CdnFox

And delete this exposed to a very real threat. If interest rates go up the debt can very quickly become completely unserviceable. And that can happen for several reasons. There's already one or two of the major financial houses suggesting Canada may very well find itself for the credit downgrade. That can trigger higher interest rates necessary to sell our bonds. It is possible for world interest rates to go up either through the cost of tariffs or is an anti-inflationary measure. And not just inflation in our own country, if we see inflation elsewhere the feds me have to raise their rates in other countries to combat that and we would have to raise ours to remain competitive. Interest as we saw in the 1980s would completely bankrupt us. We're hugely exposed

He's being as pedantic as you were and obviously throwing that in your face. When you got shown to be wrong you decided you would try and be technical and it isn't a good look as he is now trying to demonstrate back to you by being technically correct in what he's saying even though it's not particularly germane. Hopefully you can see how stupid it is and in the future you won't be participating in that kind of childishness again either

Oh look who's making up lies again to try and justify his own petty hatred and bigotry This is probably accurate That is probably less accurate. It was probably begging various contacts for support or money or both

You have to remember, he was raised by wild zucchini and may not have grown up with Christmas carols and songs

Umm being on the left IS being wrong all the time Again pretty much the left No still pretty much the left Pretty much anytime the left makes an accusation of something it's actually a confession of their own behavior and an attempt to deflect. You guys take projection to a new level And you demonstrated here all the time. You make ridiculous and nonsense statements either attacking the right Or defending the left and it's always childish nonsense. Let's have a demonstration. The PBO just announced that carney's budget violates every other countries definition versus capital. Including England which is where carney learned his version of this. Comment on that. Explain how that's okay without using any lies or deflecting or anything like that

Well it depends on how much you wanted to find things. Without a doubt some people are denied care. Does that mean it's a "death panel"? I guess if you wanted to find it that way maybe. Some people think math is racist. Well technically you could make an argument it's true depending on how you define things I think most people would call it a stretch of at least. That's really not what we're talking about here Let's use Obamacare as an example. Obama swore up and down you wouldn't have to give up your doctor. Turns out you had to give up your doctor. But was that a deliberate lie on his part, or did things just turn out a little differently in the end that he want it? I think he knew that that was going to be a likely outcome and he was being dishonest but that's not quite the same thing as out and out lying. Politicians stretch things and they spend things and I think we all accept that that's part of the game. But sometimes they go too far and it becomes a lie. And sometimes they deliberately lie with the intent of defrauding or misleading the public for an agenda and that's when it gets to be serious and frankly I don't find trump to be any worse than Obama or Biden

Yeah we did those too

Not really. We have some that do but the vast majority of things that leftists like you pretend protect the environment don't

Of course! IT was all harper's faut anyway!

No they don't. First off most of the studies that have been done including the most recent include government rebates on a number of the vehicles. So now that those rebate programs have ended those vehicle prices shoot up by 5 or $6,000 and that changes the results entirely Secondly they tend to only go out for 5 years. So they don't include replacing the batteries. The warranty. Is usually for 8 years or 100,000 km. So sometime after that you're going to have to replace the battery and suddenly you have a bill worth tens of thousands of dollars that isn't factored in. I have two trucks on my property that I've owned for years that are both older than 20 years. Both of them have engines that still run great and would drive around the city no problem, both are in pretty good condition one slightly better than the other. Both of them if they were EVS would have had to have their batteries replaced probably to the tune of about 40,000 to $50,000. Ontario man quoted $50,000 to replace an EV battery | Driving There are a large number of stories like this The studies are often done by people who are advocates for EBS and therefore they leave out calculations like that. So what the studies actually show is as long as there's government subsidies and as long as you only look at a very strict Length of time, EVS may be slightly cheaper but the reality is as near as we can tell they're actually more expensive when you do an Apples to Apples comparison over the life of a vehicle

I accept your admission of defeat Only when you are lying kiddo What you do constantly because unfortunately for you your opinions cannot stand up to the truth But you said it was simply dishonest and you know that, you knew it when you said it obviously. And now your big mad that someone points it out. Awwww muffin... it's always annoying when the adults tell you to behave yourself isn't it

You're a liar, and that is the only thing that's scientifically proven here. There is absolutely no science whatsoever that says conservatives are corrupt consciously around consciously to enrich the most powerful You are a liar sent here to provoke discord amongst Canadians and you feel miserably because you're so bad at it we can tell right off the bat you're not a real person

