Goddess

Ah, yes. The name-calling because I'm not pooping my pants like you are. The big difference between us climate REALISTS and you climate ALARMISTS is that your solutions are extremely anti-humanity. From impoverishing 3rd world countries further to somehow "getting rid" of billions of humans to terrorizing the world's youth, ALRMISTS like eyeball, MH, treeface, etc. are distinctly anti-human. REALISTS have better solutions. Solutions that don't kill people. We believe in the adaptability of humans and our capacity to come up with solutions using tech. A lot like during covid. Again - go change your diaper and simmer down.

For someone who claims to only follow science if there is consensus, I'm surprised you're so out of step with what's going on. Climate alarmism is out. You "poop our pants" people have exhausted everyone, from covid to climate, with your constant fearmongering and name-calling anyone who doesn't also poop their pants. Why Some of the World’s Top Scientists Are Starting to Push Back on Climate Alarmism – Climate Depot

Oh, come on. They don't use that report anymore because it was fearmongering garbage modeling. Why Apocalyptic Claims About Climate Change Are Wrong Part of what bothers me about the apocalyptic rhetoric by climate activists is that it is often accompanied by demands that poor nations be denied the cheap sources of energy they need to develop. I have found that many scientists share my concerns. “If you want to minimize carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in 2070 you might want to accelerate the burning of coal in India today,” MIT climate scientist Kerry Emanuel said. “It doesn’t sound like it makes sense. Coal is terrible for carbon. But it’s by burning a lot of coal that they make themselves wealthier, and by making themselves wealthier they have fewer children, and you don’t have as many people burning carbon, you might be better off in 2070.” Emanuel and Wigley say the extreme rhetoric is making political agreement on climate change harder. “You’ve got to come up with some kind of middle ground where you do reasonable things to mitigate the risk and try at the same time to lift people out of poverty and make them more resilient,” said Emanuel. “We shouldn’t be forced to choose between lifting people out of poverty and doing something for the climate.” Happily, there is a plenty of middle ground between climate apocalypse and climate denial. Why Climate Alarmism Hurts Us All Climate Scientists Speak Out The good news is that mainstream climate scientists are starting to push back against the fear-mongering. And now, eyehole, go change your diaper. You were a fearmongering piece of crap on covid and you're a fearmongering piece of crap on climate.

Capital is still flowing into Alberta. Just this week: An Ontario First Nation cracks open its' own piggy bank to invest $65 million: The Swedes investing $10 billion in a data center in Olds: Dow doubles down with another $10 billion for a major petrochemical project: For years, Alberta has been expected to bankroll failed Liberal policies, absorb policy failures and shut up and be ignored. While Ottawa redistributes our wealth to buy votes elsewhere. A new EKOS poll showed 41% of Albertans think their province would be better off as an independent country. Interesting that this poll was done back in Sept. I think that number has only increased since then.

That is horrible. I'm so sorry that happened to you. I used to live near the base around Edmonton and everyone I know has utmost respect for our soldiers. Our whole little town had a homecoming for one of our vets who served over there. I'm sad that you met with someone so disrespectful. That's not how anyone I know feels.

Uh huh. Not until they used it to scare the pi$$ out of everyone and ca$h in. Now the lie is being exposed so they're trying to dial it back, but you're still here pooping your pants.

Like RCP8.5? The "WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE" model?

This isn't the thread for this topic, and I've stated my case in many of the topics that are dedicated to this. But briefly, my thoughts are this: There are too many people like yourself, who adamantly refuse to take in any information that doesn't say "WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!! THE ONLY THING THAT AFFECTS THE WEATHER ON EARTH IS HUMANS!!!!!! GIVING ALL OUR MONEY TO BILLIONAIRES IS THE ONLY WAY TO SAVE US!!!!! ARRRRGGGHHHHH!!!!! EEEEEEKKKKKK!!!! WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!!!!" There's not much point in discussing the topic with you.

