Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/08/2024 in all areas
-
The Dems are clearly struggling in the polls, and their old fallback stories like "racist walls", "global warming" and abortion don't seem to be motivating voters anymore. Silly voters are hung up on things like high interest rates, the cost of food and gas, soaring crime, rising homelessness, streets of filth and decay, and the world at war. Prominent Dems are even admitting that there's a crisis at the border now, which exposes their poor judgement of the past two elections. So what's the one thing that clearly unites Dems? Division. They know that they can whip their dolt horde into a frenzy any time they want with the help of some selective editing and a carefully cultivated (fake) backstory. The G Floyd story was a classic example: a Dem AG holds back bodycam footage that is highly exculpatory (shows the victim fighting with police and saying that he couldn't breathe while he was still walking, or in the cop car by himself), a heartwarming story about a new Gentle Giant fills the airwaves, and suddenly anyone with any pertinent information to share is in danger of being cancelled as a racist monster. Months of rioting ensue. Kamala's heart soars past Cloud Nine. Most importantly, the Dems' media outlets can hail them as champions of the little guys again. YAY! So what if a few cops are ambushed and killed, thousands more are assaulted, and there's a couple billion dollars worth of damage to people's businesses and homes... It's no big deal. Knowing that it's gonna happen is easy. It's their go-to. But if we, as conservatives, want to combat their false narratives, we probably need to have at least some idea of what their narrative is actually gonna be and when it's gonna happen. When is easy: in the summer when it's hot and miserable, American cities gagging on the smell of feces, the days are long and the nights are warm so kids want to be out, and there are brown outs so people have no AC. Eventually someone will be shot, and someone will catch it on video who will sell it to BLM, BLM will edit it to make the cops look bad as usual, and the Dem hate/division machine will be back in business. All they need is for the AG to be a Dem so that the bodycam footage can't expose the truth/spoil the fun. I think they're hoping for nicely editable footage of a muslim victim. That way they can make fans of all the new pro-Palestinians, win back all the muslim voters (who only pretended to be abandoning them), and bring Al Jazeera into the fold. Where? There's a large muslim population in Minnesota, those guys have proven that they're down for rioting and violence, the police force there is already mistrusted, the leaders are malleable, the AG has already run this scam, Omar is there to be the professional crier... Is it too perfect? I'm pretty sure that the folks at CNN and MSNBC already have their story ready to go, they just need to insert the names. "Earlier today in _________, Minn, police officers shot and killed troubled teen Mohammed Al-something-ah while he was just returning from prayers at his grandmother's house. Mo was a delightful child blah blah blah. Everyone who knew him said that he was perfect. A lot of people here say the cops are racist, _% of people incarcerated in this county are _______ 😱" I don't think they'll choose NY because too many wealthy people own real estate there, and there are too many synagogues there to vandalize, which is bad for business. There can't be minority-status victims on the other side. When? The M Brown shooting occurred in early August, at the peak of summer, G Floyd was killed on May 25th. IMO Aug is too close to the election, they will want months and months of hate beforehand. Also the weather will cool off too soon and the days will get shorter... it's too close to bad rioting weather. May long weekend is when summer weather really arrives in Canada, I think the Dems are looking for a June victim. That way they can get 3 solid months in before the weather cools off. You heard it here first: June, Muslim, Officer Mustard in the study with the revolver.2 points
-
When a leftist or a minority does it, it's always ok, so whether or not it's hate speech depends on who's talking. Examples of "OK hate speech": https://www.westernstandard.news/news/trudeau-calls-the-unvaccinated-racist-and-misogynistic-extremists/article_a3bacece-2e14-5b8c-bf37-eddd672205f3.html Got it?2 points
-
It seems universities are teaching their college age children to trigger themselves over anything they or their radical professors don't like to hear. For example, when someone like Charlie Kirk or Ben Shapiro visit a left-leaning university, they are met with liberal students who are easily traumatized and readily insecure. It makes for entertaining video, but it illustrates how powerful the left has gotten with its bullshit take on "hate speech".2 points
-
2 points
-
Jan 6 is the day we almost lost our democracy. No joke, no hyperbole. We were exactly ONE person away from a constitutional crisis unlike anything the country has seen before: Mike Pence. If the Vice President had followed Trumpco's criminal scheme, had caved to the pressure and threats, had been cowed by Trump's rabid mob, howling for his death, we very well could have fallen into some state of chaos or civil war. I disagree with almost everything Pence has ever said politically, but that day he stood strong, did his duty and upheld his oath to defend the constitution. That day he was heroic. And I still continue to be shocked and appalled that Republicans want to put back in office the man who tried to overthrow our government.2 points
