CdnFox

He absolutely has a self-defense case. That government is knowingly using his powers to assist in the importation of dangerous drugs that are killing people. You really don't understand the law one little bit. You read something and interpret it the way that you wanted to be and assume that that's the way it is and it just doesn't work that way And which court ruled that? And if they signed a contract saying they had use of it from that gov't they have to pay compensation. Again, I don't think you understand how the law works Nope. He has warrants for his arrest in America, for crimes committed against America. And he had those before trump. Even Biden increased the bounty on his head to 25 million for anyone that could help him be arrested for those crimes Well do a little research. There are numerous drug charges etc Asked to him getting off, great. Let him go to court let a judge say he didn't commit a crime Let's be clear, if you are smuggling drugs into the united states you are a threat to the united states and regardless of where you got the drugs from or who you're giving them to that is true If you eliminate the middleman and the drug stop, you've eliminated a threat The un charter has absolutely no actual legal authority over a country. And even if it did America has a veto with any specific case to be brought forward. There's no legal weight thereno country needs any permission from the UN. No it's not speculative at all. The united states has a large body of evidence which they will present a trial. Is clear that his government used their influence to declare certain shipments and such as being government shipments when they were actually drugs in order to avoid scrutiny. There are other examples as well. But he'll get his day in court That's what people say when they know they're wrong but don't have a legitimate argument. People are dying today. They are dying of the product that these people are illegally smuggling into the country. That is a clear and present danger by any saying definition and pretending that somehow having someone kill thousands and thousands of your people is not actually a present danger or that it's a tired authoritarian play is a joke. Get your head out of your ass and stop being a twat. This guy is directly responsible for the death of many thousands of Americans, he just uses drugs instead of aircraft like Bin Laden did It causes the death of thousands and is illegal. if you want to say it's not that bad of drug and Lobby for it to be made legal you go ahead. But right now today it isn't and it kills people. Oh and they ship a fair amount of Fentanyl and Fentanyl laced cocaine as well "Hundreds of thousands die from drug overdoses annually in the U.S., with stimulants like cocaine contributing significantly, especially when mixed with fentanyl; in 2021, over 32,000 overdose deaths involved stimulants, and cocaine-involved overdose deaths are rising, though specific, recent, standalone cocaine death tolls vary, showing it's a complex, worsening crisis often linked to fentanyl. " Neither was this guy. Most countries including Canada do not recognize him as a legitimate head of state At the end of the day you cannot possibly rationally argue that illegal drugs are not killing Americans. Nor can you argue that the majority of countries saw this guy as being a legitimate head of state or that his government was legitimate. Nor can you suggest how this is significantly different than any of the other regime change or assassinations that have taken place in the past including Panama, Bin Laden, iraq, libya, etc etc Sorry but this was 100% above board as far as such things go

I'm sure indeed that both of them would have considered the socialists that have led us to this point to be a severe let down

No you haven't You're just trying to make it sound like it's a good thing that Carney your hero is once again breaking his word. The fact is if we don't improve our economy pretty quick there's going to be a hell of a lot more suffering than could possibly happen from an oil spill. Pipelines was supposed to be a key component with that.

They're not cheaper. It's just impossible to grow the amount of materials necessary without being caught in America to create any significant amount of supply.. So you're saying that anyone who consumes drugs should be locked up as a narco terrorist? Interesting take. I guess we could just wait outside the safe injection sites and safe supply locations and grab them and throw them in jail. That certainly would reduce the population of drug users and the demand

But you now think that Castro was a capitalist LOLOL Well you may be dishonest but at least you're consistent

It is one of the most common elements on the left to accuse others of what they themselves do with righteous indignation to prevent anyone from accusing them of doing those very things. The democratic people's republic of Korea is not democratic. Antifa Is very clearly fascist. etc etc/. Democrats are a walking contradiction. The rage over women's rights but then attack any woman who chooses to exercise her rights differently than they want. They blame republicans in trump for increasing the heat of the political discussion which leads to things like January 6th, but they are out there night and day saying things 10 times worse than calling everyone who doesn't agree with them a Nazi. Etc etc

Kamala has chimed in.....

maduro come get me.mp4

Does that mean you're offering to sign up? LOLOL

Basically you think anyone that's even slightly right of Stalin or Castro is far right

And they have quite publicly told him that they are not buying his shit and that they are investing elsewhere. Even our own Canadian companies are now investing in pipelines in the states and not in Canada and have no intention to do so. And Carney knew that. He doesn't want any pipelines built, he's deliberately poison to the well so that he can pretend that he's pro pipeline to Alberta while secretly saying to his environmentally religious caucus Not to worry because none will be built.

That does seem to be true, the democrats really are still sticking behind Bill Clinton

It says to. Go back and read what I said again and then go back and read the chart again. I mean I know math is hard for you but surely to Christ you could count to two without screwing it up

That's because nobody recognizes the Venezuelan government is being legitimate. Most decent countries including Canada have never recognized that government in the first place You can't call a government a state sponsor of terrorism when the government doesn't exist.

If he ever becomes one sure. Defending Your Homeland against an aggressor who attacked without warning and slotted your civilians is not mass murder no matter how much the left wishes it wasn't true. You want to blame someone for the death of civilians and children in Gaza then you need look no further than Hamas.

