CdnFox

I see...... you're saying that statistically you're due for a win LOLOLOL No, i get what you're saying. Fair enough. I know you lean left but that did strike me as overboard for you.

There's not much attacking going on there. It went in and arrested a guy with pretty minimal bloodshed as I understand it. It's not cowardly to arrest criminals. The guy was a bad guy he got arrested.

There are a couple problems with your questions First in this particular case he wasn't the leader of a foreign sovereign country. Vast number of countries including America under Biden and Canada have never recognized him as legitimate. Continuing with that he was arrested not really kidnapped. And more importantly it's not a question of should they be able to, they very clearly are able to. And this is hardly the first time. Obama had bin Laden killed without trial and without the permission of the country he was living in. And he was certainly a political leader. And there's lots of other cases. So the question feels a little late. It probably should be more like 'can we stop it and should we'? Because it's been allowed for many decades. With your guards to your second question, nothing. Many other countries have and continue to do so. India killed a prominent political figure in British Columbia. Russia is certainly killed it's fair share around the world. Many of the other countries have as well. As to the president, what it says is that you better have a fairly strong country if you want to prevent this. Militarily economically etc if you are weak someone may very well do this to you.

LOL oh noes!!!! Robosmith is regretting his substandard american education and can't keep up!!!!

It wasn't 'germ infested', i wiped it with my bare hand each time to be sure.

Oh it's kind of a step up for him, most of the time he posts links to a website that proves him wrong. No web page at all is in fact an improvement from his point of view

Uhhh no, no the businesses have been paying it. Not carney. Many businesses either charged less to the buyers (that would be us sellers paying it) or the suppliers reduced their price to account for it (that would be canadian business). But not carney, where did you get that?

Agreed but that's all Poilievre said Possibly true but that does not change the fact that getting rid of maduro is a good idea. Two things can be true at the same time. And you can still be happy about the fact that this guy is going to jail. You've lost your teeny tiny little mind. He may try and bully us economically but he's not going to invade Canada. Our carney has been brown nosing a million times harder, calling trump a transformative president and stating that the G7 can't function without him and he being praise after praise on him, and you're freaking out and wondering why Poilievre congratulated him for taking out a tyrant?? Your hypocrisy is showing badly here kiddo Hey if he wants to come arrest Carney and throw him in jail I'm all over it I don't think we'd get that lucky though And again where was this concern when Carnie was sucking up to him? Trump is going to come after Canada financially. And yes we do have to prepare for that, the whole plan for that was to eliminate interprovincial trade barriers, get housing starts going again, and attract massive investment back to Canada and start some major nation building projects. Sadly none of that has happened. And it doesn't look like it's going to happen this year either

Importing? You mean the somali?

Well I think that removing the guy is going to be genuinely well received. The hard part will be what happens next. Regime change often goes sideways real fast, and you can bet that China and Russia are not happy about this in the slightest and won't be afraid to provoke agitation. History has shown that you can go from hail or glorious us liberators to kill the capitalist running dogs extremely fast if things aren't handled well. My guess is that america will do its own version of the UN oil for food program and will hunt around for an 'interim' leader to take over who's willing to sign a long term oil deal favorable to the us. Whether the people go for that will depend on how fast their lives improve and how much they believe there will one day be free elections and such.

No No, he's deranged about everything. More like EDS

LOLOL holy shit kid Did you really like Maduro or something? Pierre said: "Congratulations to President Trump on successfully arresting narco-terrorist and socialist dictator Nicolás Maduro, who should live out his days in prison," Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said in a social media post on Saturday morning. The liberals said: Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand said Canada has "refused to recognize any legitimacy of the Maduro regime and opposed its repression of the Venezuelan people, including the persecution of dissenters and particularly political leaders opposed to the regime." It's pretty clear that both the liberals and the conservatives are okay with this arrest. Sorry kid if you were a big socialist fan you were on the wrong side of this one

No we didn't. And if we have to blow boats out of the water then that's what we'll do. But it won't come to that we both know it. All we have to do is deport them back to their countries or lock them up permanently. As we saw in America when people realized that they couldn't just sneak into the country and stay there the number of attempted border crossings plummeted. And no, there's nothing we can do to rebuild somebody else's country. That's something they have to do on their own. The Americans had to learn that you cannot "Export" democracy either. Other countries can worry about other countries and if they're people trying come here we could just simply send them back and drop them off. It's not complicated

How about the fact that regardless of how we got it it's a sovereign nation and has been so for well over a century and a half. That alone is justification enough

I think that's a little bit like saying it's better to jump off of it 27th story building than a 30-story one. Technically true but either way....