There is no denial about climate change. Everyone knows the climate changes. We all see it every day. There is no utter indifference, either. The majority of people (in the West, at least) are perfectly happy to do what we can to reduce, reuse, recycle, etc. Almost everyone agrees that we should continually make efforts to do things in ways that impact the planet less. The questions are: How much is man responsible for? How much of a crisis is it?

The dominant composition of the Canadian federal system of government at a glance. Canada now has 40 million people, over 60% of which live in Ontario and Quebec. As to the Federal legislative branch, Ontario and Quebec hold 200 of the 343 seats available in the House of Commons, or 58% of seats, and 48 seats of the 105 seat Senate, being 46%. Regarding the executive branch currently, Federal Cabinet is comprised of 28 full Ministers, 17 of which are Members of Parliment from Ontario and Quebec, being 60% of Cabinet. The Federal Civil Service has 43% of the entire Federal Civil Service working in the National Capital Region (“NCR”) on either side of the Ontario and Quebec border. Then another 24% of the Federal Civil Service work in Ontario or Quebec outside the NCR, for a total of 67% of the Federal Civil Service being in Ontario and Quebec, inclusive of the NCR. The many administrative decisions made by the Government of Canada and it’s Civil Servants are only challengable in a court by way of judicial review to the the Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal. This is so, as the Federal Court Act at s.18 makes it so, and prohibits Superior Courts in each Province consisting of judges from those Provinces, from questioning decisions of the Government of Canada by way of Judicial Review. These decisions are ones effecting Canadians not just in the NCR, Ontario or Quebec. Yet, both the Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal have little representation from the other 8 provinces. The Federal Court Act mandates that its justices reside within 50 miles of the NCR, meaning they have to physically reside in Ontario or Quebec. There is no statutory or constitutional requirement that the Federal Court or Federal Court of Appeal have proportional or fair representation from each of the provinces either. Of the 37 Justice on the Federal Court of Canada, 25 of them or 67.5%, were appointed from the Ontario or Quebec Bar. As for the other 12 appointments, 3 are from the B.C. bar, 2 are from the Newfoundland bar, 2 are from the New Brunswick bar, 2 are from the Saskatchewan bar, 1 from the Nova Scotia bar, 1 from the Manitoba Bar, and 1 from the Alberta Bar. There are currently 17 justices of the Federal Court of Appeal. Of the 17 justices, 16 or 94% were from either the Quebec or Ontario Bar, and one is from Nova Scotia Bar. Any appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada requires leave. Generally, leave applications are denied, with only 6.8% being granted in 2025. At the Supreme Court of Canada, 6 of the 9 justices on the Supreme Court of Canada are from Ontario and Quebec, or 66.66%.

Of course the climate changes. Duh.

