Leaderboard

I wonder who might be the money behind the fake YouTubers. A network of inauthentic YouTube channels posing as Albertan voices is spreading misleading content about separation and U.S. annexation, reaching tens of millions of viewers, according to a new report. The analysis by the Canadian Digital Media Research Network found roughly 20 channels working in a co-ordinated way, amassing nearly 40 million views while presenting themselves as grassroots commentary from within the province. Lead author Chris Ross says the videos are not organic and appear to be part of a systemized operation using repeated scripts, shared clips and near-identical titles posted across multiple channels at the same time — all signs of co-ordination rather than independent creators. https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/article/co-ordinated-network-of-fake-youtube-channels-pushing-alberta-secession-and-us-annexation-narrative-report-finds/

The drugged out nut job did not have a weapon. He just tried to force his way in to kidnapping people in a car. Now he is dead thanks to a good guy, father...with a gun.

I already posted the evidence. But you dont care because you are a traitor and focused on the destruction of the USA.

Of course there is, you can vote for a different government The only people claiming that are the businesses exploiting these people for low wages The fact of the matter is when you have a large supply of super low wage people who don't go to human rights for abuses then of course business is going to make use of that. And eventually it becomes built into the cake, this system requires exploitation in order to function rather than changing and adapting to something more healthy. A small amount of immigration or I should say perhaps inappropriate amount of immigration can be a valuable thing in the long term. But that is not what we are facing

No, I'm not surprised. It's why Zelenskyy was always groveling for handouts. What a sick bunch of f*ckers.

The left loves to lift up all these wonderful countries that tax the shit out of everyone. We love to say that taxing people to death will eliminate wealth. Well, here is a stat that will prove that. World GDP per capita 2025 US state per capita 2025 The poorest state in the US is Mississippi at just under $55,8877 per person per year. Here are countries that are near or below that mark: UK $57,600 Finland $56,500 Canada $55,800 China $14,000 Only 26 countries out perform our poorest state.

Right now, at Superstore in Langley, you can get 12 oversized hot dog wieners for $2.44. I told someone that while they were drinking coffee and it almost came out of her nose 😂. Not kidding. I don't wanna imagine what's in there, but at that price it's a fkin amazing dog treat. And it makes me feel like my $9 smokies are sooooo healthy lol. Should we thank our PM for these lower food prices? 🤔

Yup... https://nypost.com/2026/03/02/us-news/luigi-mangione-musical-set-to-premiere-on-nyc-stage/ The Libbies are floating a play about Luigi Mangione. Not decades later as a sort of educational look at a murderer...but a musical comedy. Is there any doubt now that these Libbies are complete traitors to America and humanity itself?

Change it to China and it sounds like liberals.

Well, you did. The second you started talking about taxing individuals you start talking about individual finances and how well off the individuals are under a certain system of taxation. Is productivity an intrinsic good, or are you intending it to be a proxy for individual well being? You are doing the latter. Which is a correct instinct. The GDP of a slave state could be off the charts, but you wouldn't want to live in one. So, detour aside, you want to make the argument that lower taxation leads to higher productivity and higher individual well being, therefore it's better to live in a system of lower taxation. That's your thesis, right? The point of the thread? But the data you linked doesn't support that. GDP and GDP per capita are the crudest proxies. As I said earlier, GDP PPP is what you want to look at if you are trying to comparing quality of life across countries using GDP data. (Which is the data that's readily available at-a-glance. Economists who study standard of living will look much deeper.)

1. Using the word in a way that contradicts the classic definition. That's your prerogative, I call myself a conservative after all. 2. Making fun of the idea of a play. A lot better than making fun of the actual attack, which I wouldn't do. I think I do remember people making fun of the hammer attack on Pelosi, including Trump's own son. 3. Yes, you're a culture Warrior remember? You already think left of center equates to subhuman so why are you surprised by this? 4. Half the country is sick to people on the other half who are part of the culture War. You're at war with them. What do you expect?

More of a lefty thing, and you are 100% onboard. It's bullshit is what it it is - a win for illegal aliens and their left-wing chumps.

The destruction of the USA is the ONLY path FORWARD to the CREATION of his beloved land, ZUCCHINIOPIA!

