Leaderboard

Nice. Trying to think of some good ones here. Omicron is hard to beat. They picked it well. How about variant 666, Wormwood, Golgotha, Pluto, Leviathon

I know and some are among the elderly, and good old boys too. The dumber you are, the more scared you are, and vice versa.

That may not be your last normal, by any measure as the things are going. Let's wait for the year five, variant omega-epsilon-omicron-175 and keep the spirits up!

I can tell you MY Ancestors did SQUAT to natives living hundreds of years ago. You DO realize though that European history is all about wave after waves of groups coming in and displacing those before them? I do blame him for trying to criminalize the criticism of Islam. And for running a 300 billion deficit. But its just what the left does. The only going for him is his smoking hot wife.

Were you ever confused about what was between your legs? I sure wasn't. The hormones that define your sexuality are pretty effective, especially once puberty hits. The most confused people are those who are told that what's between their legs defines attraction, when they actually feel very differently. Some people are actually born intersex - that is with evidence of both male and female genitalia so clearly there is more going on that 'boy or girl and nothing else'. When these people hit adolescence, their hormones (usually) tell them who they find attractive - males or females. This has presented serious problems for boys who were deemed girls at birth because their gender was not clearly defined by their genitalia and and girls are easier to make than boys. Homosexual behavior has been observed in animals.

I meant for the OP to be about parliament, not religion. Blackbird and I have talked privately and I will respect his views. For me, the refreshing aspect of the story is that Parliament worked. All parties worked together. It also put any question of Mr. O'Toole's leadership to rest. You don't get it. It doesn't matter what you tell your son. He will be either gay or straight and nothing will change his preference. If he was born straight, he will always be attracted to girls. If he was born gay, he will always be attracted to men. Your job is to show him support and make certain he knows he is loved by his parents for who he is. Yzermandius, are you willing to undergo conversion therapy to become gay?

So....if I tell my son he is indeed a boy and that the reason he might feel attraction to the same sex is normal teenage confusion ..... I can be hauled into a court?

It is backwards. We are injecting first, doing safety studies later. The cost-benefit analysis for children is non-existent; it is 1 to 2 lives per 1,000,000 assuming the vaccine is safe. But the vaccine isn’t safe. It has already killed at least one child who died after getting myocarditis already and that story was censored by social media. More importantly, the chance of permanent disability is quite high. Consider the case of 12-year old Maddie de Garay who is now permanently paralyzed, cannot walk and must eat via a feeding tube. She was part of the Pfizer clinical trial for 12-15 year olds which reported her result as “abdominal pain.” This trial had only 2,200 participants. This suggests that the rate of disability even for kids could be as high as 1 in 2,000. We don’t know since another trial wasn’t done. So that means the vaccine has the potential to disable 500 previously healthy kids for every life saved. Is it worth it, especially when safer alternatives are available? Shouldn’t we do a larger trial to find out the true number before we do a mass rollout to kids? Of course we should. But we aren’t. We are doing everything backwards, experimenting first, and looking at the data after the experiment. This is the biggest unregulated unaccountable medical experiment in the history of mankind. Censorship keeps these events from public view. Facebook has removed groups of over 200,000 people discussing vaccine side effects. If the vaccine was safe, that group would have nothing to talk about and there would be no reason to remove it. Vaccines that kill less than 25 people are pulled from the market. These have not been, after killing far more people than 25. Why not? For children - 4 deaths is the threshold for banning a vaccine. It is now well established in the peer reviewed literature that the spike protein is toxic. The vaccines cause the spike protein to be manufactured for up to 48 hours in all parts of the body including the brain thanks to the efficient delivery mechanism of the lipid nanoparticles and PEG. The spike proteins produced in these cells do not remain anchored as designed; they also break off the cell and become “free spike” which is even more dangerous since it can circulate in the blood. The net result is inflammation and micro-clotting inside all organs (including the brain) throughout the body as well as temporary opening of the blood brain barrier (which explains the severe migraine headaches). This explains the wide range of neurological symptoms after injection. The mechanism of action is confirmed by the adverse event reports. The VAERS database shows that over 6,000 people have possible vaccine-related deaths as well as over 300,000 SARs that are consistent with the mechanism of action. If we remove 500 “background deaths” in the VAERS system each year, we are left with over 5,500 “excess deaths” that are coincident with the vaccine rollout. The safety signals have been flashing “red” since January in VAERS, but nobody was paying attention (except for a few users on Twitter who were being ignored). This is a HUGE number of excess deaths and SARs. So the question for the CDC is “OK, if the vaccine did not kill these people, then what did?” The FDA knew that the biodistribution data on these vaccines would deliver the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs which contain the mRNA) to all parts of the body. But since they thought the spike protein was harmless, this wasn’t a cause for concern. Now that assumption was proven wrong, it should have sent alarm bells ringing. The drug companies should have been required to immediately do toxicology studies in NHPs and the amount of bound spike and free spike should have been measured. Of course, nothing of the sort ever happened because the FDA and CDC are all focused on reducing vaccine hesitancy, not safety. This is the scientist who invented the mRNA vax: C19 VAX REACTIONS - Home This UK paper shows that vaxxed people are 2.2X MORE likely to die of one of the variants. SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation (publishing.service.gov.uk) That’s right… getting vaccinated actually increases your chances of dying from COVID if you get it. The perfect way to combat vaccine hesitancy is to allow a debate between the 2 camps of scientists - the ones paid off by Big Pharma and the ones who are unbiased and still doing the safety studies. But the bought off docs and scientists refuse, in spite of many invitations to openly discuss these things.

