Goddess

I laugh at people who use MSM for information.

I hope someone else can explain this to you. I don't even know what you're talking about. The MSM smiles when you use it? I used a "roll my eyes" emoji, not a smiley face. You spelled "channeling" wrong and I don't know anyone named Peanut. I think you're having a stroke.

☝️ I clearly said MSM is not the internet. Are you having a stroke?

I go to the ones that produce the studies. That's not the MSM. Ummmm, no. I read the studies. Maybe there is someone else here that can explain the difference between the MSM and the internet to you. 🙄 But it suddenly makes sense now, why you think everything you see or hear on TV is true. This is the most bizarre conversation I've ever had. I know the difference between MSM and the Internet. You clearly do not.

When I download and read a medical study from, for example, the NEJM's website, that is not MSM. OMGawd. Do you really not understand this?

WTF are you talking about? MSM is not the internet. Do you really not understand how the internet works?

Yes, I don't get my covid information from MSM. That's how I knew the jabs would not stay in the arm, that they wouldn't prevent infection hospitalization or death, that they weren't tested for transmission, that they are not vaccines but are genetic therapy. All the stuff that, turns out, is true. I go right to the medical journal sites. Where do you think I should get medical studies from? Does your doctor get them from CBC, too?

Are you okay? You're not making any sense at all. You think MSM is the internet, that medical studies are posted on grocery store bulletin boards and your toaster talks to you.

I don't. That's why I disagree with MSM a lot. You do. That's why you agree with MSM a lot.

Why would you think that? Do you have dementia? My toaster doesn't talk to me. Scary that yours does. You should tell your doctor.

In case you're serious and you really have no idea where medical studies are posted 🙄, here's just one: The New England Journal of Medicine | Research & Review Articles on Disease & Clinical Practice You can use the search bar to find studies on any topic you want. Then you can google the scientists and there will also be pages & pages of either printed or videoed discussions of the papers by other scientists. They talk about the methodologies of the studies, how the study can be improved, how it relates to other specialties (a study on covid will include discussions by vaccinologists, biologists, immunologists, lots of different fields) so you get a good all around picture of the value of the study. You'll be directed to other related studies or informed of better studies that came later. So, yes. They are found on the internet.

???? You know that medical journals, scientists, researchers.....they all post their papers on the Internet, right? Where do you think medical studies are posted? The grocery store bulletin board?

Amazing.

No. You said I subscribe to frauds. I don't know you got into my email accounts, but you made the assertion. You must have the list. Who do I subscribe to that's a fraud? Imagine, all this effort you have put into this, when you could have just scrolled and gotten the link by now.

Like who? Name the frauds I subscribe to. Are you in danger? Is someone holding a gun to your head, forcing you to read this thread? Blink twice if you're in Milwaukee.

Why not ask them if they are keeping up with the latest research? Ask if they've seen certain studies? Datasets? Unless you don't care, then don't. It's your body, your health. Fuque off. Your attempts to shame others for asking questions is pathetic. If you think peer-reviewed medical studies are the same as information gotten from a smart appliance, you're stupider than I even knew. Maybe TV is your only source of information because anything deeper is over your head.

Actually, you're lazier. It was ME who subscribed to many scientists, doctors, researchers, epidemiologists, virologists, immunologists so I could be up-to-date on the latest research & studies as they emerged. It was ME who actually found the study when it first came out, took the time to read it, checked the credentials of the authors, evaluated opposing views, listened to scientists discuss the study, compared the data to other similar studies, condensed it to pertinent parts and put it into layman's terms, screenshotted charts for posting, took the time to create a well-thought-out post and posted it. YOU......refuse to scroll.

So......MSM. 🤣

Again, you heard that TV. Whatever is on TV is the extent of what you know.

Your "win" by being lazy, along with its imaginary trophy, is of no concern to me.

I did cite it. I'm just not scrolling the whole thread or searching through my files because you demand I do.

I've provided all the sources, all the cites, all the discussion. If you're genuinely interested, they are all there. If you choose not to read them, that's on you. If your big victory is "I refuse to scroll", then congrats, I guess. Laziness as a debate strategy is something I expect from eyeball, the 12 year old, etc.

I have an 82-page thread on a topic that I have busted my a$$ researching for years. And gawd only know how many pages of discussion on a myriad other related threads here. How is that "refusing" to back up my assertions?