Those geniuses have already planned to go around BC by going south. Keep insulting and painting Albertans as the bad guys. You and your king are about to get what you deserve. Loyal Canadians... Do you mean Liberal sheep? Folks out East don't even know how many genders are out there. Once Alberta leaves, Saskatchewan will quickly follow!

I'm not sure how these geniuses think they will be acble to move the oil. BC would have no incentive to take all the risks. The pipeling to the states runs through Saskatchewan. Do these clowns really think that loyal Canadians would just roll over and see the country destroyed? And for what? What grievenses would be satisfied by separation? The worst case scenario is that the Americans would move in and steal everything of value. Albertans will lose everthing of value.

He's not making it up. Nobody on this forum has left of a life than you, and there are few people more blinkered and partisan than you. What sort of tragic life causes someone to post 10,000 insults a year on a single internet forum? That's your life, buddy boy. 🙃

FACT ARMING PEOPLE DOES MAKE US SAFER!!! More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun-Control Laws

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1BsrxmKbfB/?mibextid=wwXIfr This is what female cops did as soon as the shooting started.... In my opinion, ONE cop who confronts danger is worth more than 100 that flee...

That we never hear you speak out against the palestinian violence against others. Even though it's more plentiful and prevalent. You even called the slaughter of well over a thousand civilians an example of Hamas exercising its human rights. Yet we're supposed to believe you're morally outraged over some faked up IDF prison abuse?

By every president.

He has no morals...per sae...he hs his wife's approved morality... And point to make.

Who said anything about income? This is GDP per capita, not income. Those are not the same thing.

Yup its pretty pathetic act alright. Trudeau is boinking starlets and Harper is advising Carney. LMAO!

His point is to oppose. He has no need for the inconvenience of logic...morality...honor...respect... He simply must oppose. I thought the clip was funny. Although your point is well made.

Nope, I'm just mocking how lame Harper's Conflict of Interest Act was at doing anything about it. Trudeau sailed thru like a neutrino thru tissue paper.

@CdnFox Maybe you are right, I hope you are right. When you said Canadians will wake up when it affects them, when things get so bad it can't be denied. All the polls in BC are flipping. It seems when land acknowledgements were just performative theater, people loved the virtue signaling. But now the reality of "land back" is hitting home. BC Land Rights Divide 56 (+7) 31 (-11) 6 (+4)

Meh... @John Stone is running away, like all Libbies, when faced with logic. Unfortunately for Libbies, logic doesn't take one's overwhelming feelings into account. Their pure hatred knows no bounds, nor honor. All they know is hatred. So...when cornered by logic, they run away like the cowards they are, hide behind their women and children, and claim victory. In short, these are disgusting people driven by one need. To hate.

Subtext: The algorithm feeds these directly to gullble rubes, who happily drink it up.

Nonsense. This is a case of data that you don't know how to interpret. Income is an irrelevant comparison on it's own. What you actually need to understand is how much quality of life people can get with the money they earn. If a person A makes twice as much money as Person B, but also has a 2x cost of living then they are equally well off. There are economists that study quality of life measurements full time and in sophisticated ways (the US doesn't crack the top 10 in most lists), but even if you just wanted a crude, raw number, you're using the wrong one. You'd want to look at PPP. Open your first link. Flip the 2nd selector to PPP GDP. -- The US comes in 12 on that list--the entire US, certainly not Mississippi.

It's not the method that I find disturbing, it's the choice of "proteins". It's all lips, a-holes, blood, noses, fat, eyeballs, testicles, penis and brains, plus preservatives, food colouring and yummy artificial flavouring. I don't doubt that they're able to throw sick animals in there either. I doubt that the recipe for the Superstore wieners is all that different from the $9 smokies, but I just don't get how they can suddenly turn a profit at $2.44... That's like a 1984 price. Are they "Soylent Wiens"? Lol. 👀 👀

Dead people don't know that they're dead. The pain is only felt by others. Same goes for ^^stupid^^ people.

