CdnFox

It's the inevitable conclusion of socialism and communistic models as well. Check out russia - putin isn't poor and none of the soviet leaders including stalin ever missed a meal. Or china, or venezuela or cuba etc etc etc. The difference is - it's almost impossible to get rich under capitalism without making others around you rich. Gates, jobs, bezos, all of them made many many many millionares as they grew in wealth and those millionares spent money helping provide good jobs etc. Everyone gets a little richer. Where as with YOUR model the rich at the top only get rich by making everyone else poor. The more socalistic you get, the more people like you run the show, the poorer the population is. The people at the top skim the cream and there's nothing left. Thats why the richest countries in the world are capitalist and the poorest are always socialistic.

Canada produces it's own food for the most part. Far more than britain does. Our costs would be cheaper. Actually our population densities are pretty high. We have more land but we don't live on it. And most of our agricultural centers are near our major living areas. Of course - we DO have carbon tax so that is going to bump up food costs a lot for the distances they do have to travel. Not in food. We'd still need as much space to grow the food so a lot of it would have to be shipped farther. It would actually make it more expensive. Having the farmland situated nearer the people is more efficient. Were you talking to your mirror?

No, that would be transphobic. It would also be a bit of a lie wouldn't it the right doesn't think that. Yeah - still a bit of a lie. It sounds more like you're just making crap up but having a tough time remembering what you made up before so it SEEMS inconsistent. But what can be expected from someone who can't even get the definition of 'karen' right.

I didn't realize you were part of that community. Actually - it explains a lot LOLOL

Personally - I would NEVER do that to you. I"m quite positive you don't know anything. (oh come on! SOMEONE was going to take that shot )

Don't know who that is - but i'm pretty happy you're here so we can make fun of you You're freaking hilarious! It's like someone gave a monkey a copy of the woke manifesto and a Red Bull and now they're posting on the internet LOLOL!

Thank you. He just won the point It was pretty obvious he was right to begin with but it was fun watching you squirm

LOL - really. Would you care to bet? So do you - but you gave one. I mean, it's wrong and you don't actually use the word like that but still.. Telling the truth IS what you consider lying to be And imagine that - you coudln't deny it you just tried to change the channel You've called him a nazi - and now you're attempting that other trick we've discussed many times where you claim that just because the person thinks and talks like a nazi in your opinion, that doesn't mean he IS a nazi per se. So he's a nazi by association Everyone who disagrees with you is a nazi in your world. Oh - so you're ADDING to your definition that they must ALSO believe in the global jewish conspiracy. But you've said YOU do, you bring up soros as an example and say that the jews cause all sorts of problems. Your definition couldn't even make it to the end of this thread. Yep. I'ts your little way of calling people nazis when you know you'll have trouble defending it, "Now -i"m not saying HE'S a nazi - i'm just saying how he thinks and how he acts and what he says and everything else about him is nazi. But - that doesn't mean i think HE'S a nazi" LOLOL It's one of your little dishonest games. But we're pretty used to your lies I know that it upsets you that nobody here takes you seriously. Did you want to post a meme? Should i get back here with those goalposts? What can i do to help

ROFLMAO - ohhh i'm SO sorry.. did those nasty facts get in the way of your echo chamber ideology agani? How terrible What were you saying in that other thread about people who just resort to insults out of the blue making the board worse? LOL!! What a pathetic troll. umm.... yeah. So you're actually responding to it. So i'm not sure you know what 'ignore' means. After you insulted me first in that thread? I responded in complete good faith and you were a complete dick.Maybe apologize for your own bad behavior before you demand apologies from oithers. Its pretty retarded to think it works the other way. You're a typical leftie loser - you insult others, you behave badly, YOU provoke a fight, and then when the other person punches back you cry and whine about how mean they are. And now you're 'professionally offended' and hide behind a fight YOU picked. Gee i can't imagine where your kid gets it from. You want people to treat you in a civil manner? Treat people in a civil manner. You didn't and now they don't. Deal with it.

ROFLOMAO!!!!! - Wow - i managed to break her before 7:30 am THat's a new personal best Sorry you're emotionally damaged so early today sweetie - maybe go back to bed for an hour and try again?

