Goddess

If you're interested in further reading about this incident and why it's important, see Dr. Robert Malone's substack from today, HERE: https://www.malone.news/p/the-next-pandemic-starts-here?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=583200&post_id=200437488&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=1x9svr&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email Also a good explanation of how gain-of-function research is financed and why it needs to stop.

NIH Researchers Charged in Smuggling of Monkeypox Into US - Newsweek Two scientists working for the NIH were arrested at Detroit Metro Airport. Mr. Munster is not just any scientist at NIH, he is Chief of the Virus Ecology Section at the NIH's Bio4 lab in Hamilton, Montana. And Mr. Kwe is a "research fellow" in Mr. Munster's section. Their job is to "study emerging viral pathogens" and how they "cross the species barrier". Sound familiar? It should: Suffice to say - these 2 would know how viruses are to be transported. So, did these 2 highly trained, BSL4 level, health experts transport their latest research samples from the Congo to Montana in a secure, military-grade biological containment transport system in a special reinforced military aircraft? No. They jammed them into a plastic suitcase and boarded a commercial airliner. Full of passengers who were unaware that just a few rows away the Chief of Virus Ecology was sitting in coach with a carry-on full of monkeypox. Here we have........The Experts.™ They were on their way back from Brazzaville, Congo which by sheer coincidence (everything is now a "coincidence" in virology 🙄) was experiencing a monkeypox outbreak. When questioned about what the case contained, they calmed replied, "Diagnostics and testing equipment." When authorities opened the case, it did NOT contain diagnostics & testing equipment. It contained 113 vials. The FBI, who have recently become suspicious of NIH scientists who lie about concealed virus samples, have tested 20 of the vials, so far. The delightful results? 17 of the vials contain "deactivated" monkeypox virus. 2 vials contain chickenpox virus and 1 contains human DNA. I remind you that in 2014, CDC found dozens of staff infected with anthrax from vials labeled "fully inactivated", but which actually contained live spores. That same year, some old vials at an NIH campus labeled "deactivated variola" (SMALLPOX) were found to contain live virus. FDA Review of the 2014 Discovery of Vials Labeled "Variola" and Other Vials Discovered in an FDA-Occupied Building on the NIH Campus US Attorney Jerome Gorgon Jr. sums it up quite nicely: “These NIH experts apparently broke our laws by smuggling viral pathogens on a packed commercial airplane from an outbreak in the Republic of Congo. Let that sink in.” Jennifer Runyan, FBI Special Agent with the Detroit Field Office reminds the credential class: “No researchers should believe their positions, credentials, or professional status place them above the law.” Nice sentiment, but let's be honest. They absolutely believe they are above the law. And why wouldn't they? They work for the NIH, which has spent the last several years telling us they ARE.... **The Science**, NEVER EVER EVER do your own research and anyone who does is a Neanderthal who eats horse paste. What was their motive? Why would senior NIH scientists risk federal prison? Why were they taking such a chance? Well......sneaking samples into the US accomplishes one very valuable objective: It erases the chain of custody.

No, I'm not. Reduction in deaths is what we want. That is the goal. And that was achieved mainly through improved sanitation, better nutrition and hygiene. In addition, healthcare - especially the management and treatment of acute infection vastly improved after the 1960's. The measles vaccine can prevent some deaths but that is not the whole story. Measles is not a death sentence, it's an endemic childhood disease that the majority of people experienced. By preventing transmission, the measles vaccine broke the natural ecological relationship humans had with measles over millennia. Unlike other pathogens that have come & gone, humans developed a lasting relationship with measles that scientists and researchers are now discovering, in that those infected with measles as children have a survival advantage over those who do not. This has been studied since about 2014, and needs further study, but it appears that those who have had measles are less likely to die from heart attacks and cancer and are less likely to suffer from various chronic diseases. I know one of the studies was massive, from Japan, and followed over 100,00 people for decades. The length & cohort size of the study was very helpful because the difference remained statistically significant even after adjusting for variables like age, body mass, family history, etc. The Japanese study shows why measles, unlike most pathogens, never died out over time through natural selection. There are even studies showing that children with Hodgkins' experiencing remission when having measles. And studies that show that mothers who had measles as children pass that passive immunity onto their newborns, protecting them in the early months of life when the measles vaccine is not given. All of this means it's quite likely that vaccines upended the natural decline of the virulence of the measles virus and broke the natural ecological relationship humans had with measles, which the studies reflect conferred a survival advantage to those who had the infection. Sorry to ramble, but I find this subject fascinating, and the point I'm trying to make is that prior to vaccines, measles was considered a mild childhood infection, like chickenpox. For perspective, it's one of the least killers of children. Bee stings, trampolines, drownings - all dwarf measles numbers. Not that every death of a child isn't truly tragic. That goes without saying.

