CdnFox

Westinghouse IS a brookfield company you dolt. It doesn't say Brookfield, it says a brookfield company, How very like you to double down on stupid tho It's clear in the very first sentence of my post that it was WESTINGHOUSE. How the hell are you getting FASTER at looking like a complete tard every time we talk?

It's unfortunate that we've put ourselves in this position. But it is what it is. If the gripen won't do then we wait i guess. Sucks but you don't do the WRONG thing just because you can do it faster. There's a great deal of sign of them doing that. And trump has been clear that he's quite prepared to use economic and even military force to take the territory he wants. It isn't just rhetoric, ask Venezuela. And he's threatening other countries as well and there's a very real chance it'll go for it. One of the best ways to put pressure on him with regards to that is to stop buying their military equipment and start developing closer ties with Europe. Already we're seeing Europe begin to band together to shut trump down on talking about Greenland. If republicans other than trump begin to realize that America is about to become isolated and less relevant they will pressure trump to back off. You do not buy from people who are threatening your country. Again that's as simple as it gets and there's no getting around that. You can't blow off what the leader of another country is saying about your country has simply rhetoric It don't matter to them that we purchased from someone else and we don't consider them an ally. There are a lot of Americans including a lot of American Military that will not be excited about that. And it's the strongest health statement saying we're not interested in working with you cooperatively in any more of the conflicts you pick around the world. It also leads to better developments with European equipment. The more we buy from them the more it's worth it for them to expand their development process. And we may never win a war with America, but if it's painful enough to beat us that's all we need to deter them. Any war with us means it's happening in their backyards and in their homes and if we're not dependent on them for gear that's a pretty big risk even if they win in the end. Well the first part would certainly be true. The stronger we are, both militarily and economically by the way, The more Americans would tend to respect us and the less they would be interested in picking a fight. Let's face it, in a straight up fight the average man can kill a cat and certainly would but no man is excited about the idea of getting into a fight with a determined cat. Even if you win you're going to get scratched to crap and it's going to hurt like 10 hells and that's enough to deter people

Play stupid games, catch stupid bullets. An unfortunate event but seriously, what did they think was going to happen

Activists don't have a job if the problem gets solved

Come git some little man I noticed that with every other country trump is threatening the military but when it came to Canada he was like "No no no! Not them! I wouldn't threaten them militarily! Just econoimcally!!!" Trump scared of us and so are you. Like I said before, don't make us burn your white house down again

How would you know? You're none of those things

NOpe. Japan, the UK, and China are consistently the largest foreign holders of U.S. debt, with Japan often holding over $1 trillion, representing roughly 12-13% of foreign holdings, while the UK and China hold significant but varying amounts, with the UK recently holding around 9-10% and China around 8%, though their shares have shifted over time, with Japan taking the top spot from China around 2019. So china comes in at a distant third. They're not even close to number one Looks like you were Robo wrong again RoboSmith Do you ever get anything right

Other than those last bunch of times And let's face it if you voted in the last election or two then you voted conservative or liberal and there were no other choices. Voting NDP was voting liberal. Golden green was just to keep the liberals in But you are a strong liberal supporter and you prove that here on an almost daily basis. You claim otherwise but then again, you lie about literally everything else so it's pretty hard to believe

Like yourself? You're extremely tolerant of corruption that you are aware is occurring and for some reason think harper should be responsible for There's no point to transparency if you're going to keep voting for them when they're caught doing bad things

We can start with this. And as we buy new gear we can buy from somebody other than the Americans or god help us all start making our own. We may not be able to get rid of everything American made tomorrow but we can start by not buying any more American made militray goods. You don't buy your military equipment from people who are threatening to take you over. You just don't do that I don't know how to be more clear. It would be like buying your locks from a known burglar, doesn't matter how good the locks are it's a bad idea

Uhhh,.... it was actually the left wing democrats of the day who opposed abolition. The conservative republicans were strongly opposed.

