CdnFox

Where are you seeing that? I haven't seen that reported at all

What kind of retarded dolt thinks that working in an industry for 25 years is the same as having no experience in that industry? And considering your last bright idea was "A drama teacher with no experience in politics? Yes please!" I think we can safely rule you out as somebody worth listening to when it comes to picking a competent person for the job Prime minister is not an entry level position. This guy has never done a day working in politics or running a government or the like. He is a banker. Being a banker is not the same as being a politician in the same way that being a banker is not the same as being a doctor. You would have thought you would learn from your last pick not to choose someone with zero experience. Poilievre has decades. So if experience matters to you then you know who to pick

And was that 2014? In fact was it 2010? 2000? 1980? 1950? No? Earlier than that? So it sure wasn't a problem in canada when trudeau took over Because 2015 is when Trudeau took over and things have certainly got a hell of a lot worse since then. Now jews are being attacked in the streets, their schools shot up, massive protests calling for their death, there are union groups and teachers advocating for the destruction of israel.... so if we have to go back 100 years to find something similar then you're kind of proving the point they were making. We didn't have a big anti semite problem in canada. Now we do. THe culture wars and race hatred we see today came up from the states and was spread by the liberals

Who claimed that you said she was right? You dishonestly characterized the statement she made and I pointed that out but I don't recall saying that you believe she was right. Did someone else say that? I hope you're not being dishonest again No it didn't Mike. Lying again I see. Point out where it said that you believed she was right. Seriously, if you didn't have dishonesty you'd have no honesty

She's dumb as a stump. She agreed with everything he said and then literally everything else after she agreed was wrong. I have no doubt that other people that have no education in these matters and are equally of low intellect believe that somehow she's making right-wingers look stupid. But to anyone with a brain or a smidgen of knowledge she's a complete adult. Imagine arguing that GDP per capita isn't relevant or is it indicative of quality of life. Or imagine suggesting that if we lower the prices of real estate that it wouldn't matter because the developers will just pocket the money as if there's no such thing as competition or a market. Like that is seriously "I believe in Santa Claus" level stupid. Oh well. There will always be those in society who think that McDonald's is healthy and fine dining.

Of the total population of canada, 1 percent is a significant portion. There were about 17,000 in bc alone at the turn of the 19th century at a time when bc's population was only about 100,000 people. That's a pretty significant hunk. And that's from one country. Soooo - thanks for admitting i was right i guess?

oh look at you trying to backpedal your way out of it You said that only whites were allowed. Yeah the Chinese were not only allowed but arrived in huge numbers. You can point to very brief periods in history where they unfairly had to pay a tax but the tax is not a restriction on entry. And lots of the periods of time there were no 'restrictions' as you call them. So now that you've been proven to be a complete liar and a fraud you're going to try and backpedal it and say "oh, but by 'not allowed' i meant there were some financial disincentives" Pathetic. Chinese arrived in large amounts. Black people arrived in fairly respectable numbers considering they were coming from the US. Japanese and other asians were also arriving in substantial numbers through most of our history. So once again you're a lying sack of shit who can't man up when he's wrong. LOTS AND LOTS of people who weren't white were allowed into canada and ALWAYS have been. Well that's not possible - no non whites were ever allowed in Canada according to you until recently!!!!! LOL thanks for taking the time to confirm you're full of shit.

Nope. They absolutely did not. No they don't. And when conservative governments do it and the electorate finds out about it conservatives punish the shit out of them. The problem is that those on the left are constantly prepared to reward that behavior. And yet you want to excuse it by pretending somehow it's acceptable to other people. Like your own lack of morals and decency is somehow ok if you can pretend everyone else feels the same way. They don't. We're not talking about a slip up or a misunderstanding or somebody being incompetent and doing something they shouldn't have, we're talking about constant and regular deliberate breaches of ethics and the law that began almost immediately after he took office and has not stopped. Not to mention allowing foreign interference in the form of Chinese money pouring into liberal candidates and taking no action to prevent us because it was beneficial to him. Sorry, you don't get to pass that off as everybody does it. You are supporting a corrupt government because you are a corrupt and moralist individual as are many on the left. Fortunately the ones who are not as a moral and repugnant as yourself have finally realized that they cannot support the scumbag liberals the way they used to and are now turning to Poilievre and are set to give him the largest majority in history. The liberals will have a long walk back from this one and they may even be wiped out, which is what they desperately need. The party has become inherently corrupt and so has its base. They need to be shaken up and think about their actions.