I will post this CDC chart one more time for the benefit of those who don't want to scroll back for the actual exchange. This is measles death rates in the US, 1900-1960. To many, this chart shows that as sanitation, better hygiene and nutrition improved in the 1930-1940's, measles deaths went down dramatically. The first measles vaccine was rolled out in 1963. Every chart for every childhood disease looks exactly like this one. To User, this chart shows exactly the opposite. That it was vaccines that eliminated measles. I don't believe User is physically blind, but there is mental blindness there that cannot be reasoned with. I don't respond and I ignore you because you are a fanatic who cannot be reasoned with and who denies evidence right in front of your nose.

So many lies, deflections and deliberate obfuscation here, I don't even care to address you at this point. I knew you could not discuss rationally when I showed you the charts on childhood disease rates absolutely plummeting like a stone before vaccines were even introduced and the actual CDC stats that measles deaths had dropped 98% before vaccines and that this was due to advances in hygiene and sanitation..... and you looked at those graphs and charts and stats and said they showed no such thing and that vaccines were 100% responsible for reducing childhood disease deaths. You're a brainwashed zombie. Intellectually lazy. And the proof of that is you are here arguing vehemently on a topic you know very little about, the only info you have is from CBC headlines and quick google searches for opposite views.

IMO, all taxpayers in Canada deserve much more respect than the Liberal gives them. Canadians are not tax cattle or sheep to be fleeced.

Are you mentally incapable of understanding other perspectives? Cannot comprehend nuance? If the government tells the public the risk is near zero, and it turns out that is not true, the risk was not addressed adequately. Ask any covid vaccine injured person if they feel they were told of the honest risk and I guarantee you 100% of them say, No. Ask Dan Hartman, who lost his 17 year old son. Ask Kayla Pollack, now a quadriplegic in a wheelchair, unable to work or care for her young son. Ask Carrie Sakamoto, facially disfigured with Bell's and nerve damage. Ask every teenager who can no longer play sports, because of myocarditis. When people are told the risk is similar to the risk of the flu vaccine and it turns out to be much higher, people feel lied to. Ya, I know you make the excuse that "They didn't know." I showed you an entire article on the many issues with mRNA tech, well known before they were mass marketed. Every single one of those issues appeared after rollout. Blood-clotting issues before - then upon rollout, 2 of the 4 mandated injections pulled for blood-clotting issues. Did the government warn people about that? No, they did not. The public was told the injection stays in the arm. It was already known they did not. It was already known the spike settled in certain organs. Do you understand that that is NOT GOOD? That a heart or an ovary or a testicle filled with spike is NOT GOOD? Do you not understand medical ethics? That forcing a medical intervention on perfectly healthy people, who have near ZERO risk from a disease, is not only highly unethical and was the entire point of the Nuremburg Trials, but that the intervention MUST be 100% safe for healthy people or else the risk outweighs the benefit? Sheesh. 🙄 You're basically saying you are just fine with the government outright lying and lying by omission. Some of us are NOT okay with that. And we are not the ones in the wrong here. You are.

I don't either, never have. So I have a lot of friends that are gay - both men & women. For the decades I've known some of them, they have always hated all the rainbow crap. They don't like it being taught in schools, they don't like all the special treatment. They just want to be able to have a job, buy milk when they need it, eat out, get married if they want, etc and live a normal life. They don't want to walk around naked, they don't want drag queen story time in kindergartens. None of the gay people I know want the rest of this crap.

What??? No more luxury Normandy butter cups? What are you - a racist?

