Leaderboard

Muahhahahahaha Yall started it. Now we finish it. **I swear he replies to me more now that I'm on ignore than before.

The rush to emulate Putin's kleptocracy of thieves continues. If you're a pervert, a diaper sniper, a tax evader or simple con-man you might get appointed as a henchman by The Penguin himself. Trump wants Charles Kushner, father of son-in-law Jared, as U.S. ambassador to France Pardoned by Trump 4 years ago after pleading guilty to tax evasion, illegal donations

To call something stupid for no other reason than you do not have a defense against it speaks to your deficiency, not the original proposition. It reminds me of a teenager whose mother says, "Clean your room." And the child replies, "That's stupid!" Trump of course has very loudly signaled that he will abandon the US’s allies and join with the kleptocrats. A move “straight out of the autocratic handbook.” It all makes you wonder how strong is the devotion of the US to the democratic faith?

This will be an extremely popular pick for the smart people.

Will you wokeness disciples help? Looks like the silly b*tch is $20M in the hole. https://nypost.com/2024/11/30/us-news/kamala-harris-still-begging-for-cash-weeks-after-election-loss/

A republic just means you don't have a monarch. It isn't a system of government. Democratic systems and constitutions exist in both republics and monarchies.

True. Because most of the other side will be going to jail LOL right?

They were listening to people like you. One of your leftist heroes, Trudeau senior, was a primary architect. Canada is today largely built on leftist policy and propaganda. I can see why you think it's a mess, but if you want to know why go look in the mirror.

No it isn't, that's why we have constitutions, bill of rights and courts.

Well, for that matter, neither did Biden. Quit blaming the US for other countries doing shitty things to one another. But, you seem to be alluding to the hypothesis that somehow Trump had an affect on curtailing Putin's aggression. It’s true, Russian hardliners spent years criticizing Putin for not invading sooner. But the reasons for Putin’s restraint, i.e. not invading until 2022, have absolutely nothing to do with anything Trump did (or that Putin “liked him,” lol). Putin’s strategy was instead to put his efforts into splitting the West (I can tell you about the massive internet campaigns in another post), and have Russia forge closer ties with Europe. In 2014, it was Merkel’s warnings of massive damage to German-Russian relations that made Putin back off. But we were talking about the election, and why Trump voters voted for him. The Ukraine war was actually a low priority for them. Whatever was going on with Russia and Ukraine did not much influence their vote. In fact, immigration at the southern border, climate change and the Israel-Hamas conflict were larger issues of foreign policy. Yes, Trump appealed to the basest instincts in those people who were looking for a strongman to protect them from the “other” – whether it was immigrants or the “radical left lunatics.” A superman who promises, “I alone can fix it.” I suggest you read Henry Murray’s The Personality and Career of Satan to be astonished how closely Trump fits the personality. Aw man, Trump is a joke, completely lacking in diplomatic skills and intelligence. He knows how to stir up a cult following, but that's about it. I will let you read Harris's resume for yourself: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Kamala-Harris But honestly, more than the good that Harris could do, I am concerned about the devastation Trump might bring to the US and the institutions that define it. Good boy! Gold star for you.

Kamala was talking like she was sitting at bar with her friend that just got cheated on and after a few drinks tells her how he isn't worth it and don't let him take your power.

They have made up this new boogeyman. Now, Trump (Who ended the Obama era family separation policies) is going to SEPERATE FAMILIES! He's a horrible no good awful man that is just bad bad bad aahahhaaa! They don't even understand that this is what made him so popular. The lies are just making him stronger.

