Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 09/28/2024 in all areas

  1. Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election AKA clear findings of COLLUSION between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligence, as detailed in Chapters 4-6 of the full committee report. (u)report Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (.gov) https://www.intelligence.senate.gov › documents PDF Aug 18, 2020 — ... Russia interfered in .the 2016 U.S. election. vi. COMMITTEE SENSITIVE-RUSSIA INVESTIGATION ONLY. Page 7. COMMITTEE SENSITIVE - RUSSIA ... 966 pages But gatomontes99 pretends that one paragraph authored by 5 RepubliCON Senators which was NOT agreed to by other committee members like the above conclusions, takes precedence and in desperation calls posters who point that out "batshit crazy." When HE'S LOSING THE DEBATE, it is gatomontes99 who goes batshit crazy.
    2 points
  2. The FBI used the Steele report as probable cause, and nothing more. And, lo and behold! With that probable cause came warrants, and with the warrants came criminal convictions. The Democratic Senator from New York just got convicted by Federal prosecutors. You aren’t crying about that being unfair. The Democrat Federal prosecutor in New York just indicted the Democrat mayor of New York, for the crime of accepting first class travel and a meal in exchange for ordering the fire department to approve a building opening in time for a visit by a head of state. Imagine that’s a Republican — Open the building so the President of Turkey can visit it when he arrives, THEN add the missing fire sprinklers or whatever. Your head would be exploding! These friends of Trump are criminals, and they were deeply involved in Russian business, and Trump’s Russia policies as President made no sense for the United States. It still makes no sense to insist on giving Ukranian land to Russia in exchange for a “peace” which surely will not last.
    2 points
  3. MAGA republicans are by far more patriotic, intelligent, and reasonable than Demis. I don't even know that much about Alex Jones, but I can guarantee he doesn't lie as much as CNN does.
    2 points
  4. "OTTAWA — An NDP MP tabled a bill Thursday seeking to change the Criminal Code to criminalize downplaying, denying or condoning the harms of residential schools in Canada. Leah Gazan, who represents Winnipeg Centre, presented her private member’s bill on Monday, less than a week before the country is set to mark the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation, meant to honour residential schools survivors and their families." NDP MP tables bill seeking to criminalize residential school 'denialism' (msn.com) These people don't have a clue about basic freedoms. Much of the residential school claims have been false and some of it is purely subjective or speculation. Canadians have a right to their opinions. The NDP should definitely not be in Parliament. They fit more in Cuba or Russia.
    1 point
  5. Trump was correct. They are emptying their prisons into our country. Highlights: Illegal Immigrants (with criminal records) Released by ICE: 626,566 With criminal convictions: 435,719 With pending criminal charges: 226,847 Murderers: 13,099 (convicted), 1845 (charged) Sexual Assault: 15,811 (convicted), 4250 (charged) Assault: 62,231 (convicted), 42,915 (charged) Of course, it isn't just Harris. Every sanctuary city/county/state is aiding these criminals in remaining in our country. They are a threat to every single person in the United States. This cannot be stopped with more catch and release. This cannot be solved with more open borders. The only way to stop this, they only way to fix this, is to turn everyone back and create a task force to find and deport every single person on the non-detained list.
    1 point
  6. I can't believe CNN actually aired this. That old saying stands true. Republicans think democrats are people with bad ideas. Democrats think Republicans are bad people with ideas.
    1 point
  7. No, deflected and dodged. You can't bring yourself to say the words, to acknowledge the plain facts. Look, it's easy. Bob Menendez accepted bribes. Hunter Biden lied on his gun paperwork. Paul Manafort colluded with Russian intelligence. All three are plain facts. But as a rabid partisan you simply cannot acknowledge the third. Bizarre.
    1 point
  8. YOU HAVE NO PROOF OF THAT!!!!!! (other than his posts and behavior and such which doesn't count because see above)
    1 point
  9. The irony is he's going batshit crazy trying to disprove that he's batshit crazy.
    1 point
  10. Yes but that doesn't say what he WANTS it to say so it's not REAL evidence, it's just OPINION!!!
    1 point
  11. The evil progressivism of the Renaissance is the root cause of the failure of Western civilization. Obey the Church! Burn the witches and science heretics! Wives, children and slaves must be beaten often!
    1 point
  12. Here's a clue for you: Trump is a narcissistic a-hole and pathological LIAR who puts HIS OWN INTERESTS ahead of the nation's and violated every ethical norm. Not to mention 34 FELONIES with more INDICTMENTS. Do you understand now, Mr. OBTUSE DENIAL? LMAO
    1 point
  13. Wow such an intelligent nickname did you have kindergartener invent that for you? Of course you will because you’re a conspiracy nut who also is so gullible they fall for Kremlin propaganda over and over.