-
No other nation has come remotely close to delivering the amount of military aid to Ukraine as the USA. Why he did not lend or lease equipment may be that it cannot be returned or that Ukraine couldn’t be expected to repay. I don’t honestly know, but Biden has been pushing Congress continually for military aid to Ukraine and the GOP’s been putting on the brakes. I have studied International Relations. Republicans love to pretend that it’s very simple and based on “America does whatever the hell it wants and everybody does what we tell them,” but the real world doesn’t work that way. Obviously.2 points
-
You are so full of sh__ The Proud Boys were very well known as a violent white supremacist threat long before Trump told them to “Stand By.” As President, he had definitely been briefed on the groups who posed domestic terror threats, and Proud Boys and Oath Keepers were at the top of the list. Trump was telling the Proud Boys to be ready to engage in political violence. For F’s sake… have you ever seen photos of them at protests? They come dressed in bullet proof tactical vests, like armed soldiers. Here’s a photo of Enrique Tarrio. He looks like he’s dressed for combat. Because he is.2 points
-
"Calling those charged in the Jan. 6 storming of the U.S. Capitol "hostages" is a grotesque comparison, the White House said on Monday after Republican former President Donald Trump called for those jailed over the riot to be released. "It is grotesque to make those type of comparison," White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters aboard Air Force One just days after the third anniversary of Trump supporters' 2021 attack as legislators were certifying President Joe Biden's 2020 election victory." https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/jan-6-hostages-rioters/2024/01/08/id/1148736/ Not sure I'd call them hostages, but they're definitely political prisoners. The left has turned the DNC into banana lunatics who answer only to globalist dictators. I hope Trump will be up to the task of putting these cultists down - it isn't 2016 anymore and he's 8 years older. It might be time for someone like Vivek Ramaswamy to step in as leader of the free world.1 point
-
I went back a number of posts between you two and I still have no clue what you mean by 'reversing it'. I never saw AG mention reversing anything and the post you're replying to just suggests change, which I gather you are in favor of anyway. Btw, if our dollar was worth $1.05 American I don't see how an outboard motor would cost so much more here than there.1 point
-
The REALITY is that you have ZERO ACCESS TO REALITY. The SCOTUS is the only court that matters. The rest of you degenerates can go pound sand, or each other.1 point
-
Hydroxychloroquine, A Drug Trump Promoted To Treat Covid-19, Linked To 17,000 Deaths, Estimates Show Joshua CohenJan 7, 2024, A bottle of pills of hydroxychloroquine sit on a [+] AFP via Getty Images The former president, Donald Trump, repeatedly promoted the use of hydroxychloroquine in the spring of 2020, as both a preventative against and treatment for Covid-19. He did this despite the drug not having proven effectiveness or safety. According to a study published in the February 2024 issue of the peer-reviewed journal Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, the pharmaceutical has now been linked to approximately 17,000 deaths. The drug known as an anti-malarial for decades, hydroxychloroquine, was prescribed to patients by some doctors during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic “despite the absence of evidence documenting its clinical benefits.” Authors of a new study—a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials involving 44 separate cohort studies—estimate that 16,990 Covid-19 patients in the U.S., France, Belgium, Italy, Spain and Turkey died as a result of taking the drug. This translates into an 11% increase in the mortality rate among Covid-19 patients. According to researchers, the toxicity of hydroxychloroquine in patients with Covid-19 is partially due to its severe cardiac side effects. Former President Trump made it a habit in the spring of 2020 to preside over daily briefings conducted by the White House Coronavirus Task Force, where he continually embraced preventive and therapeutic use of hydroxychloroquine. Notably, the President’s advice directly contradicted guidance from the nation’s federal public health agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. There were plenty of warnings at the time from clinical researchers and senior public health officials alike, including National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci, about the unproven, experimental nature of hydroxychloroquine and the concern that it might do more harm than good. And this wasn’t the only time Trump gave unsound medical advice to the American people. You may recall when in April 2020 Trump infamously suggested that bleach or other disinfectant chemicals could be useful to combat coronavirus infections. In the spring of 2020, according to the American Association of Poison Control Centers, accidental poisonings as a consequence of people ingesting bleach or other