I don't watch CNN. I don't watch TV, period. My Hegsworth thread was based on quotes from his books. My DOGE thread was based on a Washington Post article.

my wife is an ageless beauty whom dotes upon me I'm just thankful that she still puts up with me after all these years as she is the relentlessly positive ray of sunshine, while I am the cranky s.o.b

As a conservative, I'm pissed off about fake polling numbers which are used to make it seem as if the Libs' scams weren't that big of a deal, or their poor performances really weren't so bad, etc. "We think this guy is the greatest ever, but don't believe us, look what the polls say! All the cool kids like our golden child!" But just imagine how Dem donor feel after being told: This is the most consequential election in history! Democracy itself is on the ballot! If we lose there will never be an election, and we're THIS close!!! Donate now and save the world from racism and autocracy!!!" Then the election comes and it wasn't close at all. Kamala lost voters for her party in every demographic, in every state, and almost every single county. 4 years later, "against all odds", there's another election 🤣. Demb donors: "So wait, the polls weren't close when you said they were, and democracy wasn't really on the ballot..." God forbid the economy stays strong and Trump makes the world peaceful again, what can the Demis tell their supporters to get them to open up their wallets next time? If this Trump administration is as successful as the last one was, the Dems are f_cked. They need to pray for lots of war and economic hardship, with a bit of fascism, but they can't even obstruct their way to that because they don't have the senate or congress...

LOL... you care more about yourself. I expect that we can prevent others rape, murder, and being victims of violent crime by deporting these criminal illegal immigrants instead of protecting them like folks like you support doing. She can't be anymore dead than she already is. If you care about it, you would support doing more to prevent others from being brutally murdered as well. Just like her dad does. Once again, you have more outrage here over this than the circumstances that led to her death.

Yes that's correct. Did you not see the title of the thread you're all bent out of shape over? Oh, do you have any examples of lefties that are like you?

Okay, but if the Notwithstanding Clause gives provinces the right to tell the feds to go pee up a rope... It's like watching a kitten chase a laser dot.