    1 point
  14. You won't even acknowledge the basic facts of what Manafort did, so who else knew or participated is miles beyond you. It's more important to you to be partisan than to be honest about a basic matter of public record. So weird and hacky.
    1 point
  15. Trump has a niece and nephew who have either wrote books or given lengthy articles, about why Trump is dangerous for America.
    1 point
  16. I'm not answering because the premise is that Manafort's actions are Trump's actions. They are not. Since you can't acknowledge it, Manafort worked for 2 months and got fired for what he did. To assert that what he did was somehow sanctioned by the campaign (and thus Trump) is batsh1t crazy.
    1 point
  17. WOW! Damn! So you’re saying Kamala Harris personally put over 1,000 people in jail? That’s incredible. Can you name, say, three of those thousand people and show us the charges they were convicted of? Or are you just pulling nonsense out of your bunghole?
    1 point
  18. For F’s sakes, man… Trump didn’t get statistic wrong, he was corrected for outrageous lies. Why’s that so f-ing hard? There are still no actual reports of pets being eaten by Haitians, who are in the U.S. legally. If Donald Trump has the right ideas for America, then why does he need to lie at all? Wouldn’t the truth be perfectly fine? Can’t you report on immigration problems without making up lies and repeating internet rumors?
    1 point
  19. If people think it is so terrible for natives to be sent to schools to deconstruct their own culture, then why is it okay for white kids to be sent to schools that deconstruct white culture?
    1 point
  20. So you are prepared to admit that Manafort, on Trump's campaign, colluded with Russian intelligence? Again, easy question.
    1 point
  21. What's so baffling about your disgust is that no one fired so much as a single shot in resistance in the US or Canada. It's especially bewildering given how readily the US carpet bombed and killed millions of people in other countries to stop the spread of communism.
    1 point
  22. User ended my fun in that thread. But you proved my point. Thank you.
    1 point
  23. He doesn't care. He just doesn't. All he cares about is "getting" Trump. And I've been letting him go on and on about his because he's making my case for me.
    1 point
  24. You don't get to call anyone a chickenshit when you are on here hiding from people yourself.
    1 point
  25. Again, do you dispute any of those "tidbits" (your pet name for facts that are a matter of public record?) or not? Because the evidence against Manafort, Trump's campaign manager, is utterly damning. If you don't dispute those facts, the only refuge for Trump is that he didn't know what his campaign manager was doing with Russia to help him win. Is that what you'd like to claim? Oh, and as a bonus can I assume that you'd like to claim that he didn't know what Roger Stone was doing either?
    1 point
  26. As we discussed in the other thread, you still think Trump colluded with Russia. That, right there, disqualifies you from being an arbiter of truth.
    1 point
  27. I get it, her plan was to let enough immigrants in illegally so that america went to the trash can so fast nobody else would ever want to come and then illegal immigration would stop
    1 point
  28. I've yet to see a MAGA Republican who knows anything or has the juice to argue his way out of a paper bag (that's how one becomes a MAGA Republican after all)but boy are they confident and loud! Just like their Messiah. Alex Jones is frequently mentioned on this board. You've posted about him several times. You sound like Trump suddenly not knowing David Duke, Nick Fuentes or the Proud Boys, lol. But for the folks playing along at home, Jones recently lost everything (even more than Fox, about $1.5B IIRC) for leading a conservative conspiracy that the Sandy Hook shootings were a hoax and leading an online mob to harass those grieving parents.
    1 point
  29. Actually it would be "Hodad is crying like a little biotch because gatomontes99 won't accept his false premise."
    1 point
  30. They got nothing from Manafort cause Trump was PROMISING A PARDON. Duh Trump made it public to play the victim like he always does. You're LYING. ^BULLSHIT.
    1 point
  31. Fast of mouth and slow of thought as you are, not surprised that you can't track your own post, but yes, feeding strategic information to the foreign intelligence service that is using such information in an operation intended to help you win an election is exactly what collusion is. Now, you could argue that Manafort didn't know, but that would make him even dumber than you. Improbable.
    1 point
  32. Those really big assed spiders in your garage that freak everyone out? Trump puts them there.
    1 point
  33. Actually he's just obsessed with people who are obsessed with fake vaginas. If nobody else ever brought up fake vaginas then he probably wouldn't even think about them. Never seems to come up when you and black dog aren't around for example
    1 point
  34. It says a lot that the biggest sponsor of terrorism wants to keep Kamala Harris in the White House.
    1 point
  35. You know, I have family members that don't agree with me on politics. However, any of us ran for office, I know for a fact that noone would run to the media to air grievances.
