CdnFox

Nobody even knows who you're talking to. I guess it's the weekend, your communication skills are going to shít already

So your theory is that Israel didn't talk to the us before doing this Uh huh. Right

We understood it all along. That's why people like us support Israel when hamas actually wages war on them It's you who pretends that when there is no war at all people are justified in killing civilians and children, not because they're fighting back but because of some nebulous concept of being repressed

Better than you apparently. You said it clearly and in plain English kiddo. And once again you are forced to try and retract something you said 15 minutes later when you realize how stupid it makes you look You have said many times now straight out that the attack was completely justified because Hamas is just defending itself against repression You are all in favor of terrorist activities provided it hurts Israel and backs Palestine and Hamas. You then complain and pretend that Israel defending itself is the same as committing atrocities. The good news is you're not alone in your views, Hamas shares them entirely. The bad news is that particular view is getting a lot of palestinians and Hamas people killed right now. Well, bad news for you I mean

Sure, right before the israelis ate the apple and then killed Abel i'm sure I mean israel has been oppressing iran for centuries now.

Israel threatened to invade and bomb israel with nukes? You really don't get how english works do you And iran has been actively funding attacks on israel for years.

With him, two things can be true.

LOL well that didn't take long to scare you Every time i post facts, you run away like a frightened deer and stick your head in the sand Thanks for proving you're a liar AND a coward

Did you get confused again? We're not talking about burning fossil fuels, the people who are going to consume fossil fuels are going to do so regardless of what we do. We're talking about who's going to sell it to them, but the amount of it gets used will be the same either way So that would be your entire argument completely out the window. Maybe next time think for more than 8 seconds before you type

Immigration system is not bypassed, there may be a fast track here but it's still a process. They don't pick them up today in the morning and drop them off in their original country in the evening. But if they are put outside the country while they actually do have absolute lawful excuse to be in the country then they still have recourse. They can re-enter the country by using the courts and they can sue for any damages. But the reality is that so far of all of the people that have actually been deported I haven't heard of a single case of anyone claiming that they were actually entirely lawfully in the US at the time they were deported. Again you're kind of sounding like there's no process and that is not accurate. There is a very fast process that I believe takes like a month or less but there is still a process. And to spend that out of control and suggest that this means that American citizens will be sent to foreign concentration camps it's just silly.

That is patently false and insane. Rioting at this level is not common at all. It's maybe once or twice a decade. And it greatly surpasses police staffing levels for what is actually "Normal" circumstances. Its a shame then that the rioters have made it necessary

"would" have been? In fact, WERE. They demanded it as part of their discussions with the king. Canada and John A had NO interest in it at all, but were forced to address it as part of the king's promise to the native people. And like every gov't he chose to deal with it in the cheapest and easiest way. "The christians are already running a large number of schools, tell them we'll dump the issue in their laps and pay them a small amount per kid". WAAAAY cheaper than trying to send someone to every single tribe everywhere. But it was voluntary (another thing modern teachers like to forget). And yet vast numbers of first nations people sent their kids. And their kids came home in the summers it's not like they never saw them for 4 years. Modern teachers would have you believe that John A passed the law because he hated first nations and then had soldiers go around and round up the kids and horse whipped them all the way to the interment camps residential schools.

This conflict started on October 7th. At that point hamas, representing the people of Gaza, chose to initiate a war by attacking civilian targets deliberately with the intent of slaughtering innocent people as their primary goal. The reason for doing this was not 100 years of history, but rather the simple fact that they believed that Israel would retaliate and that a few thousand of their people would be killed and they could translate that into political power and money at the UN. It grossly underestimated the world response to slaughtering that many innocent people and are now paying the price. This is not about the last hundred years. This conflict did not start 100 years ago. This cannot be justified in any shape or form by anything like repression or anything else. Gaza had numerous peaceful opportunities and paths for positive change if that's what they wanted and they chose violence that has led to self-destruction pretty much like Nazi Germany or imperial Japan. End of story. Thanks for playing

