CdnFox

Well we almost paradise thing was actually your statement but I love that you're now trying to argue with me that your claims were wrong But it is true that we did pretty good under harper and we did far worse under Trudeau. As I said things were not perfect under harper but they were pretty good No it was never shit under harper's term. It was actually quite good. There was the recession which was global but we weathered it extremely well, far better than most countries and on the whole we did quite well. I'm afraid you're listening to the voices in your head if you think I said that we did shit. So your argument now is that the only manufacturing jobs out there are low-skilled factory jobs? Is that your final answer? I wanted to give you a chance to change your opinion before you wind up looking stupid again

Ummm.... you realize that shows that canada's increased and that china's growth had nohting to do with us, right? LOLOL YOU LITERALLY JUST POSTED A CHART THAT PROVES YOU WERE WRONG!! OH my GOD how do you always manage to do that! Your chart shows that canada had steady slow growth and that china's had nothing to do with us and didn't actually reduce ours at all!!! I know... math is hard for you ROFLMAO!!!!

Never afraid to look stupid i see Our manufacturing sector grew stronger and stronger until chretien's day Real Growth of Canadian Manufacturing Since 2000 Ohhh lookie, strong growth all through the 70's and 80's And even the 90s! Took a big hit with the dot com crash around 2000, took a hit during the recession and was slowly returning but ... not any more. As usual you're 100 percent full of shit What's shocking is you make it so easy to prove you're a liar

Actually pretty close. Despite the worst global recession in almost a century Canada did very well, recovered quickly, went back to balanced budgets. Our banking was strong, our economy was strong and getting stronger as the recovery went on, our debt to gdp was pretty damn good and our gdp per capital was pretty sweet too, nose to nose with the usa's for the most part. Wasn't perfect but it was pretty darn sweet. That's to be expected in a high immigration country, but we always kept up with gdp per capita as a ratio... until trudeau That's a real problem. Nope. Canada just isn't a place that people want to invest in anymore because of the liberal policies. Investment is actually been fleeing our country in recent years never mind slowing down. And companies aren't being shy about why. Embrige literally said they would not consider putting money here under the current regulatory environment and that was AFTER mark passed his 'magic fairy dust' bill. Nope. In fact most of it happened after that was a thing. Our sin has having regulation and taxes that drive away business. Our NEXT sin is destroying the oil and gas industry growth that we should have had. And you can lay both of those things at the feet of the libs for the last 11 years. NOBODY IS GOING TO SPEND MONEY HERE. The tax system, the regulations, everything about our gov't and way of treating industry drives them away. You think an AIRPLANE industry will start here? With ottawa having spent a decade wiping out any company it could for environmental reasons? They would crush it and claim that people need to find alternatives. Instead the libs put their investment money into EV battery plants! Billions! And look at how that's turned out for us. What a freakin' disaster. The liberals have killed any chance of new industry coming here and setting up shop.

Why are you scared of the question I asked you? Why don't you just answer it? You're dodging like an expert coward. I've answered every single one of your questions including that one previously. Why are you so afraid?

No, it's a lie because you knowingly told something that wasn't true. That's kind of how definitions work And you know what the lie is, you're just trying to change the channel from the real issue at this point. WHY you lied is the million dollar question. I asked you why this caused you to have such an emotional break down in the first place. Notice you ran away from that one. Did you want to try again or will you be cowardly running away from it another time?

which the left was repeatedly warned was EXACTLY what would happen if they kept doing that. They said it was perfectly fine for the fbi to manufacture crap, for obama to weaponize the intelligence community to go after trump, for the faked up 'criminal' charges that nobody but die hard lefties think should have been criminal charges in the first place, etc etc. And they were told "if you allow this, if you don't speak up against it, nobody is going to be interested in speaking up when it happens to YOUR people in retaliation later". welcome to later.

You are literally talking to yourself on the internet LOLOL Well. EVERYONE'S going to think you're both sane and kewl now right?

