CdnFox

Many of your posts insinuate that. Are you saying you don't like him?

Sometimes I just skim it I've made no secret of the fact that a lot of the time I post on the fly when I have a few seconds And I tend to use a lot of voice dictation. That's how I pump out posts fairly quickly. I often go back when I have more time and edit any errors. But most people are big boys with big boy pants on who can overlook a few errors and they know what I mean so that's what matters. As I frequently overlook other people's small mistakes as well. But it's hilarious that you have no actual argument and the only thing you can whine about is I don't take time to proofread every post to you on every occasion 😆😆😆😆 Like, that's all you've got and you're clinging to it desperately I hate to break it to you, but so far you just never been worth my time to invest the extra effort If you're finding it emotionally crippling then let me know and I'll send a note home to your mother authorizing an additional cookie and a nap for you LOL!

i accept your admission of defeat This is clear that half of the corporate Propaganda will go one way and the other half will go the other way. Fox news is offset by CNN and nBC. But the primary issue is but nobody will come to you and demand that you pay for fox news or come to me and demand that I pay for CNN Are you saying you're ok with me buying machine guns? Because i'd like to talk further about that LOLOL Defense of the realm is a primary duty of a sovereign nation. Propaganda is not. And while the use of the military is a political situation and can be left or right the military itself should not be. Should know tied to turn the military into a leftist project and now nobody wants to serve. Turns out that tampons in the boys bathrooms aren't motivation for people to put their lives on the line. You want me to look up words for you now? You should really learn to look up the words you don't understand yourself

i see where you're going with that - then we'd want to kill ourselves and it'd be over finally.

It absolutely is not. It's not our job even a little bit Our job is to decide who will do the job. We also have a say in what they're going to do indirectly. We absolutely do not tell them how to do their job That's not for the people of Canada to decide. Politicians make those decisions. The people of Canada will decide whether or not the politicians are good at their job and whether or not they want them to be replaced A process that you claim is pointless. And there's nothing left-wing or right wing about peacekeeping or and being involved in a conflict. The decisions there are what is in the best interest of Canada. The rest is just more of you usual bullshit that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand. Different governments may have different priorities and different policies. That is perfectly natural. People will select the politicians that are making the decisions. That is what a representational democracy is. But that in no way shape or form makes it fair for the government to turn around and spend my taxpayers dollars directly attacking their competition through state-run media which is what is happening currently

This is one minute 54 seconds, pierre explains what he thinks the role of government is and he's dead right. This is exactly why we need this guy running the country instead of the carpetbagger that we have right now

I don't recall feeling this way before, but I feel like there's a strange sense that we're not actually going into a new year, we're starting the second half of 2025 somehow. It feels like the second half of a season of a TV show instead of a new season if you know what I mean. Like we didn't resolve anything and everything still up in the air and we needed another 12 episodes to put it all to bed before the season was over We started the year with questions about whether or not there would be changes in political leadership and whether there would be an election and so on and so forth and we're kind of still answering that. If there's no additional floor crossings then they will probably be another spring election after the NDP get their leader. Cardi's popularity is falling, will this leave opportunity or won't it, there's a lot of similarity between how things feel right now and the sort of questions we were asking at the beginning of 2025 as if those questions really haven't been answered. The beginning of 2025 we saw trump and trade war and tariffs and all that was supposed to be resolved by now but basically we're back to where we started with round two coming up with the CUSMA negotiations. We haven't resolved our economic issues, we're still facing the same challenges and it's kind of going back and forth like we were supposed to have this resolved but the same inflation and cost of living issues are ongoing, The government has promised to get all these projects off the ground it was all things but it's all still up in the air. Even the memorandum of understanding is contingent on a number of events taking place between now and April and hasn't really been put to bed and the pipeline issue was still as up in the air as it was when carney got elected It just feels like 2025 didn't resolve anything and we need a second season to put everything to bed so that we can move on. But maybe it's just me

The fact that they're even doing this shows we don't get along If we get rid of Quebec we won't have to worry about it

This is complete nonsense. State funded media has advantages that corporate media simply cannot. So you don't get a balance, what you get is a lopsided view. Also the CBC claims to be a government-funded organization and claims that this gives it more legitimacy, which uneducated people will believe. It's assumed that something that is funded by the government must be impartial and highly professional and that's absolutely not the case If you want an honest system that portrays both sides of the story then you get rid of government funded media entirely and you let the free market do its job. Then you get the CNN's and the fox news and people can listen to both and make a decision But there is no universe where I should have to pay my money to an organization to say lies and run propaganda for a political party i disagree with.

Then why should i pay for it? Funded by taxpayers absolutely means 'gov't media'. At the end of the day a media outlet is always responsible to the people who pay the bills and if it's a liberal gov't paying the bills that's who they're loyal to. So stop the gov't funding, and if the people want it they'll pay for it.

and later said he felt the Jews were going to be just fine.