It's convenient to blame Trudeau for the restrictions we may see for Omicron. This is global. Countries are finding this variant all over the world. If this is a conspiracy and not a global pandemic that will take 2 or 3 years to ultimately beat (like the one in 1920) Governments of all political stripes are in on it. Conservatives in the UK, Liberals in Canada, Liberals and Conservatives in the US (Who fast-tracked the vaccine trials, Trump right? He also got infected and was hospitalized). The Commonwealth Oceania nations have bought in hard on dealing with COVID. I was actually hopeful we could be done with this by Q2 next year. That's still possible, but only if people don't reject all Public Health advice as a global plot to control humanity. And if you really do believe that, the game's over anyway. They've already won.

This is a great day for the Devil and the forces of darkness who are enslaved in the liberal ideology of decadence and immorality. I am sure the Devil and his minions are dancing a victory dance in what appears to be another successful attack against Christianity and western traditional civilization. "But the ominous — and for faithful Christians utterly unacceptable — aspect of the attempt to ban “conversion therapy” is the expansion of its meaning to cover any expressed opposition to homosexuality or transgenderism. While highlighting this is the focus of this article, it should nevertheless be added that voluntary therapy to overcome homosexuality or transgenderism — alternatively called “reparative therapy” or “sexual orientation change efforts” (SOCE) — indeed should not be illegal, even for (or maybe especially for) minors. To prohibit it violates the freedom of speech of both therapist and client, and also violates religious freedom if the objective of therapy is obedience to religious precepts against homosexuality or transgenderism." "What CI (Christian Institute) emphasizes is that the proposed legislation in Great Britain “would criminalize the ordinary work of churches.” Only a small part of what Evangelical or other traditional Christian churches do actually addresses homosexuality or transgenderism, but where it does, holding inclinations and actions Scripture clearly says are sinful to be sinful, and urging repentance would be illegal conversion therapy under certain legislative proposals, and subject to severe penalties. Simon Calvert of the Christian Institute observes that while the government’s current proposal does not say precisely what “conversion therapy” covers, the LGBT activists who chose the term “conversion therapy” are clear that it must include “prayer, preaching and pastoral counseling.” Indeed, all religious activities involving turning people from LGBT inclinations and behavior, including exorcism, and perhaps parental instruction, would be illegal. It amounts to a loss of state neutrality, with the state mandating theology supportive of homosexuality and transgenderism. This writer would add that the term “conversion” in “conversion therapy” may have been carefully chosen. Just as it is being expanded from meaning professional counseling to overcome homosexuality to religious teaching against homosexuality, so it can be expanded from sex to religion. That is to say, exhorting to religious conversion from one religion to another, or from no religion to a particular religion, or even from any religion to no religion, could become illegal conversion therapy. Any claim that salvation can only be found in Christ, and all other approaches to God are vain, could be criminalized as “conversion therapy.” Conversion therapy bans strike at the Gospel | Voice (christianpost.com) It is clear from this that such a law that basically silences churches, ministers, and believers is an attack on freedom of religion which is guaranteed in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This is the direction the world is heading. It is to create a liberal free for all of immorality and depravity with no contrary voices allowed. "1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, {false…: or, one who foments strife} 4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; 5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away." 2 Timothy 3:1-5 KJV We are in the last days, as prophesied long ago, in which the world is self-destructing and becoming more evil. Many people (the woke, liberals, or progressives) think we are becoming more enlightened, but to anyone with an ounce of insight into the truth, the opposite is true.

Andromeda.

I'm actually surprised Germany will be locking their unvaccinated population and not putting them in the gas chambers.?

Answer: Yes small (l) liberals and other progressive do believe in a money tree. The fact is there is a limit which was demonstrated by economists like Laffer to what a government can squeeze out of its tax base. Progressives seem to think there is this mountain of money to be tapped. That's why they are not alarmed at ever increasing debt levels. Those who are not progressive on the other hand I think have just thrown in the towel. After clown shoes ran a 300 billion deficit it was pretty much game over as far as reigning in debt. Tax reform instituted by the Harding administration started a major growth phase in the US economy coming out of the First World War. The Roaring Twenties. Right now tax cuts for the lower and middle brackets is also so low that there really is no more room for movement. I like a tax cut like anyone, but there is little benefit to the economy cutting much lower than 15%. That just demonstrates there is a down size limit to cutting taxes as per the Laffer curve.

