CdnFox

What you said was there wasn't there. In fairness you have to speak English at a higher than grade three level to get that, I should have remembered my audience No that's completely stupid. It isn't restricting anything. Your access to those operations are exactly the same as they always work, this is about funding and has absolutely nothing to do with restricting access. There are a lot of medical procedures that the governments medicare does not fund. So what's happened here is you made a ridiculous claim and you've discovered you were wrong. And rather than deal with the fact that you're wrong you go on for paragraph after paragraph claiming that English words don't mean what English words clearly mean. There's no restriction here. In order to preserve Medicare it cannot pay for all treatments to all things to all people. So there are a lot of procedures and things that it simply will not cover, and this is one of them. But that in no way shape or form means you have any less access to having the medical procedures done, it just means that you have to pay for it yourself. There was no significant organized campaign against Bud Light. Swinging a miss on your part kiddo And it's amazing how many aspartations you make without providing proof considering how much you claim that nobody else provides proof And yes, it's very obvious that you are the liar here. Just got caught at it again moments ago. And then you play the game where english words don't mean what they actually mean. Oh and as to kammy - you lied again. This popped up top of the list with a simple google search 12 year olds are children btw. So you lied there again as well. you've got nothing left kiddo. All you can do is pretend that english words don't mean what they clearly mean. Children DO get mutilated in surgeries. Kamala DID openly speak about AND PUSH FOR gender affirming surgeries for anyone INCLUDING ILLEGALS in prison. Nobody moved any goalposts. You've lost yet again. And it's lies like yours that cost the dems the election. People are done with your brand of bullshit.

Literally everyone And many chimed in here to tell you. Did you honestly think anyone was watching you dance like a monkey and NOT laughing at you? Hell kid - you can't even say why you're doing it. You're like a clown who thinks he looks normal and fashionable

You mean we'll get to see thoughtful insightful interesting viewpoints like yours claiming that a significant portion of the board needs therapy because you disagree with them? I take it you are putting yourself forward as one of the people that should be on the ignore list.

The reason for that is you forgot the other thing they do. Sure you're absolutely correct, they complain about things that republicans have never done. But they also have a bad habit of blaming them for things that happened that the republicans didn't do. And one of their favorites is nazis were republicans

That kind of proves their point though doesn't it? The left really does want to see us all eating bugs according to you

not everyone and their dog. Just lefty losers who can't cope with the concept because they feel it makes the left look bad. Especially the drunk ones. You know, the ones that nobody takes seriously anyway because their alcoholics who wind up drunk posting on the internet just before the weekend? They really have no life for anything going for them and they're watching their world collapse because leftists have basically destroyed it, but the one thing they always had and held dear was the Nazis were the far right. And without taking away from them well they've got nothing. How could they even fight an election? All they've got is insisting that the republican candidate is a Nazi And Hitler. So if it turns out the Nazis weren't the right, then how are they supposed to call the republican candidate a Nazi? This is what keeps them up drinking at night. Sorry kiddo. By any reasonable modern definition the Nazis were the left. They controlled the market and the economy extremely tightly for the specific purpose of advancing the social interests of the nation. They also increased social programs, medicine, a bunch of other traditional left-wing values. The Nazis were basically functioning in almost exactly the way as we see democratic socialists behaving today. That may irritate you for some reason but it's the simple truth

With post like these do you mind if I refer to you as Shat-myself?

Sure, but that is a viable method. Like we could do that. And it's not an unreasonable ask from the neighbors if that's what's happening I am beyonder that anybody from anywhere would choose to use Canada as a criminal springboard for entry into the united states. I think we should be doing more to stop that. Then again Trudeau has been actively encouraging chinese involvement in our elections so obviously he's not terribly worried about something as simple as foreign border crossings. I get the sentiment behind your comments. And I would probably suggest that most people would think that the majority of people crossing aren't themselves die hard criminals even if they're being used by criminal gangs But a very high percent of them are. And it is 100% legitimate to say that 100% of them are criminals and have no problem committing crimes if they heal it will benefit them. So who knows what they would be willing to do as far as crimes go in the states. At the end of the day I can't blame the Americans for saying that there's a problem and they expect us to do our share to try and help resolve it. If we are making a reasonable effort and we are doing the same sort of things that they themselves do then as far as I'm concerned that's good enough and if they have a problem with it then they're being unreasonable and we should address that appropriately. But we all know that when it comes to the people side of the equation we're not doing hardly anything. We don't screen people In any kind of meaningful fashion. We've got thousands of people who came here claiming that they had intent to study at places like the University of Moosejaw. They were lied to, they might actually believe it, but they obviously had no intention of studying there because they didn't do any of their own background research on the place or they'd have realized it was fake. And there's really no excuse whatsoever for Canadian officials not to say where are you studying and kind of raising an eyebrow when it's a place that doesn't exist. So we definitely could do a lot more on that front. So the Americans kind of got a legit reason to wine

