CdnFox

What a liar you are. You are absolutely adamantly opposed to him back when he was running for the leadership and would never have voted for him under any circumstances regardless. Your mindless liberal drone, you're not voting for anybody but them. You devoted for Trudeau again if he was running. You're a bad Canadian as far as your duty is a citizen goes and you don't care about the right choice for Canada you only care about supporting your tribal team. Pretending you were really on the fence there and couldn't decide BUT... then he said THAT and.... give me a break LOLOL. Meanwhile Trudeau is pocketing taxpayer dollars and saying anyone who has concerns about the vaccine is a bigoted women hater and you're like "give me more of that guy!" LOL!

There were tons. Had it been up to the western provinces we would have been there for sure. I don't know how good is judgment was, but at the end of the day he was right and you have to call a spade a spade. Many people believed the Americans when they said there was evidence of weapons of mass destruction and that turned out to be wrong. One of the primary differences between the right and the left is I'm perfectly capable of admitting when the right makes a bad decision. That is not something the left is ever capable of doing, even when it is so obvious and so painful that even a child can see it. But again you have utterly failed to present any evidence that this is due to some sort of tie between the conservative party and the republicans. Which was supposedly your point. So what you appear to be saying is that you have realized you were wrong and you were foolish to even say it but you are going to try and dance around that by changing the subject to something where you were correct. I get why you'd want to do that but it still makes you look childish

Oh yes, your usual admission of defeat always love to see it Next time don't say stupid things, don't defend the stupid things you have said, and then don't pretend that you are being stupid for humor sake even if we are laughing at you

Sure. Academics in general these days are more left-leaning than right leaning although that has fluctuated over history. But today that is the case. So if you were raised in an environment which hammers home far left thinking day and night obviously a higher percentage is going to lean to the left. There's also a practical consideration. Republicans are more likely to think that if research is worth doing the private sector will pay for it and if it's not worth doing why are we asking the public to pay for it? Obviously they recognize that there are some research that should be done even though it may not have commercial value today but the democrats are more likely to be a little wasteful in that respect and obviously the more money available for research the better as far as they're concerned. No that's stupid. And amusingly and somewhat ironically very unscientific

It's a common phrase to mean woke left research that is not of any real value. I'm sure you'll get over it Good. There is great value in shaking that established tree every now and then and forcing them to rethink recalibrate and reorganize. Those groups are every bit as susceptible to becoming stale and corrupt as any other and every now and then you've got to kick over the anthill and let them rebuild. Sorry but that's just your echo chamber propaganda talking. The left isn't Progressive. The left is ideology driven and claims that everything it wants to do is Progressive even when it is regressive. It's your way of saying you're the good guys and all others are the bad guys, but it's meaningless. Every major advancement in our culture had come from the right. Most of our technology which has freed people from having to work in agriculture (until recently in human history 80 - 90 percent of the jobs were focused just on providing food) and gave them the time to pursue other activities. Capitalism has lifted more people out of poverty than any other system including socialism by an order of magnitude. The right is anything but reactionary. The right is what builds things. The right is what invents things. The right is responsible for more equality than anything the left has ever done. The right promotes meritocracy which is the strongest and most permanent cure for racism and sexism there is. the right constantly uses science to support its positions. Again your feelings on this are not based on facts but rather are based on hatred and bigotry which is really all the left is worried about these days

They are cutting funding to research which supports a political agenda rather than provides needed research. Lesbian dance theory research does not benefit America as a whole nor is it necessary. And they're not cutting funding at all they're saying that what funding there is will not go to that particular topic. And while it might be a stretch to say that that's supporting lies it absolutely is not a stretch to say it is supporting propaganda and a political agenda rather than honest research. They're absolutely right to say we're not interested in that anymore

In respect of your honest and fair evaluation I will point out a couple things I didn't like. I felt that his focus on John a McDonald, which is a little new whereas most of the rest of his stuff he said before, is a little misguided. While I absolutely do believe that John a should be held up as a hero and the father of confederation that he is, and while I also agree that it shouldn't be lawful to tear down statues or public works, I feel it could be divisive to make that a front and center issue and I have serious qualms about passing laws to jail people rather than some form of other punishment for tearing down a statue in protest. Trudeau is the most divisive prime minister we've ever had and we need very much for the next prime minister to be looking at how he can bring all people together.