household cleaners spiked in America, doubling from their levels a year before. This takes nothing away from the positive work of the Trump Administration during the Covid-19 pandemic, igncluding its efforts initiating Operation Warp Speed, a public-private partnership to facilitate and accelerate the development, manufacturing, and distribution of Covid-19 vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics. This program has been hugely successful, as measured by the pace at which Covid-19 vaccines and treatments were developed and launched. But Trump’s issuance of unwarranted treatment recommendations left a lot to be desired. All such governmental advice must be tightly regulated and given only by those with the requisite knowledge and expertise. This is not to say that there aren’t things that could improve at U.S. public health agencies, including messaging by medical experts. But in the end those in government disseminating messages to the public ought to be officials whose expertise isn’t in doubt. They may make mistakes, but they’re qualified practitioners of medicine or have a clinical science background. Trump did not have this. He never should have gone to the podium and addressed the American people touting unproven therapies or dangerous substances. The moral of this story is that when presidents with no medical expertise contravene public health entities, expect trouble. This is particularly the case when a president like Trump takes center stage, upstaging rigorously trained medical professionals rather than leaving all actual healthcare decisions and guidance up to them. https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshuacohen/2024/01/07/trump-promoted-hydroxychloroquine-to-treat-covid-19-a-drug-now-linked-to-17000-deaths/?sh=3108819d2fcd1 point
-
No it isn't. It's a peaceful protest gone wrong, thanks to Federal plants helping incite violence. The videos clearly show something different than what you dipshits have been clamoring about, so the notion of a Jan 6 insurrection will become nothing more than a woke fantasy in 2025.1 point
-
Trump Derangement Syndrome requires you to make a stoopid post like that, so I won't hold it against you. Your post IS incorrect, however, so we do need to address that. Post sources stating that Trump said that he "Promised to invoke the Insurrection Act on day one to crack the heads of anyone who protests against him". We'll also concentrate on the word "him" as you're clearly trying to depict him as a dictator.1 point
-
Can Biden lead the free world at the time of existential challenge? It depends on some key variables. Will there be stairs involved?1 point
-
Enrique Tarrio was convicted of seditious conspiracy and sentenced to 22 years in prison. You can go read the court papers if you want. Trump is obviously a Putin stooge. That’s why Trump is happy to hand Ukraine over to Putin.1 point
-
You’re talking so you must be lying: ”Education. Democrats lead by 22 points (57%-35%) in leaned party identification among adults with post-graduate degrees. The Democrats’ edge is narrower among those with college degrees or some post-graduate experience (49%-42%), and those with less education (47%-39%). Across all educational categories, women are more likely than men to affiliate with the Democratic Party or lean Democratic. The Democrats’ advantage is 35 points (64%-29%) among women with post-graduate degrees, but only eight points (50%-42%) among post-grad men” https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2015/04/07/a-deep-dive-into-party-affiliation/1 point
-
1 point
-
I think the serious defacing and fire starting will begin the next Summer when Trump is back in the WH. We may have to establish a violence response group that can keep these criminal thugs from setting our neighborhoods on fire.1 point
-
Sorry, I meant to refer to the US law, but really I’m interested in people’s opinions. After all, the decision to permit hate speech in America has been legislated from the bench, not by law.1 point
-
I'm so sorry - i totally forgot about his degree from the Community College of Facebook. And here i was treating him like an uneducated plebeian. When i SHOULD Have been treating him like a mis-educated one1 point
-
Example: There was a ridiculous conspiracy theory that Barack Obama’s single, unemployed mother, for no reason whatsoever, bought an international plane ticket, flew to a secret foreign nation, had her baby, flew back to Hawaii and obtained falsified witnesses and documents to cover it all up… for no apparent reason. Pretty stupid. But this lunacy continued, so the Secretary of State of Hawaii personally inspected the certificate. The lunatics continued, so Obama produced his long form birth certificate. So… yes, government officials do sometimes respond to ridiculous conspiracy theories.1 point
-
So you have a conspiracy theory that it's a conspiracy to appease conspiracy theorists. I see. Oh what a tangled web we weave.....1 point
-