Then you would be taking them out of their mandate. That in such cases I would be against that as well. It can be argued that there is already been a fair bit of left wouldn't spending on the military yet strangely putting tampons in the boys bathrooms hasn't improved recruitment The military is a prime duty of the government however. Delivering propaganda news is not As far as fossil fuel subsidies go I'm not sure what a left-wing slant would look like but if somebody is spending money on the fossil fuel industry it has a political slant rather than the intended purpose of growing the industry and I would say that needs to stop as well. He certainly seen more than enough left-wing taxes which is more likely and I don't think we should be doing that The oil industry is neither left-wing or right wing and the military is neither left wing or right way so you can remove those biases and still have the core duties that are necessary for Canada. The CBC is inherently left-wing at this point and nothing is going to change that and the information they provide is only filtered through that. It's like a scrambled egg, it's too late to take the yolk out. And providing propaganda for the masses is not a primary government duty. Private Enterprise can handle the delivery of news just fine If you like the CBC you can pay for it out of your own pocket.

Eyeball. stop being a pedophile, we've talked about this before. Sigh.

No, you always say that and then specifically exclude the crimes committed by hamas whom you support. You have said repetitively that hamas's actions on October 7th were justified due to their human rights to resist oppression. In other words you don't consider the terrorist actions to be crimes against humanity, you only consider Israeli actions to be crimes against humanity. You pay a little lip service to the idea once in a blue moon but then you'll go on for hours and hours about how palestine was absolutely justified Nope.

I've read it many times. The problem is I read it with logic and reason and you read it Desperately trying to twist it to fit your agenda Einstein believed in the idea of a jewish homeland and while he had concerns about a Particular leader in the end he expressed his belief that israel was good and would prosper.

No there isn't. At all. It ain't even occurred when einstein wrote that letter. All Einstein said was that the creation of the Jewish state may lead to long term unrest because palestine wouldn't accept it, and AFTER that he said that he had faith that the nation of israel and it's people would be fine. You can't draw a "clear line" between events that never happened yet. It doesn't exist. It's a fabrication that you try and create to justify your hatred of Jews. But it's not real. The only reason that the violence and hatred continues is because the Palestinians prefer violence and hatred. But I love that you're trying to sell the idea that the Palestinians are like "The massacre was totally justified, I have a note from Einstein!" what a twat.

Oh look at that, my hypocrisy meter just exploded.... Your entire argument has been nothing more than you put in your head in the sand and fingers in your ears to avoid the truths that you don't feel comfortable with.

Oh look who brought hatred to the argument instead of reason or logic. Imagine that Are you trying to claim that there's no bias at the CBC?

No he voiced his concerns about a political party and a specific leader of that party specifically. Palestinians did start the conflict, you've taken what Einstein wrote out of contacts and ignored what he wrote later, and the Palestinians are a group of people who have perpetuated evil and hatred as a national sport and not for any valid reason And they recently paid a price for that. If they don't learn sooner or later the next time will be the last time and they will have no one to blame but themselves

Why would you? I said the people that are picking up what you're putting down, not you. Start drinking a little early today did you

There is no terrorism standing from that event. The hatred existed before that event and the hatred has existed unabated since, the incident made no difference and was the better part of a century ago. So the cost is zero and i can live with that. If you're worried about costs you should be talking to the Palestinians in Gaza about the cost of their unrelenting and completely unjustified hatred which is led to the destruction of their home and the loss of lives of many of their people. Their irrational hatred is what costs money. And what causes the terrorism I'm sure you think if you lie often enough that somehow it'll magically start being true You're the only person around here who was openly advocating for and cheering on the targeting and slaughter of innocent civilians in an Undeclared conflict and an act of terrorism. You've been very clear that you support that, I have been very clear that I don't. You consider it a human right I consider it a crime against humanity. We are not the same

LOLOL holy shit kid, are you reduced to nothing more than being a grammar nazi? And it took you a month or so to think of it? ROFLMAO!!! If you're only argument against what I have said in this thread is that I made a typo in one place which is pretty obvious then you're absolutely admitting I was right Kid, there are days when you come across as being pretty pathetic but damn.... That's pretty bad even for you. You have to see that right? You could do better than that surely

It went under reported at the time. Carney does so much amazing bullshit and does so much to ruin our reputation internationally that sometimes it's hard to get all of the stories in in the same day they come out. I noticed you didn't have anything to say about it though Your hero not living up to expectations?

Except that the words that he said of concern about a certain political party was not the same as concern over Israel at all, and the words of support that he had for Israel were said after Israel was formed whereas what's your quoting was before that Basically you're lying. You're taking something out of context and trying to present it in a certain light that simply isn't true. And you keep getting called on it. Yet you keep lying. Which tells me you know you're wrong and you're just hoping to convince other people that there's some validity to your Jew hating and massacre supporting ways. The probably isn't

He's bringin' it bringin' it bringin' it BACK! COGNATIVE DISSONENCE!!!!! WOOOOOO!!! 🎶🎵🎶DAAAA DA DA DADADA🎶🎵🎶