I think you're pretty grossly overstating that and many of those were in fact democrat policies. It is often been joked for example that canada's conservatives are basically America's Democrats, although that's probably slightly less true these days as the democrats have taken a hard turn to the left. And going back to reform alliances a little silly. That would be like saying that liberal policies and NDP policies are exactly the same because the NDP supported the liberals. The conservatives have often liked many of the ideas that the republicans also like, they prefer less control over firearms, they prefer supposedly lower taxation although to be honest looking at the deficits in recent years they probably differ a great deal on financial policy in that regard these days. But that is not the same thing in the slightest as having close ties with republicans. When it comes to America harper negotiated vastly superior free trade in lumber deals, to go on the other hand actually got us a week or deal. Mulroney got us a spankingly great free trade deal against Ronald Reagan. A deal that was so good that despite running on canceling it the liberals under cretchen actually kept it in place without change. I think you would have a hard time actually pointing at policy for any of the conservative governments in the last 30 years that showed any favoritism at all with the republicans. Sure. Americans went to war and a lot of Canadians felt we should have been beside them as we always have been. Harper was wrong and the liberals called that one correctly, but again you would have a tough time showing that that was because it was a republican in power. Conservatives have been just as eager to go and just as supportive when democrats were the ones starting the wars. I think you're conflating I believe that some of the American ideals are good and worth considering with some sort of connection with the republican party. I think that they just think those ideas are good and it has nothing to do with the party that came up with them. Like Poilievre said, it doesn't matter what trump says we should be dealing with our fentanyl problem because we should be dealing with our fentanyl problem for our own sake. He's not siding with trump. He's just saying the guy's got a valid point and we've got a real problem and we should be dealing with it

I wouldn't say the first, I would say both sides are equally prone to slinging such stones if they perceive the group that did the funding to be biased in any way. The lefties are just as quick to decry a report funded by Big Oil. And fair enough, bias is always an issue even when it is government funding. Government funding is every bit as biased. The government tends to fund research that supports its policies or enforces its belief system that it's selling. Why do you think there were so many papers on lesbians etc etc under the previous administration? Why do you think there will be none under this administration? And further, even when the gov't isn't bias the people from the gov't in charge of allocating the money very often are. There has been much talk about how left leaning achademics have refused to fund any research that might contradict the narrative on climate change for example, even if that isn't a gov't instruction. All research is questionable. The peer review process is better than nothing but almost useless. All you can do is begin to look at bodies at work and look at the research itself and have a discussion about it. But regardless, there's nothing anti-science about saying I as a taxpayer and not interested in funding Research into lesbian dance theory. I don't see that as being a research topic that will benefit the nation in such a way as to justify a public expenditure. And you are being disingenuous when you make your claim that just because they are saying they don't want to find these subjects that funding itself will go down. Different research will be done, not necessarily less research. And there is no group more anti-science than the left these days. The left wing religiously ignore science that doesn't support its point often to the point of Ridiculousness. So before you go throwing any stones you might want to get out of that glass house of yours

Told ya Any more stupidity you'd like to get out of your system? Honestly the only thing dumber than snarkily saying someone should do their research without providing any evidence they were wrong is to do it without having done your research and then having someone prove you're wrong. If you don't feel just a little bit ashamed of your performance there then you need to ask your doc to up your dosages. Utterly irrelevant. The liberals could have launched a challenge if they wished but the house speaker had in fact ruled and he is the authority.

Almost none of that is accurate. Hitler always intended to go after the Soviet Union. It was always the final plan. Hitler did not actually intend to go up against britain, he had believed and hoped that he could negotiate a settlement and wanted no part in a war with England. But England had to be neutralized if he was going to carry on with his plans in Europe. He had taken out his main rivals there, France the low countries etc and italy was on his side, so he gave up on Britain when it was obvious he wouldn't give an easy win but he thought they were neutralized. Because he didn't care about them, he just wanted them out of the way while he went after his primary target. Trump is serious about china but it does not see himself as losing that war at this time and he is dead serious about his belief in manifest destiny. Not the first American to see things that way. Trump is about consolidating power in the united states and he has not coming after Canada because it's an easy target he's coming after Canada because he wants Canada because it will make the US considerably stronger. In other words, no matter what happens with china he's still going to be pushing to Annex Canada. He will fail but he wants to get as close as possible. As for dogs and cats you are completely wrong and misunderstand that entirely. Neither animal chose anything. We domesticated those animals and bent them to our will. Dogs are pack animals and as pack animals they're easier to train and they are eager to work with a group. They have an extreme loyalty to their group. Cats are not pack animals they are much more solitary and therefore they don't understand the concept of working with a group. It is outside their intellectual capacity to grasp, but that makes them excellent solitary hunters which is what we domesticated them to do in the end which is hunt rats and mice without guidance or any team involved. Both are tools that humans domesticated for their own purposes and both are used for the purposes that they were intended whether they want to or not. Which is exactly how trump sees China and Canada.

