CdnFox

You mean you lied about it in your previous posts. Yes we can see that. Every single one of your claims has been shot down with evidence. And you keep coming back to the same nonsense, one day somewhere down the road we're going to spend money honest really for sure guaranteed we're not lying this time Which is bullshit Even you posted an article about how clothing had been purchased and we were going to get it any day and that was over a year ago and now they're running out and begging soldiers to give clothing and rucksacks back because they don't have enough. You're a liar and you simply are trying to defend the liberals against the indefensible and it's pathetic. I'm not buying it, sane canadians aren't buying it, obviously the Americans aren't buying it And this is exactly as I predicted. So in fact it's I who know more than you. You don't know shit and it shows

No no, trump definitely created Ebola. And syphilis. And hairy spiders. Every democrat knows that, it's the first thing the voices teach them.

You posted that the contracts were awarded for new military rucksacks and uniforms and that was a year ago and we don't have them The liberals cancel contracts all the time. How many freaking times have they bought and then unbought the f-35s? They've done it with helicopters and transport aircraft and all kinds of things and that's when they're not giving it to the Ukraine as it comes across the line So nobody believes that shit. They promise to give the armed forces a raise right? And then after that was done they immediately clawed back a huge amount of their pay. Carney absolutely promised over a million dollars a year to make sure that happens and what have we got? Nothing. We're even talking tanks and planes we're talking about clothing. Are you honestly telling me it takes more than a year to fill an order of clothing. You're a lying sack of crap who's covering for a lying sack of crap. Carney isn't fixing the military, he's not digging himself out of anything, he's making announcements he knows he'll never have to deliver on and any money he does spend he spends on infrastructure that has nothing to do with the military that he was going to spend anyway What a gullible fool you are

They do, and you've proven yourself to be a complete ignorant twat. Here's the bottom line, seeing as you don't seem able to comprehend anything more than that. You cannot store electricity economically in enough volume to be there when you need it. You can store oil or gas economically in enough volume to be there when you need it. So any system where you must store electricity for future use because it can't be made on demand is useless as a primary power source. At best it's secondary or support. IF you can't understand that very simple and easily verified fact, then you need to fire your elementary school teacher and apply for remedial courses.

What are you talking about you twat? I never went to France with anything. Again this is simple. Do we have any more equipment or bullets or uniforms then we used to? No. Do we have fewer armored vehicles than we should have had? Yes. Is any of this going to change in the immediate future? No There's nothing on your list that actually resolves our issues and nothing that carney can't cancel and most of it hasn't actually been firmed up So again it's all lies. He says that we spent our NATO commitment last year and we didn't. From an accounting point of view he can make it look like that but the Americans and everybody else with half a brain can take one look and see that we didn't. We spent about what we always do. And no planes ordered no submarines ordered no tanks ordered and we have the same order for vehicles except we gave 50 of them away already. And all you post is crap that some day we might order something (but not enough even if it's true) All you're doing is proving us right. You're a freaking joke Meanwhile our military is begging soldiers to give its gear back because there's not enough DESPITE you posting news from LAST YEAR that they'd made a selection and would be ordering gear You're a complete fraud. You have no clue about what you're saying.

The left: "WE NEED RACIST DEI POLICIES BECAUSE WE BELIEVE ONLY RACISM CAN FIGHT RACISM" "WHITE MALES ARE TOXIC" "SETTLERS ARE EVIL" "WHITE PRIVLIDGE MEANS WHITE PEOPLE DON"T HAVE TO WORK HARD" Also the left: "the right is racist"

The RCMP generally follows the guidance of the prime minister's office. Right sgt pepper? This was a deal negotiated by the prime minister's office and signed while the Prime Minister was over negotiating with the Chinese. If you're going to try and pretend that this has absolutely nothing to do with the government and you're going to embarrass yourself to a degree that's surprising even for you. Like who. I assume that the prime minister is stupid. No, but I definitely know more than you. Your defense of the indefensible is pathetic. China has been found by our security organizations to be directly interfering with Canadian politics and our police force just signed a deal with their police force and we don't know anything about it. If you needed explain to you why that is wrong then you're nothing more than a liberal doormat

Bottom line for @BeaverFever is what everyone is CORRECTLY saying is you can point to all the announcements you like but nothing substantial is actually happening. Our guys don't even have enough clothes and gear. We have none of what it takes for a modern army to fight effectively. And despite a year of promising to move faster than ever before and CLAIMING to have spent 2 percent of gdp on "Military" improvements, nothing is better. And we still won't be properly equipped next year. Or the next year. And i'm not talkig abou the big ticket stuff like subs. The spending so far is largely for show. And we're paying millions to carneys buddies because they're supposed to make procurement faster than ever before in history 🙄🙄

I think you answered your own question. They've always been corrupt and hid as much as they could But now without opposition getting in their way they don't even try they just put everything under wraps and do whatever they want to do. Whatever they want to do probably isn't very good for the country tho, it'll be what's good for them. Very much like that yes. Probably somewhat. About 30 minutes after it's too late.

