Goddess

If your child has a severe anxiety disorder and cannot wear a mask, can your doctor freely write a mask exemption for him? If you have an autoimmune disorder and your doctor feels that given your low risk from covid, the injections would make your condition worse, can he freely write an exemption for you? If you want to take Ivermectin prophylactically or because you have covid, can your doctor freely write you a prescription for it? The answer to these questions is "NO." He cannot. But before covid, he used to be able to treat you according to what is best for YOU. Now he has to do what the government tells him to do with your treatment or risk losing his license to practice. Is this really acceptable to you?

As a #Doctor of #Pharmacology and regulatory specialist with extensive experience in analyzing good manufacturing practices, Maria Gutschi is well-equipped to evaluate manufacturing processes. After conducting a thorough review of #Pfizer's manufacturing documents, she has identified glaring problems that seem to be unsolvable.

In other news: Attorney Aaron Siri (who was responsible for getting the Pfizer documents released) also had case against Moderna. A US court has just ordered the release of 24,000 pages of Moderna documents, starting in July. Of the 24,000 pages - 13,685 detail adverse events. We've seen the Pfizer Pfu@&ery. Now we get to see Moderna's!

DKS DATA - COVID 19 ^^^ Alberta data on excess deaths ^^^ What the PHAC is going on?

This company has been reporting the data from around the world since the beginning. DKS DATA - Home Data has been gradually disappearing. Yesterday, after a record spike in numbers for those under 20 y.o. - 2,849 deaths disappeared from the Canadian data. It is this data that needs to be used to hold them accountable. Overstated death counts being adjusted with no fanfare. No surprise. The damage to the public psyche is already done - fear works and they know it.

Well, well, well........

Ooooooooooo! ? Ed Dowd will be testifying in NCI Vancouver!

NCI Counsel Shawn Buckley reflects on COVID-19 hatred at Day 1 of the National Citizens Inquiry in Winnipeg. ^^^ THIS IS WHY THESE TWO KEEP SHOWING UP ON A THREAD THEY HAVE NO INTEREST IN. ^^^

Leighton Grey is a senior partner at Grey Wowk Spencer LLP in Calgary and Cold Lake, specializing in criminal law, civil litigation, and child welfare proceedings. He's a certified mediator, founder of Lakeland Sports and Learning Academy, and advocate for Indigenous rights. Grey Wowk Spencer LLP is launching a Class Action Lawsuit against the Government of Canada due to its #COVID19 response. We encourage all #Canadians to check the link below "Many Canadians have alleged that they were seriously injured by #CovidVaccines, including three who recently testified before the National Citizen’s Inquiry, an independent initiative examining the federal government’s COVID policies." - Gray https://gwsllp.ca/covid-19-class

Dr. Jay Battacharya - part of his testimony at the NCI.

You're both here to bully. You both could have used this time to listen to the excellent testimony of Dr. Jessica Rose and look at all the links she provided to multiple scientific studies. But you chose to use the time to bully me, instead. Because neither of you are interested in science. You're both interested in bullying and censoring science.

And your choice is to deny science. You are anti-science. So what are you here for, other than to bully me? Neither you or Dialamah has added anything to this thread. Yet here you both are. Together. Bullying.

Another one. No interest in anything I post. No interest in science. Just a cheerleader for Big Pharma. Loves scientific censorship, stated you want to see more of it. Here to bully and censor. No other reason.

This is exactly why you've spent the last 3? days and about 30 posts ordering me to post about reverse transcription. You have no interest in it. You have no interest in science. You said so yourself - you refuse to read it. You're here to bully. No other reason.

One thing is obvious - you have no interest in what reverse transcription is. You just saw a female on the internet that you thought you could order around. But I'm not your mommy. You won't get hand-delivered pizza pops from me.

Did Mommy bring your pizza pop down to the basement yet?

Who gives a shit about your "opinions"? Post some damn science.