Wow, have you ever noticed that the more stupid you look, the less coherent you sound? Maybe some sort of mental defense mechanism or something? Any way, "ur" welcome kid

Well, if you mean being able to take something existing and mass produce it is a 'huge deal' in the sense of it being an important factor in our supply chain or being 'industrially disruptive' globally or the like then sure. If you mean it's a big deal innovation wise then good lord no Paying people like crap, having near slave labour in many cases and having gov't subsidies requires very little brain power They can't do anymore than anyone else can. In fact arguably they can do less. The thing is, drones and their use plate relatively well to defensive uses. However their offensive capabilities are somewhat limited. And by defense I mean they're great at blunting an attack and denying the enemy the ability to control the conflict in and around the battle line. But they haven't given the ukrainians the ability to go over to the offensive, have they. Other than localized counter-attacks and the like. There's no danger of Ukraine marching on Moscow anytime soon. The drones have played a harassing role strategically causing some damage for the Russians but it's pretty minimal. China's not worried about defense. And if china wants to attack another neighboring nation such as Taiwan drone technology is going to work against them rather than for them. No, that would not be an accurate statement. Britain did indeed Pioneer the Industrial Revolution but nobody copied their innovations. Or at least to be more accurate that's not where they fell behind. It would be well over a hundred years later and other countries have their own industries at that point and develop their own Technologies. But really it was capacity more than anything, written fell behind places like America because America became larger and during world war II really leaned into its industrial base So no it wasn't anything to do with copying There may come a day in the future when china becomes a world leader in technology and innovation. But that day is not today and it's not going to be tomorrow.

So she lied under deposition and then her attourney corrected her lie later. That's still a lie. IF you break into someone's home and steal something even if you later return it, that's still theft. The point of deposition is to give the other side time to prepare their case. She lied under oath during a deposition and denied the other side that chance. Lying under oath is a crime Soooo... what you've suggested if true is that she committed a crime.

So you're probably a little young to remember this but as a result of that the gov't came up with the "clarity act". There is no legal provision for a province to separate unilaterally. So that's kind of forbidden short of armed rebellion. Instead what they said is that the gov't is required to enter into negotiations with a province that votes to separate. But the Feds must agree that the question was clear and the results were clear. Here's what the clarity act says about that (paraphrased by ai) The legislation does not stipulate a fixed percentage (such as \(50\% + 1\)) for what constitutes a winning vote. Instead, the House of Commons evaluates a clear majority by looking at: [1, 2] The size of the majority vote endorsing secession. The overall voter turnout and percentage of eligible voters participating. Any other relevant circumstances at the time of the vote So if there's a vote, for it to be "legal" the gov't has to reasonably agree that the question was clear, and that given ALL the factors the vote shows a CLEAR majority. So for example if two voters showed up and it was a 100 percent in favor of separating the gov't would say "two people can't be considered to represent a majority". So you can't pin it down to a precise number but it would be very very unlikely that 50+1 would be considered to be a 'clear' majority unless turn out was insanely high. Most experts i've heard have kicked around numbers like 60 percent assuming turn out is somewhere between 50 and 70 percent. And even that's not sure.

We drove industry away and they invested in other countries a little infrastructure We had industry here when Trudeau took over. Now it's drying up and blowing away Your lies about decades and decades ago doesn't change the simple facts that we face now and that is a direct result of the Trudeau government over the last 11 years

No no no, you're supposed to just keep repetatively posting your last post over and over, that's the level of debate you're at now 😆😆😆😆 The fact that you posted knowing it's untrue makes it a lie. A better question i'd have is WHY are you lying? This was a very simple and easily verified statement "the gov't didn't properly warn the public, now they're failing those who got sick'. Those really aren't debatable, as you yourself proved in your 'cite' the gov't made it sound like the risk to the mNRA vaccine was no different than any other vaccine and sometimes (my cite) they went even further than that and they knew the testing wasn't there to make that cliam. And the story i posted was of the gov't failing to support someone who'd suffered. And it's from that day, which is why i posted it. It's not some old article. So why did you freak out? You immediately went into an emotional tailspin. You freaked out and became irrational and desperate, and made a terrible argument and have now embarrassed yourself desperately trying to cling to it beyond reason. Why? It's like you've got some weird attachment to the trueau gov't's covid response, like it hurts you personally that Trudeau may have been less than honest with the public. Lemme tell ya kiddo, if you're going to try to pretend trudeau was an honest politician this is going to get a lot worse for you before it gets better LOL

OH MY GOD!!! Are you actually copying EXFLYER NOW?!!? LOLOLOL!!!!! You're just reposting the same lie over and over because i've broken you teeny tiny little mind and you can't cope? hoy SHIT kid i used to respect you a bit LOL ok well now that you're basically my biatch and i'm living rent free in your head, lets see how long you can go for. LOL Go ahead, post it again! Don't let exflyer beat you!

