Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    31,589
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    323

Everything posted by CdnFox

  1. He is as far as you know. So here you are running around Calling people who are black as far as you know monkeys without a care in the world. You've proven yourself to be a hypocrite again. And now I'll wait your meltdown where you will Make your usual homosexual fear fantasy reference
  2. I know. I was the one who told you that You should call trump and see if he's hiring. You certainly lie enough for it. There are reasons for his actions. The fact that there are reasons doesn't mean they are justified, but it does mean there's reasons. There's reasons why rapists rape women, that doesn't mean they're justified or someone mentioning what the reasons are is condoning it Have you considered having a conversation where you aren't a lying sack of shit?
  3. Of course you do, I'm sure that you are creators would have programmed That Into You
  4. it is what it is. This is what the people voted for when they voted justin in during the last election. Now we're going to get clobbered and Justin's going to pretend he's some sort of hero trying to defuse a situation that he himself created on multiple levels. Elections matter.
  5. LOL - @Nationalist winds him up and robo goes BZZZZZZZZWZTZTZZZWZWZWZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzt! (Flop.)
  6. Wow. so you just called a black guy a monkey and then said he gives off cracker vibes. Remember when you lost your shit for days pretending fake outrage when i compared someone to a monkey dancing to a hurdy gurdy? Hypocrite
  7. It's not complicated. Until like 5 minutes before the election started the conservative party had been a party in name only for the last 60 years. Most people didn't even know it existed. There were other right-wing parties that fill that role and the conservatives were just a shell. A series of events led to a situation where all of a sudden that party took off in the polls. And the other party, the liberals which were actually a little bit to the right of most liberals, collapsed and their vote went to the conservatives. It was a just add water instant sort of party. And as a result they had no ground game. They had no real volunteer network, they had no preparation, no voter management software, barely any get out the vote planning. To top it all off a couple of the old liberal parties people decided to run anyway as independence and that cost the conservatives about four or five ridings which would have given them the win. The independents did not win but split the vote. And is icing on the cake they didn't get any advanced polling out because they had no prep for it and on the night of the election there was a terrible storm they kept a lot of people at home, and the evidence is that cost them a lot of votes and some key ridings. Their leader also didn't have a super great campaign, it was his first campaign and again he really didn't expect to be running it from the front and some of his prep work showed that. If they spend the next 4 years getting their act together and properly merging the two parties and prepping for the next election they should win quite handily. Considering where they started from they actually did pretty well. Zero seats in the last several decades to one seat short of forming government
  8. Yeah that'd be you, grammar nazi
  9. And once again as soon as the left starts losing an argument they turn to weird homosexual sexual fantasies instead of reason or logic Every. Single. TIme.
  10. Wow, you've been beaten down so badly lately all you've got left is grammar nazi? that's pretty rough.
  11. And china. And the answer is because they are the largest trading partners of the united states. It's that simple. It would have seen that if it wasn't for the fact that you're even more simple
  12. And? Again, whenever the government chooses winners or losers it fails. And what you just mentioned was not a case of that. How many subsidies and 13 billion dollar plants did Canada have to provide in order for automakers to improve? The answer is largely none, The technology got better in the consumers Wanted the efficiencies that came with it and were prepared to pay the price. Electric cars are not there. The technology is not there. A small market segment finds them to be desirable but if you took the subsidies away that market segment would be quite small. When the technology is right and it makes sense people will support it. When it doesn't they won't. Fix the technology to the point where it makes sense and there will be no need for subsidies. Governments fail at choosing who wins and loses in the marketplace. As long as ice engines make more sense some more people they will be the prevalent vehicle sold.
  13. They weren't Canadians yet but it was a war between Canadians. The name would change but the people didn't. Swing and a miss. Also like a month and a half old
  14. it was right in his post. The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If all else fails, just be angry. So that retarded language you mentioned that you can't understand and aren't familiar with would be english. And yeah, we know.
