Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/30/2020 in Posts
-
I didn't read the whole list but all of those things are several orders of magnitude below Trudeau's laundry list of actual scandals. Things Trudeau did that weren't even considered 'scandals' because no laws were actually broken are: ceasing the fight against isis, denying that islamic state was committing genocide, allowing terrorists to come back to Canada and re-branding them as 'fighters', intentionally spreading covid in our country (let's face it, anyone knows better than to leave the flights open from a pandemic zone - even the gov't of China restricted travel from Wuhan to the rest of their country), telling Canadians that our budget would eventually balance but racking up debts of $10B or more every year, giving away billions while telling our vets to kiss his ass, constantly denigrating Canadians and creating culture where it's ok to discriminate against police, 'white folk' and Jews, covering up for muslim terrorists attacks in Canada (the Danforth shooter was an 'incel' lol), attacking Canadian gun owners by using events which had nothing to do with our gun laws, etc.4 points
-
The problem is that anyone comparing Harper's government with what we see happening in the liberal camp these days do not think, NB. It is all about feelings with those types. Logic and facts have no place in their twisted ideology.3 points
-
Pierre Trudeau was worth about 20 million when he died. He didn't do it for the money. His wife? She loves the limelight. His son? ===== To their credit, Lester Pearson, Brian Mulroney, Stephen Harper, Pierre Trudeau managed to keep a federal state together without a civil war. Justin Trudeau has made Canada into a third world country: the family name.3 points
-
On another note . . . . . Stephen Harper acted like a Prime Minister. He had the bearing, the education, the intelligence to speak with depth and clarity, knew how to dress and shave . . . . the list is long. What we have now is an uneducated, unqualified, inept little boy . . . despised by world leaders, seen as a joke and a fool where ever he goes, and an embarrassment to Canada. Not too proud to be a Canadian at the moment . . . .3 points
-
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/highly-unethical-someone-paid-nearly-200-people-to-promote-positive-we-charity-stories-on-google/ar-BB17mNa4?li=AAggNb9 Everyone has to admit that the Keilburger brothers are pretty slick no matter what side you're on. These guys have also clearly picked up some bad acting skills somewhere along the way. I wonder who they learned that from?1 point
-
All these people are assholes. Anyone marching around acting like he's on patrol in 'Nam needs some therapy. One of these days someone is going to make a mistake, and given these people are, as I said, insecure/poorly adjusted assholes, that's likely to cause a lot of damage. They are a product, all of them, of a media which thrills to violence and confrontation, and which seems to be doing everything in its power to cheer it on, and some crappy, stupid, self-centered politicians at all levels who care about nothing and no one but themselves. That mess in Portland was an excellent example of this. Trump sent federal agents in mostly to make himself seem like a tough, law-and order guy, instead of an incompetent degenerate. He prodded people - notably the unwashed herd of vacuous progressives in Portland - to treat them as his representatives. Of course that brought them all out baying and screeching. Then the morons from the Democratic Party joined in to urge on more violence, calling them 'gestapo' and 'secret police' and 'stormtrooopers' and saying the were 'occupying Portland' and violating the constitution. Everyone from the moron who's mayor of Portland, to the shrill, stupid governor of Oregon, to Nancy "they're stormtroopers!" Pelosi did their very best to provoke violence in hopes of profiting from it politically. Scores of federal agents have been hurt in the nightly melees outside that court house while the media and Democrats gasped in horror at the thought of "unmarked cars" as if every police department in America didn't have masses of unmarked cars and agents and police in plainclothes. The media and the politicians on both sides disgust me.1 point
-
Why on Earth haven't 3 percenters been dispatched to liberate America from the recklessness of so many fraud friendly states? Of course if the jackboot of authoritarianism were on the other foot they'd be dispatched to liberate the one's using fraud as an excuse to fear an election.1 point
-
I read enough of the list to know that my time was being wasted. If there were some serious issues on there I'd keep reading but you were busy comparing apples to orangutans. You're right, maybe Trudeau/Tam didn't know that they were actively spreading the virus. Maybe I just knew that knew that they were releasing the formula for spreading the virus, instead of fighting it, because I'm brilliant and I usually know more about the spread of viruses than Canada's top virologists and epidemiologists. Thanks for that ego-boost marcus, but I didn't really need it. If you put something like the We scandal into Harper's list, where Harper's mom got her hands on almost $500K via one intermediary [a dubious 'charity'], it would literally stick out like an RPG in a sour cream bagel. So would SNC Lavalin. So would Adm Norman. So would unleashing islamic-state-trained war criminals into our society. I'll admit the Aga Khan scandal wasn't that big of a deal, but the fact that he spent Christmas on the Aga Khan's private island instead of in Canada set off some alarm bells imo. He's supposed to be a catholic.1 point