Listen to the CNN parrot trying to sound intelligent ffs. What you're reading is a revisionist history BS that was made up to appease Dem apologists. "The wars had nothing to do with us!" You're just too stupid and too fond of lying to ever take accountability for anything. Ironically what you're doing there is admitting that the Dems didn't just fail in one area, they failed on every foreign policy issue. Climate change was not a big issue though, dummy, and according to your own article, the majority of undecideds favoured cackledummy on climate change. Sure, it's a joke, but not a lot of non-conservatives are aware of that. And it takes a seat way at the back of the bus to the wars. I get that you put a lot of faith in polls, but that's because you don't understand what they really are and what they're used for. It's no coincidence that the polls are always wrong, and always overestimate the same party as the MSM. The fact that you didn't think the Russian war was a big deal is just a measure of your own stupidity. Everyone with half a brain or more understands how important that war was, and how big of a deal it is that foreign involvement was increasing constantly. Every escalation of that war was a huge threat to global peace and stability. When you say "strongman", you're just parroting a laftard buzzword for "someone with common sense." It was incredibly stupid for convicted killers to be released into the United States on their own recognizance to wait for their asylum hearings. It doesn't take a strong man to see through that, it just takes a brain that isn't completely addled. Every election candidate promises to fix everything you id10t. In fact, the Dems candidates constantly say that only they can save democracy. Talk about tilting at windmills, dummy. They act like Trump is the one who's using the FBI and judiciary to target his political opponents. They act like he's the one who has the MSM lying for him 24/7, like he's the one who wanted info about the Hunter laptop blocked from the public. You're sitting there acting like there's something wrong with Trump and his messaging, and the Dems were the party of fascism and division. Stop pretending that you read books you illiterate twat. If you actually read that, then read it again and think about how much more closely it describes Kamala: The distinctive underlying characteristics of the Satanic personality, then, are a) a secret feeling in the subject of having been harshly, treacherously, unjustly, or ignominiously deprived of his deservedly large share of benefits, rewards, and glory; [the "woe is me" mantra belongs to Kamala: she's the self-appointed champion of the invisibly oppressed] b) a basic state of alienation, resentment, and distrust; [Remember, the author isn't talking about someone who was actually targeted unfairly by the powers-that-be, he's talking about someone who is delusional. Someone who says things like: "I'm a woman, and I'm black, and it's only racism and misogyny that have prevented me from becoming the leader of the free world by now. Hell, I was saying 'FWEEDOM!' when I was 3. I should have been president before I graduated HS."] c) a hidden envy coupled with expressed contempt of the notable achievements of others; [Who says things like: "We need to make large corporations and billionaires pay their fair share!"?] d) repression of guilt feelings; and [Only 1 candidate blew her way into politics, and then became VP as a DEI hire.] e) the adoption of one or another strategy—sly, slippery, and subversive or openly destructive—of giving vent to his self-consuming hatred. His negative characteristic, by which he is most easily identified, is the absence of any capacity to experience or express authentic selfless love, gratitude, admiration, or compassion. [One of the main characteristics of a narcissist is their inability to be empathetic towards others. That's exemplified by people like Kamala who think that they're helping low-income Americans out by bringing in illegal immigrants to steal their jobs and compete with them for low-income housing.] That's the opinion of a cultist fop with a low IQ and a penchant for lying. FYI the entire world saw war and chaos recede continuously, at a sharp pace, from 2017-2021, and then suddenly break wide-open again within months of Biden's inauguration. One of your main character flaws is that you feel like it's important not to acknowledge the successes of your political opponents, so it's like a mission from God for you to fail to appreciate the fact that Trump was able to negotiate a peaceful withdrawal from Afghanistan, and that it went along without a hitch for the last 18 months of his presidency. As a dedicated liar and a snake, you have to pretend that the final leg of the withdrawal, under Biden, was somehow graceful and perfect. You didn't see the people desperately clinging to the outside of an airplane as it took off, and/or you refuse to think about what that meant. You have to write off the drone-striking of a Kabul family as unlucky and trivial. And try as you might, you can't think of anything even remotely similar to that level of failure that happened when Trump was president. Remember that Trump didn't inherit a peaceful, easy planet from Obama. It was a huge mess, all around, and he tamed that mess. What went so wrong under Trump that he had to blame Obama for a drone strike against children, or people falling off of airplanes? Do you honesty think that things went smoothly for 4 years and then suddenly the wheels were going to fall off in 2021? I know what your answer will be, but we also know what the truth is: it is not reasonable to predict such abject failure instantly coming on the heels of 4 years of success. Here's her resume, dummy: Gave up her **** to a man over twice here age - Willie Brown - and was give two lucrative political appointments which she was mainly unqualified for, as they were completely foreign to her career path and education. Got destroyed in the DNC primaries in 2020... Tulsi Gabbard hit her with a broadside and she went down like the Hood Was a DEI-hire as VP by Joe Biden, who had previously told a national TV audience that he was limiting his options for a VP pick to "black females". Was chosen to manage the southern border for the Biden administration, and was such a catastrophic failure there that her only defence was "I didn't really do that job", but we all know that she did. Even the MSM, which lies most of the time, admitted to it. Was gifted the DNC presidential nomination when Joe Biden was exposed as mentally unfit during his debate against Trump. Kamala knew about Biden's diminished mental state as well as any, because she was around him far more than anyone else, but she lied about it to America. Refused to do interviews or answer questions for the first 75 days as the presidential candidate. She only read from a teleprompter to Americans that whole time, she answered a total of about 5 quetions - that works out to one every 25 days. That was the actual sum of her human exposure to merica, aside from that she just read from the teeprompter Kamala lied several times during her debate against Trump, was fact-checked zero times, while Trump was fact-checked several times while what he was saying was known to be true. Kamala never addressed the unfairness of that debate When Kamala finally started doing interviews she was a dismal failure. She was combative and rude to interviewers who were doing their best to make her look good (most notably A Cooper and B Whittaker), and her answers were a mixture of lies, off-topic rants and filibustering. We literally have no reason to suspect that Kamala Harris would have done well in any aspect of her duties in the WH, because she was such a dismal failure as VP. She is just a lying, slandering, combative, rude, stupid person with nothing but failure on her resume from her entire term as VP. I challenge you right now to cite a single success of hers as VP: ________________... Based on what, stupid? Trump just ran the most successful presidency since Reagan. How do you look at a track record of nearly unparalleled success and then project abject failure from it? That completely defies logic, dummy. And don't cite CNN propaganda as your reason either, Radiorum, it's only fit for laftard echo chambers. "We feew wike Twumpie sed heez gunna do this: "Mwah mwah mwah mwah mwah!!!" Feel free to cherry-pick a few innocuous sentences from my post and reply them with more off-topic rants, radiodumb. It's your style. Adios.

