CdnFox

Are you saying that you wrote all the science papers that say climate change is a crisis? Why would the fact that you are a liar invalidate the work of real scientists? Obviously it wouldn't. The problem is there is no science. That's the part you were lying about. That's why you're so angry and bitter about it

Of course they're laughing because you're just a joke Why? Nobody else is pretending it is anymore. the libs killed the carbon tax, haven't mentioned climate change on the campaign trail, the ndp has abandoned it as well. Llike i said, you're just a joke

Prove it. Show us some scientific research that says it's a crisis or that canada can do anything about it.

I wouldn't call BLM and the woke left SUCCESSFUL dictators but yes, that definitely is their modus operandi. Tear down any good statues lately? Yes it does. It's laughable that anyone would think of you as a master of anything. Are you sure you didn't misread it, check again and see if it says "Loser" .

I can see why it isn't the official one. I'll stick with keep calm and carry on thanks

Whereas you're still at the whining and crying because your diapers are full again stage You realize you're just digging yourself deeper and people are laughing at you right? LOL I guess it's your way of distracting from the fact there is no science and you're realizing you've been kind of a sucker all this time

So why can't you show a brick? like, even a single one so far? Why can't you show ANY science to support your claims? It's kind of funny, you guys talk about all this science and that it's been SOOOO studied that there's ZERO room for argument etc.... but can't produce even a single bit of science that proves its a crisis or that there's anything canada COULD do that would make a difference even if we shut down all emissions. I'm saying Eunice Foote would throw up a little hearing you attempt to claim anything about science.

Or anything else for that matter but it's never stopped you from having an opinon before My voice to text insists on calling him 'kearny' about half the time. i usually correct it but sometimes i miss it. If it's too much for your brain to figure out that i meant Carney based on the context i'll try harder to spell it out for you. in crayon. We absolutely can. That is precisely what you did. And once again you're attempting to change the subject. I don't think that poilievre is disappointing a lot of people. I think a lot of people are frustrated with the circumstances, and if he loses there's going to be criticisms and he's going to have to answer for that. He began to become complacent with what appeared to be an easy win and then all of a sudden trump happened and he wasn't ready for it. However the CBC would absolutely love everyone to believe that there's huge infighting amongst the conservatives and that all hope is lost. Gee, I can't imagine why the CBC would have any reason to be prejudiced against the guy who's going to cancel them if he wins It is pretty much confined to people like you. Nobody else would start spouting that kind of nonsense this early in the campaign, it is day five for god's sake. This is a concerted effort to give a sense of hopelessness to the conservatives. There are obviously many who would like to see the conservatives lose including the CBC and Doug Ford. As I have said, there are legitimate criticisms and we will have to see how the campaign plays out. But only the granddaddy of all town fools would suggest that five days in everybody's giving up hope and is turning on each other with knives out. That is pure propaganda and you know that as well as I do. We will see. Trump is an X Factor that it is extremely unusual and hard to quantify. It is driving this election in a way that you just never see in the past so it's hard to predict the future. But I do know that the latest polls have the conservatives moving up. Not down.

No you didn't. Go dig up that quote. If they win the election it will be because he had the skill to deal with trump and the liberal media machine that's promoting Harris as the next god emperor. Oh, sorry i mean Carney of course And if the liberals win it'll be because of trump. I think everyone can see that. SO we'll see how it pans out.

I suppose someone that hit their head off in enough might think that No frustration. Merely an observation. If the conservative party didn't exist they wouldn't be voting for the liberals. They are voting for the liberals out of hatred and bigotry. It's a simple fact.

And your zucchini!

You'd have to be 15 different kinds of stupid not to. Trump has been extremely clear. Carney is trump's guy. He expects carney to win the election and expects great things to happen for America and Canada after that. Meanwhile he doesn't like Poilievre. You would have to be one of the more dishonest people on the planet to pretend that somehow this means that Kearney isn't his choice Are you the kind of loser who tries to distract from a statement that's been made by changing the subject because he doesn't like the truth? Never mind, I think we can all see the answer And while there are things to criticize about his campaign and I have in fact been critical where appropriate, quoting the CBC is a complete joke. At the best of times they're extremely biased against conservatives, and right now while the conservatives are threatening to defend them do you actually honestly expect them to say the truth? I have spelled it out elsewhere. The latest neutral polls show that the conservatives are around 42% which is where they've been pretty much for a year. They show the liberals are at more like 44% and the NDP are somewhere between 7 and 9% In other words, it's not that the CPC is doing badly per se, it's that the NDP is doing insanely badly and the relatively small amount of people that were still with them when all of this started have now fled them to join Kearney in the hopes of defeating the CPC because they are basically hatred and bigotry driven people That is going to present a problem for Poilievre because nothing he can do is going to change the perception of those people. All he can do is try and win back some of the soft liberal support. I think he has to address the whole trump issue a little bit more effectively, But it is going to be challenging because the mainstream media absolutely intends to torpedo him and trump is sucking all of the air out of the room. If you thought that just having him stand up and shake his fist at trump was going to make any substantial change to his campaign you are quite wrong.