I get it, you're one of those people who thinks if he repeats a lie it'll somehow be true. It was a lie the first time you said it, it's been a lie ever since you repeated it. You didn't address it with facts or anything. The government indicated that the risks were similar to other vaccines. That was an untrue statement. Therefore they didn't adequately or substantially inform the public as to the risk. Sorry this simple fact causes you so much brain damage but all you're doing is repeating the proof that I'm right You:

That doesn't really seem to be the problem here. The problem is drones are no drones the only way to dig these people out is to go in on the ground and they weren't prepared for that. We've seen this before. This isn't America's first crack at regime change.

Yawn. Lie lie lie, that's all you do at this point. There's been no running, there's been no circles, you're just too much of an emotional wimp to cope. The gov't did not substantially advise people of the risks, then didn't stand behind those who got sick, that's bad. Same thing every single post. You:

No they're using some components made in china but china didn't invent those components. And Ukraine at least has moved away from that entirely and is making their own. It's like claiming that because iPhone components are made in china that china invented the iPhone. That's not how it works And? Are you now claiming china invented drones? Sorry but they didn't. Funny enough it was actually an ex israeli military guy living in the us who designed and produced the first cheap military drone, and commercial civilian drones Draganfly made the very first quadcopter which would become what we know as drones today - A canadian company. Chinese take what other people do and find ways to do the same thing cheaper and in higher volume. that's it.

Nobody says that. And I have real expertise in a number of areas. That isn't to say china doesn't do some good work or doesn't innovate but they're not leading the pack in anything. They are experts at copying. Sorry kid but that really is where things are. Might be different someday but not today

The thing that kills me is they keep lying and lying and their supporters still believe the next lie The budget will balance itself and will be balanced by the end of 2019 - complete and utter lie We're investing in infrastructure projects and it will return far more than we are paying into it- Complete and utter lie We're investing in battery plants across Canada and the billions and billions were spending will pave the way to the future - Complete and utter lie Inflation is transitory - Complete and utter lie I can get a deal with trump by July- Complete and utter lie It's not reaaaaaly a recession - Complete and utter lie But each and every time their supporters suck it up as the gospel and will go on to believe the next one without question

Well you can't really, the fact of the matter is is it had a definition. What's happening out isn't arguing over the definition it's attempting to rewrite the definition to fit a political agenda and that is happening because of the left. And that is very common, the left and the last 15 years has spent most of its time trying to twist the meaning of words in order to increase the emotional impact of their arguments because logic simply doesn't fit No, that would be you attempting to rewrite the definition of something in order to fit a political agenda and that is happening because you are on the left 😂😂😂😂 First off trump supporters are not a monolith. Second your attempt to demonize the people is only so you don't have to actually treat them like humans and listen to their concerns. Which is a bad habit the left has picked up in the last decade or so thirdly, most don't care about things being "whiter". Both the black and latino votes increased substantially under trump. It's a childish argument. what polling indicates motivates trump voters is that they think he'll be much better than their other choice for the economy and inflation, and that he will crack down on illegal immigration which is something even the legit immigrants seem to want to see whether you like that or not. So far he's done pretty decent with the economy, he's blown it on inflation, he's delivered on immigration. He creates an unstable environment and people are getting sick of that too, but so far he's delivered on more than he has failed on and we're only a year in change into it. But it this way. He's delivered on more of his promises by far than carney has. So anything negative you can say about trump voters you can probably double down on for carney supporters

No that's you lying like a cheap Rug and crying your eyes out because you know you're wrong I pointed out over a dozen times that Your own quote shows the government saying it's no different than any other vaccine which wasn't true. And you know that. So now you're just lying On top of it I also posted quotes from the government down playing it even further You're embarrassing yourself and you're disappointing me. It should be beneath you to try such cheap and pathetic left-wing tactics to "win" A discussion that you're on the wrong side of

😆😆😆😆 People have generally become less tolerant of other people over the last 10 years. Trudeau spent all of his time trying to divide people and it's kind of stuck. But the problem is that is exactly the kind of talking nonsense that Stokes separation. And regardless of our differences (i'm right you're left, I like scotch, you like beer, i'm human you're a mutated life form from alpa centauri etc) i think we can both agree that by and large separatist sentiment isn't good for canada if it can be avoided. These things get a life of their own, and the more it gets discussed and 'put out there' and the more we see the kind of replies you were just saying the more separation sentiment is going to grow and the bigger the chance of an... what are we calling this, not 'brexit', perhaps al-be-leavnin'now maybe? Kinda sounds first nation-y This stuff can very suddenly flare up and take off and telling albertans they have nothing valid to be unhappy about and to pee up a rope will just fan the fires.

Screaming hysterically at clouds isn't 'laughing'