Well we only have one Nazi here and he tends to lean a little left to center The fact of the matter is people like you on the left think virtually everybody is Hitler. I mean people insisted Trump was Hitler. And his followers were Hitler or Nazis anyway. So chances are the people that you saw that were Hitler worshipers we're actually just normal everyday run-of-the-mill people. But they're right of Castro so you think they're Nazis

Mostly because it's a lie. Almost nobody represented the right wing in germany. The truth is there really wasn't much of a right wing to begin with. Prior to the end of world war I Germany had a constitutional monarchy where the elected people had very little power at all and most of the decisions for the country were made by the nobility. Right-wing proponents of free democracies and such were actually shunned. In fact the biggest proponents of free or open market democratic society were the Jews. Most of what germans argued about was the flavor of socialism they would like. The communists obviously wanted communism. One of the socialist parties wanted a socialist model that favored state ownership of everything, but didn't go quite as far as communism. The other socialist party wanted open markets and a market-based model but one of the states to severely control the model to promote what it perceived as being the benefit of the state. The Nazis were the third party. But the national socialists were still socialists and left-wing. But the left today loves to lie about this because they're concerned that if people realize that the Nazis were basically what we call democratic socialists today in their practices that somehow people will think that it's the socialism that was bad. When in reality it wasn't necessarily that so much as it was the belief that the greatest benefit to society was expansion through military conquest which was a german belief going back to the beginning of the 19th century and certainly wasn't originated by the Nazis. That was the problem. But it does highlight one of the potential problems with a socialistic model. Socialism seeks to guide society towards an end that it sees as being noble and better. But if someone gets control who's idea of 'noble' and 'better' isn't so good..... you've got a problem

You're not really supposed to start drunk posting until Friday are you? Still wrestling with that alcoholism huh? Well I'm sure that debasing yourself and making yourself look like a childish loser will definitely fix things. What a sad little man. Imagine being so ashamed of yourself as a person that all you can do to try and make yourself better is lie about what other people said. No wonder nobody respects you here

Turns out I did my Google search just fine. You just lied and what you said was there wasn't. Sorry kiddo, that's on you. Not at all. You're welcome to pay for as many as you like if you want the doctors welcome to do it for free if he feels like it. But it says that taxpayers won't pay for it. And in my first statement i said basically 'they don't care if people do it. They DO care that taxpayers don't pay for it" And you're the one saying "No no no no that's not true they're limiting it for adults as well!!" Then you post an article saying people don't want to pay for it. Let's cut this a little short. It is not restricting services whatsoever to say that government programs won't pay for specific non-essential surgery. That has always been the case in America and is in fact the case in Canada. So when you said that they wanted to limit the treatments available to these people that was a lie. It's also extremely common that significant medical procedures require doctors to consult and authorize the surgeries before they happen. That is in no way shape or form limiting Care. And that was your argument. Bud light Did a minor ride campaign with a trans person. And people didn't like it. As I've been saying for quite some time and a lot of others have said as well people are sick of the woke. So they just stopped buying that product. And the interesting thing is the sales number suggest very strongly it wasn't just conservatives. A lot of people are just sick to death of woke crap and they got fed up and just said I'm not buying any more of that product. That's it 12-year-olds are small children. For that matter so we're 14-year-olds. Once again now that you've lost an argument you're going to try and play some sort of weird semantics game. These are children who are being mutilated. In fact it is the very definition of being mutilated. And the fact that you try and lie and weasel about it kind of proves my point. You know it's wrong, but you don't want to say it. There's no point in providing any evidence with regards to Kamala Harris. As we've seen even with clear evidence you just lie and pretend that the evidence isn't there. It can be found in 3 seconds with a Google search. You remember at the top of this where you tried to pretend you were mad at me because I didn't do a Google search to find your information the way you thought I should have? Go do a Google search Enough of your sea Lion bullshit. And how could I not know what the term means with one of the kings of sea lioners of all times right in front of me. Once again, you have to lie in order to try to make your point because you don't have a point. Nobody said anything about calling people bigots. I'm talking about going after people's kids, I'm talking about forcing people's mothers and daughters to have to stare at a penis in a changing room to make you happy. I'm talking about demanding that children's Parents have no right and should not be informed if their kid is looking at gender changing surgery through the education system. I'm talking about towns and schools and other people being forced to celebrate trans events even if they don't agree with it. In short I'm talking about the attack by the trans community on basic human rights that other people have. And yeah. If that's what it comes to and if that continues then I guarantee you there will be blowback