Oh yes, your usual bullshit when you've been caught out and can't defend yourself. You couldn't refute what I said so you try and dismiss it despite the fact that Even a grade schooler could see that it's true How about you spare me the faux outrage instead and just admit you're wrong instead of virtue signaling The report doesn't prove that it's true in the slightest. And again what they caught is not synonymous with what they smuggled. Switching to artificial intelligence because you don't have any intelligence of your own I take it Sorry kiddo but that literally is exactly what I said. You can't say we don't have any because we have large fentanyl Labs busted in Canada and some produce more than domestic demand by themselves. And that we're smaller than Mexico. It literally confirmed what i said. Your AI experiment has let you down. I am 100% correct. There are huge massive fentanyl labs in Canada. They produce more than domestic demand. Canada has less than Mexico but you would be a complete loser to say it has none. You said it had none But I love that it took artificial intelligence for you to realize I was right all along. It would appear that my actual intelligence is superior to your artificial intelligence and your non-intelligence As I have always claimed, the flow from Canada is substantial. it is no where near other sources such as mexico but it is a lot more than zero. Is there anything else you'd like to prove me correct about at the moment? You have no idea how much I'm laughing at you

Well if we found that he had a giant kitten eating lab that raised kittens specifically for consumption and had enough kittens on hand to feed every Canadian twice over and we had caught him eating some kittens.... it might be pretty reasonable to assume there's some kittens we didn't catch him eating sadly the kittens are smarter than you

Your usual defense for ignoring arguments you can't refute from people who are smarter than you is that you have them on ignore. At the end of the day you're a coward Mike

There are no PCS. Glad to see you're still paying attention And it's certainly not getting worse for the conservatives in general, in fact the latest polling has them above 40 again. It's rare to see them doing much better than that so it's not that they're getting clobbered. The problem is that the NDP is down to about 7. And while the CPC stole a bunch of their support some time ago, all of the recent losses are going straight to the liberals. Kearney isn't really beating the CPC, he's murdering the hell out of the NDP and this is become a two horse race. The NDP voters that remained who are now going to the liberals are hate-filled bigoted ignorant people who will do anything including trash Canada in order to see the CPC fail and always will. The real question is will they really show up to vote. If the polling keeps showing that the liberals may win then that probably will happen, if carney slips a bit then that probably won't. There's no doubt that trump coming out in favor of Carney will give carney a bit of a boost Because he looks like he's handling things (nothing's been handled and a sane person would ask why trump likes carney but...) So we'll see what happens, But if carney wins we'll see more of the same and i think that as we've already experienced it will be a poorer and angrier nation moving forward.

Yes. And it's a good thing that this is drawn attention to the problem and that we're devoting more resources to catch and prosecute fentanyl manufacturing and dealing within our own borders. We should have been doing that regardless of trump. maybe, i know they're cracking down on a lot of the illegal immigration that smuggled that stuff. But just like i would say that securing the border against fentynal is THEIR problem, securing our own borders is more of 'our' problem.

Well that's not true at all. It is a lot more than zero. And no amount is 'trivial'. You can make the argument that it's pretty small in comparison to other sources, you can also make the argument that THEIR border is not OUR problem. But you could ALSO make the argument that we don't do a reasonable amount to control it in our own borders. There are massive fentynal labs in operation in canada, a number have been busted and they're HUGE, way more than would be of use for our market. We've done little to address it and that creates problems. It's childish and stupid to over exaggerate the problem. It's equally as puerile and ignorant to pretend it doesn't exist. That is just as likely to mean they aren't catching it as it is to mean it isn't flowing.

You didn't explain. You made a statement unsubstantiated by any evidence whatsoever. Despite all of the many people who have requested the science How do we know. Produce a scientific research paper that examines this Again, you link to a propaganda page not a scientific document. In all this time you have not been able to produce one scientific document to substantiate your claims. You talk about all this science and how massively overwhelming the evidence is and yet you cannot produce one single dram of this supposed evidence Why is that? It kind of feels like maybe the evidence doesn't exist

And? That's not a very good place to start at all. Our air has always had carbon in it. Carbon dioxide is a necessary thing for life on this planet. So as is the case with most of your posts your information is utterly useless. And once again you post this utterly useless information rather than some of this science you claim exists but can't seem to find to save your life. Which is why you were dumb enough to pretend that you could "tax away" climate change all these years.

Why not post some of this climate science then? You certainly talk about it enough but you've never actually responded to a single request from anyone (and there have been many) to cite what you're claiming with actual science. Of all the lefty concepts, climate change is the most passionately argued and least cited.

Mr Trump? Is that you?!?

Then this happened...

But you're not. And that's very obvious everyone here. That is I have pointed out in the past when you get called out for your bullshit you tend to try and pass it off as a joke. It's one of the many reasons nobody here respects you. You just a dishonest little weasel who tries to claim "I meant to do that" whenever you fall off your fancy bike

Ford appears to be happy to undermine poilievre for his own reasons. That's really not a 'conservative' schism. I note the latest mainstreet polling does have the CPC gaining 3 points again which is outside the margin. But they've got the ndp all but non existant and the liberals ahead by 2 points as a result. I don't know that's going to be what happens on election day. there are other indicators that strongly suggest that's not the case. Trump's phone call may hurt PP badly. Trump is making it sound that he expects Carney to win and that if he does things will "all work out" as he says. which is concerning but many will say it shows he can work with trump. Mind you those tariffs are still scheduled for april 1. I do find it hilarious that now that it's clear that pp is NOT trump's guy and Carney IS, the libs are scrambling to explain that you WANT trump's guy in power