CdnFox

No they don't. Unless you were talking about your barbie dream home What everyone figured out was that you were lying your ass off, and it took about 6 seconds I don't recall moaning about how much it cost to fix my roof? 30 grand tho, must be one hell of a big roof. I can get an entire pod of 4 townhomes reroofed by a good company for that. If it's just a regular house i'd be pissed at that price too.

we've got a thread going on this already. but yea. Trump whistled the tune, the left fell for it and lined up like good little mice and rats to do precisely what he wanted and carney dropped our tariffs.

No he doesn't. He can leave it with the government or he can give it to a presidential museum. That's it. So he doesn't get to decide at all, he gets to pick from one or two choices that are decided for him. If he does anything else he breaks the law. You can't keep it, he can't use it for his own personal use after he leaves, you can't sell it and pocket the money. So it's a lie. And you and I both know it's a lie. You can say he enjoys the benefit while he's president of having a really luxurious plane to ride but that's about it. And considering that the Air Force and Boeing have screwed up delivery of the new air force one to replace the very aged current one and it won't be ready until long after trump is out of office it's not the craziest thing in the world to accept one from someone else But pretending that this is a direct benefit to him and his finances is puerile. You didn't give a shit when the bidens were pocketing massive amounts of money including his kids. Can you explain given that why we should care now? And in any case this isn't an example of that. Trump doesn't get to keep the plane. It is not his personal plane.

You literally applauded a man being shot in the streets because he worked for a medical insurance company

Some more information has come out; Carney dropped most American tariffs day after Trump meeting | Toronto Sun He did it THE DAY AFTER he met with trump. He met with trump, the NEXT DAY almost all american tariffs came off, and the us ones remained on us. That's mr 'elbows up'

Kid, anyone over the age of seven can see through your lies. You're not mocking anything. You're desperately standing up for the liberals and you always do and not just with me but with others as well. Every single time someone says the liberals should be held accountable you immediately launch into lengthy diatribes as to why they shouldn't and never should. It's become a running joke, others have commented on it. You absolutely are against any accountability towards the liberals, you believe that accountability should only apply to conservatives and frankly you haven't even stood up for that too much other than to say the lack of accountability is all harper's fault You have to remember that very few people are as stupid as you are. I'm sure you think you are fooling everyone, but that just simply is not the case

You think it isn't? That is without a doubt where it is the worst by farI didn't say downtown. You're sticking that in because you know you're wrong and you said something stupid. But definitely out of doubt by far the vast majority of our problems are in urban areas not rural. And we are not going to address those issues with prefab housing, they're simply isn't the room. Did you have some data that proved otherwise? That our housing crisis is mostly in the rural areas of Canada and the urban areas are doing great for housing prices and rent? No? Then shut up and stop being such a useless twat I guess that's one way of saying your IQ is lower than 80. This has absolutely nothing to do with soviet style plans for 5-year plans or anything like that This is very simple. Our capacity for homes increased last year by xML. Therefore the number of immigrants we import this year cannot exceed X capacity. If it does it creates a housing crisis and people can't afford to live. Which is exactly what's happening right now. People cannot afford their homes to live in and they can't afford good food. I know this is hard for your brain to understand and counting is difficult unless you take off your mittens, but if the number of homes exceeds the number of people who want homes, it drives prices up radically. And the people at the bottom are the first ones who can't afford anything. If you have two apples and three people somebody's going hungry. Which means everybody is going to bid more and more for those apples until the poorest person can't afford to bid any higher and then the apples go to the two wealthiest That is our canada today when it comes to housing. And for some reason you think that's a great idea

Ahhh your usual admission you're wrong without saying it There has never been a single time when the gov't should have been held accountable that you haven't argued that they shouldn't. Including this one. If you cared about accountability at all you'd be mad they're not releasing a budget. Instead you started off lying in their defense and then went on to spout gibberish about how there is no such thing as a 'real' budget anymore which is childish. Nobody spends more time arguing that the liberals should NEVER be accountable more than you. Besides, it's all harper's fault. You've been saying that for decades

