CdnFox

His crap fixation is probably what caused his butt cancer.

"PASTY Skins" !?!?!?!!? Sir, i'll have you know we prefer the term "luminously gifted", you albedo-phobic anti-reflective bigot!

You think everyone dies of a**hole cancer? Yeah, that might turn out to just be your family

Absolutely - it forced them to come clean about spending they wanted hidden. It lead to the downfall of justin on top of it. The liberals were forced into accountability because they had to produce a budget. Now that they've been bitten by having to be accountable, the liberals and carney don't want to be accountable like that any more. So they've tried NOT having a budget. But due to political pressure they're having to come up with one this year. They'll still look like tards when they present it late tho. So here's the weird thing. I look at the budget doing it's job and forcing accountability on a gov't, and i say "budgets are necessary" You look at the same thing and say 'budgets don't really exist" which is false, then try "budgets are omnibus" which is utter nonsense and you can't provide an example of, and then say 'here's examples of why budget bad" and provide a number of examples of the gov't being held to account because of budgets. And you get big mad when people say you're not really interested in accountability If you cared, you'd have been the first in line to say 'carney should have to produce a budget'

That's part of a budget. That's not an "omnibus" bill. And that WAS used to hold the gov't to account. Opposition parties saw the slush fund growing and started to demand to know where the expenditures were going and the gov't suddenly was in major trouble over it. If there had been no budget then the money would just have been spent and nobody would be the wiser! Again, you're pointing out examples of the budget WORKING to hold gov'ts to account. And you haven't provided a single example of this 'omnibus' nonsense you've claimed. You've been cornered by your own lies. Now in desperation to try and cover the fact that you made all of this shit up because you support the liberals and want to defend them not producing a budget you're actually providing examples that prove you were wrong. Are you done looking stupid yet? Ready to admit you were full of shit? Because the rest of us already know you're the last one who's pretending otherwise . Budgets are a primary way that governments are held to account. It forces them to announce what their plans are, how much they intend to spend to make these plans work, and whether or not the revenues coming in are appropriate and where the money is going. When carney tried to hold off till next spring to produce a budget he was attempting to evade transparency and accountability.

I think covid has made enough people sick without you helping. Where the hell did i put my pepto bismol?

That is a 100% bullshit line of reasoning. Grover got massive personal benefit in the form of huge publicity over it. And trump doesn't get to keep the plane either, it will either remain in service or become a public display, JUST like the statue of liberty is. How about the desk the president's still use to this day? A gift from england and for the sole benefit of the president of the united states. He had to stop using it when he left, and trump will either have to leave the plane with the gov't when he leaves or donate it to his presidental library WHICH IS STILL RUN BY THE GOV"T BTW, and will be for the benefit of all americans who want to see a piece of history. I keep telling you, you take away from all of the stuff that's worth discussing about trump when you keep going with this childish nonsense. If trump takes the plane, it's not a direct benefit to himself. And he can fly around in whatever he wants to fly around in. And the cost is a null issue, the new plane they're building for the new air force one he's already into the tens and tens of billions and still going, 100 million or so on this is peanuts.

Well that was my point. It may not say it outright but the result is exactly the same. LOL yeah, "Do what i say or i'll blow your brains out with this gun.... but remember it's your choice". This is a little different but again it shows how the gov't can twist the meaning of words and definitions to create massive human rights violations. The law actually only says you can't misgender, deadname or the like. So at first blush it seems like as long as you don't call your biological male child who now considers themselves to be a female a male You're fine. So many are saying "well you should respect their gender of choice so that's fine' But now they've raised that to the level of 'Child abuse". If a woman who gave birth to a son and raised a son now suddenly calls her son a son she's guilty of child ABUSE? This is the same as beating a child? Or starving a child? It's in the same class of crime according to this law. There is no intent to harm the child, the parent has a different opinion and may not feel it's healthy to just accept this. However. this is just the start. All you have to do is decide that refusing to provide gender affirming care is the same as refusing to affirm their gender verbally and now you've got a problem. Misgendering is illegal, and denying care is misgendering. Boom. This is how they sneak laws past people that the people may not tolerate otherwise.

But it's hilarious that his entire defense is now "i'm a grammar nazi"

Yeah. It's hard to believe they didn't pick it up at some point, and he did have medical tests done just before the election. Remember, if he'd had his way he'd have run in teh election and might have been president right now. And it sure feels like he would have done that with others knowing his condition and he would have put the US into a state of crisis out of his own greed and the greed of the DNC. It's very very hard not to come to that conclusion based on what we've been told so far.