How about applying the GST to everything the rich buy including financial instruments they invest in? The vast majority of society, one way or another, need a bigger share of the economy's capital gains. If not by means of higher wages then by higher taxes otherwise there will be blood, the deepening state of inequity is as unsustainable as it is inevitable. The only other solution is fewer people and a shrinking population to bring the needs of the economy and environment into better balance. Impoverished people make poor environmental stewards - they can't afford to be. Want to bet we'll see barbed-wire and machine-guns as the solution to refugees and immigration in our lifetimes?

indeed the Woke Progressive managerial elites are an army of grifters so that's a wash hence why this is a culture war against the decadent, debauched, degenerate & deranged Establishment the emperor has no clothes; Trump is simply the messenger

You social justice sluts are a good laugh - LOL!!

A number of us kept pointing that out since January of this year. I made dozens of posts personally that pointed out if they keep lying about trump and making up these ridiculous nonsense conspiracy theories and pursuing a billion and one ridiculous lawsuits, All they would be doing is driving people into trump's camp. Trump was behind Biden a little right up until he got arrested. And then it went downhill for them from there We have seen it said over and over and over again: If all you can do is make crap up then what you are saying is there's nothing legitimate about him to complain about so he's actually pretty good

Make America Great Again, plant more poplars. Enough to crowd out the weeds.

Beauty... there are people here who need to write that last sentence on a blackboard 1,000 times. As long absent chickens return to a structurally weakened roost in large numbers, I find myself repeatedly asking the same question: "WTF did you think was going to happen?"

It will only be popular with the MAGA CULT like you. Patel will never pursue ANYTHING but Trump's interests and those are NEVER close to JUSTICE. 🤮

Again...and just for you...you special little pup. 1. Have conservatives actively worked to stifle free speech? No. 2. Have conservatives opened the border and lied about it? No. 3. Have conservatives refused to prosecute criminals and let them go into the population only to rape and kill little girls? No. 4. Have conservatives wantonly created a sh1t economy? No. 5. Have conservatives used the law AND the IRS to attack political opponents? No. 6. Have conservatives attacked Christians? No. BUT...the Libbies have...on all counts. Lookes like level headed people would have to admit that if anyone is "evil"...it would be the Libbies. Now...stop p1ssing in the house Pup.

I would think this would benefit the rich and hurt the middle class and poor. The rich make far more in money than they can consume, so they invest the rest. Before the GST existed Canada was doing just fine. Get rid of it. Our government wastes money on all sorts of nonsense.

Now now. It's not fair to make him choose, two things can be true.

Provinces have a Charter veto, not a veto on the whole constitution. Some issues like national defence are federal issues that can't or don't make sense to made by each province. But I do think there should be as much provincial and local control over laws as is reasonable. Problem is the agreement that decides what feds and provinces were in charge of was made in 1867 and re-opening the constitutional is basically impossible in this country because of Quebec.

So with 10 - 12 provinces and territories all with a veto as strong as a permanent UN Security Council members who needs another government on top of all that limiting us?

Read a book.

Ya something like that.

indeed keep these pathetic losers coming with their cry whining little b!tch threads just to let us know how Trump derangement twists in their guts like a rusty knife so much winning

Oh, God, no. It involves certain principles that Trump is steadily eroding.

This is a map of the age of consent in the US, I don't where this magic 18 years comes from because only about 11 states in the US have that as their age of consent. Most states it is 16

well from 1603 to 1814, the "Canadians" were only the Quebecois of Nouvelle France the United Empire Loyalists whom fled the American Revolution still called themselves "Americans" it was only after the American forces went up and down the north shore of lake Erie in the War of 1812 burning down all the Loyalist farms in retaliation for the defeats inflicted upon the Union by the British that the American Loyalists here changed their names, adopting the French name "Canadian" to distinguish themselves from the Republic

That's nonsense. Sometimes the courts are right and the provinces can still use the clause. The purpose of the clause was to get the provinces to sign on to something that limited their power, including Quebec, who still didn't.