That is the most Pureile thing you've said and you have said quite a few Pureile things. You would still have immigration. The level of immigration would be reduced to a point where it did not exceed our capacity to provide for the immigrants. That is nothing but good, that is absolutely intelligent in every way shape or form, there is nothing intelligent about bringing in so many people that it causes a housing crisis Congratulations, you are officially dumber than a stump That's not where our housing crisis is We have a housing crisis and inflationary crisis that is directly tied to the immigration rates. If you've been hearing it, it just happened so there you go. You've probably been hearing that if you jump off a cliff you'll injure yourself at the bottom since you were young as well and guess what, if you do that it's still going to be true today You disagreed with the most important part earlier. Immigration is important. Excessive immigration is completely destructive and is even worse than no immigration. You seem to feel that excessive immigration is perfectly acceptable and it would be stupid not to have it. This is considerably Dumber and those who say we shouldn't have any immigration at all But correct answer is we should have modest immigration that does not exceed our ability to provide for the newcomers in the form of infrastructure such as homes, medicine, education etc. You can have as much immigration as you want provided it doesn't exceed that capacity and it has been exceeding that capacity for quite some time. According to the economic research done by various experts it's been happening since at least 2016. Which is why we are over a million homes short of where we need to be right now

2024. Might be the last one if you and the libs have your way. You spent a lot of time fighting AGAINST transparancy for a guy who claims to believe in it. The rest of your ramblings is distraction to hide the fact you support the liberal's lack of accountability. No, That happened under one PM briefly, and was quickly abandoned. It was not necessary nor widely accepted. Secrecy was considered important in the past but In modern times (since the 90's) budgets have always been discussed in committee before presented to the house and when presented to the house everyone gets a copy in advance. You're saying in the old days the finance minister hand typed all the copies for everyone and the committees discussing it weren't allowed to see it? No, that's only since 2018. Prior to that Omnibus bills COULD NOT include anything that was not directly related to the primary bill. The omnibus was there so that if a change to one bill made it necessary to change other supporting bills as well to reflect the changes it was all done in one process. But your beloved liberals changed that law and removed that. Since then an omnibus could have anything. So here we have proof. An entire post in a long line of posts of you explaining why we shouldn't have accountability. You believe firmly that the liberals should not have to produce a budget which would hold them accountable. You've defended it because a hundred years ago one guy typed a budget one time so budgets aren't real or something You hate accountability. Every single time something comes up to hold the liberals accountable you go on forever about how they shouldn't be held accountable as you are doing here. The liberals should have to produce a budget, they are deliberately avoiding being accountable, they should be punished by the voters for this kind of thing. But you will of course vote again for them next time because you don't mind a lack of accountability as long as it's liberals

dude even you have to see what a bullshit hit piece that is. First off it's wrong on every level. Trump hasn't signed anything transformative in his first hundred days? The tariffs are not transformative to world trade? Literally every commentator everywhere has called them transformative. To suggest he's done nothing transformative in the first hundred days is a joke Secondly he doesn't get to keep the plane so when they call it personal enrichment it's out and out lie This is the CBC at its worst and that's saying something. I'm not saying trump's an angel of that he should be accepting planes or the like but it's crystal clear that the article is mostly factually wrong and is simply there for people to exercise their confirmation bias if they don't like trump Post something useful. If all you've got is the cBC equivalent of the National Enquirer then you're making yourself look bad not trump

LOLOLOL i love that you used an example that proved yourself wrong previously As you point out the AI was correct - for a 95 percent confidence, that is the constant as i mentioned in a previous thread. But the confidence number itself is a variable and THAT IS WHAT"S IN THE FORMULA LOLOLOL WE were looking at a poll with a 97 percent confidence as i recall? So you used the constant associated with the wrong variable in the equasion LOLOL But i appreciate you posting your own stupidity for the world to see You suck at math. So the problem there wasn't the AI, the problem there was your compression. The AI was correct and produced an accurate statement but YOU assumed that the 95 percent was a constant for all polls instead of a variable for every poll which it is. When you read it again, that becomes quite clear. Now i can take one look at what you wrote and one look at the AI and see where the problem is. But for SOME reason you can't find ANY problems with THREE BOOKS worth of commentary, other than one non consequential error in one of them. So there you go. All you've proven with this is that ai is smarter than you, not that it's incapable of producing works that are valid.