Yes I was giving our authorities the benefit of the doubt for quite some time and not getting worked up. But this has gone on long enough. Already it is affecting our personal lives. My wife's employer told her she is not allowed to throw a Christmas party for our teenagers in our home inviting 16 of their friends. Just so orwellian.

I do. Sent the plans to the new Minister of Environment already with copies to the BC premier and Trudeau. The ball is with them now. But you have to think carefully about your own impacts on the environment and what you personally can do and contribute. Shifting the blame elsewhere will not fix it.

And yet some how Suzuki is a hero to you, he has multiple homes, none of his home have green tech built in, all of which are heated by fossil fuels....he constantly travels and not on a bike or by walking but by plane, train and automobile. he also owns a boat with is not towed by a fleet of dolphins but powered by fossil fuels he has made millions off of people just like you.... while he lives the life of Ryan... i think he is doing a great job setting the example for the rest of us...

Hey...we're building a 1000 year Reich, here. Don't stand in the way of progress...antivaxxers.

Now they just need to ban transitioning hormone therapy for children.

Clinton was a frequent visitor, and his itinerary as a past prez was a matter of public record. It would literally be impossible to keep his name out of it. It's even beneficial for the Dems to throw him under the bus now (like they did with Al Franken) to give their younger generation more credibility because Bill and Hillary are done like dinner anyways. They don't have enough political capital left to run for co-Mayors of Podunk. It seems as though Trump banned Epstein from Mar A Lago at the beginning of the century but people on this site try to make it seem as though Epstein and Trump were the closest of friends until JE died. Beaverfever was using links from 1999 and 2001 to make his case, and I know that he's getting his fake stories and misleading ammo from some alt-left source with a lot of reach. For sure implicating Trump would be Ghislaine's shining star, and she can do it with no more than a weak rumour (like Dr Ford did to Kavanaugh) but I'm thinking that there will be a lot of smaller players than Trump & Clinton named. The second feather in Ghislaine's cap will be making it look like it's a largely Republican scandal, even though Epstein was a major Demmie donor. The left wing media loves to target Gov's Abbot and DeSantis, Sen Cruz, congressmen Jordan and Gaetz, etc. Ghislaine just has to drop their names innocuously and it will be enough for the left wing media to whip their stooges into a Bork/Kavanaugh - type frenzy. If Ghislaine can use this trial to start a GOP witch hunt that helps to lessen the mid-term massacre in 2022, I can promise you that she'll get a sweetheart deal. Maybe even the highest honour of all in leftist circles - victim status ? Dems/FBI: "You make Epstein, Trump, white privilege and the GOP look like the villains here, we will let you play the victim like Jussie Smollett." You know it's true. That's how the game is played now in DC.

