Leaderboard

If you're still pumping this crap, you're dumber than a rock. Even evil doom goblin Greta has moved on to hating Jews as she knows this scam is dead. Now all that remains is jailing those who benefited from this massive hoax. As soon as possible.

Well, at LEAST the occasional one anyway You think the world is better if democracy is repressed through violence do you. Well.... no shock. no need to pretend. I don't wish people i don't like dead just because i don't agree with them. Have you EVER heard me wish trudeau or carney dead? I think they're 1000 times worse than trump, yet i've never suggested anything close to that. I've never wished any of the leftist numbars dead either, and that includes biden when it was announced he had a fatal illness. Normal, decent people don't do that very often. But the left does. They want trump dead, they want kirk dead, they want executives in the medical insurance industry dead, they want the jews dead and hell you even want me dead. That's just the kind of people you and the left are these days. But that's you, don't project your own mental health issues on us. Not at all. The same could be said of the jews, the corporate execs, the christians and the right wing free speech advocates. If any of them died your kind would be out celebrating the violence and their death. I'm well aware of that. Like i said. It's the kind of monsters you are.

Given Biden's all aliens open house during the 4 years of his fraudulent presidency, this becomes more than just reasonable, it becomes imperative: American citizens — and only American citizens — should decide American elections. The Save America Act is a common sense, bipartisan bill that would simply require — A Valid ID Before Registering to Vote in a Federal Election Proof of Citizenship No Mail-in Ballots (Except for Illness, Disability, Military or Travel https://www.whitehouse.gov/saveamerica/

That's all she has to do, eh? To be clear, I was asking if that was true, I don't know what to believe. Those are incredibly restrictive requirements, far beyond what is needed. When you register to vote, are you not checked then for citizenship? Is your name not put on a roll where it is checked at the polling station? Does the person there not check a photo ID against the roll and cross you off when you're handed a ballot? HTG that's more than sufficient. Passports and birth certificates are absurd requirements, and women do not 'change' a BC. They're not born Mrs Marriedname. It's a restricitve and backwards a requiring voters to be land ownsers, males, white or 'freed' men or pay a poll tax.

Leftists are so unaware of human history that they never heard of the climate scam before. Shaman started saying: "If you don't let me boink your daughters then [the crops will fail, the caribou won't come back, etc] and we will all die" ten thousand years ago, and "if the scam ain't broke, don't fix it." Can you imagine the panic among leftists a few thousand years ago, when the shaman were saying "The ice over Boston is only a mile thick! We're all gonna die if that all melts! I need to boink your daughters faster!"? Don't ask me how they knew about Boston though. It's one of life's great mysteries 🤣

Nobody ever talks about what Trump did with the Trump Accounts - putting $1000 into children's accounts to accrue over their lifetime. It's brilliant. So much so that a couple of big companies, Dell computers for one, also added to the accounts. This is what billionaires should be doing.

Sounds pretty good alright. I'd consider it if we joined as 13 states not just one. Giving Puerto Rico full statehood status with equal representation in Washington would probably help instill some confidence in the sincerity of your invitation to us.

You have posted agreement with everything the Liberals have done in the last 10 years. The fact that you support and cheer for failed policies, tells us you don't give a crap about them. The vast majority of your posts are slamming Poilievre on-camera appearance and stating nobody likes him. when it's pointed out to you that he has good policies, you say it doesn't matter. Because no one likes him. That's it. Oh, and thousands of posts like this: LOLLLL LOLLLL LLOOOOOOSESESRRESERSR LLOL LOL LOL LOOOOOOSSSSEERR LOL LOL LOOOOOOOOLLLLLLL LOOOOSER LOL LOL LOOOOSER LOOOOOOOSSSSSSEEETRTTTT LOL LOOOOOLL LLOOLLLL Sorrynotsorry, but thousands of posts like that - not a sign of intelligence.

No you don't. You've all said many times, you don't care about policies. You care about Poilievres' physical appearance. You state it multiple times every day. Ya, we get it. You're pooping your pants every time Trump tweets. That's your priority. Not the economy, not jobs, not healthcare, not housing, not resource development, not budgeting, not skyrocketing deficits, not 25% of Canadians who can no longer afford to feed themselves. Your only focus is on the US president and not your own country. Trump. That's it. That's all.

So-called, Climate Change will crap on the global economy, not the reverse. Ur correct tho, to call it a crisis is arguably a dramatic description - crisis signifying urgency? The global economy is just that - reliance on other Nations .......... for the sake of argument lets focus on domestic food security in terms of import and export. The U.S. is a major player in global food production - huge industry - worth about 200 billion - feeds the world, baby. Agriculture depends on weather patterns and the all important access to fresh water. A recent study found intensifying climatic extremes, combined with disruptive human interventions (groundwater overextractions) are driving alarming water related agricultural costs. The cost of production and the cost to the domestic consumer is a direct relationship - think inflation. Now project this inadequacy of fresh-water -security globally and the effects on those countries food security concerns, their exports and the effect on their economies. Ya think it could affect global food security and if it did, what would be the result - Four Horses of the Apocalypse, maybe? Climate change is not a crisis - but it is insidious. Likely it will not have a dramatic effect on this gen - maybe the next - but def the following. Relax - it don't concern U - old man! haha

What exactly are you trying to say... You're correct that we certainly haven't 'spent' enough on our military and defence. The key word here in case you missed it is 'haven't'. Your complaint this time is about....what?

Geologists overwhelmingly agree with the scientific consensus, but deniers do seem most likely to come from those looking down more than up. I don't think that it's a coincidence that this is the discipline most closely tied to mining and fossil fuel industries.

Say it with me - Robo lives in his mommy's basement

Dow futures tumble 800 points as U.S. oil tops $100 a barrel to begin the week's trading https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/03/08/stock-market-today-live-updates.html The Iran War Is Jeopardizing the Entire Global Economy The fallout from conflict in the Gulf will be much bigger than just oil. https://foreignpolicy.com/2026/03/04/iran-war-dubai-saudi-qatar-global-economy-oil-shipping-trade/ War with Iran spreading economic damage far beyond oil and gas markets https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2026/03/08/iran-war-economy-air-freight/ Iran war could make affordability bigger issue in 2026 elections PUBLISHED SAT, MAR 7 2026 8:00 AM ESTUPDATED SAT, MAR 7 2026 12:27 PM EST Garrett Downs@_GARRETTDOWNS@IN/GARRETT-DOWNS-28528513B/ Justin Papp@JUSTINJPAPP1@IN/JUSTIN-PAPP WATCH LIVE KEY POINTS Democrats hoping to flip the House and Senate in the 2026 midterm elections are dialing up their messaging on cost-of-living issues after the United States and Israel launched military strikes against Iran. U.S. crude oil has jumped past $90 per barrel, up from $67 the day before the Iran war broke out. Republicans are projecting confidence, predicting a short conflict and arguing they can continue to work on affordability while the country is at war. The war is unpopular with the American public, at a time that 61% of voters disapprove of President Donald Trump's management of the economy. https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/03/07/iran-war-affordability-midterm.html Majority of Americans oppose Trump’s Iran strikes, per new polling https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/02/trump-iran-strikes-polling-00807060 Unpopularity of Iran war 'almost unprecedented' this early on, expert says "even in the most controversial wars, like Iraq, when the war initiates, people tend to rally around the flag [...] this is remarkable that at the very beginning of the war there's overwhelming opposition not only from liberals and the left, but much of Trump's spaces as well". https://www.france24.com/en/unpopularity-of-iran-war-almost-unprecedented-this-early-on-expert-says

No. Pay attention. Counting on the ability of Canada to pull it together when we actually need to. Compared to you arseholes turning your Shiny Beacon into the Flaming Eye of Mordor? LMAO! You forgot where I said we built 4th largest army when we needed it already? What's wrong with you, how did you miss that? Your country will be a failed state in 15 years if not sooner. We'll definitely need to strengthen our border for that.

As a westerner, I have no dog in this fight.

Abacus Data conducted between Feb. 20 and Feb. 25. Alberta poll. Liberal support is up eight percentage points compared to last year’s election, with 36 per cent of respondents saying they would vote Liberal if a federal election were to be held today. That narrows the gap between the two parties. When ballots were cast last year, the Conservatives led by 36 points; now they lead by 15. FahChrissake, when are you Cons gonna wake up and get rid of this loser? Canada deserves a better opposition!

Question, who is smarter (most likely) Person A: creates informative posts that use external links as supportive or contradicting sources Or Person B: Spambot that posts links but cannot form a coherent thought in support or opposition of the link...also never posts a link that opposes his views

OMG if you don’t support Bush’s invasion of Iraq it means you support terrorism! OMG if you don’t support Israel’s war on Gaza it means you support terrorism! OMG if you don’t support Trump’s attack on Venezuela it means you support narco-terrorism! OMG if you don’t support Trump’s attack on Iran it means you support terrorism! OMG if you support Obamacare it means you’re a communist who supports “government death panels” LOL seriously dude just scan the names of the threads on this forum and you can see for yourself all the emotional right wing posts Or just watch a Hegseth news conference where he’s practically masturbating to all the death and destruction he’s describing “Silent Death!” “Death from above!” releasing videos of bomb footage set to hard rock music like a teenage jock loser, He’s like “blew up all them schoolgirls f-ck yeah bro Im the Secretary of War!” Meanwhile he can’t even explain the strategic objective of the war

You are an objectively stupid person who has nothing of value to contribute. You talk so much with so little to say, and worse, you spam the board with your bullshit. Join a select group of like minded people on my ignore list.

I understand. I find myself having to do the same thing here too many times. You don't have to, not because I would ignore it, I most certainly read everything people go to an effort to cite, especially when I've requested it. But I have already read quite a lot from both viewpoints. Here's the thing with assessing climate risk. Anyone can find studies and reports that say whatever their preferred narrative is. And I feel there is too much priority given to "models". Not just with climate assessment, I find these models to be extremely unreliable. And the GIGO theory holds a lot of water for me. And who is paying for the studies and reports. I also know that most models are most often, "worst case scenarios". And that those worst-case scenarios rarely occur. I used to work in risk management, so I understand quite a bit about how risk management works. It involves not just identifying risks, but also assessing what the chances are of that risk actually occurring. A risk may be very consequential - life on earth could end type thing - but if the risk of it happening is 0.00001%, how much time, effort and money should go into that risk as opposed to risks that may actually occur. I think the majority of people believe in taking care of our earth and being proactive with pollution, the environment and that sort of thing. I think where the climate cult has lost a lot of us is: Scaring everyone into a "drop everything and only focus on this one thing", the whole "We're all gonna die! Crisis! Crisis!" lighting their hair on fire and demonizing anyone who wasn't lighting their hair on fire, to the detriment of programs that would have actually benefitted both the environment and humanity. Shoveling trillions of dollars on if's, maybe's potentially's, possibly's, might's. Blaming everything on "climate change". The large amount of money that was earmarked for climate that has "disappeared" and the total lack of accountability in where that is going. That reeks of SCAM. My feeling is that we've sunk waaaaaay too much time, money and stressed everybody out over this, and it hasn't been worth it. Instead of spending time, effort and resources on finding better energy sources, better agriculture plans, better management of resources......it mostly all went into the pockets of billionaires, destabilizing energy grids and making energy way costlier (which it claimed it was going to make energy cheaper) and tanked the economies of a lot of countries.

I'm always happy. Thanks for asking... 🤡

So pretty clear this is a purposeful anti-democratic move based on the lie of massive voter fraud, isn't it?

You're constantly spamming about the unfortunate drone strike that killed 7 children during the Afghanistan withdrawal under Biden. Can we assume that you going to start posting about this 20x as much and with 20x the invective directed at Trump? Of course, I'm sure you'll be consistent, because you have deeply held principles. 🙄

Ya, if everybody voted Conservative, the Liberals would have surely won. 🙄

You people have been moaning and filling your diapers over commies and Marxists infiltrating every level of government and indoctrinating Canadians for a solid 50 years now - we accomplished all this without having to fire a single shot or face anything of the kind from you in resistance. Have you actually looked up the definition of spineless? How about patriot? Reflecting on far far far too long might be a good idea too. Take your time.

This proves nothing. Only that the US hit irans base. Ie sent your heros to Allah aka Hell-a. Its also sad to see the BBC spread Iranian propaganda but is not surprising given that Britain has now been overrun by extremist Muslims

It's absolutely racist and sexist to suggest women and minorities are too stupid to get this kind of id but white males got it figured out no problem 🙄🙄🙄🙄 You guys are literally claiming that black people and women are too dumb to be able to cope with this and therefore won't be able to vote despite having 3 years to work it out.

A reporter asked Carney what his response is to Japanese automaker stating that CUSMA is critical to them making any deals with Canada. Hi response: "Uhhhhh, we'll have discussions.....uhhhhh, I should say these discussions.....uhhhhh, follow up on......uhhhhhh, discussions." This is political excellence to Liberal voters. This looks good to them. 🙄 This is how little they care about Canada. This is why Canada is fuqued.

No. Equating those who dont buy the whole climate excuse for trashing the economy, with "flat earthers" is irrelevant and childish.

What facts? You, and a few others on here, are here every day posting that you don't care about deficits, you don't care about budgets, you don't care about policies, you don't care about scandals, corruption and millions going directly into Liberal pockets. You're going to vote Liberal no matter what they do. Because Poilievre is ugly. And you all think this makes you look like intelligent, well-informed voters?

Of course you cheer no limits on spending and no parliamentary approvals. I wouldn't expect you to do otherwise. You realize this post just proves you're an id10t, right?

Even sh*thole Somalia now has voter ID laws. https://pjmedia.com/tim-o-brien/2026/02/07/thanks-to-voter-id-somalia-is-embarrassing-america-on-election-integrity-n4949240 The SAVE Act is 100% a positive move to enhance election integrity in the US.

Republicans would very much like to reduce the number of women and minorities voting and this is a way to do it. It is not a trivial thing to get paper copies of old documentation.

The last time we discussed evidence I asked you for any actual scientific documents or papers demonstrating that climate change was a crisis or that anything that we could do in Canada would make a substantial difference and what that difference would be Magically instantly all of a sudden had me on ignore again rather than answer the question 😁😂😂😂 Climate change happens every day, has since the beginning of the planet, but the idea that it's a crisis or there's anything that we can do in Canada to reduce it in a meaningful fashion is a complete hoax. Oh whats that? I'm on ignore again? Golly imagine that, shucks what timing LOLOL

amen

Good grief Robo. The term "climatologist" is totally made up. Man made climate change is a total hoax.

Operational Excellence, Strategic Incompetence The president and his advisers are in the grip of “victory disease.” Tom NicholsMarch 6, 2026 The president and his advisers are in the grip of “victory disease.” The war in Iran has reaffirmed two truths. One is that the United States is blessed with the most professional and effective military in the world. The men and women of the American armed forces can conduct missions of almost any size with formidable competence, from special operations to seize a rogue-state president to a large-scale war. The other truth is that the Trump administration, when it comes to strategy, is incompetent. Strategy is about matching the instruments of national power—and especially military force—to the goals of national policy. The president and his team, however, have not enunciated an overarching goal for this war—or, more accurately, they have presented multiple goals and chosen among them almost randomly, depending on the day or the hour. This means that highly effective military operations are taking place in a strategic vacuum. Worse, Donald Trump is now pointing to these missions as if the excellence with which they have been conducted somehow constitutes a strategy in itself. He appears so enthralled by the execution of these missions that he has enlarged the goals of this war to include the complete destruction of the Iranian regime, after which he will “Make Iran Great Again.” This kind of thinking is an old problem, and it has a name: “victory disease,” meaning that victory in battle encourages leaders to seek out more battles, and then to believe that winning those battles means that they are winning the larger war or achieving some grand strategic aim—right up until the moment they realize that they have overreached and find themselves facing a military disaster or even total defeat. It is a condition that has afflicted many kinds of regimes over the course of history, one so common that my colleagues and I lectured military officers about it when I was a professor at the Naval War College. The issue is especially important for Americans, because when national leaders have exceptionally capable military forces at their disposal—as the United States does—they are even more likely to be seized by victory disease. …And now Trump seems to have contracted a whopping case of victory disease. He is clearly convinced that previous operations in Venezuela, Nigeria, Somalia, Syria, and, of course, Iran are all evidence that a total victory over the regime in Tehran will be relatively quick. But he has provided no conception of what “victory” would look like. As of yesterday, his goals have expanded to include a demand for “unconditional surrender.” Admiring the performance of the U.S. military is understandable. But it is not the same thing as using that military power to achieve some national purpose. Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth so far seem to be enjoying the fireworks. But the efficient and rapid destruction of buildings and machines, and the killing of some enemy leaders, is not the same thing as a strategy. ….Operational competence, however, cannot answer the question of national purpose. What is the war about, and when will America know it’s done? Trump, when pressed, dodges the issue of war aims by pointing to the excellence of the military. “I hope you are impressed,” Trump said on Thursday to ABC’s Jonathan Karl. “How do you like the performance? I mean, Venezuela is obvious. This might be even better.” Trump then repeated, “How do you like the performance?” Karl noted that no one is questioning the success of military operations, and he asked the president what happens next. “Forget about ‘next,’” Trump answered. “They are decimated for a 10-year period before they could build it back.” …Each time Trump or one of his lieutenants speaks this way, they generate more questions than answers. Yes, military operations are proceeding impressively, with very few casualties among the U.S. and Israeli operators. But what would have constituted a “10” that we can now say that America is at a “15”? Now that Trump, at least for the time being, has issued a call for “unconditional surrender,” perhaps vaporizing every piece of military hardware with an Iranian flag on it is enough. Comments on Thursday by Hegseth and Admiral Brad Cooper of Central Command suggest that this seems to be the plan. But “unconditional surrender” is unlikely to last. To effect such a total defeat, Iran would have to be occupied and administered by the victors. This kind of language is at odds with the reluctance of some in the Trump administration and other Republicans, including Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, to even call Operation Epic Fury a “war.” (I will exercise my prerogative here as someone who has studied and taught national security and international relations and confirm that when you bomb a nation, kill its leaders, and call for its people to rise up, you’re engaged in war, and if you call for “unconditional surrender,” you are definitely at war.) Trump will likely find himself backpedaling from the demand for unconditional surrender. He might also redefine unconditionalto denote more easily achieved aims. (Indeed, hours after Trump’s post, the White House spokesperson Karoline Leavittwas already offering an interpretation of unconditionalthat was far more limited than absolute capitulation.) Soon, the Americans could find themselves retreating to the strategic incoherence that has characterized the administration’s approach since the first hours of the war. Military operations and national purpose will become more and more distanced from each other, because military prowess cannot clarify America’s war aims. As the old saying warns: If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will get you there My colleagues Marie-Rose Sheinerman and Isabel Ruehl have pointed out the severity of this problem by noting that Trump and his aides have offered at least 10 rationales for war over the course of only six days. Rationale No. 1 was “an imminent threat” from Iran, Rationale No. 2 was nuclear weapons, Rationale No. 5 was election interference, Rationale No. 6 was “world peace” writ large, Rationale No. 10 was that America had been dragged into the war by Israel. Some of these reasons might constitute a casus belli—others, such as Rationale No. 9 (“fulfill God’s purpose”), less so—but Trump’s team has thrown them all at the wall to see what sticks, perhaps in part because the war is still unpopular with the American public and Trump has so far seen no “rally ’round the flag” benefit from launching it. But each of these rationales demands a different strategy; eliminating an imminent threat involves a different set of operations than establishing peace in the region (or the world). Instead, the Americans are choosing an “all of the above” approach, employing immense power across Iran. Entranced by the show, Trump, Hegseth, and others assume that because these operations are going well, something good will come of them. This kind of poor strategy, ironically, is an option only because of the excellence of the American and Israeli militaries: If Trump had to make decisions under greater material or military constraints, such as shortages of money, weapons, or talent, he would have to choose an actual war aim and stay with it. If the goal is regime change and “unconditional surrender,” do current U.S. operations support that goal? Again, military prowess and victory disease may be encouraging the White House to avoid thinking about some hard realities. Regimes are not changed by bombing; they are put in place by men and women wearing boots and carrying guns. (These need not be American boots, but they have to be somebody’s boots.) Trump has called for the Iranians to surrender, but to whom? A U.S. occupation force? Or is an internal group of rebels assembling in Iran? In any case, a new regime will have to gain support by rebuilding infrastructure that’s being destroyed. Are the target sets being adjusted accordingly over time? No one can answer these questions, because the civilian leadership of the United States does not seem to have thought them through. Meanwhile, despite the successes of the military overseas, Trump now admits that a regime that was supposed to be eliminated quickly could reach the United States with terrorist attacks. He told Time this week that “we expect some things. Like I said, some people will die. When you go to war, some people will die.” The American people might be willing to tolerate such risks if they knew what their sons and and daughters were fighting for and how long they would be at war. Trump has retreated behind the skill of the U.S. military rather than answer such questions. Perhaps the greatest danger of the current epidemic of victory disease is that it seems to be making Donald Trump think he’s a brilliant strategist: He is already talking about overthrowing the government of Cuba, even as American forces are still fighting in the Middle East, and the threat of terror may well be growing at home now that the United States is at war. At this point, all Americans can do is admire the fortitude and excellence of the U.S. military while hoping for victory—whatever that is, and whenever it comes. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/03/iran-strategy-victory-disease/686275/

In reality, the US is almost certainly responsible for bombing that school that killed 170 children The U.S. military was targeting an area near bombed Iranian school, sources say Three witnesses and an education official told NBC News that the school was located on a former Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps base that closed 15 years ago. Just Gazan citizens. LMAO It is Israel who was continualy threatening to BOMB Iran and finally did.

This one statement of yours proves my entire point because it is absolutely 100% demonstrably false yet you repeat it without question. Einstein had a an undergraduate degree and a PHD in physics as well was a university professor of physics A perfect example of how the stuff you write like the rest of your post is complete crap. Trudeau and carney are populists now? LMAO I thought they were elitists? You don’t even know what you’re saying

You mean the test in testicles? What a load of balls.

Yes I will show you 50,000 dead bodies with bullets marked made in Islamic Republic in their beautiful bodies as the proof you require. Bless them all and curse all those dead leaders and security forces of murderous Islamic Republic. F*ck the Islamists that everywhere they go they create a shithole and make a mess of the region. West must take steps and start deportation of these subhumans.

In the meantime, we remain one of the biggest contributors to Ukraine. Note when duty called to go fight Hitler Canada put together the 4th largest army in the world at the time. I'm not to concerned about kicking back in peacetime knowing Canadians can pull it together when we have to. The only credible threat of invasion is from the south and the only possible defence is a long term insurgency. The bulk of our funding should go towards caching weapons and training suited for that remote possibility. Just about every other threat, especially in the Arctic, is even more remote. I've long argued we should help form and fund / outfit a coalition of the willing to rid the world of its dictators but that would put us on a collision course with our allies so...as far as funding to go help them clean up the messes they make, screw that too. Notwithstanding of course humanitarian aid or peacekeeping.

The lefties have created this narrative that it is more important that we virtue-signal how empathetic WE are, by showing compassion for the sad upbringing of these men. The seniors that have been robbed, beaten, stabbed, killed in Canada in the last couple years? Irrelevant. The women being raped, harassed and assaulted? Who cares? The children being groomed into rape gangs? Not as important. My gawd, people. These are YOUR elderly parents. YOUR daughters and wives and sisters and nieces. YOUR children and grandchildren.

We clowns have oodles of "bupkis", if you ask nice we will sell you some so that you can be just as informed and reap the same benefits as we do. You will be much happier Just ask your doctor if "bupkis" is right for you. (large spectacle's sold separately)

Being killed by an immigrant is no different from being killed by a citizen and there are far more of the latter than the former, which doesn't bother con gun nuts in the slightest. AKA, delusional. ^Stupid meme to the rescue of a CLOWN with BUPKIS.

Nobody disagrees that Iran needed to be put in it's place. However, it is the obvious fact there was little planning or forethought in this decision is the problem. Everything Trump touches turns to shit. The man totally demolished all Federal agencies then started a war. What did people think was going to happen? From wanna be Barbie Dolls running DHS to the that flake Kash Patel firing all the top FBI people working on Iranian Counter Intelligence. And the list of stupidity from this Whitehouse grows by the minute.

Your faith in the nobility of the pathological LIAR is misplaced. The Ayatollahs gained power due to the corruption and brutality of the CIA installed government.