No, i said the nazis were socialists. I don't think hitler was right OR left wing, i think he was a narcissist bent on power and controlling people. You mean falsely pretend that Einstein agrees with my world view when he clearly doesn't? I would never! I'd be afraid you'd sue me for copyright But hamas is severe left wing and so are it's supporters. THat's objectively true kid Sorry for your bad luck

I accept your admission of defeat

I read it. It says you're a dumbass Now did you have a point or are you just desperate to look stupid again? A person who cannot articulate his point is literally someone too dumb to know what they're talking about.

It really is. I say something that's true, I provide all of the evidence that proves that it's true, everyone sees me do it and then you 5 minutes later will insist that none of it ever happened and lie your ass off because the truth proves that your statements are wrong We've repeated that pattern together millions of times. I tell the truth, you realize you have said something stupid, you lie to avoid the truth, everyone shakes their head and laughs at you. Except goddess, i think you genuinely just disgust her. But i laugh

Sorry, hamas and the religious fanatics are definitely left-wing. And so are there supporters, only has to glance at America and Canada to see that. It sure as hell ain't the proud boys out there supporting Hamas But as usual you have to lie to try and make your point. Which means you don't have a very good point

Don't know this guy from a hole in the wall. Sorry not a credible source and he's not citing anything i can look up. Bottom line is we gave away gear we needed and we havent' replaced it yet. That i CAN verify. Not like us, we were far worse and we're the ones the us cares about. Announcing is not buying. What do we actually have. Nothing? But haven't bought anything, That was over a year ago and we still don't have any. They are now requiring soldiers who aren't currently deployed to return their gear because there's a shortage. So maybe we didn't actually wind up buying it in the end? We sure don't have them now even though it was supposedly a year ago No it isn't and you've already seen that you're political knowledge is far below average. The bridge is absolutely an issue with a competing bridge in the area having paid trump tons of money to sour the deal for example and that's been widely reported. You simply don't know what you're talking about You mean they'll say they'll take our money if we offer it. That's nice but we haven't actually paid anybody anything or signed any deals of any substance. Or have we ordered submarines and aircraft that I don't know about? I understand just fine. And I understand carney hired a whole bunch of people to make sure it happened faster than ever in our history and yet it isn't. And the Americans aren't stupid and they look at the situation and they realize carney is playing games. We're not actually spending any more than we usually do on military stuff we're just adding a bunch of stuff that you didn't used to be military into the equation and pretending that our spending went up It's all fake dude. It's like when they gave a raise to the military and then cut back on the deployment benefits so that it wasn't really much of a raise at all and for many actually a pay cut Ourselves with announcements we'd be the toughest country in the world right now but as it is we haven't actually improved our military preparedness at all

Isn't that what the referendum is? An effort to GTFO of your country? i feel like you're sending mixed messages

That doesn't mean that they or the us forgives canada for being so far behind all these years and doesn't expect them to spend money FIRST on military improvements. Sorry to burst your bubble. Like i said it's been a year and what have we actually bought? Our guys hare having to turn in their backpacks because there's not enough to go around. Do we really need to spend 5 years buying backpacks? We can't do that faster? Carney hired his banker buddies at a million a year plus benefits just to make sure procurement was faster than ever before. They are delaying the Gordie Howe Bridge because a competing bridge paid trump a lot of money. Fentanyl and calling our PM governor is about trade deals. But this does appear to be about military spending. They're pushing Carney to make decisions about fighter planes and actually buy submarines and other equipment so the candidates preparedness is actually a real thing. Of course they'd like a significant amount of that gear to beat American, that goes without saying, but this isn't just pressuring people for the fun of it. Americans and the world are looking at Carney's so-called military spending and coming to the conclusion that it's not very military. Our military is not actually substantially better off to Dave than it was a year ago after he got elected. Despite him swearing that procurement would happen faster than any time in Canadian history That's just the way it is. Say what you like but we really can't defend our position very well at the moment.

