Leaderboard

And they're getting pretty good at it:

Isn't it pathetic that the only reason this got done was because Trump put the heat on? The BC gov't just did the same thing. This week they finally lifted the pandemic restrictions on hospital employees, allowing unvaccinated health care workers to come back to work, and that only happened now because their opponents in the October election vowed to do that exact thing.

Shocking! This is the old boring liar the public is not supposed to know about. The man that they say is the next Hitler..

I will just leave this right here. I 👀 u.

You really ought to read your own links instead of just bullshitting based on the headline. The first article doesn’t say Canada will be better off and in fact it is challenging a climate denier’s claim. Canadian Climate Institute is not a climate denier site or pro-climate change. Their own stated priorities are: Incentivizing clean economic growth and low-carbon competitiveness, Reducing emissions and accelerating Canada’s net zero energy transition Making our economy and infrastructure more resilient to a warming climate. The second link is non/expert editorial in a conservative paper citing the climate denier claim that is rebutted in your first link.

🤔

You know, I just realized something, myata. I've been reading your posts these last few weeks. Your rants. Particularly that original post in your thread about Trump being a "boring old man". You go on about hateful lies, and how Trump is a lying clown beating a "tambourine of hatred and lies". Boom Boom Boom. I've been reading these posts of yours, and seeing how Trump gets under your skin, and it reminded me of something. But I could not put my finger on what it was exactly. But I have just realized what it is - a romantic comedy. The female character has been with several guys who seem to be Mr. Right, but ultimately somehow they never quite do it for her. Then, she meets this obnoxious guy who just grinds her gears. Everything he does gets under her skin. Then she rants to her girlfriends and her mom about how intolerable he is. But they know what I now know...... You love Trump, myata.

Here - i'm told this is good for butt hurts,,,

Wrong. This thread was started to show how much of a fake, condescending b*tch Kamelface Harris' is. Get it right, or walk away and go f*ck yourself.

Hilarious. A cornered Libbie can't justify an argument, so he plays dumb. Just another of the daily examples of how stoopid these simps are.

You're an embarrasment if you think that is reasonable sagacious thought. It's a really horrible attempt to try to think of something meaningful and intelligent to say and failing utterly. it just sounds like someone who's flipping through a thesaurus in her mind and trying to grab words she thinks sound deep or insightful but they just come out sounding contrived and confused. Fortunately, contrived and confused is pretty much your wheelhouse Robo so you should enjoy it

That actually is what they say. In an interview one of the two girls who started it stated that they were trained marxists. Her words. You should give her a call and tell her how funny you found it

Trump Reveals He ‘Agreed’ to Debate Harris with ‘Full Arena Audience’ https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/08/02/trump-agreed-debate-kamala-harris-full-arena-audience/

Wtf? Really Olympics? When I was a kid, it was just about friendly, patriotic competition. Now it is a political spectacle that espouses religious bigotry. I was already disappointed with some of our athletes being overtly political, but this ended it for me. I'm done. I will not associate with such bigotry.

Trump is still projected to win the 2024 election. Can the dems afford to let him end another war that either continued unabated or was started under Obama/Biden? The optics are already terrible for them. Russia has been a Viking menace under Obama and Biden, but when Trump was POTUS they were kittens. They even worked together, sorta, to defeat islamic state. Islamic state was 100% Obama's fault, and Trump had to clean up after him. The Afghan war was showing no signs of ending under Obama, Trump negotiated an end to that war, and the Taliban didn't snipe any US soldiers during the last 18 months of his presidency. Even the domestic rioting in the US was halted under Trump, after Obama let it rage on unchecked for his final 3.5 years. If Trump becomes POTUS and ends the Ukraine and Israel wars it will just be a PR nightmare for the Dems. Even their staunchest cultist dolts will have to admit that Trump is a peacemaker and that the Dems' weakness and stupidity is a global disaster.

Senator Harris vocally throws around “F-bombs” and other profanity constantly in her berating of staff and others. The staff is in complete fear of her and she uses her profanity throughout the day. As Attorney General, Senator Harris instructed her entire staff to stand every morning as she entered the office and say, “Good Morning General. ”Gregory was also given instructions to never address Harris nor look her in the eye as that privilege was only allowed to senior staff members. Hillary and Joe are rumored to be the same way, along with Klobuchar.

lol - but...but...but...Trump!! Every time with these bozos.