This is why I find Libbies disingenuous. First you demand I provide evidence that Carney/Liberals have a part to play in this - despite literally hundreds of posts showing exactly that. Now you DO admit it has to do with Liberal policies. Not one person on the right has suggested this is entirely Carney/Liberals. Not one. But the fact of the matter is - 11 years of Liberal mismanagement has put us in the position of being VERY vulnerable to everything else you mention. So you elected, the same party, the same people, the same agenda. Expecting a different result. You know that's the definition of insanity, right? I will give you that Carney sometimes makes the right mouth noises about righting the ship here, but I see very little follow-through. The majority of what he does is half-measures - just enough to keep people like you hanging on, but not enough to substantially change anything. I think we all agree that it's going to take time to un-do what the Liberals did to Canada for the last 10 years. Carney asked for special powers to do that "at speeds never seen before" and he was granted that. A year ago. Other countries are pivoting from the Net Zero fantasies - building LNG and nuclear within months. Carney is still sitting on his power to do that, dawdling on reducing regulation. The IPCC has recently come out and said, Ya....there is no climate emergency and the trillions of dollars the world has spent on it has achieved nothing but impoverish people and make the filthy rich even richer. No other country is pursuing climate agenda anymore. They've all abandoned it. But Carney makes a metric f*ckton of money off it and Canada is the last place on the planet he can still get away with it. He claims that the world is going to be lining up for our very expensive, highly taxed, decarbonized energy. He has nothing to prove that. And no timeline estimate of when this miracle thought process will occur throughout the world. In the meantime, Canadians are suffering. Decline happens gradually and then all of a sudden. And we are at the "all of a sudden" part. The climate crisis has been revealed as a hoax. Right when data centers are the new things, with their need for massive amounts of natural resources and energy. Yeah. We noticed. Canada will miss out on the data center thing, just like we're missing out on the oil boom right now, because we can't let go of the Net Zero fantasy. The Liberal Party tries to drive the market instead of letting the market drive itself. They tried with EVs and battery plants. Billions of dollars went up in smoke. Now they're trying to force decarbonization, carbon credit system, carbon taxes, carbon border adjustments. ALL OF THESE THINGS HAVE BEEN REJECTED BY EVERYONE ELSE AND ALL OF THESE THINGS MAKE CARNEY A BILLIONAIRE. He is not here to save Canada or help Canadians. He's here to milk the last dollars available for Net Zero in the world, from the last country still stupid enough to buy into it. He's here for his own agenda and to use our tax dollars to jet around the world, making Brookfield deals and eating luxury airline food. When it all falls apart, he'll jet off from Canada with his bags of money. He will likely do that on our dime, too.

April 17, 1947 Father O'Grady, Principal Kamloops Residential School, to M. McKay Indian Commissioner for BC "These children, are mostly orphans and I found it difficult, when requested, not to accept them; they would otherwise have no one to care for them".

GTA mortgage delinquency rate now up 10x off the 2022 lows for Royal Bank. Obviously, this is Poilievre's fault.

Remember when Jack Layton of the NDP was vehemently opposed to carbon taxation because he thought it was wrong to punish people for heating their homes, driving to work, and eating? I miss him.

Told you.

You're kidding, right?

So, this happened to a good friend of mine about 25 years ago, but I think it's something to consider. Her 4th baby, she needed a c-section. She was assigned an OBGYN. Didn't think too much about it, c-sections are pretty routine. Got into the OR, got the spinal, the doc started cutting without checking whether the spinal took or not. She immediately screamed "I can feel that!" He told her, "Too bad, we have to keep going now." They held her down and she had a c-section without anesthesia, screaming the whole time. They sued, it went to court and what came out in court and what came out in the case was that he was from a Muslim country and he basically did that to her because he hates women. She was very traumatized by it and was never the same after. Lost her bubbly personality and isolated a lot. It's not just about skills & knowledge. She won the court case, BTW.

They need to be verified. We've already found quite a few practicing here who had fake degrees. One million fake educational certificates: India uncovers the biggest forgery operation in history Education Verification: Lessons from the 36,000 Fake Degrees Massive India-Wide Fake Degree Scam Cracked: Over 100,000 Certificates Seized | arabtimes From Ponnani to Australia: Tale of a fake degree racket uncovered by Kerala Police in courier trail bust No one else is looking out for me. I'm on my own side. Instead of $100 million Canadian tax dollars going to Indian students, we should be helping Canadian young people. Canada is not a charity and tax dollars don't grow on trees, despite what you and your Liberal buddies think.