This is just false, and shows you have no good answer

Nothing will top their "evidence" hypocrisy.... A 30-yr-old accusation that can't name a year, a location, a witness, has no police reports or medical records to back it up is "proof of a r4pe" evidence gathered and stored by the US intelligence agencies is suddenly worthless. And not because of the FBI lies and crimes, or the lies by "51 former intelligence agencies"... Even all of their lies and crimes were still 100% legitimate somehow. They're only illegitimate now because somehow Tulsi Gabbard instantly turned them all into criminals with the crime-ray gun that Gru made for her 😂

True. I'm not sure a lot of Alberta separatists would respond to a poll. There's a lot of talk on the Alberta lawyer podcasts of people who didn't want to sign the referendum petition because they felt the Liberals would hack the list the way they did to the Convoy and harass them and freeze bank accounts, etc. They're waiting til the actual vote.

Here are the people that are pushing separation. A lot of fake YouTube channels that pretend to be Canadian.

I wish I could say that I was above that, but if my wife throws out food that I wanted to eat, and I feel like it hasn't touched anything too dirty in the garbage can, I still eat it without even heating it up. It's like a 5-minute(ish) rule, depending on how good the food is. I'm still young enough to survive a bit of food poisoning, but I should probably take into account the size of my life insurance policy and my wife's ability to find an upgrade at this point...

U.S. intercepted Ukraine government messages discussing plot to route money to Biden re-election Is anyone surprised that Biden was funneling money through Ukraine to his campaign? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

Friendly advice: people with IQ's under 80 should use a spell-checker for words with more than 5 letters The source is "evidence intercepted by US intelligence", genius. And it would be recorded, of course. So there's "actual evidence" You're a guy who calls a single person's accusation with no police reports, witnesses, medical visits, or any other form of evidence whatsoever, "from either 1995 or 1996" lol, "proof that someone is a r4pist". By your standards, this story surpasses the burden of evidence required to constitute "proof beyond a reasonable doubt". No, not mere "allegations". Allegations are no more than the words of an accuser, or accusers. This is an instance where intelligence officials have proof that Ukrainians were "talking about an ostensibly criminal plan amongst themselves." It doesn't say that the Biden administration was requesting the funds, or that they demanded the funds before they agreed to send the money, and it doesn't even say that they had contacted any Biden officials to offer them the money, or that there had ever been such an arrangement in the past. So if Biden was implicated in any way whatsoever, there's no mention of any evidence of that. In addition to the fact that your first sentence there was factually incorrect, your second sentence doesn't say what you want it to say. I think you probably meant to say "there were no assertions that the plan was implemented", but TBH, that's not necessarily important. Even if they had proof that Biden's team, or a person with high standing in the Democrat Party, was working with them to implement the plan, that would be enough to incriminate them, 100%. Just the act of planning that constitutes a crime. If "the plan" seemed to be moving along as laid out in the intercepted communications, that would look highly suspect, but again, it still wouldn't be proof of anything on Biden's end, because the Ukraine offering money to an American doesn't constitute a crime on the part of the American unless they were willing to accept it, in the spirit that it was intended. There was no mention of what the project was, or whether the project in question had been started at all, or started and then put on hold, as per the initial plot-line. As it stands, this is a lot of evidence, but it's just evidence that possibly dirty Ukrainians were conspiring to funnel US aid money back to Biden. Nothing more. It doesn't say whether it was their own plan to bribe Biden, or if it was something that they were working on with Dems of any sort. TBH, it's not even incriminating to the Ukrainians right now, because if they felt like bribing Biden with $200M would get their country an extra $5B in aid, then it was an outstanding plan for the people of Ukraine. The only solid accusation that can be made against anyone right now [imo], based on the content of that article, is: "Why didn't US officials look into it further to see if there was any criminality on the part of the Biden administration?" Biden and his people are clearly not implicated by that story at that point. There's a smoking gun, like - red hot - but no proof that anyone was even shot at. This is a "file it on the back-burner" story right now, from my POV, but if you replaced the word "Biden" with "Trump" in that story, CNN and the Dems would be framing it as "100% proof of a crime by Trump", the Comey/Mueller FBI would be committing crimes to fake evidence, Schiff would be promising "new bombshell evidence" every week for 2 years, and you would be adamant that it was 100% proof of Trump's guilt, and that he should be arrested tomorrow 😉 Yeah, own it, robo. You too @BeaverFever. Fking cultist P'sOS.