Well I don't know about Trump supporters per se but They were talking about the files themselves not releasing them is the proper and correct thing to do. There will be a lot of information in there that will hurt innocent people including the victims. That's why these piles are sealed normally in the first place, Epstein is hardly some sort of exception or unusual circumstance But as to why trump is so ardently protecting their release, I'm giving it a fair bit of thought and honestly my conclusion is that the most likely reason is that he will consider it a loss of power or a blow to his authority. He said they're not releasing it, he said he will make the decisions, and now someone is taking that away from him. Based on his previous activities and reactions it is entirely plausible that he just does not want to give up control. We saw this with the files he took from the last time he was president In addition to that but probably to a lower degree there's probably a number of things that are more dangerous than an actual out and out statement that he was involved. And that's information that could be interpreted creatively either way. We've already seen that in action, a birthday card that may or may not have been written by him that half the country says is nothing and the other half says it's absolute ironclad proof. And it plagued him for weeks. If there's more stuff like that then this never goes away and for the next century they'll still be debating whether or not it was some sort of pedophile, and even if he's absolutely not that will honk him off like crazy. Okay got in the Epstein file the cops would have already gone after trump, they would have had that information before he even ran for president the first time, and the democrats certainly would have pursued it, they were willing to create any number of fake charges to go after him so if they had a real one they would have for sure. But I suspect there's lots of pictures of trump hanging around with beautiful young women and saying nice things about Epstein and there are always those who will take that as proof that he was guilty of something.

I understand why you feel you need to lie about Poilievre when we're discussing carney. Anything you can do to distract and not have to address the issues the better right? As it is the PBO will always be in a better position when it comes to budgets. He has access to information that the opposition party simply don't and has a full-time staff and budget just to analyze this stuff. That's why Stephen Harper created the position in the first place, and then famously fought with the guy all the time. Conservatives support more information being available even when it's inconvenient It would seem the liberals are looking for someone who they can shut up or get to speak the way they want. What do you have to say about that as a liberal supporter? They've got the track record to suggest they're more likely to be correct than not. There's no particular reason to doubt them. This isn't a judgment, these are calculations based on their knowledge training experience and data. It's possible to be wrong but it's unlikely to be substantially wrong. So a reasonable person would assume that until evidence shows otherwise it's most likely to be correct If he hits all of his projections. If carney is right and doesn't go over budget or doesn't have lower revenues and the revenue increases that he's predicting come true. But if that's not the case then we are well under sustainability. And the rest of his report says that there is only a 7% chance carney is going to hit all of his targets. So now what do you say to that?

Yeah, but aside from that evidence there's no evidence!! Unless there's other evidence in which case aside from THIS evidence and That evidence there's NO EVIDENCE!! ADMIT IT!!! Told ya,

It was definitely a considered answer if you will. You did not say they would all vote against it, he said they all were against it which is different if he expects a couple not to show up. There's also the obvious question of what's his name who is retiring, who may not choose to show up just cuz he's kind of mad at the party but has been very clear that he doesn't support the budget

Loser lefty writes a bunch of lies to make himself feel better. ALMOST manages to make it a haiku Of course there's alternatives, the conservative proposed a bunch of alternatives. They didn't even ask for a balance budget and they said they were willing to accept as a compromise carney's promises from the election of about 62 billion dollar deficits. That would be extremely easy, we don't need 50 billion in infrastructure spending right now. All that does is create inflationary pressure. You could achieve as much or more economic stimulation with 25 to 30 billion dollars that was properly targeted and reduce the amount of inflation impact. That one thing alone would have gotten them tory support. And there are several other suggestions that they made The fact that you feel the need to lie about it proves that you know you're in the wrong

I'd recommend being on the other side of a bullet proof partition I don't know much about military matters when it comes to training but i've taught dozens and dozens of people to shoot. And sure i can get them doing ok within 2 or 3 days at the range.... from a BENCH in a STATIC situation against a SET target. That isn't TOO far away. If they do their homework at home after each day. But even then there;s no way theyd be trained up to deal with a 'combat' situation reliably such as dealing with a charging bear or the like, and i guarantee if that's all they shoot if they wait a year and come back there're going to be an absolute menace yet again on their first day. Can't imagine it would be better in a combat situation which is even more confusing and scary and the "bears" shoot back.

That's incredible, my fave cw shooter was spencer "the lead dispenser' for quite a few years But i meant with a bolt aciton - here's a taste from someone who is NOT a world record holder at all BTW - the world record i believe is 38 HITS - not shots but hits - on a 42 inch target at 300 yards! 300 and he still hit it 38 times in a minute! And that's reloading eery 10 rounds! Set by a brit soldier many years ago as i recall

Federal budget’s fiscal targets unlikely to be met, interim PBO says - The Globe and Mail Their budget is misleading and won't hit target Ottawa's operating spending — not capital — driving deeper deficits: PBO | National News | thecanadianpressnews.ca The liberals are overspending on OPERATING budgets, which was supposed to be getting better over the next few years but arent. Completely by coincidence.... Ottawa seeks new parliamentary budget officer with ‘tact and discretion’ - National | Globalnews.ca

Yeah, he's playing faster with the numbers again. He lies a lot. This is something people are not quite understanding yet. He needs to bring in more people because that's how you prevent us going into a session. Immigration artificially creates a higher GDP and without it it would be obvious to all Canadians that we were in recession right now. He can't afford that. But he also knows that people are fed up with too much immigration causing inflation and housing to become unaffordable. So he's trying to say that he's lowering immigration while putting his thumb on the scale. He's caught between two problems. Justin Trudeau left him an absolute disaster and he can't really say that out loud, and also he's not terribly competent which makes fixing the problems hard

This was already expected, this wasn't bad news.

In which case they'll probably all be dead and there won't be anyone left to rue anything. Good point.