CdnFox

Well you don't need to control at all. You need to control areas where if a fire gets out of control it's likely to interface with structures or the like. It's not desirable but at the end of the day it's not the end of the world if a fire burns in the middle of nowhere The other factor to consider is you may not stop a fire but you can definitely impact its intensity. And that has huge ramifications, if a fire burns too hot in that area will not regrow forever whereas a normal forest fire often creates life and growth in the area Again there's lots of things that can be done and lots of things that have successfully been done. But we need to understand that the risk is higher for several reasons right now and plan accordingly I think he must know a lot about it, I mean there's always smoke coming out from his ears....

Nope, they're actually still climbing. We were holding our own. No matter how you slice it, they're the problem and not a single thing we can do will make any difference at all until they change their ways Hell they were here like last week trying to buy more coal.

THat can't be true herbie, we paid our carbon tax so climate change was solved!! You've said so dozens of times, carbon tax is how you fix the climate!!!!

You mean like desperately trying to claim that math doesn't support something and then changing your reason why 3 times and finally embarrassing yourself by looking up a formula and getting the calculations wrong because you didn't understand it? You are the personification of that, and you seem to be in a mood to run around these days and accuse others of what you yourself do. @User was correct, you are wrong, and i can only assume you're currently trying to make yourself look stupid by attacking other people instead of me making you look stupid just to change it up a bit And once again you couldn't refute anything he said.... all you can do is cheezy personal attacks because you don't like that he's right. LOL 10 bucks says he comes back and says it's your post count, THAT"S why you're wrong

They can jump like that and that explains the speed they can spread at but it's the crap at the bottom that makes them hard to put out.

All illegals are by definition criminals. That's why they're illegals. but they aren't being charged with a crime when they're being deported, they are simply being removed from property they have no lawful right to be on. If they're actually charged with a crime THEN they'll likely go to jail first and face trial with all legal rights attached, and then if found guilty incarcerated. But the gov't isn't charging them with a crime when they deport them, they're simply escorting them off the property. He may justify the morals behind it, but that is not an accusation of a crime, For example, if you find someone in your house illegally, it would be fair for you to be concerned they may commit another crime. They committed one breaking in most likely, who knows what else they'll do. So you would be entirely justified in telling them they had to leave. That doesnt' mean you're accusing them of actually committing another crime, but it's fair to say you're concerned and want to remove that possibility. Most people would have to admit that is a fairly reasonable line of thinking. You aren't saying he DID do something else after he broke in, but you are saying you would like him to leave so that there's no possibility of it. That is not what he is claiming and considering they are not being charged with a crime there's a great deal of doubt as to how far the duty to provide legal recourse is before they are removed. Or how extensive it should be. Lets not forget, they can still access the court system outside of the country and if they have been falsely removed they would have recourse in such cases. I have never refused anything of the kind, you have never asked me that If a child is abandoned by it's parents then a) they should be charged with a crime. IF they have already fled the country a warrant for their arrest should be posted and if they ever reenter the country they should be charged with criminal negligence and failure to provide the necessaries of life and go to jail. and.. b) the state must care for them until they are of age or depending on the state and the laws they may be placed in adoption or in the case where there is some living relative who is willing to care for them the state may choose to place them with that person and grant guardianship after a period of time. This is the same as any abandoned child, it would be no different. But those parents should face extensive jail time if they ever set foot on us soil again.

You literally justified setting jews on fire as being acceptable. Little late for you to be pointing fingers,

China’s emissions of two potent greenhouse gases rise 78% in decade Atmospheric observations in China show rise in emissions of a potent greenhouse gas | MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology In 2023, China was the world's largest emitter of carbon dioxide, releasing 11.9 billion metric tons They are still the worst in the world by far and while they MIGHT peak in 2025, they're still climbing as far as we know. FAIL!

BWAAAAHAHAAHHAAHAHAH!!!! you were literally crying when we weren't upset enough and you spend every day trying desperately to trash the conservatives and did long BEFORE the election, And your guy lost too. Couldn't pull off a majority, and now he'll face another election soon. He just managed to put the game in overtime.

Nobody is being accused of a crime. They're being accused of being in the country without lawful grounds. That's why they're being thrown out rather than thrown in jail. They're not being punished they're being removed from property they have no right to be on. This is no different than demanding someone who broke into your home should leave. And habeus corpus actually just means that they have to demonstrate there's a lawful reason why they're holding the person. It has nothing to do with proving a crime has been committed - you can't do that till a judge has conducted a trial. This is yet another case where you have reached a decision about what you want to be true and now you're trying to work your way back to an argument that leads to that conclusion. That is sloppy thinking and it doesn't work.