I don't think they can program bots with humour yet can they? Also he's a very old version, he originally ran on a commodore Vic-20.

You were already provided a link to NADA which you conveniently continue to ignore. You must seriously live under a rock if it’s news to you that every government and scientific organization believes climate change is real. How many links do you need? United Nations https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/mythbusters?gad_source=1&gbraid=0AAAAAD9kiAdI9naItlbPyCMGlBRJulPtx&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI5ci3psvZhwMVBDMIBR2XRwYEEAAYAiAAEgJY3PD_BwE US government https://www.epa.gov/climatechange-science/causes-climate-change https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/scientific-consensus/ Scientific Community and media : ‘Case closed’: 99.9% of scientists agree climate emergency caused by humans https://amp.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/19/case-closed-999-of-scientists-agree-climate-emergency-caused-by-humans The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1103618 Scientific consensus on climate change There is a nearly unanimous scientific consensus that the Earth has been consistently warming since the start of the Industrial Revolution, that the rate of recent warming is largely unprecedented,[1]: 8 [2]: 11  and that this warming is mainly the result of a rapid increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2)caused by human activities. The human activities causing this warming include fossil fuel combustion, cement production, and land use changes such as deforestation,[3]: 10–11  with a significant supporting role from the other greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrous oxide.[1]: 7  This human role in climate change is considered "unequivocal" and "incontrovertible".[1]: 4 [2]: 4  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change ChatGPT - ”Is there scientific consensus that climate change is an emergency caused by human activity ?” Yes, there is a strong scientific consensus that climate change is an urgent issue and is largely driven by human activities. This consensus is supported by numerous scientific organizations and studies worldwide. Key points include: 1. **Human Activities as a Primary Driver**: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) states that it is "extremely likely" (95-100% probability) that more than half of the observed increase in global average surface temperature from 1951 to 2010 was caused by human activities, primarily the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation. 2. **Scientific Consensus**: Multiple studies have shown that over 97% of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities. Major scientific organizations, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the American Geophysical Union (AGU), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), endorse this view. 3. **Impacts of Climate Change**: The impacts of climate change, such as rising sea levels, increased frequency and severity of extreme weather events, shifting wildlife populations and habitats, and effects on human health, are well-documented. These changes pose significant risks to natural and human systems. 4. **Urgency and Action**: The scientific community emphasizes the urgency of addressing climate change. The IPCC's reports stress the need for rapid and significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions to limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, which is crucial to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. The overwhelming consensus is based on extensive research and evidence gathered over decades. Addressing climate change is seen as critical to ensuring a sustainable and stable environment for future generations. ****** Honestly a person could keep this up all day every day its the published official position of virtually every government and recognized scientific body and has been for years if not decades. Now we all know your next moves: you’ll scream “globalist deep state conspiracy” so you can dismiss everything above without evidence then you’ll lobotomize yourself so you can forget reading it at all and go back to your lie that nobody has ever provided you any evidence.

You fantasies are your very own. You can enjoy, taste and savour every bit and drop of them .. it doesn't mean of course, that they have anything to do with anybody else

So unless you see evidence that Canada alone can save the entire world from climate change, you’ll believe that we should just pollute as much as we want? The entire world needs to reduce emissions. Canada needs to do its part.

Wow quite the renowned subject matter expert you’ve cited.

Dear diary,...

The YouTube videos that you watch, and media like Rebel News say climate change is not real. NASA is a highly respected organisation. This is what they say about climate change: https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/evidence/ You can believe what you want. However, you would be incorrect.

And? What is your point? You are here trying to say there is something nefarious afoot when there isn't. I don't let 3rd world dictators dictate to me who I am going to support for President. Apparently, you do.

They are yes or no questions. If you are asserting that there is no basis for one to judge the thoughts another person has about their own self, then I assume you are saying that those things are valid. But I want to hear it from the horse's mouth. Is it valid for two people with completely the same characteristics to define themselves one as a "man" and one as a "woman"? Is it valid for any person with any combination of traits and characteristics to define themselves as any gender? Two questions, both yes or no. Very simple.

I just realized what Kamala Harris sounds like when she talks. She talks like when you get stoned with a bunch of friends and start saying random shit and think it sounds deep and profound.