You can think that and the debate can rage on but at the end of the day, he's still wishing biden health. From the sounds of it biden is not going to get that health, it sounds pretty terminal but nonetheless there it is.

That was not the budget. That had nothing to do with the budget. That was about 7 or so months AFTER the budget, and he was desperate to pull something BECAUSE he was being held to account BY his previous budget figures and he'd missed them terribly and he was about to be held to account for that. Literally not an example of an 'omnibus' anything, and actually an example of the budget being effective in holding someone to account. it actually lead to the downfall of the gov't that did not live up to it's budget.

And I think we can all agree that's reasonable.

It's never good to see someone Dying of cancer. Even people you disagree with politically and morally. Hopefully is passing won't be too terribly painful but this doesn't sound like the kind of cancer you come back from. Still, he's got to be pleased with the fact he was able to finish out his term and he has lived a long life with much prosperity. And a fair number here cheered when they shot at him. Let's keep it in perspective But of course just because the left acts poorly from time to time doesn't mean that we have to

Two things that show you're kinda full of shit. 1) - like what. Give me a specific example from the 2024 budget bill that passed the house. And bills don't set policies btw. 2) they still inculde a budget. There was a budget presented and passed in 2024. And in fact it was a kerfuffle over the economic update from THAT SAME BUDGET that lead to trudeau being ousted after freeland said he was full of it and DID NOT live up to the budget. So please, what was this terrible "omnibus" inclusion that erased the budget and explain how the budget wasn't relevant given that it lead to the direct downfall of the liberals and an election.

You think they don't? A budget is a budget. It allows the gov't to be held responsible for their spending and their plans. The vote in the house is just an approval process it makes no difference whatever other legislation is bundled in, there's still a budget. Do you even know what an omnibus bill is? Once again you play the lying twat and pretend otherwise to excuse the bad behavior of your beloved liberals, which you spend night and day here defending and then claim not to support A budget is one of the primary accountability tools, and that is doubly true in a minority gov't. All your lies and whining and begging on behalf of the liberals does not change that.

Well the problem is is that you don't address the issue you just lie about it and then afterwards when your lies are called out you try and double back. We are on page 9 of a thread where you spent all of your time and energy along with your cohorts trying to convince everybody that trump gets to keep the plane and this is some sort of personal gain. That is simply false, It's a straight up dishonesty. Now that that's failed and you come around to something that's an actual valid point worth discussing everybody's sick of it and your credibility on the issue is already gone. And both myself and many others have been saying this to the left for two or three years now. It says if you cannot find anything wrong with this transaction and therefore had to make up something fake to complain about, and now that that's no good you're digging around trying to find something real. Spouting fake nonsense and making blatantly false accusations completely destroys the conversation.

And interestingly it wasn't the CBC who leaked it and broke the story, it was Radio Canada and the CBC ran with it because they realized once that information was out it was out and they would look terrible if they didn't speak on it

Yeah but look, no damage! That's the advantage of having all of those air-filled pillows!

Well at least we can agree on that much. I worry that he's more right than you are, but time will tell. We'll see how it's enforced and applied

That may be true. Heavens knows it's hardly the first vanity exercise we've seen a president or prime minister do But he's still not allowed to keep it it's still not personal gain

He certainly can't find any budgets

But you then have to suggest what other solutions we might pursue. If there are no other practical solutions with reasonable chances of success then we are stuck with what we are stuck with .It makes things more expensive for Canadians when we don't have jobs or economy. Trump's tariffs are creating that effect so you need to say how you will entice him to stop doing that if you don't like this method. Otherwise you're dooming a generation of kids to having a shitty life because you don't want to pay any more for your jam at the grocery store.

Trump says they're permanent. Have we received any indication or any possible reason to believe that he will take them off as part of NAFTA? Now that he knows carney will cave at the drop of a hat when ordered all he has to do to get his way is threatened to raise them, there's no need for him to take them off ever as a negotiating chip. If anything this puts us in a position to get a much worse deal And seeing is the free trade agreement negotiations don't begin for a year and that's just when they begin, we're going to be living with these tariffs for a long time and they will be trashing our economy during that time Well then what is your plan? Cave like a biatch like carney And fall on your knees and pray that trump has mercy on us at some point in the future? If you can't offer a better plan than that I think that tariffs are worth a try

No ,it doesn't. It refers to 'misgendering' as well, and a number of experts have already weighed in that denying medical treatment is a form of misgendering. Taylor and francis for example directly connects them Full article: Misgendering and the health and wellbeing of nonbinary people in Canada If you don't allow 'gender affirming care', you're not affirming their gender. It's right there in the name. I notice you didn't answer my question either. Kinda sounds like you know you're in the wrong here and you're trying to dance around it