Sure there is, there's creating natural fire breaks, there's planned burns, etc etc etc. But it's not like you need to worry about the ones that aren't close to towns or buildings. Once again you're making crap up to justify a conclusion you arrived at out of preference rather than reason or logic. Also how you address fighting the fires is part of that management and that needs to change too. Hell if you take that to an extreme why don't we have a national fleet of firebombers or the like? For years Canada made the very best firebombers, why aren't we world leaders in that with a strong national fleet that can help out provincial assets when necessary? Or detection, why aren't we improving our ability to detect fires before they get large enough to be a threat in more remote areas? The list of improvements we could make in pre and post fire forest care is endless and we've done nothing, There's many reports that show that forest management needs to change, and that we haven't. If we know that the climate is changing, and we dont' adapt, then the problem isn't climate change.

They say that comedy is the best medicine, so with you around we've got all the medicine we need You mean he's only making you cry a little? LOLOL Dude everyone on this board laughs at you

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!! YOU are the one who claimed you were celebrating after admitting you were crying!! Although now that you mention it, you ARE seriously unintelligent so i guess that was right LOLOL you really have to reread your posts before pressing Submit

So basically honoring your ancestral traditions would involve attacking the first nations, raping their women, stealing their harvests and burning their vilages Ya know - maybe we should be careful about putting TOOO much weight in ancestral traditions

I never said anything like that. LOL you must be losing the argument, you're coming up with more and more fake things to argue I accept your admission of failure well it seems unlikely that you do, that would involve counting and we know how bad you suck at it For example you keep referring to an increase in revenues as a 'reduction'. Sooo not off to a great start are ya! Well you have to actually earn something and be worth money to notice. Living on welfare as you do it woudln't seem like much.

Sure they are. We harvest forests. We replant. Forests are basically crops here in canada.

LOL - and once again you lose an argument in one thread and chase me around desperate to look less stupid You kind of look more stupid btw LOLOLOL I"m sorry i make you cry so much too. I guess you felt left out when i didn't mention that,

Nothing is 'complicated', your stupidity is very simple. It's not that people can't understand, it's just that you're wrong. This conflict exists for one reason and that is the decision made by hamas initially, and the decisions it's made subsequently. Israel is indeed innocent. It is pretty much universally accepted that if you're attacked there is no guilt in defending yourself which is what they are doing, Looks like you're a little TOO simple if anything.

You literally just tried to blame my post count again for your stupidity, so .... yeah kinda sounds like you're the biggest loser here Hows those math lesson's going? Pop quiz, what's 100 - 50? Define a varable? No? Still working on it? LOLOLOL

I have never said that, or anything like it. So once again you're backed into a corner with your lies and you invent something that nobody said to try to save your ass That would be INCREASING your revenue, not cutting your revenue. Cutting fees may increase revenue. That is NOT the same as claiming that cutting revenue and paying off debt And i said that AFTER your claim, so you sure as hell werent' referencing me TEG91-HighCostProvTax-Final.pdf Laffer curve - Wikipedia How Tax Cuts Affect the Economy Sigh. And once again i am forced to teach you the basics of economics. Can't you read a book on your own?

You hear that guys?! Burning jewish people alive is TOTALLY justified because of something that happened in a different country in 2017!!!! What a scumbag you are mike. There is no justification for this,

Ahhh yes your usual little admission of defeat when you've got nothing intelligent to add. I accept your admission no you don't. Again, you may mention them but you immediately follow it with "but!!!!" Hamas and the gaza people are the only people responsible for this conflict. And they should pay the price

No we didn't. We didnt' "take" anything. And they vote and they have representation so they did it just as much as others And they benefit from that arrangment and always have, So YOU listen. Your lies and bullshit don't excuse your racism, bigotry or hatred. This is now CANADIANS ancestral home and has been for hundreds of years. It is EVERY bit as much ours as theirs and is now part of OUR history and OUR culture and so are they, they're not wearing deer hide they chewed into shape these days are they. So it's fine to say we should recognize the history, but not to the point of excluding the rightful people of this land. Sorry YOU might think of yourself as a settler. I'm native. This is where i was born, this is my land

So you're claiming that right now even YOU don't care what you say? That's some tough love right there big guy Precisely