absolutely. It's not a crime if it's for trump! That's part of the oath now - we pledge to uphold and defend the laws of the united states of america and the constitution, unless it's trump. Eff that guy." Honestly - i'm surprised at the level of hypocrisy. I mean, we all can be sometimes guilty of cutting a little slack when it's someone we like, or hate as the case may be. Like how we tend to believe biden is guilty of serious crimes with fairly limited evidence and such. But this was beyond the pale. Like - this was out and out blatant PROVEN false accuasations, deliberate attempts at fraudulently attacking the man, ACTUAL TRANSCRIPTS of them discussing how they'll do whatever it takes to get rid of him, and they are ABSOLUTELY FINE with it. A super powerful gov't police force actively interfering with a president unlawfully - But jan 6 was the day democracy almost fell to a small unarmed group of protesters. yeash.1 point
-
I doubt that they will this year. Doing so will only hammer home the fact that in 4 years biden has done nothing to address their issues and keep their voters at home. And how can you sell your message that trump will be divisive and destabilizing if cities are burning under your watch? No - i think they'll be quiet this year if the dems have anything to say about it But if trump wins...... Plan for 2025 to be one spicey year1 point
-
Funny you should use those words when your whole post is exactly that.1 point
-
Well we do put lipstick on it.1 point
-
In the mind of the dems and their supporters..... that IS bashing them!!!1 point
-
Work implies that the effort in doing it produces tangible results. Trudeau's carbon emitting boondoggles around the world have produced nothing. Except for maybe a few lots of chuckles behind his back. Edit:-Sorry CdnFox didn't see your post saying the same.1 point
-
Democrats are like the aliens from Mars attacks who kept on saying "we come in peace" while killing people. Democrat politicians do the same thing, they talk about freedom, liberty and democracy all the while they working hard to remove people from ballots, shut down primaries and arresting their political opponents.1 point
-
So are you saying that ALL the other states didn't follow the law when they said no to removing Trump from the ballot. She based her decision on ONE states decision and who is to say what Trump did was an insurrection. I don't see anyone being charged with insurrection inside or outside of Trumps inner circle. Democrats are gaslighting everyone into thinking a simple riot was an "insurrection" that is why they treat Jan 6th like a holiday, the day we almost lost our Democracy and some grand conspiracy. When all it was is simple mob mentality and things getting out of control. Democrats have been violently rioting for years attacking everything from federal buildings, police stations and various retail and food service establishment prior but this was a line that couldn't be crossed.1 point
-
Nope, but I do know the SCOTUS will burn that b*tch and her hubris to the ground. I'm looking forward to that, and I hope you are too.1 point
-
1 point
-
The main issue is not terrorosm or housingg, health or education though they are important issues too. Neither of you speak of real issue. The real issue is that we are bringing in people of incompativle culture to that of Canada. Among these people would be those who are women haters, hating Jews and Christians, wanting to close bars and ban alcohol and impose their subhuman violent beliefs whixh lashes women for refusing to wear the f*cking hijab. Death and destruction to the religion and those f*cking clergy which allows or orders or encourages lashing womem, https://www.timesofisrael.com/woman-in-iran-receives-74-lashings-for-not-covering-hair-violating-public-morals/1 point
-
Of course, because you’re a conspiracy theorist. Your whole schtick is to put together “This COULD have POSSIBLY happened… therefore, THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED.” You live in a world of make believe and fantasy. “Fifty secret agents could have infiltrated Riker’s prison and they could have killed him and they could have left without a trace,” but just because that could have happened, it doesn’t mean it happened. Or, as former President Shlthead would say, “A lot of people are saying that Epstein was murdered,” but a lot of people saying something doesn’t make it true. You make stuff up and lie.1 point
-
Biden is supplying weapons to Ukraine. Trump would engineer Ukraine’s surrender. So the difference here is night and day.1 point
-
Here’s your problem: You think everything is politics. There is LAW. It’s written. It must be obeyed. Donald Trump is a sack of shlt. Born with all the money in the world, he he spent his entire life being disgusting — cheated on all four of his wives, engaged in non-stop business fraud, and believes that laws don’t apply to him. As in, literally filing a motion with the Supreme Court stating that he is exempt from criminal laws. So now all the Trump fools think there’s no such thing as law, there’s just whatever Donald says. But it doesn’t work that way. There’s the US Constitution, and there is Maine state law, and there is the court system. Maine has different laws; their law says that if someone challenges somebody’s eligibility to be on a ballot, it’s the Secretary of State who MUST decide. So she heard both sides, read the U.S. Constitution, saw that the little tub of shlt threw his rebellion and failed, so then she did her job, like she was supposed to. Now her decision goes to court, which the little tub of shlt is allowed to do, and we’ll see what his friends on the Supreme Court say. Most likely, they’ll agree that insurrection is just dandy if you’re one of their friends.1 point
-