Validity is irrelevant. There is no basis for one person to judge the thoughts another person has about their own self. But if a person appeared to me to be male, that's what would be communicated to me and I would reciprocate with them on that basis unless they comminate some reasonable preference for being regarded in some other way.

Future definitions, unburdened by definitions that have been.

It is 2:39 am here. If you want to continue cortorting yourself into absurdity for the rest of your life be my guest. Your definiton of gender does not even have a vague meaning. It has absolutely none whatsoever. Gender was originally synonymous with sex. If you want add Black Dog's definition then it has a vague meaning. But if anyone with any characteristics can identify as "man" or "woman" or anything else there is no meaning. It is absolutely absurd. It is useless as a term.

The server this site is hosted on only has so much memory. You may be being optimistic.

It doesn't have to be normal money, it could be something that's worth a lot of money - I got a bunch of these:

They never have considered it before, but previously the number brought in was never significantly in excess of our ability to provide infrastructure in the form of housing and so on. Right now we are bringing in immigrants and permanent residents in such numbers that we don't even come close. And it shouldn't just be housing we should consider, but also medicine and education. Basically we can't even consider Having our population increase at a rate faster than our ability to increase houses and doctors and schools.

Well I think I just answered that twice, but you seem to be genuinely asking. Where your question goes astray is "in order to belong." We can define and list out the traits and norms popularly associated with femininity within a culure. But how people think about and perform their personality is more complex and varied. Most things listed as masculine or feminine behavioral traits are in reality not mutually exclusive. Its a bit like the difference between the concept of race and the concept of ethnicity. Someone might have a very physical idea of what an asian person looks like. But if asked for a list cultural traits associated with Asian ethnicities, you couldn't use that list to define if someone is asian or not.

Well there are millions of fat women who belch and fart like anyone else. Though I get what you mean. I'm not super well-versed in the theories about gender but what you're implying is that someone is presenting themselves to the world as stereotypically male in their behaviors and clothing, etc but at the same time has a uterus and other physical sex characteristics of women? You're asking if it's possible for this person to identify as a woman? Of course. Its extremely common and widely accepted (even among conservatives) for women to dress and act in ways that that were once strictly masculine. Women wearing pants was not acceptable for example.

It's adorable that you think a MAGA hat is definitively masculine. Literally marketing from a highly emotional NY dandy in makeup and spray tan.

That was a snippet from an article. Not me. I should have put it in quotes.

Trained Marxists were they? Degrees from Lenin University deep in the heart of your sick mind I suppose. BTW my 11 yr old nephew "edits movies", you can do that with computers that cost more than $399 if you're elitist enough to know how. So after multiple posts of deflection, you still haven't given incidence of a Democrat lie.

FOS LIES is his name for FOX News. The FOS is an acronym for "full of sh-t". He thinks this is so clever that almost every time he types "FOS Lies" it is immediately followed by LMAO.

Yeah and many including me commented on that here before, but in order to do that she's still got to put up a plausible fight. The dems already look like losers for their screw up with biden, if their back up also starts to go down in flames then their supporters are seriously going to lose heart and it will very badly affect fundraising and the downvote. A close race where she puts up a good fight and just can't make it happen in the end but did well is one thing, flops and is nosediving by the end of September is going to be very bad.

...just follow the money... You sound like Goddess. So did you follow it forensically by any chance? What sort of accounting methodology did you use and who did it lead to? Do you have their names, a trail of communications emails, meeting minutes by the inventors to corroborate your claim of invention? How much data did you collect/generate and who reviewed it? When will charges and convictions be forthcoming and will you be in line for a reward? Or did you just say it was invented for effect?

How about if you stop being so f-ing judgmental about other people? Why not let those people decide for themselves what their gender is? Why do you think we need a “discussion” and that it’s any of your business? You don’t know what kind of sexual or gender feelings other people have, and it’s none of your business. Rule #1: Nobody can have sex with another person unless they consent. Rule #2: A adult cannot obtain consent from a minor; Beyond that, who you screw and how you feel about it is nobody else’s business and it’s definitely not the government’s business.

Someone who covers their drink when you walk into the bar?

I realize this is slightly off topic, but Winnipeg destroyed BC Lions 25-0 in CFL Football yesterday