So let's go with that. 21,000 people of which a very high percentage are going to be bad people because they are being brought in by american criminal organizations. They're obviously not Americans themselves or they wouldn't need to sneak across the border In what universe is that not a serious problem? Thousands of criminals coming across the border to work with American criminal gangs. How many hardcore criminal gang people do you think would be a number that would actually cause you concern? Like how many bad guys would have to move into your neighborhood before you said you know what, maybe we don't need this many. I mean your premise is laughable. That is a lot of bad guys Complete false equivalence. Smugglers are smugglers. Americans do their best to try and nail criminal smugglers at the best of times. As I said it's got absolutely nothing in common, the guns are already in the united states and people, commonly Canadians, legally go across the border into the united states and then try and sneak them back. That is not the same as someone coming from another country into Canada and then walking across the border in numbers where we know it's occurring but do nothing. You cannot conflate those two things. Contraband and people are two different things. When a person comes into Canada and we don't screen them or we don't question them and then they go from Canada into the US that was something that we had an opportunity to prevent. More importantly we do drug and contraband interdiction all the time along the border but we don't do it with humans. If it's being smuggled separately then we guess we have to take a look at what we're doing to prevent it to coming into Canada. But it is completely retarded to suggest that somehow the Americans have no right to be concerned about it coming into the united states. And if we're doing as much to try and keep it from Canada as they're doing then great, we have to talk to him about that. But I know we're not doing anything about the people No that's not what he's saying. Now you're trying to make excuses for him because what he said was stupid and you want him to be smarter than he was. Not in the actual process they don't. I was the one that said that they have to talk and be consulted and work out what's going to happen with each other but then you present a united front with the gov't putting together their negotiating team and that's who's doing the talking. When was the last time you saw successful negotiations take place where multiple level of governments renegotiating independently. Like feel free to go back 100 years It absolutely is. Again the author has said something stupid, I have pointed out that it's stupid, you want the author to be smarter than he is so you're making excuses for him. That may make you smarter than the author, but it doesn't make the author any smarter

Happy thanksgiving to our American cousins

But it turns out they're not elastic. If you need to go somewhere in a relatively short period Of time a plane is the only practical solution. And driving still burns carbon fuel. People don't just take air planes because they want to fly on an airplane, they want to go somewhere. This is already been studied to death. Elasticity of energy expenditures is far far lower than was anticipated and the simple fact is the only way the carbon tax can help is if it hurts the economy so bad that people can't afford to do anything and just sit at home. That's not acceptable

They didn't do a either. So something that can't do what it was intended to do and also can't do something it wasn't intended to do and the only thing it does do is cause financial hardship is actually a useless thing. Only the left needs this explained to them