You make hypocrisy sound like a bad thing. For liberals it's practically a prerequisite

You are both uneducated and insane. Chinese people came here in huge droves and represented a significant portion of the population since the very beginning. They practically built the railroads. Other asians as well. And while blacks weren't terribly prevalent they were certainly allowed to come here and in fairly sizable numbers. Going back to the 1800s there was a black mayor of Victoria in British Columbia for example and he was well respected. He wrote that occasionally racism would rare its head but for the most part people were extremely welcoming and supportive of him. The idea that only whites were allowed to come is completely retarded. Much like you

It's not really what they said though and it's kind of dishonest for you to say that. Racism was not a significant problem prior to Trudeau. Sure, there were some outstanding issues but for the most part racism was not a big factor in canadian life prior to Trudeau. Then Trudeau imported the race wars and intersectionality from the states. Now racism and prejudice has exponentially exploded. Hate crimes are up something like 300% and just the last few years. Racism and racism laws have gotten to the point where if a comedian tells a joke he could wind up being wiped out financially. It has become epidemic And that is true. You can wind all you like you can even call it an exaggeration to a degree but it is substantially true. The stats and the facts back it up

On the other hand you will repetitively vote for someone who has proven to be corrupt, breaks the law regularly, is dishonest, and has lead Canada to ruin. But he didn't say woke! So he's all good right? People like you are one of the best arguments against democracy

I think in all of the years I've known you this is the first time you've ever started a thread instead of complaining about the threads other people start well done. On to the 'review'... anyone who starts off saying her attention span is less than 2 hours so this was hard for her is probably not going to be intelligent Her first real critism is that polievre talks about women... accurately LOL She agrees with him and then just says she's tired of talking about babies. from there it goes downhill. She's dumber than a stump. She doesn't understand that gdp per capita 'reflects' what people earn and what they can afford and what kind of taxes the gov't collects. She feels it doesn't. SHe is wrong. it does. She then goes on to misquote facts about inflation. She then says the only reason people are struggling is the rich stole your money!!! LOLOL (stupidest comment ever) She doesn't say he makes false claims about housing. she says that if the developers saved money they'd keep it. Which shows a SHOCKING lack of understanding about the market So a little dishonest of you there mike. Bottom line this is a person who's dumber than a stamp hammer, you've misrepresented what she said Mike, and honestly she's SAID HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHNIG HE MENTIONED, but just carries on to say if Polievre fixes the problems the rich will just steal the money anyway so we're all doomed. Mike, if this is an example of what you consider to be "good" commentary, i can see why you don't get a tonne of respect here. Surely to god there's a better critique out there that actually critiques? I could write a better critique and i liked the interview.

I really dont I enjoy the forums but they're what i do while i'm doing something else for the most part. Most of it is iphone and voice dictation, or while i'm watching tv or while i'm on hold at work etc etc. People like you can only do one thing at a time. Slow brains have to focus to get even simple tasks done. And seeing as you can only type with two fingers i'm sure that it seems like my posting requires some great amount of time. skilled people always seem 'impressive' in their abilities to the dull peasantry Now now don't rush him..... he can only type with two fingers and he needs one of them to work the dictionary as he goes

Welp - sounds like they've called a caucus meeting for next week. Liberal MPs to meet next week as calls for Trudeau to leave intensify | CBC News I suspect we'll finally hear what is intentions are then and whether he'll step down or go to an election himself.

of course! It's the only way he can get low cost slave zucchini! Be reasonable man!

Sure sure. (looks around, ,owns house, 2 nice vehicles, is set for life, political party is set to win greatest majority in canadian history, just watched trump cream the democrats etc etc) Yeah, if i "lose" any harder i'll be in the 1 percent For the 21's century the conservatives are set to dominate. They've had about equal time so far in Canada with harper getting about 9 years and trudeau at just over 9. Now it looks like the cpc is going to crush the libs into the ground because it turns out that left wing ideology is the worst thing possible for a country and now people can't afford food or shelter after 9 years of it. So chances are the cpc will be in for at least 10 years probably more and the liberals may very well collapse or take 3 or 4 elections to bounce back. Meanwhile the west grows stronger politically with every census, and that is very bad news for the libs who refuse to elect a western leader. Given all that i get why you're bitter But by all means, bring on Carney. I'm sure he'll do every bit as well as mike ignatieff did ROFLMAO!!!! Stupid liberals still think prime minister is an entry level job