An easy-to-understand description of the IGg4 class antibody switch that is happening from the jabbers: The bad news just keeps coming for the mRNA guinea pigs. There are quite a lot of studies, now, about the likelihood of mRNA vaccines inducing an IgG4 class switch, and the consequences that would have for those who took those shots. In short, because of the long-term persistence of the spike protein, instead of staying in the arm and being gone in a couple of days as was promised, that persistent exposure, lasting months, years or potentially indefinitely, instead trains the immune system to ignore and disregard a viral infection. Similarly to the archetypal case of pollens, when an otherwise healthy immune system encounters a foreign body, and it persists for long enough, the body undergoes a cascading response switching between IgG subclasses from one, to two, to three, and eventually arriving at IgG4. IgG4 is called the anti-antibody. Every antibody subclass serves as a flag for the immune system. With classes one through three, and from the broader IgM/IgA types that will bind to nearly everything, versus the custom-made IgG type that is produced to bind to one specific antigen, one recognizable part of some foreign body, the antibody activates the rest of the immune response; the complement cascade begins, various immune cells release signaling chemokines and cytokines to recruit immune cells to the site of the infection, and the immune response begins in earnest. In contrast, IgG4 serves the opposite purpose; the immune cells that meet it will be disabled, the local complement cascade will be interrupted and pacified, and the immune system is told, “Don’t worry about this one. He’s harmless.” This is a necessary adaptation to prevent an otherwise damaging inflammatory response to ever-present foreign bodies such as pervasive pollen in the spring. The failure of this mechanism, among others, manifests as hayfever; a completely pointless, damaging inflammatory response is induced, where none is necessary. A few molecules of pollen (generally) aren’t actually going to hurt you; IgG4 is among the body’s mechanisms to recognize that, and call off the cavalry. What you don’t want is an IgG4 response to a replicating pathogen that is going to harm you - and that’s exactly what the mRNA shots are, quite foreseeably, causing. A new pre-print study: Class switching toward IgG4 six months after primary mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination in kidney patients | medRxiv just published from the University of Amsterdam, has confirmed exactly what we said was going to happen: after a long delay, up to six months or more after taking at least two shots, the immune response in mRNA vaccinees eventually switches to the non-inflammatory IgG4 subclass. This is bad news bears for, it appears, anybody that took those shots. The Study The researchers followed four cohorts of patients undergoing treatment for kidney disease. The study included only those who had taken at least two COVID-19 mRNA “vaccines,” and studied the patients’ immunologically healthy, unvaccinated family members or close associates for their control groups. Baseline levels were measured 28 days after vaccination, with IgG4 consisting of 3-5%, versus IgG1 at 55-65%; later, between two and six months after their second dose, almost all of the studied patients had substantially elevated anti-Spike IgG4 levels, up to five times their starting prevalence at 10-15%, with subtypes two and three having all but vanished, and IgG1 levels remaining stable. This is an interesting development. In a full class switch, IgG1 tends to vanish almost completely, to be replaced with IgG4 almost exclusively. Here, only IgG2 and IgG3 vanished, and IgG4, rather than completely taking over, was only elevated in the response, with IgG1 proportions remaining stable. Complete vs Partial Class Switch The subtlety of the switch belies its effect. IgG4 is a potent immunosuppressant; it does not need to completely take over to exert an outsized effect. Most of the body’s systems rely on homeostasis, and various levels of signal and countersignal, as I’ve covered in previous articles; a given pathway will be affected by both agonists and antagonists, with competing levels of “peace” versus “war” signals, and the eventual response will be determined by which is stronger at any given time. IgG4 works a little differently. When an immune cell responds to an IgG1 antibody, it’s likely only there because it’s already been summoned to the site of infection; some cells will continue to amplify the signal, while most will just get to work attacking the foreign body. An IgG4 response, on the other hand, takes priority. The antibody manually interrupts the complement cascade, binding to C3a, preventing C3b deposition; immune cells that are told to stand down will reliably repeat and amplify those orders. One IgG4 calling for peace will be heard and amplified more loudly than ten IgG 1-3 encounters. Of course, there is a silver lining. The fact that IgG1 remains dominant means that, at any given site of infection, there’s a reasonable chance that there won’t be any IgG4 present for at least a while, and the immune system will still be able to do most of its work. If IgG4 were dominant, the effect would be comparable to AIDS; even with an otherwise healthy immune system, even boosted in its power by the common C and D vitamins, the response would be completely shut off, and the viral infection would be free to run rampant, causing extensive tissue