I posted evidence. And you are the one who lied about what I said. And now you're lying again. But thanks for proving to everyone that you're a liar I never mentioned the 2020 cases. You were the only one that brought that up. So now you are lying about what I said and then pretending to be mad that my cite did not provide evidence of something I never said. But thanks for proving to everyone that you're a liar There was no lie there sorry But thanks for proving to everyone that you're a liar That is an absolute lie, which is why you presented it without any citations. But in addition I never said when the screaming started I just said they spent 4 years doing it But thanks for proving to everyone that you're a liar. You may not be very good at presenting proof of anything ELSE you say, but you're great at proving you're a liar

Know what you say is that the atrocities are completely justified when they are committed by Hamas because they're repressed. Truly no interest in prosecuting any issues committed by Hamas. You occasionally throw the line to the contrary so you can pretend that you're not 100% completely biased but it is painfully obvious that you are because your next statements will be how they were justified doing this because they were repressed You've lied one too many times and now people know the truth about you. There's no point in faking it anymore

Congratulations, that was officially your most useless post this month. And it was up against some pretty stiff competition

I am not saying that they are stupid. What I'm saying is that corrupt regimes seem to have great success figuring out how to take and hold power regardless. It has always been the case and I see no reason why it would be different now " I say we take off and nuke them from orbit. IT's the only way to be sure!" There's no doubt that iran would not keep it's word. it will continue to work towards arming itself with nukes and any 'deal' it signs would be just to buy time and pretend to cooperate. Turning their facilities into rubble is the surest way in the short term, longer term they'll have to find a way to monitor that,

Sure. 100 years is about how long iran has been developing nuclear weapons. 🙄🙄🙄🙄 Heck you've' been saying that since 1837.

I never said it was an issue. Which means YOU are the liar, claiming i did. But we all know you're a liar. Thanks for proving it again tho. The issue is that from the beginning the dems said it was impossible and it was all conspiracy and he was trying to steal the election etc etc... now they're making the same claims they said was impossible I know little guy, that makes you so mad but it's still the truth

No. It was correct. As usual you want it to be different so you claim it's different but it isn't. What he said is correct. And your buthurt doesn't change that. You are the one in the wrong here. Supporting terrorists is wrong. Trying to excuse the intentional slaughter of innocent women and children is wrong, But you don't like that so you're reduced to posting silly memes

History suggests that overthrowing this regime will only result in a new possibly even more corrupt regime appearing shortly in the future. It kind of feels like a better choice might be to weaken and cripple this regime and leave it hobbling around on one leg while disrupting its programs like nuclear weaponry. I mean it's not like the area hasn't had regime change before

Funny how the left calls tens of thousands of people burning and looting private property and attacking police while armed with various missiles and weapons for over three days forcing curfew to be imposed a 'minor' protest and yet insists that a thousand people who protested in the capital for a few hours are a THREAT TO THE NATION AND THE ENTIRE WORLD AND OUR DEMOCRACY WAS ALMOST DESTROYED!!! FREAK OUT!!!!

didn't we go after the germans before america decided to get off it's ass and get involved? Twice? And we were in korea

I think that's obvious. They received the vast majority of their ordinance from America right now due to the war with Gaza, there is zero chance whatsoever that they would use that to bomb another nation without first getting a green light from the US. And this absolutely 100% would play into trump's stated political position with regards to Iran and nukes. I didn't realize how extensive this attack was initially. But apparently it involved over 200 planes and hit over 100 targets. That is an absolute crap ton of Firepower and ordinance, that isn't just some small raid across the border or series of drone strikes. The Israelis were not kidding around

You're grossly exaggerating. The law and due process does allow for this for those who are less than 2 years in the country. And while trump has been pushing the limits he's not bypassing the law entirely at all. The judges have said in cases where you know the person is going to be deported back to a prison or the like then the process needs to be longer but generally speaking they haven't had a problem with the vast majority of the deportations. You guys are waving around the term due process like you just heard it yesterday and you're so excited to have a new term to play with. But you must remember the deportation is not punishment. If the government punishes somebody the processes must be different, if the government seeks to imprison somebody then the process must be different, but if all they're doing is escorting them off the property then they still absolutely have access to do process from their country of origin and they can apply to either be admitted or to make a case as to why they are already legal or whatever they want to do. There can be no doubt that trump is trying to give the absolute minimum amount of due process that he possibly can and still be lawful and sometimes he's put a foot over that line with certain individual cases, but by and large there are no mass examples of people being denied due process at all if you understand what due process is