Every obedience experiment in history had the same overlooked finding. Not everyone complied. In Milgram’s lab, 35% refused to deliver the final shock. In Asch’s line experiments, 25% never conformed, not once, across any trial. In Zimbardo’s prison, at least one guard refused to dehumanize. One prisoner demanded a lawyer instead of a doctor and broke the psychological frame entirely. We spent decades studying the ones who obeyed. We barely asked what made the others different. That question matters more now than it ever has. The resisters in the COVID era were not difficult to find. Physicians who filed exemptions and lost their licenses. Nurses who walked away from careers rather than mandate patients into decisions they hadn’t genuinely chosen. Scientists who published contrary data knowing what it would cost them. Parents who stood alone at school board meetings. Ordinary people who simply said, quietly, without drama , no. What made them different? Research consistently identifies a cluster of factors. Not personality traits you either have or don’t. Situational and cognitive patterns that can be cultivated. First: prior reflection on authority. The resisters had usually thought, before the crisis, about the limits of institutional trust. They weren’t cynics. They were people who had already asked the question “under what conditions would I refuse?” before anyone was asking them to comply. Second: a concrete reference point outside the consensus. A value, a principle, an oath, a relationship that existed independently of the institutional structure demanding compliance. Something the system couldn’t reach. Third: at least one other person. Milgram found that a single dissenting confederate reduced compliance dramatically. The resisters rarely stood entirely alone. They found each other. Sustained each other. Gave each other permission. Fourth: the willingness to tolerate social pain. Not immunity to it. Tolerance of it. They felt the pressure. They felt the exclusion. They chose the discomfort of integrity over the comfort of belonging. None of this is innate. All of it is learnable. The most important thing Milgram, Asch, and Zimbardo taught us is not how fragile conscience is. It’s that conscience can hold, if you’ve trained it, named its limits, and found even one other person willing to hold theirs beside you. Build that now. Because the experiment is always running.

👇 THIS 👇

“I will always be straight about the challenges that we have to face and the choices we must make. And to be clear, we won’t transform our economy easily or in a few months — it will take some sacrifices and it will take some time." ~ Mark "You Make Sacrifices So I Don't Have To" Carney

Stockholm Syndrome?

Geiger Capital: "Western governments told their people that we needed to mass import low-skilled foreigners to keep the economy strong. Well now they've done it, and their economies are still weak. It's because of their policies. They forever changed the demographics of their nation for nothing."

The slur "anti-vaxxer" and the hatred directed at the unvaccinated was never really about the unvaccinated. Jung spent his career studying what happens when human beings cannot face what lives inside them. The answer is always the same. They find someone to put it in. Jung called this projection. The unconscious transfer of an internal psychological content, a fear, a weakness, an unacknowledged doubt, onto an external figure who then carries it for the group. It is one of the oldest and most reliable mechanisms in human psychology. And in 2021, it ran at civilizational scale. Think about what the pandemic had actually produced in the compliant majority: Genuine fear of death. Deep uncertainty about whether the interventions they had accepted were truly safe. Suppressed grief over lost time, lost connection, lost autonomy, lost careers. Unexamined anxiety about whether they had thought critically enough before complying. None of that could be faced directly. Facing it would mean confronting the possibility that the certainty was false, that the compliance had costs, that the authority was imperfect. So it was projected. The unvaccinated became a container for everything the vaccinated could not hold. They were selfish, carrying the projection of the resentment people felt but couldn’t express toward the institutions that had restricted their lives and destroyed the economy. They were dangerous, carrying the projection of the fear that the vaccinated still felt despite their compliance. They were irrational, carrying the projection of the doubt that had been suppressed rather than examined. The intensity of the hostility was not proportional to the actual epidemiological risk the unvaccinated posed. It was proportional to the size of the shadow being projected. Jung’s diagnosis of this dynamic was precise: the more violently a person or group insists on the evil of the other, the more certain you can be that they are encountering their own rejected contents in the mirror. The way out is not more argument. You cannot reason with a projection. You can only withdraw it. Which means the most radical thing any of us can do, now, and in whatever comes next, is look honestly at what we are projecting and why.