Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    30,058
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    314

Everything posted by CdnFox

  1. In a way. It suggests that carney gave him bad advice and he was too stupid to realize how terrible it was. And now we're going to get that same bad advisor bringing his advice to the table directly.
  2. You're literally quoting a source called "the cult" who's referring to a "la presse" opinion piece. And the examples they give are, not surprisingly, not true. For example, Jagmeet said "guess how many houses he built?" And then said six while PP said 200,000. Not "affordable" housing, as the article suggests. And they did build 200,000 homes while he was minister, that DID get fact checked. You should be ashamed of yourself for posting that. It's the equivalent of posting a fox news story about Tucker Carlson's opinion that kamala told more lies.
  3. You're wrong
  4. I wish you were joking. but fact is you're dead right
  5. You can really taste the slavery in ever bite. Their secret ingredient isn't just love, it's Indentured servitude.
  6. He's Canadian. It wasn't Mexican slave labor like you
  7. So you can't answer his legitimate questions or comments? I guess that's your way of admitting you lose then
  8. He's already doing a lot of business with carney. Carney's company leases their American office from the kushner's. Carney knows a lot of people that trump knows. Trump is certain he's going to be able to get concessions from carney that he needs because he knows he can reward carney in ways that will benefit carney even if they don't benefit Canada at Large.
  9. Well essentially. However, it's a little like saying that there's no point in watching the game, you should only look at the final score. The game is what makes it entertaining
  10. So you couldn't answer the questi on about carney either huh Never noticed how the left especially the far left such as Michael here freak out and thrash wildly trying to change the subject when asked a simple question and inevitably come to the conclusion that somehow it's all your fault
  11. The problem is we don't. He's stealing the conservative platform because it's popular. But he's the same as he's been for the last 5 years when he was assisting the liberals that have been in power since 2015. He's absolutely no different, we will just get a continuation of what we have always had for the last 10 years
  12. This is a threat about the province and the provincial NDP. So at least we know that there's no question here you're just ignorant
  13. So you think 10 MORE years of liberals is going to change that considering the last 10 didn't?
  14. Ahhhh yes, whataboutism. The lefts' answer for everything. There is an answer for that but why don't you answer the question for carney first you hypocrite? They don't care dude. It's about tribalism for them. All they care about is that their tribe wins. If that means accepting insane lies, watching the country burn, stealing the future from a couple of generations, well that's just the price you pay isn't it.
  15. The problem is people in their rush to try and pretend there's more than two Sexes misunderstand something fundamental. No matter what there is still two Sexes, even if a person has more than one sex or has no sex. A person who is born one sex and transformes into a second sex later is still either male or female, there is no third sex. A person who is genuinely both sexes is 2 sexes, male and female, they are not some different third sex. a person who is androgenous has NO sex. But in all those cases, there's still just two sexes. So you might say that in some cases people can change sex, or have two sexes, or no sexes. But there's still just two sexes.
  16. What about the zucchini?!!? WON"T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE ZUCHINNI!!!! Well maybe if they can break out and run away the gang member can hide them in his home for a change
  17. The damage done to the country isn't relevant to those people. You and I think in terms like that but they think in terms of tribe. All they care about is their ideology and defending it, if that happens to make the country better than great if it happens to make the country suffer well that sucks but what can you do? The NDP, who has spent the last 10 years going on ad nauseam about how all of the world's problems exist because rich billionaire corporate people are not paying their fair share of taxes are now set to all vote for a rich billionare corporate person who didn't pay his fair share of taxes. AND renovicted people, AND moved his business to the states. That's how irrational their hatred of "conservatives" is. It's not about the country. It's not about rational decisions about policy. IT's about continually fuelling their hatred and spite and trying to find ways to justify it. Everything else is secondary
  18. There were a number of changes between 2017 and 2019 that allowed for this. Poilievre talked about it and we have had lengthy threads about it here. The liberals absolutely did that. The police chiefs have all complained about it, the provinces have complained about it, the liberals promise to fix it, and yet here we are I love your pretending that you never heard of it though despite all the discussion the endless newspaper stories the fact that it even came up in this campaign etc etc
  19. It doesn't need to be a conspiracy. There are a couple of reasons why bolsters would intentionally or inadvertently put their thumb on the scale. There can be absolutely no doubt that ekos did, And Frank Greaves said he was going to when Poilievre got elected. He said he would do anything within his power to make sure that Poilievre never got elected and he doesn't make idle threats! See you later walked it back but he has said similar things since and his polling is way out of whack and includes questions which are basically asking how terrible people think the conservatives are before going on to say who will you vote for. Alternate polling such as donut polls or taxi polls or burger polls Etc are not scientific but they are often strangely accurate. And once again as I have said there are maybe a dozen indicators of how the election is: That you can get an idea of how things sit, polling Being one of them, and this election they all seem to be in conflict. Honestly if you're looking at the polls and all of the other indicators the indicators of this election could very easily be argued to be pointing towards a strong conservative minority to a liberal majority and everything in between. That is absolutely rare. Election results can be surprising but usually everyone is equally surprised, this is kind of nuts. Reminds me a little of trump's election where things just weren't adding up to what the polls were saying. we'll see if that happens here.
  20. LOL well i guess i can't blame you guys for a little salt after your hopes got dashed with Kamala And lets set aside that PP may very well still win and that would not shock me overmuch in this election But just to humour your spite and hatred Lets say he loses Most likely it will be a liberal minority. And no NDP to prop them up. The CPC will still be riding at about 39 percent which is usually a majority. They'll review the election, learn from the mistakes and PP will get stronger just as harper did from his first loss in 2004. Over the next 18 months canada will get to see the "new" libs. Carney will badly disappoint, more scandals will come out, he won't get anything done and the threat of trump will be greatly reduced by that point. Or it will be obvious that Carney can't fix it. The deficit will be 50 percent to 100 percent higher, and homes and food will still be unaffordable. And the ndp will get a new leader who doesn't care about his pension and basically we'll be back to about where we were with justin. And because the bloc will be happy to kill the parliament if the libs have a moment of weakness we'll bide our time till they're slumping and then pull the plug and try again. You're quite wrong. PP isn't losing this election, he's done better than almost every liberal AND conservative leader in the last 25 years. If it weren't for trump scaring the ndp in to somehow voting for a rich billionare industrial banker who's job it is to help the rich avoid taxes that the poor needs (i will NEVER understand that ) then he'd have had this election in the bag. But the ndp will recover as they always do and people will learn to hate carney as much as justin and there you go. The upside of that is that in about 2 years we'll probaby hit a bit of a growth spurt in the world economy, and it'll be the CPC who gets to ride that instead of being the ones to clean up the liberal messes. For a change
  21. I will kill you. You're certainly killing me.
×
×
  • Create New...