Indeed my wife is 49, and she's still vastly cuter than 31 year old Laura Loomer the spitting image of Dorothy Gale, and she's barely aged a day since

Again, you demonstrate that whatever meaning you seek in Laken Riley's death is entirely rooted in your own discontent with the left. Like I said you're worse than a bloodsucking ambulance chaser. Her tragedy doesn't exist for your pleasure.

What you're doing right there is called 'an accusation in a mirror', if you were wondering. It's when you accuse someone else of doing what you're actually the one who's doing it. You guys run around saying things like "mostly peaceful protests", "there's no inflation", "walls are racist", "Joe Biden is mentally fit", and "Russian collusion" for years, then you pretend that you only tell the truth and the other side lacks credibility. You're a liar, herbie. It's all you do. Bingo.

Probably. Extraordinarily paranoid statements such as this require especially extraordinary evidence.

The purpose of the notwithstanding clause is that so that courts don't have unlimited power. Courts aren't always right, given that court rulings can often contradict or overrule previous rulings, so giving them unlimited power to interpret the constitution is as silly as giving any other branch of government unlimited power to fulfill its duties. Just as an example - in 1993, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that a ban on medical assistance in dying was constitutional. They ruled the opposite in 2015, contradicting and overturning their previous ruling. Which time were they right? If the Supreme Court admits they are sometimes wrong, shouldn't there be checks on their power?

I'll becoming in your wife tonight.

Oh Hi Mrs. Nationalist.

Notice how this goofball has to pretend that "right-wing" means "open market and pro democracy" and not "economically and socially conservative." The fact is there was a strong right wing in post war Germany consisting of the military, nobility and economic/industrial elite. This is the group that rejected the social and economic liberalism of the Weimar era state and quite literally enabled Hitler and the Nazis to take power which they would not have done if they felt that Hitler was some kind of bleeding heart socialist. This is quite literally the stupidest thing you've ever written, which is quite the feat given your output. Democratic socialism is a reformist movement that advocates for a democratically run and decentralized economy and rejects authoritarianism. Nazism was a revolutionary movement that explicitly rejected democracy and embraced private ownership of the means of production. It's apples and hand grenades. This is what happens when you have a stupid person (you) with a very dim understanding of history and a political agenda: rather than looking at the facts (in this case that the Nazis were a reactionary conservative authoritarian nationalist movement that happened to embrace some populist social and economic policies for the benefit of a very specific group of people) you have to distort reality to fit into your idealogical box no matter how absurd your conclusions turn out to be. Like this: In order to arrive at this conclusion, one would have to ignore what the Nazis actually believed and what they actually did and why they did them. The Nazis didn't increase social programs: they cut them. They also limited who was eligible to receive benefits from the state to people of Aryan descent and excluded millions of "undesirables". Left wing ideas like egalitarianism were anathema to the Nazis; indeed the Nazis' entire program could be summed up as opposition to those left-liberal ideas.

1. I am automatically sceptical of any pro-immigration arguments that involve staving off population decline. Population decline due to low fertility is going to be global problem in the near future, including in the countries where the majority of our immigrants come from (India, China, Phillippines, etc.), so what you're doing by mass importing people here is delaying the population decline temporarily while shifting the burden of the population decline from the economies of those countries to the expensive and largely outdated Canadian welfare state. 2. Canada has 350,000 births and 330,000 deaths annually, as well as an emigration rate of about 100,000 per year. This adds up to a total population loss of about 80,000 per year, so we do not need more than 300,000 people a year to maintain our population. 3. Even when we took in 250,000 permanent residents annually for decades, our population growth was one of the highest in the world. I highly doubt that reducing that number slightly is going to make our population fall. According to several economists at the National Bank of Canada, we need our population growth to be below 500,000 annually to get out of the 'population trap' situation we are currently in. FTR, when both permanent and temporary residents are included, our aggregate population growth has been over 500,000 annually every year since 2018 (minus 2020, for obvious reasons). We are already saturated and don't have the jobs, housing, infrastructure, etc. to accommodate all the people currently here. 4. If the cost of increasing our population is importing cheap labour to depress our wages, saturate our infrastructure and subsequently reduce our standard of living to third world levels, maybe increasing our population by that much isn't such a good idea.