Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    41,497
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    351

Everything posted by CdnFox

  1. Actually most lawyers disagree with that. It's generally accepted she should have been charged. AND - i KNOW clinton did run across the tarmac and shortly after the charges were dropped. Because we read the opinions of US lawyers? You really suck at this don't you.
  2. There is an element of truth to that i suspect. Historically it is true that societies tend to come together to face an adversary, even if the adversary is non human such as just staving off starvation. When all the "good" adversaries are gone and defeated, then people tend to start to worry about more petty things. When we're children, "Cyclops could beat Wolverine" seems like a big deal because your life is pretty easy and that's the most important thing you have to worry about. As you become an adult you worry about more important issues like where will i work, how will i pay the bills. If that's not an issue and there's nothing to worry about - i guess we go back to the cyclops wolverine thing, only for adults it seems to be 'my vagina can beat your penis!" Sometimes i think the kindest thing an alien race could do for us is threaten to invade.
  3. Yes - sorry did you need to have it explained who we were talking about when we refer to the chinese gov't interfering? I kind of felt that was obvious. They were "Targeting" him. That means a variety of things. Collecting information, preparing to take action against relatives such as getting them fired or harassing or the like which requires prep, perhaps funnelling money into his campaign so they can pressure him later, collecting "dirt" on him or his family that could be used to hurt or blackmail. Just because you put someone in your crosshairs doesn't mean you've pulled the trigger. But if they found evidence that this kind of thing was happening and the chinese were PREPARING to pull the trigger if they wanted then that is something he and his family should know. Well you're wrong, you just misunderstand what the concern here is.
  4. I have not always found that to be true. But i would imagine sometimes people's perception of how they meant something to sound vs how it sounds to others may be at odds.
  5. Well of course you have - just like all jews are nazis which was your other schtick for quite a while till i pointed out that wasn't really a thing you can say in Canada. Because they're true - i can actually hear you thinking about posting a meme I can speak german better than you can think in english. In other words, no.
  6. She wasn't charged because bill ran across the tarmac and had a little "chat" with the AG
  7. Yep - you have a special 'nazi by association' section for when you get pressed. "ALL CONSERVATIVES ARE NAZIS!!!!!" "wait a minute - how can you claim this person is a nazi, when (facts)". " oh - well.. it's POSSIBLE he's not a nazi maybe - BUT HIS IDEAS DEFINITELY ARE AND SO HE"S STILL A NAZI PROPAGANDIST EVEN IF I CAN"T PROVE HE'S A NAZI!!! " REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE LOL - it's hilarious You'd take gold in the olympics for sure if there was a 'mental' gymnastics category
  8. LOL - pretty funny watching the left wing pity party I had no idea reason 10 lived rent free in so many people's minds. It's also interesting to see that all the people on the left do all the blocking. And yet i see just as many insults thrown by crackhobarbie and treebeard etc as i do from reason 10. You guys realize all you're doing is announcing to the world that he's got under your skin and you can't cope right? Shouldn't have been acting like a retard then. Should you.
  9. They didn't act on it entirely apperently. They were preparing information and such in order to do so but hadn't pulled the trigger. They probably would have if they though the conditions were right where they would get a big benefit and not get caught.
  10. (i mean... he's not wrong.)
  11. they don't. Never have - men have worn dresses throughout history. Scotsmen and their kilts are beloved even till this day. I remember what Sean Connery said when a girl asked him what he wore under his kilt - "On a good day, Lipstick!" Awwww.... you're mad aren't you. You were trying to sell the idea that this was nothing and there is no such thing as get woke go broke and that's not working out for you is it. This is a GIANT warning to companies everywhere not to get involved in politics, and it's coming on the heels of some other big cases of that. So you're pissed. We get it. You should have a drink. Why not go buy yourself a case of bud?
  12. My girl, be real You are many decades and many many many women too late for that claim LOLOL!! Sorry kiddo You totally call everyone nazi's and fascists, and you have absotluely included me in that as well both in generalizations and directly And when you think i'ts too hard to sell someone as a nazi, you claim that their ideas are nazi And when you can't argue someone's point you change what they said to something else and then argue that. "What you're REALLY saying is... " Your entire routine is just cheap debate tricks and pathetic thinking, which is why so many wonder if you're even meant to be a real account. It's got the same comedic appeal to it as watching Urkle or Pee Wee Herman - which is why you're so amusing! (Deliberately left off a smiley face there - now you can count them and only have to take off ONE of your mittens ! LOL)
  13. Yes - i deliberately tried to keep it to a number which wouldn't require you to take your shoes off to count LOLOL! ROFLMAO - i'm going to add the term 'incel' to your list of tells Whenever you break that out you're clearly frustrated and trying to think of the most hurtful thing you can Warms my heart to see you so broken little girl - better luck next time Did you want to finish this off with a meme?
  14. Yeah , the language he uses is that of someone attempting to appear wise. Pseudo-intellectual if you will. Real intellectuals don't put quite so many on 'ignore' as i see him do It's a weak mind that can't face a contrary argument. Jokes about broken clocks aside, most people can find SOME things they agree on. Honestly - we should probably focus more on that as a society. Although it's not as much fun that way. Lets start with trying to figure out something something a little more simple and less politically divisive than trump derrangement syndrome. Like gender dysphoria or the grand unified field theory or something.