Its amazing she took the ONLY state that ruled to remove Trump from the ballot, while every other challenge has been shot down to remove him from the ballot. I will be willing to bet she wants to run for higher office and this was a good way to get her name in the news.1 point
-
this is going to be a real problem for the SCOTUS they have to rule on the 14th but then it gets them into a predicament, they have to look at article 2 where it says the state legislatures have the duty to appoint the delegates to the EC in any manner they may see fit. now when it comes to article 2 of the Constitution the SCOTUS will have to decide are primaries part of the system to choose delegates to the EC or not. IF they are then it is up to the state legislature to say how they will be run those primaries and who can run. under Article 2 state legislatures don't even need to hold elections they can just appoint who ever they want and tell them who to vote for at the EC. of course IF they did this I am sure the people of their state would be really mad and they would not have a job for too long GOD BLESS AMERICA1 point
-
I have to ask why can't Trumpers / MAGA people can't see what Trump is doing. Trump does lie a lot that is a fact. do they think he is lying when he says he wants to be a dictator for a day? They cheer that and IF he does get reelected he will try to go for it, then he will shut down the MSM all except for FOX and he will have one of his most faithful goons run that so they don't say anything against him. and he will lock up everybody he thinks is against him including some of his MAGA followers. then seeing he has suspended the Constitution he will then declare himself President for life like his buddy Putin. and after he does that he will go back to his low IQ followers and say see I was only a dictator for a day like I said I would and they will cheer and say see he didn't lie Trump isn't a dictator like we said he wouldn't be , Trump is President for life. it will be the end of the USA as we know it. GOD BLESS AMERICA1 point
-
Well here we are. One week into 2024. Tree and decorations are down. The SCOTUS will deal with Colorado's election nonsense a month from now. Anyone wanna guess at the outcome? Gaza is now a pile of rubble. Ukraine has lost 20% of its land and is out of men, money and time. BRICS continues its erosion of the USD, and it's been downgraded. Trump still leads in US election polling while Biden gives his first campaign speech to openly display his extreme TDS. The US border is still wide open and Mayorkis is being impeached. Biden also faces impeachment while his son is being dragged through the coals. Here in Canuckland, the political opposition makes our PM look stupid on a daily basis. The weakness and stupidity of western leaders is inviting other nations to fill the vacuum of power. Gas prices are rising again, which will drive inflation up too. All in all...the Libbies should be proud of themselves. They have driven destruction of the western world to the breaking point. One of our fine Libbies has admitted to having illegals working for him. Slavery is returning to the USA. 2024 is going to be very interesting. I wonder if the tampoon machines in the mens' washroom will survive...1 point
-
Oh look, when faced with a fact a leftie goes into 'whataboutism' mode. I'm shocked. Are you shocked? I'm shocked. And the fbi actually were charged and convicted for what they were accused of doing, sooooooo1 point
-
If the result of the Jan 6 violence would be that Trump remained President, would that mean the U.S. government had been “overthrown”?1 point
-
You can join in, just bring some caviar and champagne. All those carrying large doses of TDS will be turned away at the door. Also new crystal balls will be provided to replace those tarnished by TDS induced drivel, along with instructions on how to emulate the Biden hair sniff.1 point
-
BIDEN WOULD NEVER EVER NEVER CUT BACK TRUMPS RULES OR OPEN THE BORDER!!!!!! HE WOULD NEVER DO THAT!!!!! DUUUUUUUHHAHHAHAAHAUUUUHHH!!!!! "yes he did, right here specifically". YOU"RE DAMN RIGHT HE DID, BECAUSE TRUMPS RULES WERE CRAP AND WE NEEEEDED TO OPEN THE BORDER MORE!!! DUH DUH DUH DUH!! ..... DUH! (run and hides). I mean - he doesn't even miss a beat1 point
-
You have to treat others the same way you want to be treated1 point
-
It was her job to rule on the objection. She held a hearing and she ruled. The ruling is subject to appeal. She said she will abide by whatever the final appeal determines. Nothing wrong with that. Basically, this issue will head to the US Supreme Court, they are heavily biased towards Trump. Whether she ruled for or against Trump is irrelevant; the issue is going to the US Supreme Court either way, so don’t get your panties all twisted up over her ruling.1 point
-
That's what the forum is all about. If you don't like it, don't spend your time here complaining about it.1 point
-
Steven Guilbeault . . . . treacherous!1 point
-
Future Liberal voters maybe. Trying to appease Trudeau's globalist masters along with the WEF. Suckholing to the UN. Probably all three.1 point
-
Ya, you ignore all the measurements and data compiled by NASA satellites over decades and the scientists on the ground actually measuring rates of glacier melt and latch on to political hacks and snake oil salesmen with no scientific credentials like Marano. You never question their motives and sources because they are telling you exactly what you want to hear. Talk about gullible, you set new standards.1 point