    1 point
  36. No sane person can honestly praise the Biden/Harris administration for their border policy. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/tren-de-aragua-venezuelan-gang-members-slip-into-us-rcna156290 During the Trump administration, border officials encountered about 3 million undocumented people crossing into the U.S. Though a breakdown by country of origin isn’t available for those years, the migrants tended to come from Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and Mexico, all of which share law enforcement data with the U.S. During the Biden administration, the number of people trying to enter the U.S. has risen to 10 million to date, and the composition of the migrant flow has changed. Three million is still a lot of illegals, but it pales in comparison to 10 million during Harris/Biden. And some pundits think the actual number may be much higher than that. Is Harris going to take a new, holistic approach to border security?
    1 point
  37. That explains why N American EVs are $20,000 more than Chinas. The workers make so much more there they produce cars cheaper....
    1 point
  38. Next he will start phoning you claiming he's Don from Windows... your modem is infected....
    1 point
  39. Deflect, dodge, duck and weave, but whatever you do, don't answer basic questions. And be sure not to trip over that tucked tail. Do you dispute that Manafort was Trump's campaign manager? Do you dispute that regularly had clandestine meetings and communications with Kilimnik? Do you dispute that at those meetings he gave Kilimnik "sensitive" internal polling and strategy from the Trump campaign? Do you dispute that Kilimnik in turn relayed that information to Russian intelligence services? Do you dispute that Russian intelligence services was running an active election interference and disinformation campaign against US voters with the express aim of helping Trump win?
    1 point
  40. Of course. Do you know everything is trumps fault. Jesus crucifixion, the fall of the roman empire, WI WWII, korean war, Viet nam, he killed Kennedy, 9/11, climate change and worse of all!!!!! The j6 trespassing incident. Just to name a few
    1 point
  41. A Harris watch has two faces which can be flipped or flopped at will.
    1 point
  42. CNN probably LOVES the fact that Biden supporters fear and loathe Republicans. Wasn't that the point of all Biden's messaging?
    1 point
  43. Ivermectin: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9823263/ Despite community vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and reduced mortality, there are still challenges in treatment options for the disease. Due to the continuous mutation of SARS-CoV-2 virus and the emergence of new strains, diversity in the use of existing antiviral drugs to combat the epidemic has become a crucial therapeutic chance. As a broad-spectrum antiparasitic and antiviral drug, ivermectin has traditionally been used to treat many types of disease, including DNA and RNA viral infections. FYI the possibility that ivermectin could fight covid was never a joke. Let me ask you, what was the reason for the vax rollout, User? Was it to "stop people from dying"? Yes, it was. Did it stop people from dying in Canada? No it did not. We jabbed 86% of Canadians in 2021 and we had the most covid deaths ever, by far, in 2022, with 4x-vaxed people suffering worse than any other group. The covid jab simply DID NOT WORK and then the MSM just stopped talking about covid deaths. Ivermectin was broadly used in Uttar Pradesh (240M people) and what happened? People stopped dying at an inexplicable rate compared to other regions. Was that a success? No? The criticism of ivermectin actually appearing to work there was "correlation is not causation", but why do we need an excuse for the jab not working in Canada? And what was the official excuse, anyways? "No success is proof of success"? No excuse was actually given, the MSM simply stopped talking about covid deaths even though they went sky-high. 30% higher than 2021. Vax-apologists like to pretend that "It took a massive increase in the number of infections for the number of deaths to go up", but didn't we force people to take the vax because it theoretically slowed the spread? "You can't give granny covid if you're vaxed". Give it a rest, User. The vax was a dangerous Big Pharma joke on Canadians, and pretending that ivermectin didn't work was also a really funny Big Pharma joke. Big Phrama is a trillion dollar industry. They control the health publications that we cite as authorities. They've been trying to get us hooked on 'flu vaccines' going back decades now. Generations actually. The nurses union has had to fight off mandatory flu vaccination in the past. Covid was supposed to be Big Pharma's messiah. They couldn't let an off-patent, dirt cheap treatment rival their expensive drug.
    1 point
  44. Sweety, because you are a left wing extremist, you can't see how CNN is strongly left leaning. You have confirmation bias with regards to the stories they run. So when they say Trump colluded with Russia, you believe them because you want to hear it.
    1 point
  45. Is someone saying it should be lawful to stab those people when they are walking down the street?
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...