Nobody believes that except DieHard lefties. Which is why he's back in office

We do. And it's getting worse. The percentage of people that are caught going from Canada to America versus Mexico to America who are known gang people or who have serious criminal problems is it a ratio of something like 8 to 1. And there are well over 100,000 such crossings each year and it's growing exponentially. It's a serious problem. Well that's smuggling and it's a bit of a different issue. A lot of those people are Canadians. And we have a lot more control about securing our borders. Think of it this way, if America was knowingly letting people bring cocaine into their country and then letting them walk across the border into our country that would be a similar comparison. No he isn't. That isn't playing for time. No, many chefs spoil the broth. You have one point of negotiation and you work it out. When you have 10 people negotiating the same thing from different points of view you get a mess. Like I said they should have input the negotiations should come from a single source It's dumb. It's a meaningless phrase that isn't helpful. Standing tall is about ego and pride. What we need is people to be statesmen like. What matters here is getting stuff done and building a relationship For the next four years.

Everybody kiddo And you mention the gay sex and constantly. Like I said, whenever you get beaten you have weird sexual fantasies. Wasn't me that brought it up 🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿

Right, so I point out that you're wrong and why And somehow it's my fault and you're mad at me. You are an unmitigated ignorant ass and I can make fun of you just as easily whether you have anything to do with me or not so your call

You can't even post a link properly and somehow once again it's my fault I haven't even looked yet and i already know your links are going to be more lies. Lets look. This bill would not limit gender affirming care for anybody. It addresses who pays for it. They don't want the state and taxpayer dollars paying for it, but anybody can still go and get the surgery done if their own personal insurance pays or they're paying for it out of their pocket. So you lied for that one. Strike one Took a bit of digging but that one doesn't actually limit care either. Not only was the bill shot down but it actually didn't limit care, it simply would have required that a doctor sign off on the care first. The idea of having doctors approve medical treatments he's not entirely unusual. So strike too That one just talks about the first two which as we noted don't actually restrict care. So Strike three So no big surprise that I couldn't find this on my own, seeing is the problem was you were lying. None of these restrict care. They restrict who's going to pay for it and they also say that if you're getting medical treatments a doctor should be involved. Nice try No no you just desperately wanted to be. And the reason you want it to be is because You know what was said was true and you don't want to deal with it. So rather than address the legitimate point raised you are simply trying to hide behind the idea that somehow everybody freaked out over nothing. I pointed this little tactic of the left out I'm about a million times on this site alone. The view is a popular TV show that frequently spreads misinformation and was very popular with the left for doing so. They're now getting in trouble for it and becoming nervous about it as the original story suggests. Nope. Unless you're going to suggest that all of them are 18 which we know not to be true then it's still a simple fact that children are being mutilated. So that was another thing you lied about No that particular one was your plan. And evidence was already provided to show that's how she felt. If you feel the evidence isn't good enough then it is on you to prove otherwise. See that really is how arguments work. You are free to discredit somebody's evidence but if you choose to do so or say that it's not good enough you have to provide your own. I know I know. If we take your sea lioning away you won't have anything to argue with. God knows that facts and truth don't work for you ROFLMAO!! Well if your point was that if you continue to attack the right without cause or merit then the right might very well choose to react if necessary then yes, I imagine I did

For study says exactly what I just claimed it did. I shot you down for trying to claim that it said something it didn't How many millions of times do I have to tell you, if you have to lie to make a point then you don't have a very good point. The study was conducted regarding Texas only, it makes a wide number of assumptions and doesn't claim otherwise, and is not indicative of what you are claiming.

Oh do you mean the Donald Trump whom women attacked relentlessly, and who they went after in the courts for the most stupid of charges and tried their best to run into the ground? That Donald Trump? Most people don't have his cash and connections to be able to fight that kind of protracted battle. They went after him with every single thing that they had, and the fact that he was able to come out on top doesn't mean that the average male can fight that kind of battle without severe financial destruction. If anything Donald Trump proves that I'm right. The left literally spent the entire campaign and a billion dollars and their entire message was how terrible a person he was, not how good a person they were. That is the left today and if you don't want to risk losing everything just to speak a little truth then it's not worth it

You went on and on about how great she was.

Everybody thinks so kiddo. You bring it up every single threat and many of commented on it. There's a couple of other posters who are similar but you definitely have a serious issue. You're so submissive that it's ridiculous. Even in this thread you've been begging me for permission to stop posting, which is weird beyond belief Now even blackbird is laughing at you.