Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/19/2024 in Posts
-
So now that we proved your source is completely bullshit, lets go back to the issue. The claim was made that forcing people to get vaxxed was 'not worht it', and your reply was that "MILLIONS' would die otherwise. And you claim there's no evidence that's untrue. So. lets start with your own failed 'research'. They took a model that assumed everyone in canada who was vaccine hesitant or adverse did not get the vaccine. that's not accurate - many hesitant did after being forced but THEY assume nobody did. It's grossly unrealistically high. And they put the number of people dead by that gross exagerration at 2800 people. 2800. Not "Millions". That's in a grossly exaggerated model that doesn't even take into account age. That's a "Worst possible case" kind of thing. So your own post shows that it was NO WHERE NEAR 'millions". It wasn't even hundreds of thousands. It wasn't evne tens of thousands. How stupid are you to post the proof you're worng? There are plenty of other sources too. For example - consider the graph below. From January to about june vaccinations were slowly rolling out - remembering it was a month beteween first jab and second jab when you were actually immunized so the people getting thier first jab in april for example wouldn't have been immunized till somewhere in may or june. So lets look at the impact in deaths over that time. the vaccine SHOULD have meant deaths would go down as more and more people got vaccinated if it worked as you say. Whopsie doodle - they don't. The increase stays in pretty much a flat line all the way along, regardless of what percent of the population is vaccinated. Next up - the point of immunization was to get 'herd immunity' - that magic point where we have enough people immune that the disease won't spread rapidly. The world health org put that at 70 percent. ( https://www.who.int/news/item/23-12-2021-achieving-70-covid-19-immunization-coverage-by-mid-2022_) But - while they note that getting there with vaccines is better than just letting people get infected - the infected are just as immune. A large percent of the people who did not get vaxxed got covid and lived. They are the 'naturally vaxxed'. A high percent of at risk people would have been vaccinated by choice. The people who didn't would mostly have been low risk. And they would have caught the illness (and did) and would have been no different than a vaccinated person. Look at the number of cases over time - those people are all 'vaccinated' wether they got a shot or not, So the evidence is clear. there would NOT have been 'millions of deaths" as you claimed if we had allowed people to choose. You were completely full of shit - i'm right again and you once again posted your own proof that i'm right with your 'report'. Gotcha Oh - and finally, A Johns Hopkins study says 'ill-founded' COVID lockdowns did more harm than good https://health.wusf.usf.edu/health-news-florida/2022-02-02/a-johns-hopkins-study-says-ill-founded-lockdowns-did-little-to-limit-covid-deaths LOL -have a nice day3 points
-
ALL innocent people should try to stave off banana courts until they can find suitable recourse. Trump is doing the right thing.3 points
-
Well not without overheating his processor, no.. And you have to take into account the very small 'hard drive'.3 points
-
Why does this bother you? Half of the Libbies are Jew haters.3 points
-
2 points
-
It is interesting how they (the most passionate of internet forum posters) truly do think that they are making widespread, tangible impact. When you point out that the forum is very small and very obscure they go apoplectic about how they will not bow down to the man and that I (or you) have my head in the sand. Nothing stated on here ever is read by true decision makers so no matter how well reasoned, passionate, etc. it may be.. it is for nothing.2 points
-
2 points
-
But that isnt true: Joe Biden believes that his uncle may have been eaten by cannibals after his plane was “shot down” over Papua New Guinea during the Second World War. The US president’s theory is, however, contradicted by official war records of 2nd Lieut Ambrose J Finnegan’s death, which suggest that his aircraft suffered engine failure over the Pacific in 1944 and that he did not survive the crash. This is his personality, though. Joe has to make everything about him. When he walks into the room, he grew up with people just like the people in the room. Remember when he grew up on the black church, loved with Puerto Ricans, was jealous of all the people with Polish names, almost lost his house to fire as he told the Maui residents. It is always about him. Watch the video to see how out of touch with reality he is:2 points
-
You're just pissed off because woke fascists aren't running Twitter anymore. Get over it, Adolph.2 points
-
I doubt it. He was overheard telling the drapes that growing up his mother was a venetian blind so he understands what it's like to be disabled.2 points
-