-
A Liberal MP wrote a letter, critical of the PMO over this WE. Who was that? I didn't get the name! Hopefully, this will encourage other Liberal MPs to speak out. A coup might be breaking out!1 point
-
This is a good example of why all those people who voted LIBERAL, need to hold on to hope that their decision to vote for Justin and his lying liberals was the right decision .... nobody likes to be wrong....Your right most people that voted are hypocrites....So are we even now, is that it... ....does that wash away everything the liberals have done or not done now and into future.... and the excuse is now , it's expected this is what politics looks like now..., so Justin do your worse it means nothing to voters, in fact the worse it gets the more they will stick up for you... This is not the golden opportunity for the conservatives, this is one of many, and it just keeps coming...Liberals know that the conservative party right now could not find their ass with 10 arms....this entire period has been the liberals golden hour....lets not stop there the NDP, Greens don't have strong leadership to attract any of the left.......Canadians are been programed to think anything right of center is poison , that and they're really afraid the taps will be shut off and no more free Justin tidbits to put in our pockets... This country is divided on so many levels it's actually funney and the liberals can't see that...nor do they care as long as the funds keep pouring into their pockets... If you can honestly sit there and say Canada as a nation is better off under the leadership of Justin, then i say we, deserve everything Justin and his crooks gives us, but don't say we are smarter for it...because todays conservatives going forward are wingnuts because or what the cons have done in the past..... Now that is sound thinking....1 point
-
Of course the CBC tracker shows that. They were paid off by the government, Did you forget that one. Sorry but history will show ,that trudeau is the worst ever. And that I will bet on.1 point
-
I agree, but we will see how he responds this afternoon.. new drinking game this afternoon, take a shot everytime Trudeau says: I’m so sorry Competent Civil Service To my knowledge Cabinet confidentiality It was her responsibility Harper Not to mention that Liberal Finance Committee Chair Wayne Easter broke the rules by shutting down a meeting earlier Monday without holding a vote. "The committee Chair cannot adjourn the meeting without the consent of a majority of the members," says House procedure and practice, 2nd edition1 point
-
How did his mother get so rich, I doubt Trudeau left her millions or that she got millions in a divorce settlement from Kemper (which is still her legal name)1 point
-
WE gave 250,000 to J-Lo to go to a WE Day event. Maybe WE should consider just giving money to the people they want to help, that seems a lot more efficient.1 point
-
It is hard to believe this idiot is still pretty high in the polls now but hopefully things will change when the only real opposition party selects their new leader. It is a fact,Liberal supporters are extremely tolerant of wrongdoing when it's on their side. Hypocrites. I've seen different figures,but Brian Lilley writes that Margaret Trudeau got closer to $500,000 from WE when travel expenses are included. That's an awfully large percentage of the money handed over to WE finding it's way back into the steadily growing Trudeau family fortune. https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/lilley-kielburgers-defend-but-dont-always-answer-in-we-scandal1 point
-
He just keeps playing dumb. He’s one of the forum domestic chicken hawks. Advocating, defending and excusing violence while being completely free from any risk of it. Regardless, the only group of people creating their own country was the leftists in Seattle. The ones destroying property and physically attacking people.1 point
-
So, Ottawa paid WE Charity $30-million to run student program up front, that 33 Mil up front to a company with no track record or assets . Who made that offer and who authorized that payment - and - did we get it back. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-we-charity-contract-came-into-effect-may-5-ottawa-paid-most/ Oh Boy: I think there's another 'teachable moment" coming - somebody's nose will grow https://www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/ts/politics/federal/2020/07/27/we-charity-started-work-on-justin-trudeaus-student-grant-program-weeks-before-cabinet-approval.html WE Charity started work on federal student grant program weeks before cabinet approval Liberal MPs are obstructing a Parliamentary Committee from doing its work of course, they must be hiding something.1 point
-
The massive increase of tests accounts for higher infection raw numbers. Currently America tests about 8 times that of Spain and Germany and about 14 times that of France. I notice you forgot Belgium. Second waves can still happen in areas where the previous infections were high like Italy or New York. But who was gotten is already gone or cured and immune. Why would it surprise you that it might take a little longer to resurge? As the Guardian told you resurgences are starting to happen in Europe. And there's all sorts of stats buried within stats. Positivity rate for example would not necessarily include things like false positives or negatives. Who is shown positive in increased testing would be another big one. Younger people are often asymptomatic and have a miniscule death rate yet increased testing would catch them and increase positivity rate. I believe you've already been told this and other arguments against your belief Positivity rate is the be-all, end-all of stats.1 point
