CdnFox

I doubt you're keeping our mental health care costs down

LOL we accept your admission of defeat

Exactly! Obviously the strawberry fairies are the suppliers, but who's pulling the strings? Is it the keebler elves? Nawww, they've had a feud on with the fairies for years. This can only be the work of the berry mafia, with the "don' cherry running the show! Quick robin, to the bat cave!

Very true. And honestly he is absolutely famous for using the patented left-wing "why are we even talking about this" defense, where anything he feels he can't defend suddenly becomes beneith us to discuss and we must all be bad people for even bringing it up as a discussion point

You certainly do, and we appreciate your admission of failure And as I have pointed out many times in the past literally everybody is laughing at you

I think it's nice that he has something he's good at

His cognitive dissonance is probably causing you to dunning-kruger it (inside joke, not sure if you were around for his cognitive dissonance or dunning kruger phases)

Now you're just at the point where you're lying to make yourself feel better. It is pretty much word for word the same assertion I started with. I know you didn't address anything. As I have pointed out multiple times. And I refuse to explain myself for the fifth time if the four times before that were too much for your brain. You are literally operating under the belief that if you repeat a lie often enough it'll become true. I'm afraid this conversation is far over your head. Which is sad because it's one that a five year old that understand. The bible cannot be taken verbatim. But the good news is x-flyer agrees with you so that's the level of mental support you've got for this issue You're totally on the right side

There's no spin kiddo, nor is there any gas lighting or is there any revisionism, this has been the same since the beginning. The reason you're freaking out and screaming like a baby with its diapers full is because you realize I was correct and there's just not much you can do about it. You suggested that he was quitting because of the budget. I said that wasn't the case And he still did not support the budget. Lo and behold he did not support the budget And nobody is confused about the voting record. You don't seem to be understanding what I'm saying it just seems to be a common problem with you left these days. Sorry kiddo but if he supported the budget he would have voted for the budget. That's how it works. That's what support means Honestly it's exhausting to try to explain this to you,

Historically the NDP has always been a bit of a Jekyll and Hyde thing, Either being focused on working class families and the workers and the sort of socialistic support that they feel they should have, and at other times being a left-wing activist party focused on social justice warrior issues and wokeism. Jack Layton would be an example of the former. Jaggers would be a good example of the latter. They have always done their best when they focus on the former, but what you get in the internal party apparatus is a tendency towards activism. Some of the candidates being proposed are really against this kind of stuff, with heather referring to it as purity tests that are unnecessary and hurt the NDP. Others think the NDP should move towards being left-wing activists. We will see how it plays out, but the reality is the NDP simply doesn't do well as an activist party. That's more like the greens.

Well then what does equal justice Herbie? What would be justice for the families of the lost women. You seem to feel that there should be no consequences to this kind of action. Was locking him up in the first place a mistake? I'm looking at the crime stats since the liberals took over. Got to tell you that you're catch and release concept seems to be getting a lot of people killed Be thankful he was white. If he was first nations he probably would have been released on time served so that he could participate in a healing circle

This would probably be a lot more convincing if you didn't spend so much of your time sounding like a crazy person

Don't panic!! At this point there are NO signs of bouncy castles, we might be ok here....

That's simply not true. Post the transcript where he threatens him with legal sanctions if he doesn't change the vote count. Never happened

This is the exact very same assertion I started with. Precisely. I even gave examples of how the unverse being made in 6 days doesn't necessarily mean 6 24 hour periods. The word can be used to mean different things. Pretty much every serious bible expert including the pope. It is 100% a comprehension issue on your part. Nothing I've said is controversial and it's all very obvious. Human languages and imperfect thing at the best of times. At this point it's pretty obvious that you realize you've said something mind melting stupid. And you're sad attempts to try and backtrack and twist your way out of it just makes you look that much more of a twat. There is no motive here kid. I correctly responded to somebody who claimed that science and religion is incompatible by saying that science and religion is in fact not incompatible. Go play with your Lego. The adults are talking

Yawn. Yes yes, you're very pretty. I'll put the picture you made on the fridge. Sorry kid the bible was not meant to be taken verbatum. Sorry about your comprehension issues. Say hi to your imaginary friend for me

