Goddess

WOW. Dr. Pierre Kory is being quoted and interviewed in MSM. PIERRE KORY: Here Are Three Unforgettable Lessons From The COVID Pandemic (msn.com) Dr. Kory is one of the doctors I have followed from the beginning and he was censored and cancelled up til now.

It's a fact that Baric, Daszak, and the Chinese bat lady were monkeying around with coronaviruses to make them more infectious in humans by altering the furin cleavage site to use ACE2 receptors that attach to human cells by means of a spike protein. They were doing this at the same lab right when the same virus appeared - same place, same time frame. Funded by Fauci with the NIH. Daszak is the source of the "natural origin" (mis)information and Fauci backed him up by lying to Congress about the GoF research. These are all facts. It's not just the GoF stuff - it's the attempted cover-up that is also damning.

This is the father Dialamah mocked and said was a liar when I first posted about him and his son. I've followed his story from the beginning. I can't wait to see him testify at the NCI hearings.

These things seem to only make local news. Never MSM. Steinbach family files lawsuit against AstraZeneca - SteinbachOnline.com - Local news, Weather, Sports, Free Classifieds and Job Listings for Steinbach, Manitoba On March 23, 2021, Marina Reimer received what she refers to as a "life-altering" phone call from her son. Twenty-one-year-old, Jackson Reimer was calling his mother to let her know that he suddenly could not see anything and that his head felt like it was exploding. Jackson, who his parents refer to as a healthy young man, was experiencing spontaneous right occipital intracerebral hemorrhage, also known as a hemorrhagic stroke and extremely low platelet count. Six days earlier, Jackson had received his AstraZeneca vaccine for COVID-19, at Whistler Blackcomb BC Conference Centre. According to his parents, the stroke and subsequent craniotomy, caused Jackson to be legally blind with a severe cognitive brain injury and memory loss. Jackson was eventually transferred to Manitoba where he spent three months rehabilitating at the Riverview Health Centre in Winnipeg, in the Acquired Brain Injury Program. The Reimers say it was during that time, and over the course of the next year, that comprehensive testing determined that the AstraZeneca vaccine was the most likely cause of Jackson's stroke. The Reimers say that Health Canada, as the federal regulator, carries a significant responsibility to complete due diligence on the medicines and vaccines to protect the safety of Canadians. The statement says that AstraZeneca, Verity Pharmaceuticals, Vail Resorts and Vancouver Coastal Health, need to take accountability for releasing the AstraZeneca vaccine before it was fully tested and for not providing information about the risks and potential side effects to enable us to make informed decisions about our health. "We put our lives in their hands," reads the statement. "Our governments used fear and persuasive marketing to encourage the vaccination. The well-known marketing 'the first vaccine is the best vaccine' was not the case for Jackson. The first vaccine was the wrong vaccine."

1. In 1999, Anthony Fauci (Director of NIAID), in partnership with Ralph Baric and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill constructed an “infectious, replication defective” recombinant coronavirus to infect human cells. 2. In 2002, NIAID and UNC filed for patent protection securing the rights to the spike protein chimeric bioweapon now modified for use in the gene therapy represented to be a “vaccine” 3. In 2003, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention patented the genome of the SARS coronavirus securing all commercial use of SARS. 4. In 2013 to 2016, NIAID, UNC Chapel Hill, EcoHealthAlliance (led by Peter Daszak), and the Wuhan Institute of Virology violated 18 USC §175 enabling the construction and chimeric manipulation of a pathogen known to be lethal to humans (the S1 Spike Protein) in repeated and habitual felonious acts. 5. In 2015, Peter Daszak stated to the National Academy of Sciences that, “…until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process, Daszak stated.” 2016 Feb 12. 6, Developing MCMs for Coronaviruses. Available from (link in comments below): 6. Beginning in September of 2019, NIAID, UNC Chapel Hill, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Chinese Centers for Disease Control conspired to conduct a global operation in the release of a respiratory pathogen to force nations into developing and deploying a global vaccine program including having President Trump sign an Executive Order (Executive Order 13887) mandating the production of mRNA vaccines months before any reported SARS outbreak. 7. In 2020, two companies who had never safely produced any vaccine before were selected to manufacture an untested and unsafe product to unleash on the population.