-
You're a little mixed up. You're arguing the wrong post. My point you're replying to in that post went to the graphic below which you previously posted. With that you claimed trump was pushing for a separation of states from the federal fold. That would be either a mistake or a lie. You tell me which. Trump was just suggesting the states liberate themselves from the Democrat lockdown.1 point
-
Mowich, I have to agree on two points: 1) Many columnists/posters claimed that Stephen Harper was bad/dishonest. Yet, Harper (and his family) never took a cent. 2) Other than the federal Liberal Party, this particular scandal has nothing to do with Quebec. It is people in Ontario who made the pay offs, bought favours. .1 point
-
Well, Proud...........people are going to do what they want and unless you support total government oversight into every area of our lives, you will just have to realize that there will always be a certain segment of the population bent on doing harm to themselves.1 point
-
WE Charity Moved Millions To Private Kielburger Company "Massive red flag," says charity watchdog https://www.canadalandshow.com/we-charity-was-in-financial-trouble-before-covid-says-charity-watchdog/ Trudeau gov. $912M contract was with WE Charity’s recently formed real estate holding foundation “It is absolutely shocking that the government would say that they provided a grant to We Charity when in fact they provided the grant or funds to WE Charity Foundation – a shell corporation with no assets, no history, no record of charitable work.” Kate Behan, managing director with Charity Intelligence Canada, called for the public release of the original CSSG agreement between the government and the WE organization. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/newspolitics/trudeau-gov-dollar912m-contract-was-with-we-charitys-recently-formed-real-estate-holding-foundation/ar-BB17397l?li=AAggNb9 Where would all this lead, I wonder?1 point
-
The stories coming out about the WE charity keep getting more interesting. https://www.canadalandshow.com/we-charity-was-in-financial-trouble-before-covid-says-charity-watchdog/ Others have discussed how awful Trudeau is and I completely agree. Leslyn Lewis name has also come up and she seems to show a lot of potential. https://www.leslynlewis.ca/policies Quite a nice contrast with the Libranos in my opinion.1 point
-
All comrade Turdeau supporters are accomplices to corruption in Canada. The liberal party should really call themselves the Liberal Corrupt Party. and why not, They show us every day as to just how corrupt they are and they could careless about being seen as corrupt. Teflon Don comrade Turdeau will never face justice. Why? Because the ordinary Joe and Mary six pack sheeple could careless what Teflon Don and the liberal party does. And if the sheeple think that voting for the liberal conservative party will change things, well then they truly are people who live in wonderland. Harper had a golden chance to change all things liberal, and bring back real and true conservatism back to Canada but the moron did nothing. Politics is all just one big joke and a scam. Good frickin' grief is right.1 point
-
LESLYN LEWIS! They're talking about her yesterday on CBC or CTV - apparently, she's been gaining momentum! Conservatives going to her are said to be non-social conservatives who just don't want either O'Toole or McKay. She's also endorsed by pro-life groups. Conservatives, don't waste votes on anyone else. Vote for Lewis! I'm telling you - she'll have the majority if she runs for PM.1 point
-
My contempt for trudy and billy knows no bounds. Their supreme arrogance and sense of entitlement is absolutely sickening.1 point
-
Agree . . . . everyone is a 'victim'. A victim of bad personal choices, a victim of this or that. Everything that's wrong with you is someone else's fault. John A. Macdonald caused you to sit on your fat lazy ass and eat 3lbs. of Oreo cookies. Stephen Harper caused the fender to rust out on your '86 Oldsmobile Omega. Donald Trump caused you to not show up for work . . . . the list is long. Country of pussies and whimps . . . . no one's responsible for themselves.1 point
-
No our national sports are: 1-complaining about line-ups at Tim Horton's; 2-complaining about the weather; 3-complaining about taxes 4-sending obese Quebec males in speedos to parade up and down beaches in Florida. Next may I say I love you and Ah Mare Eekah. Very nice country. Many guns. Much bad beer. Very nice country. Melania me love you.1 point
-
Where do you get that idea? We can fly into the US without quarantine. My understanding is that Americans can’t fly into Canada unless for essential reasons. Business flows in both directions in equal volumes. I would worry about next winter, however. If Florida doesn’t watch the rise in cases, that will hurt traffic flowing south, and not just from Canada.1 point
-
Another reason that the border should remain closed. Expectations and compliance are different in each country. Border crossing shock is real and part of the denial/defiance dynamic.1 point
-
Sure, enforcement is an issue. Governments will concede that. But you can certainly deny service to someone who isn't wearing a mask.1 point
-
How does a mask provide any control? It's public health. You can mandate seatbelts, certain vaccines, education for children etc. If No Shoes, No Shirt, No Service is legal, then so is No Mask, No Service.1 point
-