It's not a brilliant political move in the slightest. Conning people and then not delivering is not a good look. It buys him time right now but already the polls and pollsters are quite clear the people are getting fed up with his inaction. And it's just been a year If he winds up going to the polls is April or May, which is a very real possibility if he can't get another 2 floor crossers, he may very well have a tough time holding on to his minority. At the very least it'll be worse. And he'll be extremely vunerable due to a very long list of broken promises where things simply aren't happening, Moving forward it won't be very long before alberta realizes he's been playing them. To be honest i think smith knows and is setting him up for this. When albertans figure it out all the 'western alienation' sentiment is going to come back 10 fold. Just in time for the proposed referendum. You have to be a little more subtle in your lies and spread them out over a little longer time. "Hey we can just lie to everyone" is not political brilliance.

Nope. US announces $25m reward for arrest of Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro - BBC News Sorry but that was biden. Not trump. Trump raised it again later in August. Once again you're proving yourself to be a liar.

Are you trying to claim that a secret mission designed to go in and get somebody as quietly as possible with his few casualties as possible should have been openly voted on in the congress?

Bill c69 is the big one. The oil Industries have come flat out and said if you remove the restrictive legislation will play ball but we're not interested in your magic fairy zones or even putting the money into a proposal while there's a tanker ban. He knows that. He knows there isn't going to be a proponent. He knows that excluding the first nations when he was talking to Alberta he's going to infuriate them and when they will never agree to it. He's deliberately sabotaged it, and now they're not even supposed to finish working out the details of the memorandum until April. Then he'll poison pill the thing again and drag things out till next year. All he has to do is keep doing that and he'll be able to find a time to have a next election and hopefully win a majority There will be no Pipeline with him in power, it will just look like there's about to be one at any minute

I'm sure you consider yourself property of the united states, I'm sure you think trump owns you. We don't have that problem Be sure to make certain your caller isn't on too tight before bedtime, you wouldn't want chafing

The chart says exactly what I did. Your problem yet again is an inability to cope with math. I even let you off the hook for the fact that there's a pretty major countries that aren't on that list, which doesn't really make it world opinion. Here's the problem you run into All the time. You come to a conclusion that you like, and then desperately try and justify if I working your way back to a question. That's always bad thinking. I have such an easy time making you look silly because I start with questions and then work my way forward through the evidence to a conclusion. That means a lot fewer mistakes, a lot less painting myself into a corner and a lot less logical dead ends that you run into If you want to do better you have to start with questions and then come to a conclusion not listen to your echo chamber and decide to try and defend whatever they like

None of that means what you're suggesting. Are you suggesting that it was against the law for israel to defend itself when attacked by Gaza for example? You're taking laws out of context and out of where they were intended to be applied and trying to pretend that they apply to a situation that they don't And no. Everything that maduro did was not legal by any stretch of the imagination. Nor were his actions in assisting to help drugs being smuggled into the united states. No more the crimes he committed well in the united states. That is why there is in fact currently in arrest warrant out for him in the united states So your argument falls apart on the face of it. It is been held by most countries that Maduro was not the legal leader of that country, that he illegally came to power, it is well known he is a major player in the smuggling of drugs to the united states and has facilitated it many times and benefits from it financially and that does make him a clear and present danger to the united states the safety of its citizens So they went and got him. I'm not sure that that can be seen as a violation of the UN charter. Was it a violation when Obama blew up bin Laden? I noticed you guys keep dodging that question. Which kind of tells me all I need to know, you know you're wrong you just mad because it's trump

Not what i say, what the chart says Now you're mad at me because you didn't read your own 'source' again LOLOL

Of course it is, consider the audience I'm writing for Anything more complicated than that and you start bleeding from the ears and have a hissy fit No, that would be the other guys. You guys are the ones who lie to yourselves almost as hard as you lie to others and ignore simple facts and truths. Are you talking about when Obama killed Bin Laden? I mean what you're saying is true but it was generally accepted at the time that it was a good idea. What's happening currently is the arrest of a criminal who has an actual warrant. They didn't kill him or anything and now he'll have a chance to face trial. More than we can say for what Obama did It MIGHT if Every word that you just said wasn't a lie He actually did mention democracy quite a bit. He didn't belittle anyone and said that as soon as it was practical they would turn over control to the people's representative. And that's absolutely 100% standard each circumstances like this. I'm taking responsibility and running the country until that time is again, 100% what you're expected to do in a case like this. So the intent that we can see is that he intended to arrest one of the highest members of the drug cartel letter basically funding themselves by selling literally tons and tons of illegal drugs inside America, and then take care of the country until democracy could be restored Sounds terrible 🙄🙄🙄 You on the other hand appear to be siding with the guy who's known to be a mass murderer, extortionist, kidnapper, drug cartel leader, and who repressed his own people and ran fake elections that most countries don't recognize is legit. That's the side you're on Did you want to think about that some more for a minute?

There will be no proponent as long as the current regulations are in place. They don't trust the liberals they don't trust Carney and they all agree that if carney was serious he pulled the tanker band and the no pipeline law. Carney knows this. All of his dancing and prancing pretending that there will be a pipeline it's just for show. It's not hard to make it undesirable for businesses