Yes. Jim, not Mark.

that's not generally the meaning of the term that they're using. And if it was there be no need to include it because it would be automatic.

Irrelevant to what you said. You're now just trying to excuse your hypocrisy. Here's the thing. You let the liberals off and get a walk for the exact same things you say people should be outraged at trump over. That kind of hypocrisy is what makes people tune out the message on trump and ruins your credibility as a poster and a person. If it's wrong for trump its' wrong for carney. but for you it isn't.

I doubt that very much. And you were pretty arrogant for a guy who was 'just making a mistake'. How do you make a 'mistake' like that? What, you tripped and accidentally added 5 months? You must have looked it up and at no point anywhere does any document say that harper took 8 months to deliver a budget And right there you prove your dishonesty. You said "come up with" originally and now you want to change it to 'passed'. Mean while you want people to believe you're not a dishonest liar and I wasn't wrong, i just rounded down to the nearest month because i know you have trouble with numbers that get into the double digits (oh and fun fact, the budget must be shown and presented to the opposition in committee before it's tabled so it really was more like 3 months for him to 'come up' with it. Even when you're wrong, you're still more wrong than you thought you were ) But you're trying to pass that off as being the same as your lie that it was 8 months before harper "came up" with a budget.

Exactly! Except nobody ever said that That was YOUR claim not mine I just laughed at you for posting a visual representation that showed almost all blue and a little red and claiming "look! This proves the liberals are doing great!!!!" LOLOLOL So here's the difference, you're refering to something that YOU made up and are trying desperately to attribute to me. Whereas you really actually did screw up trying to figure out what a variable is in math, you really did insist for pages that 100 - 50 is not 50 and here you really did agree with Eyeball (should have been your first clue you were on the wrong track) and tried to claim that harper took 8 months to produce a budget when he took 3. You are wrong virtually every single time, and you're so pathetic and desperate that you're looking for spelling mistakes and dictionary definitions of words to try to deflect How's those math lesson's going? LOL

Posters like you are basically free comedy on this board. Why would anyone throw that away? We can all use a laugh

True. I assume you would have similar words for our prime minister?

I know you think that if you use that term you'll sound intelligent but really you just sound out of touch. You probably don't know much about computers but AI is actually considered to be a pretty powerful research tool these days So you were asked to come up with anything in the book that actually is substantially incorrect and in fact in three books you only came up with one really minor thing which isn't substantial I'm not suggests that you don't think the books are wrong you just don't have a better argument other than they are AI generators. I guess you thought if you put the word slop in there somewhere it would somehow make it worse. But you still have to defend that. Can't refute the important parts of the book that he's referring to then that strongly suggests that they are fairly accurate.

Not everyone has a magic credit card that can triple it's value overnight

Exactly! And you kept zooming in till it didn't look like there was so much blue Or like when you claimed a book was completely useless and when asked for evidence,,,, you could only find one small and meaningless error and couldnt' refute the rest And once again you lost a discussion in another thread and followed me around trying to make a random insult to make yourself feel better and lo and behold you've made yourself look stupid yet again really you'd think you'd learn, it's effing hilarious!

you mean how he's been signing things and then holding them up to show his signature just like trump does? Yeah, what the hell is up with that? And you can bet that if a conservative did it they would be all over him about how he's just like trump. I'm getting the sense that the shine might come off of carney a lot faster than anyone thought. At this rate if the NDP can get their act together carney's first budget might very well wind up in his government falling when it finally comes out next year

Dude you are wrong literally every time we talk this is the most recent example. Whether it's not knowing what a variable is, or insisting that nobody mentioned milk in a conversation about milk, or posting a study that proves i was right and the study i already posted was correct, or not being able to comprehend that 100 - 50 is 50. This is just the latest example. I'll probably bug you about it for a while About all we can say about you is that you may be wrong a lot but by god you're consistent

Says the guy that claims that the 2nd amendment only applies to militias