i'd be genuinely curious to see some real research about that. I feel like it's not true, or more accurately that's not the whole picture, but I don't actually have the stats to back that up. I wonder if it's more cultural, with young adults being more likely to be discouraged from preparing for the possibility of sex with birth control products like condoms. I have heard anecdotal tales that young men or women being caught by their parents with condoms is just as bad as being caught with weed, especially the girls. I think that's less true in Canada. But again, no stats or strong arguments to put forward so...

Which is why you went on to defend it and attempts to deny that it was a joke when I pointed out that it was inaccurate. You're such a pathetic liar. You got so emotional that you made a False claim about what PP said so that you could argue with that. And you do that constantly. And then i pointed it out and you doubled down, tried to twist around it and still claim he said something like that and when i proved that to be false THEN you're all "uummm.. er,... just kidding!" Then only joke here is you. You had 10 years to take meaningful action on climate change and you utterly failed. I'm sure that PP will do something to address emissions and pollution (harper did, and that actually worked), but it will be low effort low cost things because the public is completely DONE with "Climate change" fakery from you and your kind that makes them poor and does nothing.

... may break your bones but lefties dodge the question

That really is the sad part. Whenever you encounter the left on the web anywhere they're all the same. No ability to think or reason, entirely driven by spite hatred and emotion. They're like anti-vulcans or something. Instead of live long and prosper they're all die now and fail

LMAO! Uhhhh... kiddo? THat's not me suggesting russia is the victim. THat's me stating what russia's stated reason is. I know, i know. You get emotional when you start losing a discussion and your english skills always start to crumble I've never ever suggested russia is the victim. The fact that russia claims they were afraid of something doesn't change that There isn't any. I know you're desperate for there to be but my position is consistant. This conflict is 100 percent hamas's fault, every death is their responsibility, there is nothing that can mitigate that, this is not some sort of noble cause. And nothing changes that. You just wish that somehow two wrongs make a right. I assume you mean october 7, and i'm not actually trying to justify the killings at all, that would be you. Further i never said anything about history, i said the war started October 7th and i'm right. ANd nothing that happened before that justifies that, sorry. I know you're desperate for the terrorists and child killers of hamas to be the good guys, and for the people who support them and keep them in power to be innocents. But none of that is true in the slightest. Ummm.... they actually do that you know LOLOL you'd think a bc boy who'd spent some time outside would know that. Works pretty good if you can't fight fire with water, then you fight fire with fire. You're just losing all over the place tonight aren't you

Sure kid. Oh so you did say it but now it was just a joke. Dude, you doubled down on it. When I pointed out he had no such thing you kept going on and insisting he did and then finally had to admit that he never said he had a plan but that he mentioned he liked carbon capture during an interview talking about the federal budget from the liberals. That's not being facetious. That's getting caught in your bullshit and now you're trying to pretend that it was all just a joke ha ha ha. Says the guy who just just got called out for lying and making shit up You're bullshitting about Polievre because you don't like him and trying to claim he said or did things he didn't. That's it. It does all the time and people take me very seriously and they know when I'm joking. With you it's just lies and bullshit and when you get busted THEN "it was all a joke honest!" PP has never claimed to have a plan that would control the climate or even seriously impact the climate. That's all i said. And if you'd agreed with that you could have done so 10 posts or so ago but you kept on and kept on till you looked like an a55hole and now you'r e mad and you want it to be all my fault as usual.

