CdnFox

More of an observation. And we all know that you're so obsessive about me that you absolutely would spend days trying to find a quote that fit. Unfortunately it looks like you couldn't, you never ever said that PP was the only man who could lose the election. You probably spent hours looking before realizing that was as close as you'd get LOL So yes, that is entirely believable. You obsessed like that over me all the time, in fact it's far from the worst we've ever seen It obviously eats at you night and day the fact that you lose so many arguments to me. And so many of them are to your own mistakes and foibles, most of the time I just have to sit back until you prove yourself wrong. Which you've done again Now all you have to decide is whether or not you're going to blame how long this post is, or how frequently I post for the fact that you said something stupid. Ahhhh Decisions decisions

Ummm... she never said any of that. Find me the quote where she says he's in synch with trump's policies, or ANYTHING about ripping off america first. Second you're behind the times. Trump has already confirmed carney is his man and expects him to win the election and start to work. I haven't heard trump gush about someone like that since putin and little rocket man So if being trump's bag boy is bad, you won't be voting for carney this election. He's already sold out.

You just said yes of course it isn't illegal. I mean.. is it really asking too much for you to maybe keep your story straight for an entire sentance?

Nope. Thats' not who's overdosing Close. I start calling people kiddo when THEY don't have a valid point And they're just making shit up. As you were. It's kind of a statement of distain. You're behavior is childish, you're just making crap up, you don't have a point, you're ling or being obviously stupid, you get called kiddo. Kiddo Nice try tho We've already discussed your tell in the past LOLOL I accept your admission of defeat Sure they can. They still die, people can do surveys etc, it's not hard. I literally posted the numbers as determined by a gov't agency. Sooooo yeah. Oh... worth noting, as always when you know you're losing.... not a single fact, not a single cite, not a single thing other than your own crying like a baby. See ya around kiddo. Maybe next time do better.

No, most of these people died from not getting medical treatment. That's why they were on a waiting list Still can't find any facts or anything to refute it huh? Well there you go

WHAT THE HELL IS BONNIE CROMBIE DOING IN THIS VIDEO?!!? bonnie crombie.mp4

First thing carney did was insult and lie about pp and call him a maga worshipper. Explain to your kids that if they want a more civil discourse maybe they should stop being a complete two faced hypocritical biatch like their father and not throw the first stone.

Kid, it has NOTHING to do with self medicating. It has to do with people wanting to get high. You're now just making shit up at random (no cites to prove why they od i note) Pathetic.

Of course it is. Everyone knows you lefties believe that such things are ALWAYS legal, you just have to call it something else.

You do both. You're ambi-dishonest. But you never cite. Yep. As noted i'm correct. It's exactly what i said. And sorry the majority of that is urgent care. Cancer treatments etc. People spend their lives waiting for critical surgery but don't get it, many die from it and some die in agony waiting. Sorry to prove you wrong AGAIN kiddo. But hey if you have some other numbers lets see. YOU were the one who claimed i was wrong so post some facts. Here's bc alone: More than 1,400 hospital ER closures 'damning indictment' of B.C. Health: Opposition - The Chilliwack Progress Emergency room death highlights Canadian healthcare crisis | Canada | The Guardian But not just bc In a year of ER closures, N.L. sees 24 per cent jump in emergency department deaths - Powell River Peak ANyway i could fill a page or three. Canadians die waiting for critical care at a vastly higher rate than the us. Prove me wrong.

I mean if you do we're still not going to help but we could all use the laugh

You haven't posted any science.

You posted almost the entire article. That's not the 'relevant bits', that's just spamming the board which is what he complained about. And you're lying again, i've never "admitted" that i "don't read". I actually read quite a bit. More than you apperently. and my response proves i do. Jezuz kid, no wonder people don't respect you. IF you're going to lie that brazenly at least try not to do it where the proof you're wrong is a few posts above And stop spamming the site and next time whatever quote or paragraph you think is really relevant then go ahead but don't post the whole thing and expect people to dig through it and try to guess what your point is. IF you have a brain use it, only the stupid just mass spam and hope people figure out what the hell they're talking about.

??????? Honestly if you and myata aren't dating you really need to start.

Literally none of that made sense. It's inappropriate to drink before posting

LOL quick? It took you Days And lets take a look: Your claim now: I said it when he took control of the Conservatives, but Poilievre was pretty much the only guy who could lose the next election for the Conservatives. Your claim back then: Pierre is unelectable. If folks want Trudeau in for another term, he's the path for that. You said absolutely nothing back then about him being the "only guy who could lose the next election" You didn't think it was possible for him to be elected WHEN FACING TRUDEAU, and of course that has proven to be wrong. He's still got a good chance of winning now, and trudeau will NOT be elected or running. So trudeau got driven out and now it's a neck and neck race with carney, and you said nothing about him being the "only guy who could lose a race But i love that you took the time to try to find something anywhere that was sort of close so you didn't look so stupid So we agree, you did NOT say he was the only person who could lose the race for the cpc. At all. You said he was unelectable and that trudeau would win, both of which has tuned out to be false. Thanks for taking the time to prove me right tho AHAAHAAHAHAHAA once again i have to do nothing but sit back and let you prove YOURSELF wrong

In fairness is pretty hard for them to enjoy their favorite pastime of lying themselves into believing their talking points if you're just going to come along and slap them with the truth. So in the end this is all your fault anyway

I had no idea you were 120.

You mean you can't really read and don't know what's relevant so you just throw everything up and hope there's something in there you can use. Yeah. We know.

Yeah but he's winning at the moment. SO he may be a thief and a goof and a liar but hes' an effective one. We'll see. Still 4 weeks left and that's a long time in poiltics. I just have a tough time believing quebecers want someone who's already insulted them that badly and that leftist want someone who's the very example of a rich person they wanted to eat just last year.

Definitely debates have changed elections and the media won't be able to cover for him as easily. And you can bet everyone will be gunning for him. If jack needs Singh has even a tenth of a brain he will forget all about poilievre and we'll focus on Kearney stealing the woke agenda when he's really an evil conservative at heart who renovicts people And you better vote NDP to keep that from happening. The block leader is going to get shot down because everything he's proposing carney can just say I'm not going to do that. Like he's running on no pipelines across Quebec and Kearney will just say okay no problem and his entire argument is out the window. I don't think Carney even has any plans currently to come out west. He knows if he ties up Ontario and Quebec he wins. So that's where he's focusing his energy. I'm sure he'll poke his nose out to Vancouver once but at the end of the day he doesn't care about canada and he doesn't care about the west, he cares about winning and draining canada dry.

Oh I'm sure the liberals will take steps to keep them deep in their pockets if necessary. At least the ones they like

They think 'orangemanbad', and then are set to elect a guy who's a rich international banker and who gave musk 250 million to buy twitter and who gave Jarad Kushner hundreds of millions to help him bail out his country by moving his offices to the states and leasing his building. It's the final proof there must be a god because there's no way THAT level of stupid could happen accidentally.

Well he's got to get his cardio workout somehow!