destruction, blood clotting, releases of stressor chemokines, and the various other unavoidable signals induced by cell death, until it ends up overwhelmed by that pervasive counter-signal; at that point, very late in the course of an infection run rampant, a cytokine storm would commence, with the body realizing it has some catching up to do against that infection; inflammatory artillery starts firing everywhere, all at once, and massive tissue destruction and death follows in relatively short order without intensive medical care, and even then it’s a crapshoot. Cytokine storms were, for a time, the leading, direct end-stage cause of death for those in hospital with severe COVID-19, frequently following bacterial infection from incompetently executed intubations causing mechanical injury to throat or lung tissue. The Immune Microenvironment An immune response is, generally - except in cases of cytokine storm - hyper-localized to the site of infection. Consider that everything that constitutes the immune system is carried in and by the blood, which is constantly rushing by, never static. Immune cells that were, five seconds ago, moving through your heart, calmed and idled by the absence of any antibody or chemokine signal, only momentarily find themselves, by pure chance, rushing by the site of an infection and suddenly in receipt of that alarm. The alarm, too, travels through the blood. A cell that releases an alarm, in the form of various molecular chemokines or cytokines, will see those molecules rushed away in the bloodstream. Immune cell motility - their ability to choose a direction in which to move, to follow an alarm to its source - is based upon these cytokines. A CD8 cell in your leg, where nothing in particular is going on, will be in an environment that is saturating it with ‘peace’ signals; when it smells an alarm, it will physically move in the direction of that alarm, trying to get closer to the site of infection. As it moves closer to the site of infection, that signal gradient will gradually shift away from the bias toward peace, and the volume of that alarm will steadily increase; closer to the infection, there are more cells releasing those alarms, and increasingly fewer ‘peace’ signals. This balance is instructive to the cell as to whether it needs to be in attack mode yet. Hi ho, hi ho, it’s off to war we go... IGg4 is among the strongest of "peace" signals. Spike-specific IgG4 generated post BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination is inhibitory when directly competing with functional IgG subclasses: Cell Reports As it processes the increasingly pervasive gradient of alarm signals, and draws closer to the site of infection, it’s still being saturated with both types of general signals; if it started in the leg, and an infection is in, say, the groin, the cells in the knee are still saying everything’s fine, but that smell of danger is getting stronger. The most effective cells aren’t generalists; CD8, the heavy artillery, are largely produced specifically to respond to one epitope of one hostile foreign body. While the immune system is ever present, we don’t walk around with an army of cells ready to attack some specific pathogen or another. There’s billions of potential pathogens, with billions of potential protein conformations that could be recognized by any one cell; we can’t keep them all, in quantity, all the time. While there’s generally some present, for most types of potential infection, their quantity is minimal and residual from the last time that pathogen was seen in the body. That is also, coincidentally, the reason why the practice of measuring actively circulating antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2, as a proxy for whether one is protected, or in need of another booster, is quite insane. That faulty approach was used to justify instructing people to get one booster after another: just one more of the genocidal frauds perpetrated on the world by Dr. Fauci. A properly established immune response will create memory B-cells, which then sit idle until their pathogen is encountered, and only then will they flood the body with antibodies and immune cells tailored to that pathogen; it is not natural to walk around with persistently high levels of antibodies for a pathogen you have not recently encountered. That is the primary reason this class shift has occurred - that unnatural, ever-present exposure is what drives the class switch. The logic that evolved here is, effectively, that if we’ve been on consistent high alert against a foreign body, that has been continually present for six months now, and you’re still here to tell the tale, then it’s probably harmless, and your immune system should stop overreacting. This is also, coincidentally, a major method by which immunological cancer therapies will eventually, if not rapidly effecting a complete or near-complete clearance, induce tolerance toward tumors and cancers. An immune evasion mechanism with IgG4 playing an essential role in cancer and implication for immunotherapy - PMC It’s exactly the same process, and irreversible; as cancers tend to evolve, under extreme pressure, numerous immune evasive features that prevent any recognition of some cells, that timer does not actually begin until the pharmaceutical immune interventions that unmask them are commenced. From the moment those tumors are made visible for an immune response, where they were previously invisible, the clock is ticking toward an IgG4 class switch and a substantial shutdown of the immune response.