I've never observed your ass (thankfully) but i have observed your behavior and comments here, Based on that it's fairly easy to make a reasonable deduction. And you could have cleared it up at any time and chose not to which strongly suggests that while you don't want to admit it it's still true. Oh but I have been paying attention to your posts. And I never said anything about "That's the right for you these days". So only one of us chose to lie in this post and it wasn't me I think that says all that needs to be said Can you quote any of these alleged high praises? I've been as critical of them as I have been non-critical. However I do believe in speaking the truth which is something that obviously offends you. He lost the election, that's true. However as far as being a drag on his party he took the party to 41% of the vote which is something that hasn't happened in many decades. And his political intuition is actually extremely evident and strong and demonstrable. So what's happening right now is you're throwing a temper tantrum, you're angry that I'm right again and you're smashing your fists on the ground and kicking your feet saying whatever pops into your head while crying your eyes out. It's not a good look kid. There are legitimate criticisms of Poilievre that you could make and actually defend but the reality is you just hate him and the reasons don't matter why. Much like how you love carney and the reasons don't matter why so you ignore the bad work he's doing You're not the dumbest liberal on the board. If you set aside your hatred and anger and bigotry and focus on critical thinking you can make much stronger arguments. You should give that some real thought

Yes he can! He's been practicing very hard

By everyone else I assume you mean all of the other voices in your head

I don't think that he said somalis were eating cats and dogs. I think that was the Haitians I know, i know. All foreigners look alike to people like you

That's probably just the neighborhood kids laughing at you. You're so dramatic.

uhhh,,,, according to your chart there's only two countries in the world where more than half of the people don't like israel. The rest of the countries have less than half. The rest of those people are only mildly concerned or actually favorable. And it doesn't even address what they're concerned about so they might like israel in general. Soooooo... once again as always thanks for providing evidence you're wrong, most of the world doesn't strongly disagree with israel if you're chart is to be believed, Do you even read the stuff you google? Bullshit. Not only have you frequently cheered the repression of various groups that you don't like, it's already been shown that these people were not repressed. It is their choice to be in conflict with Israel and they could do something entirely different and have freedom and prosperity You just hate Jews and want to see the Palestinians win by eradicating the Jews even if that means the death of civilians and women and children

Which means I've gotten more right than you so far You must be so embarrassed It's utterly irrelevant and even after it happened einstein said the Jews would be fine in Israel. You know that everything you say is stupid. It's easy for myself and several others on this board to shoot it down as being the trike garbage it is. So you were desperate to try and link your position to someone who is regarded as intelligent so that your position looks less stupid So you lied about what Einstein said and took it out of context to desperately try and make yourself look better. But at the end of the day you still just look like a twat. A violent terrorist supporting twat

Game set and match

The truth you mean? Yeah, I know. It's like I'm married to it or something uhhh ok. But they also trashed our medical system and that's what we were discussing. No, this is not a 'decades old' problem. From time to time we've struggled with the number of nurses and occasionally doctors but it was always fixed. The NDP has been in power for about 8 years now and since that time things have absolutely plummeted. Mabe it wasn't wise to let those thousand and thousands of health care doctors and nurses go during covid instead of finding a way to keep them. do you think? And maybe the province should have fought harder for more health funding or fewer immigrants when justin jacked up the immigration to the big cities? The bottom line is they sat around with their thumbs up their asses while things got worse and worse and worse far more so than ever before in our history. We weren't closing down tons of emergency rooms back in 1980 or 1990 What you're seeing is the end result of a socialist provincial government combined with a socialist federal government and things are vastly worse than they've ever been

So what you're saying is you don't believe in democracy. The great leader should be assigned by the party, not the people. Democracy is just too dang important to be trusted to the voters Would this be the same dncc that kept a man who obviously had serious dementia and other health issues in power for over 3 years and then through giggling kamala harris in as an afterthought at the last minute when the whole world saw what he was? Really sure they're qualified to determine who and who should not be leader