Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/27/2019 in all areas
-
That's not how armies work. Armies have a rank system and order flow from the top down. It's cute that you want all the soldiers to have input, mind-you. Diverse input to-boot. Should we attack? Your vote counts!2 points
-
1 point
-
Agreed...the white pride bashers seek to ignore history and atone for their own self imposed, guilt ridden ideologies. White pride is all around us in tangible achievements that cannot be erased by their "waycists" rants, and "Black Pride" was never dependent on the patronizing crumbs that leftists think will eliminate "racism". The worst kind of discrimination comes from leftists who insist on maintaining welfare state dependencies for all groups, generation after generation, regardless of "race".1 point
-
Wow....you post as if you represent the views of "black" people...when you don't. Black Pride is far more complicated than that, and something you have not lived. Please fight your white pride battle without distorting the history and meaning of "Black Pride".1 point
-
1 point
-
lol. It's cute watching conservatives getting all concerned about greedy corporations. Don't get me wrong its encouraging to see but just too late.1 point
-
CTV showed Trudeau visiting Coinstance Bay. Ooooops, The clip showed what looked like an angry man berating and wagging a finger in his face! That must've been an unexpected reaction to CTV.......the clip got jerky, and you could hear the man, and the flustered anchorwoman trying to talk over what is being shown! Looks like the man was telling Trudeau he was disrupting their effort to shore up their homes. Lol. That's kinda a good way to tell Justin he's exploiting this disaster.1 point
-
'Political Islam' seeks secession from France: Macron French president says ‘communitarianism’ has settled in parts of the Republic, referring to Muslim communities https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/political-islam-seeks-secession-from-france-macron/14629781 point
-
He's saying that Trudeau's logic is a double-standard. Trudeau believes that words used to identify a group associated with terrorism must avoid the impression that this is a trait of the whole group. To some extent it depends on what Trudeau meant by White Supremacy.1 point
-
1 point
-
The way I read it, Bernier is saying the opposite. He thinks it's absurd to associate the word "Sikh Extremists" with Sikhs in general, and I agree with that. If the government identifies a group of terrorists as Sikh Extremists, it doesn't make me think all Sikhs are extremist. But it does demonstrate the liberal inability to discriminating things very clearly and precisely.1 point
-
Maxime Bernier thinks white supremacists represent all white people. He has clearly lost not just his confidential government files this time, but his entire supply of marbles.1 point
-
1 point
-
"I'm so young. I can't believe it. I'm the youngest person." -Donald Trump1 point
-
I don't feel that at all. Being surrounded by ass-holes probably makes it easier to see how asinine being one is.1 point
-
Canada warming at twice the rate as the global average isn't new. It's been known for decades. What is puzzling is the fact that all of these journalists think that this is news.1 point
-
...and to add...Islam was invented by Muhammad specifically to stick it to the Jews who rejected him as the next Moses. This sums-up Islam...1 point
-
Oooooh, you're one of those who believe immigrants never bring their own racism with them. Haha, that's funny.1 point
-
Reality has a progressive bias, its even in our DNA however distasteful - kinda like knowing we have monkeys for ancestors or learning our grandparents also had sex for fun.1 point
-
I tell you what Armchair...people are extremely fed up with Muslim extremists who engage in terror. They are fed up with them just as they are ALL religious extremists. Because Muslim extremists are this time appear to be engaging in most of the terror attacks we read in the media, they are in the news and each time they engage in terror they reinforce the anger towards Muslim extremist terrorists. Most people can not differentiate between a Muslim extremist terrorist, a Muslim extremist, a Muslim, an Arab. The words are interchanged yes. The lines get blurred and yes its important moderate Muslims know anger you read on such threads is not about moderate Muslims its about Muslim extremist terrorists. I have been the first to come on this board and lecture like a self righteous prophet to others to take care in the differentiation and I am equally as guilty of blurring the lines-we all are at times. For me the only people I call Arabs are Beduins. Technically an Arab could be anyone descendant from people of the Arabian peninsula region and that could mean Christians, Jews, Muslims, Druze, Berbers, Kurds, and others. PIK does not need my defence but I can assure you he does not think all Arabs are savages. If you read back his posts and those of people I have given my high almighty lectures to, they all know the difference. They do. What we are all expressing is an anger at Muslim extremist ideology and in particular Muslim extremist ideology that leads to terrorism. Also Islamic segregation in the name of Sharia law is another thing many of us find problematic. You will find in Canada there have been religious parties, such ad the Christian Heritage Party. They were started as a strong reaction to specific moral issues such as abortion or homosexual lifestyle or people having children outside marriage. Interestingly their views are shared by fundamentalists of many other religions so technically they don't just get support from fundamentalist or extremist Christians. For the most part they remain fringe groups and certainly the Christian Heritage Party is not terrorist in inclination and welcomes support from fundamentalist Muslims, Jews, Siekhs and Hindus particularly on issues such as sex education ins schools. That is part of the democratic process but it remains fringe, not main-stream and it remains peaceful, not violent. That said you will find people in Canada do not like religion and politics mixed. For the most part we like to keep the two distinct because when you mix them it leads to nothing but extremism. That said this province and country are headed for a conflict with extremist Muslims or any extremist religious followers who want to segregate their members and define law by religious beliefs. However please understand this religious segregationists like Amish or Hasidic Jews don't go around blowing anyone up so most of us don't really gave them much thought. The disdain over the Ontario Islamic Party is about the mixing of religion and politics in light of how its practiced in Islamic states. It is about people fed up with anti-democratic values . Its not necessarily about race, but I tell you what, as a Jew I have plenty of people assume because I am a Jew and support Israel's right to exist that I am an extremist and hate Muslims, etc.. Read back Saudi's idiotic comments equating holocaust survivors who fled to the Middle East as migrants. That is a deliberate script that denies why Jews fled to Israel and its par for the course. Is that racist, anti-Semitic, what ist or ism do you want to call it? Does it matter? Here is what I will also say-this country, has allowed me and my relatives to live in peace. Its a mix of aboriginal and Christian traditions and British and some French laws and I am grateful for it and loyal to it. I am grateful for the soldiers who died so I can enjoy it. . I don't want it destroyed in the name of people claiming to exercise freedom of speech by upholding views designed to create different levels of rights depending on what religion you have. So get back to me when you can explain why Sharia law and its system of dhimmitude and the way it is used today in states that practice it through "Islamic" parties is not a threat to me or the democracy of Canada or the human and individual let alone other rights of Canadians including moderate Muslims.1 point
-
WestCanMan, you ask posters now who they will vote for? In effect, you are asking posters to declare whether they prefer Team A or Team B. (Or "Someone else -Please say in your comments?" WTF?) Better to ask (more polite, nuanced): "IYO, which party will win in the next federal election?" ===== In your next OP, you can ask about majority/minority....1 point
-
If that's what you think, why are you still upholding Confederation? Because none of this can be changed so long as we are ruled by the Liberal Dingbats of the Eastern Urbane Elites, and no, the Tories will not save us. Canadian Confederation is Suzuki Nation, down in the bones. He's the Guru of the Dingbats.1 point
-
0 points
-
Yes it has gone on for a long while. That's been said already too. I certainly don't need to be told to be respectful by you, so keep your sanctimonious "advice" to yourself.0 points
-
No I'm not. I just don't think as many cling to it as long or wear it with the same sort of pride as more old stock immigrants.0 points
-
Clearly, that is untrue. The Khadr family did not come here to get away from Islamic extremism. Aqsa Parvez' family did not come here to get away from Islamic extremism. This new Islamic political party, which has many supporters in Canada, none of them came here to get away from extremism.0 points