In EcoHealth Alliance's research grant from the NIH which spanned 2014-2019, they report the following in their progress report: "In collaboration with Ralph Baric (UNC), we used the SARS-CoV reverse genetics system to generate a chimeric virus with a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone expressing SHC014 S protein with 10% sequence divergence from SARS-CoV S. This chimera replicated in primary human airway epithelium, using the human ACE2 receptor to enter into cells." AKA - "We made a corona virus that attacks human ACE2 receptors with a S type protein." Source document: understanding-risk-bat-coronavirus-emergence-grant-notice.pdf (documentcloud.org) Screenshot of above portion, on page 161:

News today from the Missouri v. Biden court case: Court Denies Motion to Dismiss Censorship Case Against Fauci and Other Biden Officials – RedState Important update in Missouri v. Biden case. The judge denied government defendants' motion to dismiss the case (except for claims against President, which are generally disfavored by the court). Upshot: the case will now move to trial. The court ruled that, contrary to the government's claims, we the plaintiffs (both the states of MO and LA and the private plaintiffs) have standing to bring the case: "The Court finds that the Plaintiffs have satisfied Article III’s standing requirements." The court ruled, "Because Plaintiffs have adequately alleged injury-in-fact, traceability, and redressability, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED on the grounds of Article III standing." As to the government's claim of sovereign immunity, the court found, "Sovereign Immunity does not bar Plaintiffs’ First Amendment claims... Defendants have ignored the basic principle that parties may seek to enjoin federal officials from violating the Constitution." In other words, the judge reminded the federal government that the U.S. Constitution remains the highest law of the land. Who would have thought? Furthermore, the ruling explained, "parties are entitled to sue for injunctive relief against federal officials in their official capacity for actions beyond their statutory authority." For these reasons, "Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED on sovereign immunity grounds." Regarding the merits of our Complaint, "the Court finds that Plaintiffs have stated plausible claims on the merits in all counts of the Complaint." Crucially, "The Court finds that the Complaint alleges significant encouragement and coercion that converts the otherwise private conduct of censorship on social-media platforms into state action, and is unpersuaded by Defendants’ arguments to the contrary." "Further, while the Government may certainly select the messages it wishes to convey, this freedom is limited by the more fundamental principle that a government entity may not employ threats to limit the free speech of private citizens." "Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged state action under the theory of significant encouragement and/or coercion." "Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged joint action, entwinement, and/or that specific features of Defendants’ actions combined to create state action." "Combined with other factors such as the coercive statements and significant entwinement of federal officials and censorship decisions on social-media platforms... this serves as another basis for finding government action." "Because the Complaint alleges state action, Plaintiffs plausibly state a claim for violation of the 1st Amend. via government-induced censorship... Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged prior restraints and viewpoint discrimination, which are clear violations of the 1st Amend." The court explains, "The First Amendment, subject only to narrow and well-understood exceptions, does not countenance governmental control over the content of messages expressed by private individuals." The court found, "Plaintiffs have clearly and plausibly alleged that Defendants engaged in viewpoint discrimination and prior restraints." In conclusion, the judge ruled, "Because Plaintiffs have adequately alleged each claim in the Complaint, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED on Rule 12(b)(6) grounds." In summary, the court accepted virtually all of our arguments in the case and rejected virtually all of the government's counter-arguments.

Ed Dowd, author of "Unknown Causes" interview where he goes over some of the research and data in his book: https://rumble.com/v2ailv0-tucker-carlson-interview-ed-dowd.html Yes, I know it's Tucker Carlson. Watch it anyways. Ed figured out early on that excess deaths and vax injuries/deaths would not be reported on by the media or government, but it WOULD show up in insurance actuary data so he's been on top of this for quite a while.

Vaccines don't work, masks don't work: Everything government told us about COVID-19 was wrong - Washington Times It wasn't wrong. It was lies. ‘We Failed’: Danish Newspaper Apologizes For Its COVID Coverage - Foundation for Economic Education (fee.org) A Danish newspaper has apologized to its readers for not questioning the government’s data and narratives more throughout the first two years of the pandemic. The Ekstra Bladet, founded in 1904, said it should have done more due diligence in examining the government’s data and conclusions before reporting them. The apology is an important reminder that the traditional role of journalism has been “an independent monitor of power,” not a mouthpiece for power. “Journalism has an unusual capacity to serve as watchdog over those whose power and position most affect citizens,” the American Press Institute (API) explains. “It may also offer voice to the voiceless.” For this reason, the API says, it is imperative that journalists not become “seduced by sources” or “intimidated by power.” This means not simply regurgitating the data and words of politicians and bureaucrats, but analyzing them critically. Throughout the pandemic, this often has not happened—and it’s a problem that goes well beyond Denmark.