She got confused and thought 'empirical' mean it was written by darth vader

I get where you were going with that but the polling says different. In fact the polling suggests that people find that Poilievre has a fair bit of charm and appeal. Not as much as trudeau did, but far more than harper. And he's 1000 times more competent than trudeau which has an appeal of it's own. (Mind you a dead slug is more competent than trudeau). And i assume that's what you meant, it's "Good" that we're giving the reigns to someone with some skill rather than just interesting socks. I have often said that if you don't have a charismatic man, you better have a charismatic plan because people will vote for one or the other. (still working on a more gender neutral version). The fact is Poilievre is a good mix of both. And people meet him and listen to him they do find him engaging. And he comes across as being very knowledgeable about the issues and aware of what needs to change to resolve it. So he's got that whole 'double whammy' thing going on where he seems like a real person to many and also seems like he's got a plan. So for people like you (and me) who don't care much about personality and care more about competence he's got a certain appeal and for people who like the charm and personality he's got a certain appeal as well. And can call in his wife if necessary and she can charm the socks off an enraged and rabid badger. LOL you just make watching you lose soooo entertaining with that crap

LOL and the winner of this year's first "that'd be the sound of a b^tch-slap" award is....

When you get busted for your lying you always try to make it someone else's fault. Was about 2 posts down or so. And if you want to get technical the OP post was about how they'd blame trump, which STILL HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PERP. So either way you were completely full of shit. He didn't mention that EITHER were islamic OR leftist. He just said terrorist. And his point was that they would say it's trump's fault rather than the criminals. Lying again to try to make your point. Pathetic.

That's not quite accurate. Gender dysphoria is definitely a disorder and a mental health issue that interferes with people's ability to lead a normal or healthy life and is still listed as such. Not every transgender person has dysphoria but most do to one extent or another and if they don't then really it's just a personal preference and there's no reason why society should play along with it any more than there is if someone decides they're more comfortable as a furry. I don't have a big problem calling a he a she if they prefer as a rule and i don't think many others did either but when they decide to require that by force of law, when speaking the truth which is that person is a biological male is now illegal then there's a huge problem So any 'serious' case of transgenderism comes along with mental health issues. Which is what seperates it from homosexuality for example, gays can have quite happy and healthy lives no matter how gay they are. Some of them argue the more so the better but transgender people become dysfunctional the more 'trans' they are to the point where it can become crippling. There is a pathology and there can't be a pathology without an illness can there. Well here's where you run into a problem. Either it's a very mild "case" in which case it's not a medical issue, but really is just a personal preference. Which is fine, people should have the right to their personal preferences but then we do NOT have a duty to accomodate. OR it's a serious case and then there IS a mental health component. And the problem is you're kind of trying to dance between those two things at the same time. It's not a mental health issue but it is a mental health issue and the people can't help it. this duality shows up a lot with trans issues. It's an illness and we have a right to treatment, but it's not an illness. We have a right to define ourselves however we want but we also have the right to call you cis or whatever else we feel like because you don't have the right to define yourself. We believe we should have freedom of expression but you should go to jail if you CORRECTLY refer to us by our biological sex. Gender is not the same as sex and also gender and sex are the same thing. The lack of consistency in their arguments is one of the reasons people are starting to turn against them and not take the issue seriously.

So what you're saying is the dems definitely don't want to win in 2028

And we have a possible runner up.... Freeland reaches out to Liberal MPs as speculation swirls Several MPs, speaking on condition of anonymity, told the Star that Freeland has reached out and spoken to them in recent days. While the MPs said Freeland did not bring up the Liberal leadership, one of them felt the calls were connected to a potential leadership run, while another said they were “impressed” by the outreach. Now here's a fun fact many don't know. Mark Carney is Christina freeland's child's godfather. He has always been close with their family. This article says that she didn't specifically mention a leadership run the people felt she was feeling them out. I have to wonder if she's looking at the possibility of supporting mark carney as a possible leader candidate. If that's true, and she's thinking of propping him up if Justin steps down, then she is cruel beyond belief because she will help him get eaten alive.

It may well work out to be a good thing. Trump couldn't launch the appeals process until the sentence was done. If the judge sentences him then he can begin the appeals process and probably get the whole thing tossed. If they hadn't done the sentencing he wouldn't be able to do that at least until after the presidency if then. But let's be real, we knew that judge was a line schedule already. Those charges couldn't have been more bogus from a jurisprudence point of view. " He's guilty of this crime as long as you can imagine him being guilty of another crime that we haven't specified" Yeah that's pretty reasonable.