Some of the most famous leaders were born into that role I'm not arguing that point...., but a large portion of leaders are also made, shaped through training and education, and leadership training...I would look at our military success rate at producing good leadership through leadership training and practiced education...To lead soldiers in combat and mange all that stress that brings and still motivate troops onto the objective is an excellent sign of leadership...That can come from a Pte or general...

$2.44 ? I can find these free! You know where? At our transfer station. A guys shows up regularly with boxes of frozen foods he dumps there and walks away. All in its original packaging in boxes and still frozen! The guy is too cheap to buy a generator for his business and when power goes off, his food thaws and has to be dumped. A fellow co-worker suggested we have a customer appreciation day! I can invite you too, if we hold one.🤣

Your example is hardly a disaster...and when compared against other conflicts...while it is tragic that any lives where lost, your example hardly meets any criteria of Disaster...

The average Saudi citizen makes less than the average Canadian, and their median wage is lower too. Also, Saudi Law usually requires employers to provide either free food or a food allowance to foreign workers under their Labour Laws. Here is how it works for foreign Indians: (iii) The contract shall include the name and address of the employer and the employee, job title, location of work, duration of contract, probation period, wage agreed upon, provision of free food or food allowance and accommodation, working hours, overtime allowance, vacation, air passages, medical insurance, end of the service benefits, provision in regard to disposal or transportation of mortal remains to India in case of demise of the employee, mode of settlement of disputes, etc. Good thing you did all that research, I guess. That took me 30 seconds.

It's not pity, it's the arrogance and hatred of the left that brought us to this point. The sheer incompetence made this inevitable. The left literally made trump look like a better choice and a more reasonable president than electing the left. Think about that for a minute Yawn. Biden did the same thing, no charges. And everyone everywhere knew that was a completely bullshit charge doctored up to weaponize the courts against him. about 75 percent of people polled said the charges were politically motivated, and they were. Even the people who agreed with the charges thought they were politically motivated in most cases, they just didn't care. The whole felony charge thing required that the jury believe that another crime MIGHT have happened without proof. They didn't even need to agree on WHICH crime. It got called the Tinkerbell law and everybody understood that this was an example of the democrats using the courts to persecute their opponents. It turned people off in a massive way. It was so banana republic it wasn't even funny. It made the democrats look like a corrupt bunch of complete lunatics who could not be trusted with power And sure enough people kick them to the curb Where is Biden's kids saw a trial but then was set free by Biden who swore he would never do that unclaimed the only reason he was going after trump is that nobody was above the law There's nothing you can say about trump I can't also be said of the democrats and had full democrat supporter buy in previously The thing is when democrats police kinds of crimes people like you applaud with both hands and give thumbs up and then our shocked and horrified when republicans don't freak out when a republican does it Nobody cares about your bullshit made up charges. And that was proved when the public voted him in again with him gaining ground and literally every single county so hard they bounced a few times Keep it up in the same thing will happen

yeah, that's where we're at - more the pity (2023) Trump faced 31 felony counts pertaining to the willful retention of national defense information, the balance relating to alleged conspiracy, obstruction and false statements — the hazard was a prison sentence in the event of a conviction. Trump responded to the indictment by falsely conflating his case with a separate classified documents investigation concerning President Joe Biden. Though classified records were found in a Biden home and office, there has been no indication that the president, unlike Trump, sought to conceal them or knew they were there Trump was given an ‘off ramp’ from prosecution if he returned the sensitive, national security material – he declined. 2024 – Trump was found guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records after prosecutors successfully convinced a jury he disguised hush money reimbursement as legal. Five years after Donald Trump sought to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential race, the final criminal case related to those efforts has been dismissed, meaning Trump faced no criminal trial over actions prosecutors once said were supported by strong evidence. With Georgia’s racketeering prosecution now closed and federal election-interference charges abandoned due to presidential immunity, Trump faced no remaining criminal exposure for actions that prosecutors once argued constituted a broad attempt to unlawfully stay in power.

This is typical. The simpleton says assumptions carry no weight, then proceeds to make assumptions. Meh...Libbies...