She needs to go. But what can you expect from her? She was an activist, and that's the only reason she was made governor general. Well, and being a native.2 points
-
We've always talked politics at family gatherings. 55 years ago Gran brought up the subject of That Goddam Trudeau decriminalized homosexuality. Dad quickly replied: Yeah and now just watch, they're gonna breed like flies! And I say he was right, now they're all over the place, right in your face like they have some right to exist! Just like Daddy, with my hand over my face chuckling. Trolling to see who takes the bait.1 point
-
In 2019, 89% of agencies covering 97% of the population submitted data, but by 2021, that coverage plummeted to less than 63% of departments overseeing just 65% of the population. Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York City all failed to submit crime data. To increase participation, the FBI relaxed the NIBRS requirement in 2022, allowing agencies to report via the legacy system. But many other cities, such as St. Louis, which had transitioned to the new method, still struggle to comply and submit partial or faulty data. The FBI compensates by relying more heavily on “estimation,” or informed guesswork, to fill in the gaps and produce aggregated data. What we are seeing is a system in transition, so data is incomplete. However, Joe's handlers, knowing the data is wrong, are trying to use it to convince you Joe did something positive. He didn't. It is a lie.1 point
-
You're turning yourself inside out over this. Free speech has nothing to do with the market. It refers to the government regulation of speech. Always has. You are free to say (almost) anything you want without the government limiting your expression of opinion. But, as the old saying goes, free speech does not mean speech free of consequences. There have always been social and economic consequences to free speech. If you say the wrong things, people may not want to do business with you or to be associated with you. If companies were intolerant of "free speech" they would exit jurisdictions with free speech provisions. Instead, companies like mine, pulled our ad dollars out of X when placing our ads on X became a risk to our brand equity. That decision has nothing at all to do with free speech.1 point
-
You really are a joke. You're rooting for a man to win the presidency who quite literally tried to illegally seize power in defiance of a democratic election. And then you turn around and pretend that "the left" is the clear and present threat to democracy. lol "The only thing that can save us is swastikas in the public square! That's the only way we can be free. Bless Elon Musk!"1 point
-
Did you know that the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to make Moderna’s and Pfizer’s shots were re-purposed to serve as vaccine platforms? They were originally intended to be a delivery mechanism for drugs and/or gene therapies. The reason LNPs were rejected as a platform, is that the LNPs were toxic if administered multiple times. And treatment of cancers and other diseases with LNPs required multi-dosing protocols. For this reason, several companies abandoned the use of LNPs. But Moderna decided to change course and use LNPs as a vaccine delivery system. Why? Because they understood that an ideal vaccine is one that requires a single dose. Here is Health Canada’s official definition of an ideal vaccine here: So, problem solved. A good LNP-based vaccine would require only a single dose. No multi-dosing = none of the toxicities known to be associated with multiple administrations of LNPs. Compare to Stéphane Bancel's comments, CEO of Moderna, which was published on September 13, 2016. Note his serious concerns about the LNPs that his company is using: “Delivery – actually getting RNA into cells – has long bedeviled the whole field. On their own, RNA molecules have a hard time reaching their targets. They work better if they’re wrapped up in a delivery mechanism, such as nanoparticles made of lipids. But those nanoparticles can lead to dangerous side effects, especially if a patient has to take repeated doses over months or years. Novartis abandoned the related realm of RNA interference over concerns about toxicity, as did Merck and Roche.” It's not just the spike protein (which there is no mechanism in the jabs to stop your body from producing) that is toxic. The LNPs are, as well. (But I'm sure it's just the breakfast food thing that eyeball thinks.) You can go see it on their website. It's the JCCF - the lawyers who won the Emergency Act case against Trudeau.1 point
-
So, according to the eyeball, there is a 0% chance that the UK's 680% with a z-score of 19 spike in neurodegenerative diseases, is caused by millions of people being forced to inject an experimental vax with no long-term studies and that the more likely culprit is a change in people's breakfast food choices. No need to investigate. Well, I'm reassured. Are you?1 point
-