You can search names mentioned in the Epstein files, here: Department of Justice | Epstein Library | United States Department of Justice Just for fun, I searched: And:

So is there any kind of major industry or manufacturing that you climate alarmists would allow in Canada? Or we're just gonna keep going broke?

BC has been working actively against Alberta for decades. This guy, featured on MSM, ......: ....... receives money from the Tides Foundation. He takes money from Tides, a US-based NGO that funds activists to oppose Canada's oil & gas industry. And guess who funds Tides? The BC taxpayer, courtesy of the BC government. From 2015-2020, the BC government gave Tides $800,000. In 2020, Tides changed their name to MakeWay and the BC NDP gave them another $15.6 million to oppose Canadian resource development. The Liberals also gave them $2.5 million tax dollars. In 2020, when it looked like Alberta was getting angry about the Liberals' blocking their resources, the Liberals gave them another $12 million tax dollars. And then Tides/MakeWay gives it to First Nations and activist NGOs to oppose Canada's resource development. So when you see this: It's the Liberal government misappropriating your own tax dollars to utilize useful id10ts, in order to keep themselves in power. Nothing else.

In 1995, Quebec appealed to France during its' separation bid, with Parizeau making a 4 day trip to Paris to seek their support. The rest of Canada did not call Quebecers "traitors".

Yes. Forgot how to do journalism.

Under the Liberals, in just 10 years, we went from a country with a balanced budget and the richest middle class in the world....to a country that has to borrow from our children to subsidize groceries for over 1/4 of our population. ** insert Liberal supporters cheering, here **

If you think Albertans are shocked or hurt that the Liberal government calls us names, rather than doing a better job of representing ALL citizens.......we're neither. We expected it.

And Quebec. They rely the most on money from Alberta.

This is a summary of what the NSCOP report said. Amazing that you are perfectly fine with all of this and don't view any of it as "treason". What NSICOP Alleged Some MPs Did NSICOP reviewed classified CSIS intelligence and concluded that a small number of federal politicians engaged in activities that advanced the interests of foreign states, including China. The report did not name the MPs, but it described the types of behaviour involved. 1. “Wittingly” assisting foreign states NSICOP said some MPs knowingly: Maintained relationships with foreign intelligence officers or proxies Provided political information or influence in ways that benefited foreign governments Accepted support or assistance that they understood came with expectations This is the most serious allegation — it implies intent. 2. “Unwittingly” assisting foreign states Others were described as unaware that they were being used by foreign actors. This included: Being targeted through community groups or intermediaries Being influenced through flattery, donations, or coordinated diaspora pressure 3. Accepting help in nomination contests The report said some MPs: Received organized support from foreign-linked networks during party nominations Benefited from mobilized voting blocs directed by foreign actors 4. Sharing privileged information Some MPs allegedly: Passed along non-public political information Provided insights into party dynamics or government positions Helped foreign actors understand how to influence Canadian politics 5. Supporting foreign policy positions NSICOP said a few MPs: Advocated positions in Parliament or caucus that aligned with foreign-state interests Did so in ways that intelligence agencies assessed as influenced by foreign actors 6. Interacting with foreign officials inappropriately Examples included: Meeting foreign officials without notifying Canadian authorities Coordinating political activities with foreign diplomats or proxies

???? Not a conspiracy. It was in Canadian Intelligence reports, discussed in committee meetings, reported on (briefly) in the MSM. You can read the reports, you know? You believe CSIS and NSICOP and all our Canadian Intelligence Authorities are conspiracy theorists? Really?? Wow. That's quite a conspiracy theory you got going on there, yourself.

We know what we're up against.

I've wondered that with regard to the CCP working to get the Liberals elected and the number of Liberals that "knowingly" cooperated. CSIS says it's more than 50 members of parliament.

MSM did a piece on the Calgary rally but they've mostly ignored what's happening everywhere else. I have a friend who has spoken about Alberta separation for years, when it was a topic that nobody paid attention to, and now she travels around to smaller communities now for the petition signings. Her videos of the lineups are eye-popping. Even small communities have lineups going for blocks and blocks. I know Fort Saskatchewan just had their signing and they've added regular times to continue because they couldn't get everybody in one night. For the next several weeks, they are open for signing 2 more nights a week. Another friend in a smaller town (pop. approx 15,000) went through the training and got certified, he signs up people in his garage whenever he can and says he gets about 15-30 people every time. He says about 120 people just on Mon, Tues & Wed this past week. My small town (pop. approx 4,000) just had our signing mid-week. It was packed. Live band, people coming and going all night. I follow a guy on X who also got certified to take signatures and he travels around to the very small communities to sign people up. He reported a couple days ago that he has put over 2000kms on his vehicle and that 80% of the people who have signed are Indigenous and Metis. There's more support than MSM is telling you. Important to note that this is just a petition to have a vote on separation, not the vote to separate.