The issue is comprehension. Specifically your lack thereof. Kiddo this is a simple concept and you can't get your head around it. Honestly it's disappointing to watch. Nobody except you thinks that the bible should be able to be taken verbatim word for word. You got to be special stupid to think that The new emotional problems

You're clearly petrified. You literally talked about how you dream about him and think about him constantly. I mean look at you, you go and search the internet for pictures of him wearing a diaper because you're so desperate to convince yourself he's not scary. You all but beg the cpc to dump him, where as if you REALLY believed he can't win you'd be begging them to keep him. Sounds like you're the one who needs diapers

Translation, you think your inability to comprehend something simple is my fault. All my responses have been substantial. Lying about it won't make your position any stronger I have explained with examples in extreme detail what I'm saying and I have posted where others from various churches hold the same views. Leaving you yourself had to admit that the bible is open to interpretation which means I'm right. My claim is not outlandish, it is not observed, it is universally accepted by sane people. You just managed to put a stick up your butt because you think someone's picking on your imaginary friend. But that's your delusion

I've explained how many times. If you can't grasp it the first three or four times you're not going to be able to wrap your head around it now. I think you've just gotten to the point where you're not listening and your ability to comprehend has gone down the toilet as a result The rest of your stuff is just nonsense. It's the same delusional crap over and over again This is simple. What I have claimed is that the bible cannot be taken verbatim. It is open to interpretation. Every single christian sect or group agrees with me. If this upsets you then I'm afraid that you don't need a priest you need a therapist. There's nothing more to say. Your arguments are laughable and just repetitive. Most of the time you make decent arguments but whenever you get shown up you wind up having these little weird freakouts

I don't know if it would have been party suicide. Honestly they have nothing to lose and there's a very real chance they would have gained seats. But it wasn't the right time, they really need to wait for a permanent leader in Canada doesn't want an election right now. So I think they will be forgiven by the masses for not triggering an election. I think that was their one and only "free shot" though. Yeah, that guy pretty much lives in your head doesn't he?

So basically your entire post is that your buthurt and you wish I was wrong but realize that I'm not so you're going to try and pretend I said something different. What I said was he's still against the budget. And I said he's not retiring till spring so he'll still be here to vote for it or against it or whatever he wants. You had suggested that him stepping down was because of the budget which Was just proven to be wrong And no, he can be against the budget but also be against sending Canadians to the polls. He was for it he would have voted for it there's nothing at all stopping him. If he's against it But doesn't want to see an election and he's the only conservative who can abstain with no consequence. If he hadn't shown up to vote at all you might have had a point. But he deliberately showed up and voted to abstain rather than to support the budget. wah wah whaaaaaah you lose and I have never ever ever not known that there were two other votes. That is a complete fiction that you're making up in your teeny tiny little mind. That was where you were trying to pretend that the conservatives vote against the block motions and the block votes against the conservative motions and the budget passes. I pointed out that that is not how it can happen and at the end of the day the government only needs one party to agree with it. Somehow you twisted that into meaning that first and second reading were the same thing as the final vote. Some days you have good days, some days you have bad days. This isn't one of your good days You were wrong, him stepping down wasn't because of the budget as we have just seen today.

LOL ummm if it passed by two then it proved me right. He was there and could have voted against it if necessary, didn't because it wasn't Or were you asking yourself that question Ahhh no, he's still against the budget. he abstained, he didn't vote for it ';) The cpc wanted to dadge an election, job managed, but if he was for the budget he would have voted.... for the budget LOLOL kid you never pass up a chance to look stupid

LOL you are so gullable 😛 You realize that's a fake right? Maybe the claim that alberta is voting liberal might have tipped you off? LOLOLOL Here's the real numbers kiddo LOL how stupid do you hare to be to think that Alberta is voting liberal now? LOLOLOL well he's interim. He's not great at the leadership job and i think he knows it but who else was going to do it

He's definitely been pretty two-faced. Before and against pipelines, foreign against climate control etc etc. It's an old liberal tactic, tell whoever you're talking to what they want to hear and by the time they figure it out you're full of it you can say we've already moved on to something else