And as we saw - you couldn't. His point was that the definition is not precise. And he's right. As we can see you're a liar. There was nothing consistant about those definitions. They were both very different, and different than yours. So no - there wasn't a consistent definition. Was your point that you were wrong? Happy to help. A dozen people here including me already provided you with very solid definitions of woke. You just like to lie and pretend otherwise. But definitions of woke will vary slightly. Just like your definition of 'karen' differed radically from other more established ones. Your whole point is a joke. And you're having to lie your ass off to make it - what have i told you about if you have to lie to make your point?

https://www.thestar.com/business/2023/05/23/canadian-debt-warning-signs-our-households-have-the-worst-debt-ratio-of-any-g7-country.html Canadian households now have the worst debt ratio of any G7 country Report from CMHC blames ballooning debt-to-GDP ratio on unaffordable housing and the rise in interest rates that is hammering already stretched homeowners. At the end of 2021 Canada’s household debt-to-GDP ratio was at 107 per cent, according to the report. Over the same period of time, household debt dropped in the U.S., U.K. and Germany and was nearly unchanged in Italy. This is going to be a problem. It would not take much of an economic crisis to lead to a domino effect on our economy that would be really bad. And this at a time when our national and provincial debts are at all time highs and the fed debt is insane. Which limits the gov'ts options to borrow during a crisis.

Meh - got a news flash for you . In the states the side that loses always thinks it was stolen. Look at the polling after each election regarding whether or not the system is fair and secure. Whichever side wins gets about 80 plus percent saying yes and whatever side loses gets less than 50. The polls after the 'hanging chad' incident for example - democrats absolutely thought the system was 'rigged' In 2016, dems thought it was a great system during the election when they though hillary would win, republicans were convinced it was rigged - the moment he won the polls reverse and dems thought it was rigged and there was russian interference and such and trump voters lept in support of the system. Hillary to this very day says her election was stolen. So it's not fox news.

I don't think anyone's MAD about the fact you lie. I think we're all pretty used to it.

nonsense. FOr example urban dictionary offers this definition: Middle aged woman, typically blonde, makes solutions to others' problems an inconvenience to her although she isn't even remotely affected. So that's two very different ones. You couldn't even get THAT right. DIctionary. com offers this: Karen is a pejorative slang term for an obnoxious, angry, entitled, and often racist middle-aged white woman who uses her privilege to get her way or police other people’s behaviors. As featured in memes, Karen is generally stereotyped as having a blonde bob haircut, asking to speak to retail and restaurant managers to voice complaints or make demands, and being an anti-vaxx , Generation X soccer mom. you totally forgot the 'talk to your manager' part in your definition as well. That's a pretty key component to the meme. And you got it wrong. That's your second wrong definition of the day. Hard fail little girl

Well you're wrong, but fair enough, at least we know. You were hoping he'd be wrong too? You HAVE argued trump is a nazi. And frankly you've argued that many people's ideals are cultural bolshevism and yet you claim that they are not necessarily nazis. Sounds like your definition is pretty fluid. LOL - then you have the same definition as him Unless you're going to suggest that all jews believe cultural bolshevism conspiracy theories.

Yeah - the guy hates canada so much i can't understand why he's here.

two people. At one beer store. Out of literally billions of dollars worth of beer sold. And you're in a panic about your safety. Never EVER take public transit. Toronto alone has about 1 assault a day it seems. Buying bud is clearly a much safer option Oh well in that case you should totally panic. You're a special kind of stupid aren't ya little guy A trans person shoots up a church and kills a bunch of people, you don't say "don't go to church" and "its just one time". Two people get into a minor scuffle outside a beer store and it's NEVER BUY BUD - ITS" TOOOOO DAAAAANNNGEROUUUS!!!! Given your personal situation i would say the bigger threat to your safety is you forgetting how to breathe and suffocating.

That why you're here? You're no more civil than he is.

Whereas trudeau was bought in a china shop.

Awww muffin I'm sure you desperately want to convince yourself of that And that's some pretty strong language coming from a bot

Honestly - i'd go to that parade.

You should buy two then (nyuck nyuck nyuck ) Well seeing as sales are down 25 percent that must mean that 75 percent of the people who used to buy still do and we're not exactly hearing of daily assaults. It's probably pretty safe. but if the left is genuinely concerned about proving that going woke doesn't mean going broke - if they're not willing to stand up for brands who did go woke when they start to go broke then that's going to be something the business community is going to notice.

It doesn't say anywhere in your story that the gays particularly wanted her to AND it says specifically that they were mad because she had said she would last year but didn't do to a scheduling screw up, It sounds like she had already apologized for it. So she said she would, she intended to, she couldn't due to a scheduling snafu and she is this year. How is this an example of Conservatives doing anything different or changing their minds on anything? It isn't of course. Just more false narrative from the left.