CdnFox

review yourself dipshit. This was embarrassing and you need to do better. At this point you don't get to have an opinion on anything else, your dumbass sealioning just makes it worse. If all you can manage is lies and asking answered questions 100 times then go join the liberals. you're too stupid to be a conservative.

article: "The constant and invasive trans activism which encroaches on peoples' rights is starting to annoy some people" Eyeball: "Clearly it's those people's fault for being 'obsessed' "

Absolute lie. The lawyer has no authority to charge trump anything. He's not the one that won the lawsuit. Trump never agreed to pay him. The judge can't order trump to pay him without a trial He has a signed agreement with HIS CLIENT. That agreement specifically states that the client agrees to pay him a percentage of the judgements collected. That is the only legal way that the lawyer can receive payment. It would be illegal for a lawyer to receive payment from trump who is not his client. I have signed these contracts. I know exactly what they say and the law around them You are 100% entirely wrong absolutely. You do not understand this stuff and you talk as if you do but it just makes you look like a twat and an uneducated twat at that. Further the lawyer has to disclose any remuneration he gets to the client from any source. If he refers her to a doctor and gets a kick back from the doctor he has to disclose that. If somebody else gives him money for the legal bills he has to disclose that So she absolutely must have without a doubt known about the money

All right boy. Sit down and pay attention, you're getting scolded. Now, i'm not going to claim you're the smartest person on this board. But you are moderately intelligent. Around here we leave the lies, the stupidity and the self delusion to the liberals. You are not a liberal (despite sounding a hell of a lot like one at the moment). I made a simple and easy to verify statement, because of a newspaper article that came out that dayd. DOn't bother with your continued lies that it's not true, i've already proven a dozen times over it is. That's no longer the issue. The issue is you immediately freaked out and started making STUPID Statements attempting to attack the idea. You made an insanely weak argument that an obscure gov't website post that DOWNPLAYS the risk somehow is proof they properly advised of the risk, then ignored other proofs that they FURTHER downplayed the risk. This is NOT rational. This is you losing your logic and reason and desperately trying to defend a position that you have fallen in love with, based on nothing more than "Muh Feels". That is NOT what conseratives do. We leave that kind of crap to the libearls and other lefties. Consequently you look like a complete retarded twat and we both know that this isn't the case. It is not possible to credibly claim that the government substantially warned the people of Canada about the risk. That has already been proven and if you claim differently it's because your emotions are getting the better of you You need to learn to control your emotions better before replying. This is the second time I've seen you make a week an indefensible argument based on your emotional response. If the facts don't support your position once you look at them then you need to back your way and come at it from a different direction. It is painfully obvious that you have some reason in your teeny tiny little mind that you don't want anyone speaking against the government policy of enforcing vaccinations on people and you want to pretend that everybody made the decisions fully informed of the risks. I don't know why you want that, but it is simply not true. And if you need to lie to make your argument you don't have a very good argument. Conservatives pride ourselves on having good arguments. So you should reevaluate what led you to that kind of poor Behavior. Never ever ever fall in love with a position, you should always be reflecting on its accuracy given the latest information available to you rather than allowing your emotions to dictate your stand I've always thought of you as a good contributor, if somewhat young and still in need of experience, and I expect you to continue to grow and become stronger and stronger Reflect on this and do better. This was just embarrassing.

You have to be kidding me. It was a huge thing in England and in Canada and to a degree in America as well Then there were the catholic school orphanages. Conditions there were almost identical to residential schools and reports of abuse are similar Sounds like you need a lot of history learning before you can comment on any of this We're sorry to hear about your thermal problems. Perhaps try wearing a sweater?

No you can't. The consequences of taking action could have been far worse than the theft itself. That's a complicated issue. We accept your admission of defeat

But the second article wasn't. And as I pointed out it was the globe and mail and then you came back and tried to claim that it wasn't that it was the national post. I have since proven that I was correct and that the second article question was in fact from the globe and mail however my quote was of the person and not of either of the articles. Is this going to be one of those cases again where you spend 10 pages trying desperately to backtrack because you said something kind of stupid and rather than just walking away you choose to Triple down on it ? Go back and look sparky. I didn't Quote the national post or the globe and mail. I quoted him and then he came back and tried to make it about the national post. I pointed out that it's just as much about the globe and mail if you're going to argue from that point of view because both were mentioned but that I quoted him. And yes, he's a leftie So at this point you've gone from a simple mistake to looking stupid. I have a side bet going with someone that you're going to double down on stupid and go full retarded because you can't help yourself I tried to get someone to bet that this all gets blamed on my post count but nobody was dumb enough to take that one

In contingency she absolutely pays the lawyer. It just means he's willing to wait until the trial has been done in order to receive payment and is paid on commission Your argument is as stupid as claiming that a car dealership doesn't pay a commissioned car salesman. Of course they do

Doing a photo op just not make someone buddy buddy. Doing business with someone doesn't mean you're cozying up to them. You're taking basic diplomatic relations and trying to twist them into something that never happened to suit your agenda. It's trite and childish.

No judges ever ruled Trump guilty of rape. So by your logic the judges have therefore indicated that no rape has been proven therefore it never happened You don't have much luck with thinking do you?

LOL bullshit You've NEVER suggested it was a fad in all the discussions ive seen you partake in here in years. In fact you've argued otherwise.