The most powerless and smallest minority group of all is the individual. Any individual who has been assaulted deserves the same response from the justice system against the perpetrators of the crime, whatever the race or gender of either victim or perpetrator. Any ideas that do not fulfill this basic reality are fundamentally unjust, because crimes are fundamentally committed by and against individuals. The individual criminals did the crime, and the individual victims were the ones targeted. Period.1 point
-
I'm skeptical about the need for special treatment where intellectually competent adults are concerned. 1.) The needs of children shouldn't be addressed in the same context as those of adults. The differences are obvious. To conflate the two amounts to infantilizing adults based on race, gender, religion or other specific characteristics. Is this your intent? 2.) Poorer neighborhoods very likely do generate more crime and my suspicion is that they get more police attention than do wealthy neighborhoods, although my guess (just a guess) is that emergency calls might be responded to more quickly in wealthier neighborhoods than poorer ones. On the other hand, some populations in poorer communities complain that they get what they believe to be too much police attention. This is a issue on which the police sometimes simply can't win. 3.) Again, please leave the children aside as any comparison with adults is clearly problematic. As for greater risk of sexual assault faced by adult women, this is likely a function of evolutionary biology that has applied throughout history. Women, of course, are provided resources because the extent of domestic violence and sexual assault is increasingly acknowledged and understood - at least in Western societies - while there doesn't seem to be a lot of demand or pressure to allocate additional resources to address domestic violence faced by men, although I believe such violence does exist. I suspect, then, that the differential allocation is largely justifiable on the basis of demonstrable demand rather than any kind of discriminatory intent.1 point
-
I just can't get my head around how it's okay to allow a biological male who far outweighs/out muscles the female competition fair, or a level playing field; at least in boxing they would be in their own weight class. If you are born male, you much more likely to be bigger, stronger with higher bone density, still male bodies and more strength even if taking testosterone blockers. Male runners are usually faster than women Even if you testosterone levels are correct there is a definite advantage to biological males as in weight lifting, https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2018/apr/09/transgender-weightlifter-laurel-hubbards-eligibility-under-scrutiny and in cycling biological males are dominating women's competitions. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/weightlifting/2018/04/09/transgender-weightlifter-strain-laurel-hubbards-exit-may-blessing/ and Andraya Yearwood still has a bit of a moustache... https://abcnews.go.com/US/transgender-teens-outrun-track-field-competitors-critics-close/story?id=55856294 I'm not convinced that these athletes do not have an unfair advantage, testosterone or no.1 point
-
Maybe they did. Maybe a lot of them are simply responding to the popular cause du jour and adopting this new persona for attention. The first places affected by the new concept of gender identity were clinics. Vaguer diagnostic criteria, and a move to “de-medicalize” trans identities, together with wider awareness, have meant a big expansion in patient numbers. The mix of patients has changed, too. Clinics used to see few children, almost all of them pre-pubescent boys; now teenage girls are turning up in droves. The number of girls seen by GIDS, Britain’s national gender-ID service for children, has risen from 40 in 2009-10 to 1,806 in 2017-18. ... One consequence is a huge increase in the number of people who say they do not identify with their natal sex. In Britain, for example, since the GRA came into force, just 5,000 people have used its provisions. Now the government reckons that approximately 1% of the population is transgender—around 650,000 people. https://quillette.com/2018/12/04/the-new-patriarchy-how-trans-radicalism-hurts-women-children-and-trans-people-themselves/ Last week in Psychology Today, I reported on Dr. Lisa Littman’s peer-reviewed study of Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD), which had caused an uproar among activists for suggesting that in some cases, coming out as trans could be a maladaptive coping strategy for confused adolescents and young adults with other underlying issues. Dr. Littman is an Assistant Professor of the Practice at Brown University School of Public Health and is trained as a public health physician. She extensively surveyed 250 parents whose children (predominantly girls with no prior history of gender dysphoria) had suddenly expressed a desire to come out. Of particular interest (given my areas of expertise) was one of the hypotheses raised by Dr. Littman: the potential role of peer imitation and social media exposure in inspiring youth to express their confusion through the idiom of transgenderism. https://quillette.com/2018/12/09/a-surfeit-of-empathy-and-an-absence-of-compassion/1 point
-
Agreed. But it is society's business if you have boy parts and want to dress and undress in the ladies room.1 point
-
This doesn’t make any sense at all, and I doubt that’s what he means. You sound like that British lady interviewing Jordan Peterson that went viral. So what you’re saying is .... insert straw man. So what you’re saying is ... insert straw man. So what you’re saying is... insert straw man.1 point