no, PP wasn't buddy buddy with castro But even if he was at least castro wasn't trying to directly interfere with or coopt our democracy or sign secret deals with his version of the gestapo. There's always been trade and interaction with china. Harper was a little more harsh with them, when they stepped out of line he invited the Dalai lama to visit and basically told them it gets worse from here if you continue. But since Justin we've been more and more and more pushed into the corner and forced to do whatever they want and now we're signing secret deals with their secret police? what the hell! Well they have to be concerned about it. There's absolutely no reason to believe that every single secret candidate knows isn't being funneled to the Chinese at this point. And it becomes a trade irritant as well. But what really pisses me off is we signed to deal over this but we didn't even get anything in writing about not having those terrorists put back that they took off temporarily. So we didn't even get it written deal on tariffs but the RCMP has been forced to sign a deal to give them Intel and cooperation

RCMP won’t release China policing pact despite Conservative, NDP pressure - National | Globalnews.ca The RCMP says it won’t release the full agreement it signed with China’s Ministry of Public Security without Beijing agreeing to do so, despite demands from the federal Conservatives and NDP for answers on what it contains. Robin Percival said the memorandum of understanding signed in January “outlines specific forms of mutual collaboration” on policing, the exchange of information and investigative assistance, but did not give further details. “The RCMP will not unilaterally make public or share the contents of an MOU with a third party without the concurrence of the other party,” Percival said. “As such, the RCMP is not releasing the contents of the MOU at this time.” So the RCMP signed a deal to cooperate with china's secret Police Service who we know has been interfering in Canada and we're not allowed to know the details. Carney is selling us out. This country is in serious trouble

Absolutely lie. Other countries including the Americans will see if we are trying to skirt the rules and bend the terms in order to make it look like we're complying when we're not. And the Americans just fired a shot across our bow for that very reason and there's nothing we can say to argue. What matters is if our military preparedness is going up and were able to fulfill our roles in NATO. And right now it doesn't seem that anyone has faith that we will

Yeah I would try and rewrite what I said to if I were you. It was pretty stupid Nobody said it was. Once again you try and rewrite what was said to recover an argument that you've already lost. By we all I assume you mean the other voices in your head. You're already failing at critical thinking and nuance in this very thread. In fact you're failing with basic facts and simple logic. Wow, only took you three tries to get there. I know, math is hard. And the point is we don't have those 50 but we claim it as military spending for our military. It isn't, it's foreign aid. And it is these things and others like them that the Americans look at and shake their head and say we're not actually serious about military spending. It's not that complicated They've been going on about military spending since the first time trump was elected. You can't pretend that it's some fake thing he doesn't really care about. What he's saying loud and clear is that canada has always been seen as an ally and now they don't as much. They don't think we spend enough, they don't appreciate how canada says we should be forming a coalition to fight them which is essentially what he said in Davos and he's pissed off. But there's no doubt that they don't believe we've made any kind of serious commitment to military spending and preparedness and that has been an irritant for ages You can try and play it off but it's quite obvious but the Americans are recognizing what everyone should see is a simple fact. We are not spending money on actual military preparedness and Improvement. And just to hammer that home .... Canada military news: CAF members asked to return gear We don't have enough BASIC FRIKKIN GEAR to outfit our military. The people not actually deployed have to give theirs back so we can get by. Are you going to tell me that's another thing it takes 10 years to research and buy? Rucksacks and backpacks? Thank god we have a shortage of soldiers, we wouldn't be able to outfit them if we had a full team it would seem.

Doesn't make any sense. I've tried twice now to get you to articulate your position. A man who can't articulate what he means is a man too stupid to understand what he's saying . Are you such a man or can you actually state your meaning without sounding like a fortune cookie that got made on a Friday?

Of course I did and once again everyone saw me and now everyone thinks you're a liar again. Not that that represents much of a change Can you point to it on the map?

https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-coast-guard/news/2026/05/minister-mcguinty-announces-816-million-investment-to-strengthen-canadas-maritime-security.html Yeah great, but that's not military spending. the coast guard is an important patrol/rescue force for sure but it's more about policing than fending off an invasion. And you're talking about an average of 116 million a year. I mean, great, the coast guard probably needed that. But it's a small amount and it's not military spending. It'll go under the defense budget but nobody would say that's going to keep canada safer from invasion than it was, that's just upgrading stuff it already uses.

Ok, so your position is that those countries who are primarily reliant on foreign trade moreso than or above their domestic consumption of domestically produced goods for their economy are the 'primary' people you are referring to when you reference "WEF Globalists". Or perhaps it would be more clear to say their gov'ts are who you mean. Is that accurate?