I want to make this claim, sexual assault and harassment are not JUST a military cultural problem, But rather a Western cultural one, it effects every Canadian in every job description. Justin government and the media has pushed this detail that everyone in the military is nothing more than some horny perv that needs to be reeled in some how and the best people to do that are the people that know nothing of military culture.... Everyone is thinking this is taught or even suggested to be OK within the military , it is not... They arrive with this preconceived notion well before joining the military....the military has even gone as far to put military laws and restrictions on any of this behavior yes it has not been 100 % effective, but there is laws and policies on the books. Had justins behavior with that reporter back in the day been done in the military or any other government department he would be on the unemployment line today. Some of the problem is the definition of sexual assault, it could be considered as simple as someone calling you a sexualized word, and that person takes offense to it, or on the other side of the spectrum it could mean rape. Once this is worked out i'm sure the case count is going to go down... . There also needs to be the same type of punishment if the allegations prove to be false, using it as a tool for revenge needs to stopped as well. The military justice system needs to be totally revamped, we don't have trained law Judges to give out sentences but rather other senior soldiers guided by books and experience...It was designed to look after very minor offences, such as being late to work or rolling your eyes when being spoken to, and in war time very serious ones like being a coward or being a traitor, or refusal of an order under enemy fire, all of which could have resulted in the accused death some on the spot without any proceedings or in front of a court of military men. In WWI military police men used to be called meat heads, anyone refusing to go over the top would be shot on sight in the back of the head, don't worry in the 1990's the military took out the death sentences off their books. the US model comes to mind, where a military court can sentence to a maximum of life in a military prison, military prison makes civil prison look like daycare. Not to many repeat offenders in military prison , In Canadian military justice system the normal max is 2 years less a day, there has been exception to that rule where a soldier who murder another soldiers child was sentence to 5 years less a day, then would be tried for murder in a civilian court. After he had served his military sentence of 5 years first... he almost never made it to trail, as there was many attempts to take his life by other soldiers... Some of this inequality or indifference comes from having 2 different standards for men and women for the same job, it creates a riff between the 2, another riff is the recruitment process is now geared towards finding women or people other than white, and part of the same riff is promoting them over more qualified people because they need more women or racial people in the upper ranks as well, all because some politician has a white board and his graphs do not match his opinion on what our military should look like, another reason to have a riff...this behavior has lead to this inequality in the ranks, political interference... and they know nothing about the military or how it works......Recruiting by quota has never been a good practice...this entire process has never produced good results. To fix that you have one standard for everyone, set by job description if you make the standard then fine you qualify to be an infanteer, or arty, or armor corps, pilot, etc...with no restrictions to either sex, much like the Special forces do, if you can meet standards then your given a chance to try the training...male or female does not matter...having forced civilian equal rights in the military is great in peace time but on the battle field it is not, everyone is a target and everyone is killed regardless of sex, race, or age, no questions asked. This means if you qualified to do that job there , your entitled to be there... men and women in the same units has already happened in the CAF, it has been like that for over 20 years now, female infantry soldiers are some what common today...Those that don't live up to the standards are normal forced out men or women...Those that are still there today have earned that right by doing the job as good or better than men... Not sure what you meant by the military encouraging sexual abuse though it's chain of command, that simply is not true, does it happen yes, it does some men/ women will take advantage of it , same as any other job in the civilian world. Those that do normally don't go very far... I think inclusivity has a different meaning, meaning the military wants to include everyone, the LGBT groups, or any of the million different genders, it has for years paid for this surgeries to become man or women, and they just announced a new dress policy for all soldiers, men are now allowed to have man buns, wear make up, and wear female jewelry when they want...this lets you know what inclusivity really means... I don't agree with these new policies for many reasons, i think it is one more riff to encourage this behavior... Besides all of this is a major distraction to keep the people occupied here so they are not looking at what is happening over there. Canadians don't really care about what happens in the military or we would not be in the condition we find ourselves in...most don't even know what the military does, or what equipment they have or don't have...So why would Canadians get upset that there is 19,000 sexual assault cases in the military.. because that is what the media is selling right now...do we care how many are in the RCMP, coast Guard, or any other government department, no one gave a shit about Justins assault case...

Very true. It’s more identity politics. Not every job can be done with equal effectiveness by both genders. On the whole, for example, females have more strength in medical care-giving roles than men and men have more strength in combat military roles than women. Does that mean that no men make great nurses and no women make great front-line soldiers? Of course not, but we have to stop pretending that men and women have the same kinds of bodies and strengths. Yes Israel has mandatory military service for both women and men. They’re a small country that needs all the soldiers they can get to defend themselves. However, unless it was her lifelong dream, I’d be very concerned if my daughter wanted to fight in a combat role. The idea that she could be deployed in an extremely dangerous situation with other soldiers who have much greater physical strength than her and who might be struggling with PTSD and loneliness, just seems like a recipe for disaster, especially considering the physical strength that an all-male opposing army would have against her in hand-to-hand combat. The stories of militaries raping and pillaging in invaded territories throughout history are real. The other problem is that the military rules are harsh by civilian standards. They’re not exactly family friendly. I realize that the typical liberal take is to pretend that all of these considerations should be ignored, even if it means watering down basic and other training so that everyone gets a participation ribbon, but I don’t care about having a military where everyone gets a turn to play. I want a military that can destroy the enemy. Perhaps we could have all-female units for those females who want to fight, but I’d be making damn sure on their fighting day that backup resources are there in case the unit is over-powered. Well doesn’t that defeat the purpose of a military? Soldiers are there to protect civilians, not to be protected. Too much time and energy in the military is now going to making people who probably never should’ve joined the military feel included. I’m sure harassment, sexual and otherwise, does take place in the military and needs to be weeded out, but the current strategy of constantly firing people for not doing enough or being part of the problem clearly isn’t working when some of our best soldiers are losing their jobs and being replaced by people who may appear more inclusive but may simply not be as effective soldiers. Once again merit is subjugated to a twisted kind of representation at all costs.

David Suzuki is in fact very wealthy. A few years ago I checked what his reported net worth was and at that time it said $24,000,000 US. There is a lot of money to be made by these climate change alarmists. (Ezra Levant also stated that Suzuki owns at least four homes. A lot of consumption for one environmentalist. )

David Suzuki is a farce . . . . an un-funny farce. Thanks to the CBC, this so called expert is the go-to guy on everything from fruit flies to farts. In actuality, he's a dangerous inciter and enough shallow thinking people will and can carry out his predictions.