without help - they have to take responsibility for their choices right? It's an !diotic position that the left chooses to believe in when it's convenient. If you threaten harm to someone if they don't choose how you would like then that is not a 'Choice' - that is coersion. And that has been upheld in our laws for ages. And if you punish someone for exercising their rights - then that is called VIOLATING their rights. not 'responsibility'. It's like watching man-boy love advocates arguing why child rape should be legal. You should be ashamed you even made that comment. But you're a leftie so you won't be - any amount of degrading or immoral behaviour is acceptable if you get to virtue signal about it.
  2. LOL - there's no justification for your ass porn kiddo - i have nothing to 'justify' I never started. I haven't posted any ass porn. You were the person who posted ass porn. And like every leftie loser out there you want your bad behavior to be someone else's fault. Think about this the next time you want to go on one of your childish little hissy fits. Whether its ass porn or hoping ai will sound more intelligent than you do or any other cheezy little tricks, you come across looking like a childish tard. Learn to be a man. FFS. Or change your nickname to Ex-male.
  3. Ummm.... that's still the popular vote. Not many people voted but he still won the popular vote. The term "popular vote" literally means what the people voted for and the most people voted for him and that's how it works. Further it is always held by our parliamentary system that people who are eligible to vote but don't abstain - and an abstention is in fact stating that you are not to be considered in the vote tally. So everyone who didn't vote did in fact agree that whatever the others chose was acceptable to them. That's what an abstention is. Ford won the most votes from the public -that is the popular vote by definition. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Ontario_general_election https://www.dictionary.com/browse/popular-vote So not only do you not know what 'popular vote' is, not only were you wrong saying he didn't win it, but you also have no understanding of our political system. Sigh. You're an 1diot.
  4. Nope - that was just you reposting the same one over and over again LOL - nobody asked for your ass porn kiddo That was all you. You decided that the best way to handle the fact you didnt' have an argument was to post ass porn. I don't know why you have ass porn but there you go. Then you started fantasizing that it was me, whom you've never seen. Are you beginning to get what a childish loser this makes you look like? When faced with any kind of argument you can't refute - acting like a 5 year old is your response. Nicely done. People think so much better of you
  5. So basically you got sued by ex-flyer the problem is that people confuse evidence and 'Proof" and conflate the two inappropriately. If person A says that they saw person B do something - that is evidence. But that does not mean it's accurate or that it's proof. Person A could be mistaken in what they saw, person A might have a reason to lie about person B. So evidence? Yes - proof? no. So in order to prove something you have to collect ENOUGH evidence that corroborates the claim from different angles and eliminates the other possibilities till you arrive at a conclusion that meets the bar - beyond reasonable doubt, clear and convincing, balance of probability, whatever. Right now - the FBI will claim they have evidence that trump may have committed a crime. That is not the same as proof or a conviction (which is basically a statement of proof). The defense will claim that the evidence is not sufficient for whatever reason and provide their own evidence that refutes the claim. The fact both sides have evidence should not be interpreted as guilt or innocence. But that's what people today do.
  6. Now you're even discussing your anal fascination with other people And as everyone can see it was you who brought up and kept the whole ass porn thing going. Now everyone is laughing at you. I told you at the time - this isn't making you look good'
  7. Ford won the popular vote. What are you even talking about. He got 40.5 and the closest runner up was the ndp at about 33. It wasn't even close. Next election he won by an even bigger margin. Sounds like your memory is as good as your logic. 100 percent faulty.
  8. Sorry kid - the guy who claims that his personal ass porn stash is somehow a picture of me really doesn't get to comment on false accusations And we both know it's not false. That's why you lose your crap like that. Whenever your hated opponents (the conservatives) do well you go full on ****** and start doing things that a 6 year old would think are cringe. well - yes and no. First time, for sure. But second time and third he actually did NOT win the popular vote. And canadians did not give him a majority, which means they didn't really vote him into gov't. That's not how our system works. If Jaggers hadn't sold out his party to earn his pension Trudeau woudln't be in power right now. Jaggy didn't run on a coalition mandate lets remember. Sooooo- not really. If the ndp had backed the cpc then the GG would be letting THEM run the show right now. So it's more about politics and less about who the people 'voted in'. Justin didn't get the most votes, and he didn't win gov't, he basically just lost better than the others and was able to buy the support of someone else.