  15. Not by much. I mean Ignatieff was frequently in Canada on lecture tours when he lived in America. I didn't mean he was a Canadian. Just like carney he had multiple citizenships etc etc. It'll end the same way. And just like Iggy he won't stick around after, he'll be gone on to something else despite claiming he's in it for the long run (Carney hasn't said that yet but he will). The liberals believe that they never have to change. That they only need a charismatic leader who can impress people to sweep them into power and they can continue their bad behavior and grift. They have believed this for decades now. And they are wrong. While they probably won't get wiped out like the PC did back in the day a massive defeat for them. For Kearney it's a free roll of the dice. Maybe some miracle happens and he gets to be prime minister of Canada which will allow him to pocket vastly more money that he does now and wheels incredible power, or it doesn't work and he's only wasted a few months of his time and blown what is a paltry sum to him and his friends. And there is always a chance that he will roll double sixes and something will happen and he will get to be prime minister, but the vastly more likely and is that the liberals are reduced to about 40 to 50 seats
  16. Except they actually have a reason for their gripes. Again, and I noticed you've never addressed this, you can't treat someone that crappy for that long and expect them to turn around and sacrifice more to help you. If they are a problem child they're one that Trudeau created by beating and molesting them regularly. And now that they're fighting back people like you are shocked that they don't want to be abused anymore.
  17. I don't think that's his issue here. This isn't like Mexico where there are hordes of people waiting to stream across the border at illegal crossings. The Fentanyl and other issues for the most part are happening at the US border crossings. People aren't smuggling this stuff in any kind of volume at all through the wilderness, especially not the Canadian wilderness in winter. They're driving it over smuggled on trucks. And Canada does not control the US border crossing. There's absolutely nothing we can do there to tighten anything, that is 100% something that the Americans will have to address. It is not possible for us to do anything about that. The vast majority of the time, when somebody asks you to do something that's impossible it's because they don't actually want you to succeed. He's using this as an excuse but his actual end goal is something else. Time will tell what that is, but I believe it's fairly obvious that it's going to be trade issues.
  18. That should be obvious even to you. He did campaign on secure borders stopping illegals and stopping drug flow. He did not campaign on a trade war with their closest neighbor and ally. Trump supporters are all worked up about stopping the porous border to the south and will support actions to secure the border to the north. But nobody was claiming or riled up about Canada somehow taking advantage of the united states. Also he's trying to suggest this is some sort of emergency rather than something that would have to go through congress. An automotive trade that has been in place for the better part of 60 years is not an emergency. Tensional killing people might be considered one. Don't ask questions you should already know the answer to That's because you're a retarded inbred leftist without the ability to think for yourself. A normal person whose parents weren't related would have noticed that I didn't excuse or justify anything. I simply stated facts I understand that for you on the left facts are like a combination of kryptonite and bug repellent. But unfortunately facts don't care about your feelings. I have been clear that I think that not only is his trade war with us a mistake but that his approach to tariffs in general is a huge mistake. I have said this is not going to end the way he thinks it's going to. And I have pointed out how this will very possibly lead to him being impeached and thrown out of power. But you think I've excusing him. I've met labradoodles that are smarter than you. Reading through the rest of your post you really don't understand what you're even talking about or what the reality is here. The only thing you said that was correct is it's going to be very bad for his people as well as us which is something I've already said a dozen times over. Go back to playing with your Lego kiddo, the adults are talking
  19. Carney will win. The lib supporters are looking at him as a 'white knight' who will come across as a great economics expert and save the party. He isn't and he won't but they believe he is and will and freeland is basically a gender bent trudeau, tied at the hip with all of his decisions. They might as well have run him as her.
  20. Well smith tried that and the left are still calling her traders for making the effort. Sadly Canadians don't get along
  21. The Vax hesitant whom he said they'd have to decide if they'd tolerate, the people he fired over it, All of Alberta at least a few times for 'environmental reasons', gun owners, ... is that enough? Do we need more? there's more if we need it...
  22. Now now Legato, Robo prefers CNN Lies. HE's a connoisseur and only consumes the trashiest of lies. You're an armature.
  23. I know right? The guy is STILL prime minister, is CURRENTLY the one handling a major economic conflict that threatens to be more damaging than covid was to us, and the left is like 'trudeau hasn't been here for years why are you still talking about him?" He's the effing PM guys
×
×
  • Create New...