I clipped this to where his wife starts to speak and then he comes on. This was PP's speech at his Canada First rally for Flag day (yes, today is flag day) For those who claim he doesn't talk policy, here you go. That was a fantastic and empowering speech, it's very similar to many of of his others but a few new announcements, just a solid performance. Carney is not going to stand a chance against this guy. And these are the policies we need to get Canada back on track

LOL " This is one of the most powerful warships in history, with one of the most sophisticated defense systems that can intercept any airborne Seaborn or submarine threat and is surrounded by some of the most competent and Powerful support vessels that create a giant shield which is Impenetrable and Will Keep Us Safe against the latest Russian Chinese or Korean supersonic missiles" * DIIIINGGGGGG!!!!* "what the hell was that?"

So because you don't understand how a dei program might affect an air traffic system trump must therefore blame a panama registered us navy crash on dei?

Entirely wrong. Trump is not a fascist movement, lawfare really is a thing and has been before trump even, trump and the maga people were around long before lawfare became a discussion with them so it's hardly a founding myth You not realize how pathetic you and your Fellow left-wing supporters look when you talk like this? I warned you a year ago this kind of talk would cost you the election. People see right through it, there's no sense to it. It's so ridiculous that even a child can look at it and say that your Bonkers for even saying it. It isn't even that it's just a lie it's that it's a cry for mental health treatment. It makes you and people like you seem like deranged lunatics that the average intelligent person is going to want to distance themselves from. The "hitler" worship crap just makes you look like you havent' got a single legitimate complaint about trump so you have to make crap up. For gods sake man, your party of preference has GOT to get itself back to reality and start having real conversations. You're looking full on retarded when you do stuff like this, i absolutely assure you there's enough REAL issues with trump that you don't have to make fake shite up!

I have never ever suggested that Russia is the agreed victim. So in other words you're mocking something that has never existed. Ok kiddo. Yeah, that's not called "sense", that's called self delusion. Why. Do you think it'll make your support of these terrorists doing it now ok? Yes, we know. You support terrorists, the slaughter of innocent people in an undeclared conflict and like every evil person in history you think you can justify your inhumanity somehow. You can't. That's not true, i've never said i support you once! Every single dead person in this conflict could be laid at the feet of Hamas and the population that supported it. There's no mitigation, there is no excuse, there is nothing moral or acceptable about it. They are evil people doing evil things with the support of people like you. Sounds like trump supports scattering them to the four winds. This level of evil was going to lead to in the first place

Yeah I've already quoted it. And it's from this thread. So you say it, I quote it, you demand I quoted again, and now you're demanding I quoted again It's always been true for you as I mentioned above that you realize you say something stupid and then try and lie about what you said. He has never suggested that he can control the climate as you claimed, he has never put forward a specific plan for climate change, you've basically just made up whatever as you went because you're big mad the left and supporters such as yourself have failed utterly and turned people off climate change by not giving a crap other than to use it to take money from people for 10 years. People are sick of the lies. People are sick of left-wing snake oil peddlers like yourself who can't even own what they said and demand that it be reposted again and again and again in the same thread You don't care about climate change, if you did you wouldn't have failed for 10 years. Pretending to care now isn't going to fly

Are you referring to the war with the ukraine? Which is about the ukrainians resisting annexation and which the russian's stated reason for is their fears over eventual annexation by nato? You are so dense scientists are trying to figure out if your brain has collapsed into it's on mini black hole yet. if you had a single moral fiber you'd realize it's not okay to kill women and children over a lie. They initiated a war that was not in progress without warning and slaughtered civilians. The purpose for doing this was to win political power by encouraging the Israelis to strike back whereupon they would go screaming to the united nations as they always do and cry about how their civilians that their military hides behind we're getting hurt. This is historically one than brownie points and goodies and they have no problem killing their own people any more than they have a problem killing others. Didn't pan out that way for them this time, they didn't get the sympathy that they were expecting and now they're not sure what to do. But this was about Evil men who want power and the men and women who support them. This has absolutely nothing to do with fighting occupation. They killed innocent women and children on the Israeli side and then hid behind their own women and children and got them killed, and the women and children on their side in question support this. Sorry sparky. Supporting these terrorists and civilian murdering scumballs has nothing to do with occupation and everything to do with political power and money

Nope. And in fact case in point when the us suffered horribly and crashed in 08 canada had a very mild recession and recovered before theirs was even over. So it's not just Canadians, you really don't know much about anything do you