The whole thing is odd, to me. The "racoon dog" evidence doesn't exist yet. Not even on a pre-print server. Yet there are already 2 major publications trumpeting this news. The same thing happened with the supposed Ivermectin trial. It was trumpeted all over the place that IVM was useless against covid, and it wasn't until 6 months LATER that the paper was finally published, so no one could look at the methodology for 6 months, and in the meantime the public was fooled into rejecting IVM and calling it "horse de-wormer."

There will be 9 sessions of the NCI. The next ones begin in Toronto on March 30, I believe.

It's worth watching Dr. Laura Braden - her testimony starts at about 8 minutes in. She goes over all the science I've posted for you here. Jordan Peterson also makes a statement on Day 3 - his statement is at about 6:20 in.

One thing I noted in the NCI Day 1 testimony - The claim in the media that you were 4X more likely to die of covid if you were un-vaxxed, was an outright lie. The actual Health Canada data and stats show that if you are vaxxed with 3 or more doses, your chance of dying of covid was actually DOUBLE that of the unvaxxed, as of Sept. 2022. And that rate is going up continually. This is why I don't get my science from CBC headlines.

Alberta has also appointed Preston Manning to investigate their covid-19 response.

EXCLUSIVE: Jessica Sutta, Former Pussycat Dolls Member: ‘I Was Severely Injured by the Moderna Vaccine’ (theepochtimes.com) In the interview, the courageous girl-band singer speaks eloquently (and often tearfully) about her devastating experience, including the pressure not to speak out, her agonizing muscle spasms, the bizarre gaslighting by her doctors, her excruciating small-fiber neuropathy, her multiple hospital experiences (“I won’t step foot in another hospital ever again”), her spinal lesions, having MS symptoms without the disease, her terror at how her condition is getting progressively worse, and described how her former friends think she’s doing something morally wrong by talking about it all. Tellingly, after begging for months, when Jessica finally got her doctor to approve seeing a neurologist, Jessica said the first thing the new doctor asked her was “when did you get the vaccine?” She broke down in tears of relief. And after reviewing her case, the neurologist told her, “I think you’ve had an adverse reaction.” He was the first doctor in a long string of doctors who was even willing to consider the possibility the new mother had been vaccine injured. Jessica’s interview is candid, poignant, and personal. She described the pressure in Hollywood from other celebrities and industry players to get the vaccine “for the community,” the pressure from her beloved, trusted doctor to vaccinate during her pregnancy and how she resisted until after her son was born, and what it means for her career to speak out (“it’s one of the worst things I could ever do”).

National Citizen's Inquiry - Truro, NS - Day 2

National Citizen's Inquiry - Truro, NS - Day 1

My experience, and that of many other women, is that most men know "what is the right thing to say" but their behaviour in a relationship says otherwise. Women have rights taken away, are often treated as "less" than the man in a relationship, women are beaten, raped and killed by men - both in domestic relationships and random - far more than the opposite. If men support women, then they need to speak up. (Thank you to the ones here who did.) I was at a gathering a couple years ago where this older man (late 60's, maybe?) was denigrating his wife repeatedly, to the point of cruelty. The women comforted the wife, but no one said anything to the man until I couldn't stand watching and hearing it any longer and said to him, "Hey, don't talk to her like that. What's the matter with you?" Not one man there spoke up or backed me up after what I said. This is why women are still second-class citizens and subject to male violence at astonishing rates. Men need to start calling each other out on that SHITE.

This thread illustrates to me a truth I've realized a long time ago - men (in general) place little VALUE on the work women do. Until they stop doing it, of course. One of the least paid jobs is that of PCWs - Personal Care Workers. They look after the elderly at nursing homes. It's mostly women who do this type of work. It's low paid, low respect - which is a shame in a society. Men generally have no respect for this type of work, as shown by Eli's comments - it wouldn't be considered a valued "work" by him. Yet how many men would want to be shunted off to a nursing home in their golden years, ignored with no mental or emotional stimulation, no working with dexterity and physio, and left sitting in a wheelchair or laying in a bed wearing dirty diapers every day. Anyone can swing a hammer. Not everyone has the patience and compassion to care for our seniors, who deserve the best of our care.

I linked another article but it was about how to report "covidjits" and that word gets flagged here.

I'm sure you have the number. I'm sure you've called to snitch. You're definitely the type. Toronto snitch lines lighting up with COVID-19 complaints | Toronto Sun Should we tattle on people breaking the COVID-19 rules? 2 differing sides debate | CBC News Mixed opinions on Pallister’s snitch line | The Star