Eyeball doesn't have to post the study. He posted an article referencing it along with its conclusions. You posting the actual study doesn't change those conclusions, nor does your clueless, 10-IQ critique of it. The absurd comedy of an angry, uneducated and no-life clown like you pretending you can highlight flaws in a 260+ page research study's methodology is top KEK.1 point
-
You don't get to make up your own definition of "woke," shithead Musk is running the show at X not "lefts" Duh1 point
-
free speech does not mean free from consequences. Fine... tell the world that you think Hitler was correct. If the world does not agree with you then you have to deal with that. A lot of folks confuse being accepted with free speech. Just because the world does not agree with what you said does not mean that you were barred from voicing that unpopular opinion.1 point
-
Even if data is incomplete.. that does not tell you that crime is up or down. I am ok with incomplete. I am not one to fill in the blanks.1 point
-
Au contraire, I know exactly what is up. I am far form ignorant. I read and I pay attention and I know not to push on a pull door. The thing with me and clearly not you, is that I am OK. Not worried and not stressing about things totally out of my control. But hey, it is good there are stressed out folks like you to make the rest of us look normal. Think about it, really think, you are flying of whatever end you are on and I am not. Who gains? Who is farther ahead? Who is affecting the situation? Who is making change? Oh? None of us? Neither you or I....well it must be a tie game then eh? LOL You don't win and I am not even playing LOL1 point
-
A good way to expose these wokeaholics is YouTubers. They are regularly documenting the decline in their cities.1 point
-
Yep. More domestic oil production than ever before. Net energy exporter. Record profits for the petroleum industry. The only reasonable conclusion is that Joe Biden is driving up the price of gas! 🙄1 point
-
You don't. You didn't just now either. LOL - well you're a m0ron but you're a consistent one I posted several data sources and a study on TOP of posting the study that eyeball referenced but didn't actually provide - which proved him wrong in any case And once again - in the face of solid evidence all you can do is have a hissy fit i mean we both know you didn't actually read any of the data - anything more than two sentences and you start crying and holding your head Sorry kiddo , If we had not forced vaccinations and allowed people to choose there would not have been 'Millions more deaths". I doubt there would have been any. Well you called it1 point
-
You don't. You didn't just now either. You just linked the report that eyeball had already referenced, and then just spun out and dissembled with your usual worthless bullshitting. You talking about the errors in a study is comical considering your absence of relevant (or seemingly any) training and experience. All you ever have is longwinded bloviating and puking on your keyboard. Nobody can use more words to say less of substance than you.1 point
-
Remember this lie? Advertisers are returning to Twitter after Linda Yaccarino calmed fears over content moderation. But now brands like Disney, Microsoft, and the NBA have ads placed next to neo-Nazi propaganda. It was a lie because the people that made this happen signed up and followed a bunch of white supremacist and then kept refreshing the page until the ads appeared. In the lawsuit filed in a US district court in Texas, X claimed Media Matters “manipulated” the social media platform by using accounts that exclusively followed accounts for major brands or users known to produce fringe content and “resorted to endlessly scrolling and refreshing” the feed until it found ads next to extremist posts. I would not be surprised if they also created a bunch of accounts just to say look at all these accounts. Even if they didn't, so what? People have opinions you don't like. Hell, I don't like liberal opinions. Should I be able to demand that X blocks and bans all liberal opinions? Of course not. The proper policy is to allow all opinions. Statements that threaten or call for violence against individuals or groups should be moderated and reported to law enforcement. If you, rightly, don't like Nazis, you have two options. You can either debate them or you can ignore them.1 point
-
The Borowitz Report is a satire paper. They're like the onion or the beaverton or the like. The problem here seems to be that robosmith didn't realize it was supposed to be satire and is quoting it as a real article. Unfortunately his creator didn't program him with human emotions like humour.1 point
-
An example of woke mind virus: https://www.irishcentral.com/news/anthony-fauci-royal-college-physicians-ireland Tony belongs in jail...not running around getting accolades.1 point
-
1 point
-
Good ol' part-time jobs and public-sector jobs to the rescue. Somehow the Dems just haven't gotten the recipe for 'spending their way to wealth' right just yet.1 point
-
Ooh ee ooh ah ah Foxy say bwana's medicine is evil. Cut off that arm.1 point