We imported more people of working age than have retired. You've actually got it backwards Canada's age pyramid 2015 Population of Canada 2015 - PopulationPyramid.net Canada's age pyramid 2025 Canada population pyramid 2026 - Demographics of Canada - Wikipedia Trudeau launched mass immigration of mostly working age people and students Facts aren't bias kiddo Well it had recovered substantially from it's time in recession. But it's true that you don't recover from a global recession in just a few years So, lets compare the two. The harper recession was brought on by a global recession that was triggered from the sub prime mortgage collapse and crashed the entire world banking system. Canada did BETTER than everyone else Carney's recession is ONLY in canada, most of the rest of the world is doing pretty decent and is no where near a recession. Canada is doing WORST Harper - didn't run on dealing with a recession, he just had to live with it and did well Carney - ran on being able to handle trump and avoid a recession and has done poorly. Hold on there tiger. You're putting words into my mouth. I have never said i blame him exclusively. In fact i've said many times that our current weak economic situation goes back to the trudeau liberals and their follies. But... he WAS an adviser there and it IS the same liberals in power. So yes even tho carney has been the pm for just over a year he and his party have to take ownership of our situation. He was part of it, and the party was part of it. Further, Carney RAN on delivering the 'fastest growing economy in the g7". That was his PROMISE. he knew what was coming, he knew what the situation was (which is more than harper got). And he promised that he'd deliver so it's 100 percent on him when he fails having known what he was getting into. Now, only a jerk would say that the tariffs etc didn't play a role and make the job hard. Of course it did. It's not the same as a world wide recession but it's still bad. But he promised that he'd make canada strong despite that. So of COURSE he's going to be held to it. Now - if we only had SLOW growth he MIGHT have a leg to stand on. But we're falling into recession. A week ago he was saying we were strong and doing great.

Oh my god. She is absolutely paying her lawyers in a contingency case. She just pays them at the end. And if they receive money from another source then they're supposed to reduce their contingency and they are required by law to disclose it So she absolutely would have known who is paying her legal bills. The fact that the bill hadn't come in yet doesn't change that You have no idea how long works do you

So not cozying up, but simply doing business with them. Well I do appreciate that you took the time to admit that you were lying even though it was by trying to rewrite what you said As always your dishonesty comes out within a post or two Wheeee, look at you go

ohhhh i don't think that was the problem Like I said they were so corrupted and Incompetent they made trump look good in both cases. That is saying something

which one? Saying they're a narcissist doesn't really narrow down which of those two you mean

You absolutely did not you horrendous liar 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂 Either way Canada is just about the last country left that allows children to be operated on or have transgender treatment such as hormones and hopefully we'll see an end to that soon The thing is there's lots of a legitimate trans issues and now they're not going to get addressed. This is no different than climate change where the left went absolutely stupid Anti tidw now nobody wants to deal with it First reading: And just like that, nobody cares about climate change anymore When the left goes too far it begins to turn people off and these subjects they supposedly care about wind up falling by the wayside.

Nope, sorry but you are the fake news here. Harper did a great deal to reduce emissions including is stimulus idea of allowing people to remove the GST from any improvements they made to their home such as new efficiency heaters and furnaces as well as the adding of insulation and roofing All of which makes a huge difference in output and tons of which happened because of that GST rebate He did a bunch of other things as well But it hurts your feelings that conservatives are actually better at reducing emissions the liberals are. Meanwhile emissions have gone through the roof under Trudeau. And on top of it he broke our economy with his taxes that were supposed to tax climate change out of existence Sorry to break it to you kid

We understand that you're prepared to lie about it in order to advance your agenda 😜

Absolute bullshit. There were numerous high-value manufacturing jobs the Canadian industry was pursuing, including the manufacturing of pipeline pipes and components. Not to mention biotech. We had a world leading biotech company in Alberta that was respected around the world. When covid hit they provided a plan to the government that showed they could easily produce mnra Vaccines similar to moderna very quickly and in enough numbers to absolutely satisfy all of Canada's needs, eliminating Reliance in other countries. All they needed was a small purchase order from the Canadian government so they could get the investment to go ahead or a director investment if the government preferred. We're talking like 10 million dollars or something tiny. The government laughed and ran them out of business and invested $175 million in a Montreal company that operated out of china that we never saw a single dose from That company has since moved to the states. There are tons of high value manufacturing jobs in Canada that should still be here or should have been created but weren't because of bad policies from the liberals. We absolutely could have competed globally in that realm in many examples and circumstances including drone manufacture. Civilian drones were basically invented in Canada Peterson is not a economist, and I've never ever said that I like him. So I'm not going to watch through 15 minutes of the show just to find out why you're wrong and completely took something out of context if you can't even articulate it yourself. Pretty pathetic kiddo

Survey suggests trans activism turning off many, especially minorities | National Post And another thing that was predicted by many here and elsewhere and scoffed at by the left Wingers. Focusing on legitimate concerns trans activists, many of whom aren't actually trans people but just professionally offended on their behalf, pushed way too hard and went way too far, especially with the transiting the children routine Now there's blowback and people are becoming less tolerant, not more tolerant The activists, as well as people here, went out of their way to suggest that anyone who had any concerns about the trans agenda whatsoever, were terrible evil, awful people, and no good, very bad subhumans who shouldn't be listened to. That kind of talk has consequences and I don't understand why the left doesn't understand that

The second article posted was https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-weak-economic-numbers-spur-recession-debate-in-ottawa-on-bay-street/ Whoopsie is YOURS little guy But my reply is in fact to HIS comments attempting to defend the economic conditions, so neither paper would be relevant. I quoted his specific 'take' on things not a quote from the paper. I get it. You read quickly and thought you had a gotcha moment and jumped in without actually reading or thinking about it. It's kind of your thing

The urge to downvote him over it is overwhelming.....

DOWNVOTES MEAN NOHTING BUT I'M SO UPSET ABOUT IT I'M STARTING A THREAD!!!! LOL yeash, i haven't seen anyone lacking self awareness this bad since the 1st annual SPCA pig roast.