  15. PROJECTION!! DEFLECTION!!!! GET BACK HERE WITH THOSE GOALPOSTS That's the other thing i constantly point out Those come out when you need to go over to the attack because you can't defend your point. You should NEVER play poker, your tells are so obvious When i laugh i post smiles When i get mad i tend to stop talking. You get a lot of smiles because basically you're one big joke If you weren't so damned entertaining i'd just not bother responding when you post, which is how i deal with some of the other lesser posters here. But you You're so easy to wind up, your replies are so rediculous, and you make the left look SO bad that i just can't help myself and honestly i do spend a lot of the time replying to your posts with a big assed smile on my face In all cases. There isn't an honest bone in your body - to the point where i noticed a few other people were wondering if you were a false flag account noting that NOBODY could be this dumb. I aslo wonder if crackhobaribie is a shill account of yours. There's a certain commonality to the level of stupid
  16. And hillary didn't? "Did you scrub your personal mail server ms Clinton" "What, you mean like with javex and a cloth?" Remember - she to this day says she did nothing wrong. That she is BIGLY innocent. But the finding was clear - she broke the law and she lied. She wasn't charged because they claim they couldn't prove mens rea which is odd because that crime doesn't require mens rea to be a crime. But - it was clear she broke the law and committed fraud. And she defends it. So if THAT was the criteria then the russians should LOVE her
  17. But you weren't and never are. You literally and unironically call jews nazis, call conservatives lesser people, say ANYONE right of your position a hair is a fascist, claim that ALL right wingers think the same things and that's just scratching the surface. Even when you're caught in an obvious lie you will stick by it. Nobody takes you seriously. You're not a very good person.
  18. Its' the truth - you only post memes when you've run to the end of an argument or you've been backed into a corner It's like a defense mechanism with you. "i can't be smart, maybe funny will work instead?" oh and Ppppssssttt - they're usually not that funny Just kind of sad and bitter
  19. Waaaaahhh. Yet this same person will demand books they don't like be removed. Bet she didn't complain when elemetary schools removed the now banned dr seuss books. Bet she's ok with the efforts to remove books or movies that were fine in thier day but would never be allowed now. The REAL reason they're mad is the right is using their own playbook against them. Hey - you like those books? They're not banned - they're just not being carried by school libraries. So - organize reading clubs outside of school where kids can read those books with their parents approval and teachers or other interested people can help explain the books or discuss them with the kids. Problem solved. But no - she's unable to function as a person unless the state caves to her wishes. Eff off - the more leftie freaks that quit the better. People will learn eventually if they want to work they should leave their politics at home. Get woke go broke.
  20. No Doubt. I absolutely love this criticism from the left that PP hasn't worked except in politics (which he's worked at for over 25 years) so he's not qualified for politics. IF they were looking for a doctor - the LAST thing they would ask is "Is this ALLL you've done in your life? Like? No plumbing or office work, JUST being a doctor? That's all you've got?" They would never look at a lawyer and say "look, i'm under investigation for a murder i didn't commit, i can't hire you if ALL you've got is 25 years of legal experience and you never even tried teaching drama". In any other profession in their personal lives OF COURSE they would look for the person with the most experience in their field. But somehow - the fact that PP has DECADES of experience and university education that's appropriate to the job somehow DISQUALIFIES him?!?! The lunacy of the left
  21. Holy shit. Now - i'm the first to admit that i, like most people, thought this was a bit of a flash in the pan and things would go back to relative normal after a few weeks. Bud would have lost a few billion in sales which really sucks but they'd get most of their market back and their stock would start to recover and that would be the end of it. Nope! IT's actually getting WORSE. https://www.theblaze.com/news/hsbc-downgrades-anheuser-busch-stock HSBC just DOWNGRADED their stock, and others are following suit shortly apperently. This will seriously affect their stock value compared to what it would have been. "In a note, HSBC analyst Carlos Laboy, managing director for the global beverage sector at the bank, justified the downgrade by questioning the ability of Anheuser-Busch InBev executives to understand their consumer base." Sales have undergone their SIXTH WEEK OF DECLINE. https://abcnews.go.com/Business/boycott-bud-light-hammering-sales-experts-explain/story?id=99505649 The boycott grew even larger, meanwhile, after the initial response from the company was perceived as conciliatory by some LGBTQ advocates, prompting a wave of frustration on the left, the experts added. So the left is pushing the boycott as well.
  22. That would not be likely. THe ndp and libs would not have enough seats to form a majority, which means they could still be brought down at any time and they would still need to win the confidence of the house with a throne speech which would likely be shot down by the bloc (and the cpc obviously). As soon as that happened the cpc would be offered a chance to form power and the bloc, rather than the ndp, would hold the balance of power. It would be almost impossible for the ndp libs to form a successful coalition unless they could find a way to convince the bloc it shouldn't hold the balance of power in gov't. Good luck with that.
  23. i think treebeard is a little confused. I believe he thinks that there needs to be a formal agreement to form gov't in a minority like that. But that is not the case. Many a minority has survived doing case by case deals and in fact the first 6 years of harper's terms were exactly that. You don't need a 'deal' to be a gov't in a minority.
  24. Well actually the libs and ndp attempted to under harper - but they screwed up and were busy taking pictures when they were supposed to be in the leg making a non confidence motion and harper prorogued parliament on them to get past the 6 month limit.
  25. I suspect most of that will end. Hogwash. Doing a ways and means would be but deal by deal? That's happened before plenty
×
×
  • Create New...