You would understand if you were at his level. As everyone knows there's logic, higher logic, Vulcan logic, and zucchini logic. You Mortals are not worthy of zucchini logic as Robo Smith is, And thus you shall never comprehend

Well that was a pretty stupid thing to say. Nobody claimed that Brooksfield was awarded any Canadian or international government funded contract. Westinghouse is owned by Brookfield and it was awarded a contract and has several contracts in the go as a matter of fact. The claim was that Brookfield would benefit because it owns Westinghouse Couldn't you at least wait till the second post to me to wind up looking like an uninformed twat who doesn't read beyond a grade 3 level? Why is it always like this? You're so desperate and eager and frantic to try and correct me on something that you always skim over stuff and jump in and make statements that are demonstrably wrong and show a lack of intelligence on your part. Nobody anywhere claimed that Brookfield got a contract and here you are demanding that Brookfield didn't get a contract. Well Done Sherlock

There's no such signal. Your opinion isn't fact.

If that were true then he would have caved months after carney did. Carney was already caving as he finished the election. Nobody could have handled that whole situation worse than carney did. Since carney took over the file we've dropped all of our tariffs and the US has put tons of additional tariffs on us and is very likely to do more as CUSMA comes up

Well of course you do but as usual you can't face it or address it or refute it so you just dodge it You first. Sorry but we DID set a better example. Harper was a better example. By far. He passed a number of laws to help minimize corruption and they had a positive effect till the libs stripped most of them. He held his people accountable, firing them for buying expensive orange juice while trudeau spent a quarter million in a week on airline food and snacks. He created several accountability policies and departments including the office of the parliamentary budget officer Soooo.... being better than you didn't work. You and those like you still vote for corruption. So if being better doesn't' work, maybe we'll try being worse. That's what's happened in the states, seems to be working for them. their economy is good, they're snagging assets, they're getting rid of their illegals and the scum who were corrupt before are getting harassed and hopefully prosecuted That's the lesson you and the left have left the world with.... if you can't join them, beat them.

Maybe he will, we both just agreed you'd make an excellent liberal, just show him your skills at lying and tell him you're willing to support his efforts to rebuild Ukraine and you heard that Brookfield would be a good company to use

What do you mean re-emerges? When exactly did it unemerge? They've been violent for years now

He also specifically lied about being on the board of directors of a number of organizations. He was asked if he had resigned from all boards and he said yes absolutely. It then turned out he was still a member of several. He offered no explanation but just resigned from those ones and said okay so now I'm not a member of any boards. The guy is dishonest as the day is long

Interesting wording,"Can't", no plans "right now", Sounds like she was at least a little tempted. I can totally understand that, Rebuilding the party is hard and it's always nicer to be part of the current government

LOLOL!!! Oh dear, little @ExFlyer Seems to have woken up and is doing his usual routine of following me around and giving little passive aggressive down arrows Awww little guy, guess mommy told you that you couldn't have that lego set you wanted and now you're all pissy mad? God i live rent free in your brain

Sigh. You are not the dumbest liberal on this board. Occasionally you make statements and arguments that are interesting and worthy of consideration. I wish you wouldn't screw it up by going out of your way to look this stupid on purpose

I think that's a tough statement to make. You might not have shared the plan but it's becoming more and more apparent but he was in negotiations with their vice president and others in country about this for some time. You'll notice the country hasn't exactly just devolved into anarchy. He's actually been fairly clear about that. And it's not relevant to this. Wish you were attempting is the logical fallacy known as repetition. You think if you keep bringing up enough unproven points then when you mush them all together it'll mean that your position is supported. That's not how logic works. You may not like trump's motivation for releasing whats-his-face (can't remember right now) but he has stated his reasons, and they are very trump like reasons, Personally i hate the whole idea of 'pardons' but that's a separate subject And whether it turns out he's got the very best reason in the world or not, it has no bearing on this situation in the slightest Well it's true there aren't many but in fact there are lefties who are shedding a tear as we speak. There's protests to let him go, to reinstall him in venezuela, etc. Well... is it tho? Because in other similar cases the same people weren't questioning the why. Trump's been pretty clear about the why. They were dumping drugs into the country with the express stated purpose of harming americans as well as partaking in other things that threatened the us security and people and this lets the us control the oil which is strategically advantageous. That DOES sound pretty trump like. Not sure there's much more to it than that. Again, i know you think if you make ENOUGH false accusations and mush them together somehow it'll produce a fact. That's not how it works LOLOL well just remember that the democrat candidate and party made that look like the better choice.

Maybe they were after flying fish?

You elected the wrong government for that.