  9. You literally did when you attempted to claim that there's 'concerns' with the study. At the end of the day the data the study has produced has been substantially proven elsewhere - as you note. So if you're not disputing it - dont' dispute it. Why? We already know that whatever the answer is it's "more than covid". It's enough to give people the right to choose for themselves. And that's what you lefties don't get here. it's what you're desperately trying to run away from with your post. The risk of the vaccine at the time was not known - but it was pushed on people who probably were worse off for taking it. When you force people (and lets not pretend they weren't forced) to take medical treatment against their will and it turns out they may have died from it or suffered serious injury (and some did) then that is morally wrong. It's horrible but it's what you and yours did. You should be deeply ashamed you didn't stand up for people's rights.
  10. So your argument is the threats against jews AREN'T anti semitic because the word has been overused by ..... the jews. Wow. That's a hell of a bird's nest just to untangle how wrong that is.
  11. https://archive.ph/B87Zg https://thenorthernaccount.ca/canadian-banks-are-pushing-for-the-bank-of-canada-to-remove-shelter-costs-from-cpi/ TLDR - The BoC has to raise interest to fight inflation - which drives up the cost of shelter. So if we stop including shelter in the Consumer Price Index and ignore it then our inflation will look lower and the banks won't have to raise rates!!!! that is seriously what they are saying. They are trying to pass this off as a rational argument. "If we just say inflation is lower than it is then it will go away". BTW - they already exclude shelter inflation from some of the key "volitile" markets. A lot of people have said inflation is higher than is being reported and for the average person they're probably right. They try a number of tricks to help minimize the appearance of inflation officially but the average person can't avoid the hit.
  12. Not in canada they're not. Name the canadian lawsuit against ford for the pinto. The pinto was built and certified as being to code and safety standards in canada. now - if ford knows there's a safety concern and hides it, then that's something different. But no - nobody got to sue ford in Canada because of a problem with the pinto. And that would still be completely different than suing someone for deliberately misusing it. You just don't get this do you. You're just not smart enough to be able to put this all together in your mind.
  13. Yeah. This election like that one isn't going to be won on money. Money can sometimes make a big difference, but often that's not what decides an election, as 2016 shows. Frankly the dems are already paying for most of the advertising trump needs. He's in the papers every other day. Every time he's in court he winds up looking like a martyr to people and he gets a little more recognition. Money really only is of use when you've got something to say. He can't really talk about his track record, people dont' like his track record. And he can't talk about trump because that just gives trump a leg up.
  14. But not lawsuits. If you sell a car here that meets all the regulations and someone misuses it - then that's THEIR fault. Not the manufacturer. Put in all the regulations you want - but if the company complies and sells the product then they're not to blame if it's misused if they complied with your regulation. You starting to get this now?
  15. There is a difference between "worth" and "cash". I swear those on the left are acting like rich people all have a money bin like scrooge mcduck where they just dump all their money and gold in and swim around in it or something. If you own 1 billion in real estate that doesn't mean you have a billion dollars IN CASH handy. In any case - why would they? It was a rediculous amount and a judge has already reduced it by about 300 million.
  16. Yeah. they've boxed themselves in pretty good and there's no easy way out. The increasing interest payments keeps them from doing anything about their extreme deficit spending unless they're willing to reign some oft he useless spending in. Which they're not. Thats why they can't cancel even the raise in carbon tax - they desperately need the money. the budget is going to be a shell game trying to pretend that all the extra costs are 'investments' and 'necessary' etc etc. But they'll still go about 40 - 50 billion into deficit. I don't think they care at this point. They know that barring a huge misstep by PP they're toast next election and they're trying to spend what they can in the meantime and make it hard for PP to reduce the spending when he gets in. That means more spending on gov't employees, more funds to their 'friends', more usless programs.
  17. I get that this concept sexually excites you so you keep repeating it. How you think that's helping your case is a bit more of a mystery And you are constantly defending trudeau. Yeah. Stop doing that.
  18. Ahhhh so it's not the FBI that's bias, it's the prosecutors The guy was very detailed in his report as to why he made that statement and it's pretty compelling. Do you have a different source explaining in any detail why he's wrong? It involved obtaining a search warrant for the trump investigation. How could it not be related? it couldn't be MORE related. So unless the whole entire thing is bias there's no bias in it? I think that's a tough argument to make. I don't recall him being asked to look for it. He simply looked at whether the investigation followed proper proceedure or was flawed. We do know from his investigation tho that there is a huge body of evidence that it was flawed and bias. So if your argument is that the bias isn't politically motivated, do you have any evidence or the like to suggest a DIFFERENT motivation? We certainly have evidence from the texts that at least some of the anti trump sentiment in the fbi was political.
×
×
  • Create New...