Look, the experiment was a failure. This thread is for looking at the science of why it failed. You want to continue to shake your pom-poms for an injection that failed, for mandates and restrictions and lockdowns that devastated society? Then start your own damn thread. You outright said you refuse to read any of the studies or data here. Then bug off. Some people do want to read it and you're here shitting on it. Start your own damn thread and wave your pom-poms for everything we've been through, there. I don't take orders from you and I will do things on my own schedule. I know you think because I'm a woman that you can push me around and bully me. Maybe ordering women around and bullying females works for you in real life. Surprise. It doesn't work on me. If you don't like being called a close-minded, intellectually lazy twit, then maybe work on not being one.

Look, buddy, we have all had NO CHOICE but to focus on YOUR ideas for 3 years. Your ideas have all proved to be WRONG. it doesn't stay in the arm it's not safe it's not effective it doesn't prevent transmission the LNPs are not broken down by the body we didn't all have the same risk vaccine passports did nothing but divide society lockdowns harmed more than they helped masks are nearly useless they bankrupted small business destroyed families abandoned the vaccine injured etc ALL. WRONG. Why don't YOU focus on some other ideas? Close-minded, intellectually lazy twit.....

Yes, super important that you post the propaganda we've all heard screeched at us every 15 minutes for the last 3 years. You know, because we just haven't heard enough from your "side." ? If you're expecting a Thank You for drunken shit-posing on my thread - which was to present the current data coming out and evidence of how the experiment is going and show the science that you all have been denied hearing and to generate discussion of the studies and data (which you refuse to read) and NOT to continue Big Pharma BS - you'll be waiting a long time.

Dr. Jessica Rose testimony at the NCI in Winnipeg. Dr. Rose is an absolute smarty-pants (check out her CV) so her testimony is a bit more scientific, although she does a great job of putting things into layman's terms. Dr. Jessica Rose's testimony is a bombshell! She exposes the flawed modelling used to justify COVID-19 lockdowns worldwide and reveals the severe underreporting of VAERS data. Her insights on the possible consequences of mRNA injections and their interaction with proteins in the body are alarming. Dr. Rose emphasizes the need for further research on the concerning findings emerging as a result of vaccination. Her testimony highlights the urgency of reevaluating current COVID-19 policies and ensuring public safety. Dr. Jessica Rose Testifies About VAERS Data and COVID Models | Day 1 Winnipeg (rumble.com) The next NCI sessions are in Saskatoon on April 20-22.

Except you're not doing research. You are quickly googling anything to rebut and then posting the exact same pharma-paid-for falsehoods we've had crammed down our throats for 3 years. I've already disproven everything you're posting but because you refuse to read the thread, you're here making a fool of yourself. But don't stop. I love that you all are going "on record" as being big supporters of all the lies, misinformation and propaganda that has so far cost thousands of lives. NO AMNESTY.

I know some won't watch the testimony above on ivermectin, but I do want one point to be highlighted: The reason the Pharma companies touted the injections as "95% effective" was because that is the magic number for a drug to receive the label of "beneficial". If it's 92% effective, then it's not "beneficial." But obviously, common sense tells you, it is. Wouldn't you take a medical intervention that was 92% effective? Or would you say, "Nope, not for me! I'll wait for one that's 95%!" THAT IS THE CHOICE THE GOVERNMENTS AND HEALTH AUTHORITIES MADE FOR YOU. They prevented you from having a cheaper, 92% effective drug, and forced you to wait while thousands died, in favour of a (supposedly, but since proved to be less than 50% effective and dropping quickly) 95% effective drug that benefitted them financially and power-wise. ARE YOU REALLY OKAY WITH THAT? OR WOULD YOU PREFER THE GOVERNMENT AND BIG PHARMA STAY THE FUQUE OUT OF YOUR MEDICAL DECISIONS? The studies highlighted in the video are the same studies I posted here, almost 2 years ago. When I posted them, detractors said that the "conclusions" in the studies were that ivermectin had "no benefit". Which was true. I tried getting them to look at the data and not the stated conclusion, but they refused. Ivermectin was shown to be 90% and 92% effective in the studies. But not 95%, so......."no benefit." It's people's stupidity and lack of critical thinking that has been so frustrating.