-
Posts
32,479 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
327
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by CdnFox
-
Meme/Cartoon of the Day
CdnFox replied to WestCanMan's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
LIBERALS HEAD TO THE POLLS TO VOTE FOR MARK CARNEY AS NEW LEADER! m2-res_720p.mp4 -
That's not your bet. That's you saying any damn stupid thing that pops into your teeny tiny little head because you decided you don't like him because he's not part of your tribe. It's not because you care about Canada, it's not because you've made a reasonable assumption or assessment of his abilities it is only an exclusively because you don't like him. And this is really not the time for that kind of bullshit. This is the time when decent Canadians and decent people stand up and do the right thing. It is painfully obvious to anybody with half a brain that Kearney is the wrong person. Jag meet isn't even an option. And pierre will do just fine against trump. It's going to be painful but it's going to be painful no matter who is in charge but I have a hell of a lot more faith that PP will do a good job and I can articulate why. All you can say is me no likey other people. Find most of the time but maybe this isn't the time for that kind of partisan bullshit
-
Meme/Cartoon of the Day
CdnFox replied to WestCanMan's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Ahem. We don't use the "s" word any more thank you very much. We prefer the term "freedom challenged opportunity deficient indentured servatudists" now? You racist! Sorry, i meant UNDOCUMENTED freedom challenged opportunity deficient indentured servatudists -
I've posted that very information for you before. You just ignore it and then continue to spout your Misinformation while claiming other people are spouting mis information. Density played a huge role in covid deaths especially in specific circumstances such as New York early on in the pandemic. There is tons of research on it and I've posted it all before
-
Why you can’t win with MAGA
CdnFox replied to Radiorum's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Lol pot, meet kettle. It is exactly what the democrats have been doing for ages and now there's backlash. The only thing that the republicans have been trying to do up to this point was try to have more control over who gets appointed to many of the judicial positions and even that is fairy recent. The democrats have been stacking ideologically aligned loyalists in every government position they can find, creating brand new government positions to accommodate additional ones and then using that to reach out to other groups like teaching groups and so on and so forth to help them stack their positions. Where was all of your concern about this threat during those days? It's far too late to complain about it now -
No problem with this is you conflate appealing with exploitation. If a woman is beaten by her mate day in and day out and finally gets away from them and another person says why don't you come be with me, I won't hurt you like that and I just want to be with you, then that's not exploitation. That's just a decent person offering to be decent to somebody and to them it seems like a great idea because they haven't had decency up to that point. You're literally talking about abusing people horribly and disenfranchising them and then cleaning that someone who says they won't do that is exploitive. That's just nuts. Don't you think you should have asked that before condemning it?
-
Yes, because that would be stupid. Nothing would ever get done, nobody would ever be accountable, little power blocks would develop behind the scenes out of the public eye with no stated policy or public input in policy, it would be an unmitigated disaster. So this appears to be the little game you play where you've realized you said something stupid and you're going to try and distract from it by making nonsense statements that muddy the issue. I made a point and you tried to deflect from it by saying that things like political parties and so on don't exist. When you got called on that you are now suggesting that an absolutely idiocy Of an idea should exist and somehow the fact that you have this bizarre and undefendable position means I'm arguing with ghosts (???) It'd be really great if you could get your head out of your ass long enough to actually make a point and if you are going to run away from your points as soon as you make them maybe try making better points
-
Tim Houston "Changes his mind" on Auditor-General
CdnFox replied to Barquentine's topic in Provincial Politics in Canada
Yep. The price of freedom and democracy is eternal vigilance. If we could get Trudeau voters to realize that we would have been a lot further off -
That would certainly be a more fair way to do it. I absolutely guarantee we would hear a lot less whining about elon and his government spending cuts if everyone had to put their share of the bill As to why we don't the reason is simple. If we did then left leaning woke scumbags like yourself and those you support would no longer be able to effectively grift money out of the people or make them dependent. I mean let's get real, fairness isn't even one of the criterias that you people pretend matters
-
Meme/Cartoon of the Day
CdnFox replied to WestCanMan's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
It was actually just one viewer. They're counting the split personalities -
And we're colder, the warmer the climate the worse it was generally speaking. And we got it later, the us had it earlier than we did and racked up more deaths as a result. Bunch of other things. And the big spike in the us that put them over the top happened under biden. These people care nothing for the truth
-
They also pay a higher percent of their income if they buy an apple at the grocery. They'll pay more if they buy gas as a percent of their income. Etc etc. Buffet pays a HUGE amount more of taxes. And he really doesn't get much more in return. So if he's already paying 10 times the money for the same benefits why on earth would they expect him to pay more? He has to pay a higher percent for his food too, is he suggesting that we should subsidize that because warren buffet?
-
Except the money was stopped because nothing was found. That's a lot of money to spend to find bodies with no bodies found. So either there are no bodies, or there are bodies but they pocketed the money instead of actually trying to find them Either way it's the same. Either they know there are no bodies therefore they don't give a crap, or they don't give a crap either way and are simply exploiting their dead for profit. Either way we're done
-
Well there's no doubt about that part. It's not like she's even pretending to be on your side or anything.
- 13 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- ilhan omar
- americans
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Sure they do. The party's all hold very social events with lots of people going to pub nights, dinner nights, all kinds of exciting things. For many people there are social club the same as the lions or the legion or the like. LOL you've never really participated at all in politics other than to stand on the sidelines and whine have you
-
yes. Badly. If that is your argument you lose. Of course if I'm wrong I'm sure you'll reply with an intelligent and meaningful rebuttal, either offering a different argument or explaining why you feel that one is valid. If I'm right you'll reply with some weak assed insult AAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!!!!! LOL well thanks for the admission i guess And look at you, using your word of the day calendar to try to sound like you're smarter than a salted slug It's so cute when your kind pretends to be 'intellectual' Blah blah blah me liberal me mad me can't make intelligent argument so me simply lash out. Sigh. All the finesse of a spastic toddler. Let me walk you through some basics. One of the many ways to explore various topics is to have a debate or a milder form of debate to put the ideas and theories around that subject under the microscope and test them in acid. How that works is one side takes a position and attempts to defend it. The other party takes a different position and attempts to defend that. To the back and forth the various ideas which are not able to stand up to reasoned and logical examination tend to be knocked to the Wayside and this process tends to continue until at the end of the day hopefully if all has gone well you are left with a few nuggets which cannot be refuted by either party or a few things which cannot be proven one way or another and are simply a matter of opinion upon which the two people must agree to disagree. This is a time-honored process and it works. You call it a zero-sum game because you Are inexperienced and poorly educated on the subject. The zero-sum game is something entirely different. Now if you're done crying and you've had your cookie in your milk if you like we can get back to the discussion, if you are still finding it emotionally too much to handle then maybe we should put it aside for right now until you feel a little better.
-
Just stop voting for her. My god. We had a member of parliament in Canada who was similarly obnoxious to people who cared about firearms rights. We organize people across the country to make donations to his political enemy to get them elected in the next election instead. It was called the Turf Mark Holland project and we absolutely succeeded. Maybe a bunch of people in the states need to organize and do the same thing. She's up for re election in late 2026, start talking to the republican party, find a good candidate that's moderate enough to win there and is electable, and start an online campaign to raise money and awareness for the person. Call it the "End of Ilhan" campaign or something catchy I bet you could get the big boys like ben shapiro to promote it. Seriously. anyone can start something like that and if it catches on it could legit result in her getting turfed. Woke is on the out. Just get rid of the B.
- 13 replies
-
- ilhan omar
- americans
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with: