Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/26/2026 in Posts
-
@eyeball is an id1ot and a traitor. Overcome with TDS, he openly seeks to destroy the USA in leu of a globalist nightmare. He pledges all his support for domestic terrorists and has to lie constantly, in order to argue his position. And that's really the bottom line.3 points
-
https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2026/02/democrats-showed-whose-side-theyre-on-and-its-not-the-american-people-249d/ What a scumbag outfit the democrat party is.2 points
-
eyeball: "I'm against lobbying but I'm always going to vote for the party that allows lobbying and never for the party that says they will do away with it when they are in power." 🙄2 points
-
lol... I enjoy laughing at the stupid American wannabe's like Nationalist, West Coast fool, etc, etc... Pigeons who keep coming back for more.... "Might" minds? If you had a mind you 'might' be qualified to comment.2 points
-
This has nothing to do with black people. That argument is nothing but a distraction to derail the purpose of the SAVE act...illegal aliens voting. They know if they cant count on illegal ballots, that their chances of winning are reduced to freaks who wear animal costumes and dopes who think it's OK to fight with federal officers.2 points
-
You can say whatever you like. Its what you do that concerns me, ANTIFA-boy.2 points
-
LOL ok mor-on. Whatever. It's this kind of crap that created Trump 2024. And will create JD Vance 2028. You fools just don't get it.2 points
-
2 points
-
Not sure what to make of this thread. Is West rooting for Trump to resign?2 points
-
I respect you eyeball, i may not like your politics or even most of your points of views, but i do respect you...I'd give you a hug , but you know , you can't be seen hugging conservatives....and i got an image to protect as well....2 points
-
This is why I voted for Trump and against word salad.2 points
-
Yup. Unfortunately they ain'-a too bright because they're so bloody obvious.1 point
-
😂 It's pretty bad when even robo notices how unsubstantiated your claim is.1 point
-
Which would mean, this mentally deficient, crusty old codger just made fools of the Demoncrats.1 point
-
Immigration in excess of our new housing builds is the primary driver. Actually i'll rephrase that, population growth is. But at the moment that all comes from immigration Sure there are other factors. But that's the number one by far. We let three people in, we build 2 homes, and guess what happens to pricing. That's predictable. We can have as much immigration as we have new infrastructure in the way of homes, food production, medical etc. Any more than that creates severe upwards pressure on inflation and a host of other problems. From that perspective I guess you could say it's not that we have an immigration problem, it's more that we have a failure to build infrastructure problem. But reducing immigration is by far and away the fastest and easiest way to address the issue1 point
-
No, tomorrow we will not be in a different spot. Two Trump presidencies in the last 10 years have underlined how unreliable the USA is as a partner. Trump is unreasonable and impossible to negotiate with in good faith, but he still needed +40% of the population to enable him. The collapse of American credibility under Trump is what's leading the world (not just Canada) towards countries like China. Nobody is naive enough to think China is a benevolent partner, but at least it's predictable and doesn't set policy based on the fickle temperament of the world's biggest man-baby. Uncertainty is the bane of business investment.1 point
-
You're a bitter little guy with all the losing your Conservative Party has had aren't you.... It's a democracy we live in with each person entitled to vote for whomever they choose. The difference here is that I voted for the party/person who won the election while you voted for the party/person who lost, yet again and you're bitter and can't stop crying Damn that's funny.... 😂1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
We're going back in time... consider every kid not had due to birth control as an infant mortality... Consider every mid-level manager not hired due to AI as killed in the Crusades... Few kids, no middle managers... I figure we're at about 1150 AD right now. Don't worry eyeball, you're good.1 point
-
OH NO! An IRRELEVANT Canuck "making fun" because she's DESPERATE to defend EVERY CRIME Trump commits. LMAO1 point
-
You Harris eunuchs really have a stupid sense of humor. Like this piece of shit:1 point
-
You’re repeating the same claim and treating it as proof. It isn’t. 1. “Ukraine took a Nazi battalion into the army.” False. The Azov Battalion was a volunteer militia formed in 2014 that included some far-right members. That is not the same thing as the unit being officially a Nazi organization. 2. Even Azov’s own spokesperson contradicts your claim. In 2015 Azov spokesman Andriy Diachenko said 10–20% of members identified as Nazis. That alone disproves your claim that the entire unit was Nazi. 3. “ALL of them wore Nazi symbols.” Also false. The unit’s emblem was a stylized Wolfsangel-like symbol used by the battalion. Individual fighters sometimes displayed extremist symbols, but it was not true that every member wore Nazi insignia. 4. The Wolfsangel argument doesn’t prove what you think it proves. The symbol existed centuries before Nazi Germany and appears in European heraldry. Nazis used it, but they did not invent it. 5. UN reports. The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights documented abuses by multiple sides in the Donbas war. Some allegations involved Azov members. The UN did not declare Azov a Nazi unit or say every member committed war crimes. 6. What actually happened in 2014. Ukraine incorporated many volunteer battalions into the National Guard to put them under state control during the war. Azov was one of several units integrated this way. The mistake you keep making You take this fact: • Some early Azov members were extremists. And jump to this claim: • Therefore the entire battalion was Nazi. That conclusion simply doesn’t follow from the evidence. You too cheer on Russia and don’t say a word about their war crimes and the crap they do… but sit here crying about the Azov battalion?1 point
-
Your fictitious numbers are wildly inaccurate. We've gone from 484K permanent residents in 2024 to 390K in 2026 and target of 380K in 2026. Add those together and you still don't get close to the 2M you say we bring in every year. Foreigners can't vote in our system. Only Canadian citizens can so there goes another theory for you.... You're correct....it wouldn't be sustainable if it were fact. But alas....1 point
-
Don't change the question in order to score partial points. The fact is that "The Ukrainian army took a Nazi Battalion into the fold." You're trying to contend that "One of the two group was just violent white supremacists, the other group were Nazis, so it was just a 50% Nazi group, not 100", which is pathetic enough, but the fact is "ALL OF THE AZOVS WORE NAZI SYMBOLS ON THEIR UNIFORMS, AND EVERY SINGLE AZOV NAZI KNEW WHAT THOSE SYMBOLS MEANT"! THE UN HIGH COMMISSION SAYS THAT THE AZOV NAZIS COMMITTED WAR CRIMES, INCLUDING RAPE AND TORTURE IN 2014 & 2015."1 point
-
Illegal aliens first. (we like to call them undocumented guests) -- the left1 point
-
1 point
-
Oh...so you have "empathy". But not for raped and murdered citizens. No, your "empathy" is for illegal aliens who drain American resources and rape little girls. Thus...if what you say is true...then both you AND your wife... Are traitors.1 point
-
1 point
-
"WE GOT 'IM THIS TIME!" You stupid fcks. How many times are you dumb little sh1ts gonna do this? You look like the twits you are.1 point
-
No. I promised the entire thread on the notion that liberals believe that requiring an ID is racist and used the voter ID and employment ID as contrasting moments of hypocrisy. Because the first half of the video he shows white liberals in NYC talking about how blacks can't get an ID and the second half is blacks scoffing at what the white liberals say. His video directly contradicts your statement that liberals never said blacks are too stupid or too poor to get IDs. There is no attack on voting rights. It is especially not an attack on voting rights to prevent voter dilllution through security measures like requiring an ID to vote and reducing mail in ballots. NYT: Error and Fraud at Issue as Absentee Voting Rises Just The Facts That is the true assault on voting rights. There you go again. Calling ot racist to require an ID because blacks are too stupid and too poor to get one.1 point
-
This is your BS circular reasoning... you support the illegal immigration, so you support the illegal immigrants using our services... then argue they should get that because they are here. They are here because you support the lawlessness. That reality changes when you enforce the law.1 point
-
I know patriotism does NOT include loyalty to a POTUS who defies the Constitution on a weekly basis. The First Amendment gives me the RIGHT to say that, and that he's a FASCIST LIKE YOU.1 point
-
And now you are going to be obtuse and ignore the point. I mean, this is what you do routinely on here. You make crappy comments and then run away from them.1 point
-
Don't look now, but your big orange ldiot already destroyed half of it. So now the destruction outside matches the destruction inside.1 point
-
Thanks for proving you're IN DENIAL. Everyone is talking about the missing files detailed in MY THREAD: FBI Interviews with Underage Trump Accuser, Epstein Data Shows and the post in it which I reposted HERE. YOUR FAILURE TO UNDERSTSTAND that doesn't make me a LIAR, it makes you an lDIOT.1 point
-
The New York Post has been having a field day with all of Mamdani's insane actions and stupidity. It's been an enjoyable read: https://nypost.com/2026/02/25/us-news/mayor-zohran-mamdani-doubles-down-on-downplaying-nypd-snowball-attack/ https://nypost.com/2026/02/25/us-news/mamdani-wants-nyc-to-spend-70m-on-feasibility-study-for-city-run-grocery-store-pet-project-sources/ This guy continues to be the biggest weapon the Republicans have, other than the twin idjuts AOC and Crockett.1 point
-
1 point
-
Like Brandon's invasion? I swear...all Newsom is, is a spoiled little sh1t who will do and say anything for the spotlight. He's an empty shell.1 point
-
So why hasn't anyone, including Mamdani, ever called the law that requires ID to get a job, racist? Oh, right, because it is not. That means the argument that the SAVE Act is racist is bullshit on top of being insulting.1 point
-
Donnie just gave the Democrats a spanking tonight.1 point
-
From Lee Humphrey Yes, Canada signed a sole source contract to buy armed reaper drones to patrol the Arctic with first deliveries scheduled for 2025, that was good. Unfortunately, before the ink was dry the RCAF decided to Canadianize them & delivery is now heavily delayed (mid 2030’s) & the reapers will still require a complete overhaul within 5 years of delivery…let me explain. The RCAF decided that they needed a CDN IR (infrared) sensor installed. Fortunately the one they selected had already been used on other reapers so no problem right? Of course, the RCAF decided to use a variant that could talk to our new maritime patrol aircraft that will arrive (thanks to another US sole source contract, sorry team Elbows Up) in the mid 2030’s which all sounds very smart forward thinking but & here’s the crazy part. All of this tech relies on US military satellites, but since Canada now wants to have dual satellite systems (USM system for NORAD) they have given a sole source contract to Telesat (whose CEO is besties with Carney). They are hoping to get enough satellites into orbit by 2040 to allow the CAF to use both CDN & USM satellites for their communications needs - depending on whether the drone, F35 or maritime patrol aircraft are on NORAD or non NORAD missions. Of course this has never been done before & will require more tech be added to the reapers hence the complex overhaul, all based on a satellite company who despite massive subsidies from the CDN gov over the last 10 years has barely managed (thanks to SpaceX) to get a few test satellites into low earth orbit for their satellite internet service & have never built, launched or managed secure military grade satellites. Only the @liberal_party gov could turn a simple $2.5 billion dollar contract with quick delivery of a proven armed drone system into a never-ending boondoggle that will end up costing at least 400% more than the original purchase price & delay full operational capability for a decade plus!1 point
-
Thanks for proving my point, muppet. When the Conservative did it, it was for "ethical" reasons, but when the Liberals are doing it, it's for personal greed. 🫠1 point
-
What am I supposed to say...? The liberals won again last year and will certainly win a majority this time around if in fact there is an election called in the next short period of time. The so-called leader of the CPC can't even manage his own caucus let alone trying to run a country. Floor crossings and likely more to come attest to that. Sucks to be on the losing team as often as the CPC has doesn't it... Hopefully the next leader will be able tp prop the party up from Poilievre's failure.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
BTW, if you read the PDF ending in 620, you'll see where the accuser had a pic of Epstein and Trump together on her phone according to the FBI agents involved in the case.1 point
